« AnteriorContinuar »
thing material throughout the Doctor's whole Book, and many things in that other Book of Dr. Taylor's, containing his Key and exposition on Romans; as also many things written in opposition to this Doctrine by some other modern Authors. And moreover, my discourse being not only intended for an Answer to Dr. TAYLOR, and other opposers of the Doctrine of Original Sin, but (as was observed above) for a general defence of that Doctrine ; producing the evidence of the truth of the Doctrine, as well as answering objections made against it....considering these things, I say, I hope this attempt of mine will not be thought needless, nor be altogether useless, notwithstanding other publications on this subject.
I would also hope, that the extensiveness of the plan of the following treatise will excuse the length of it. And that when it is considered, how much was absolutely requisite to the full executing of a design formed on such a plan ; how much has been written against the Doctrine of Original Sin, and with what plausibility ; and how strong the prejudices of many are in fa. vor of what is said in opposition to this Doctrine ; 'and that it cannot be expected, any things short of a full consideration of al. most every argument advanced by the main opposers, especially by this late and specious Writer, Dr. TAYLOR, will satisfy many readers ; and also, how much must unavoidably be said in order to a full handling of the arguments in defence of the Doctrine ; and how important the Doctrine must be, if true ; I say, when such circumstances as these are considered, I trust, the length of the following discourse will not be thought to exceed what the case really required. However, this must be left to the Judge ment of the intelligent and candid Reader.
STOCKBRIDGE, MAY 26, 1757.
SOME Evidences of Original Sin from Facts and Events, as
found by observation and experience, Considered.
That great Objection against the Imputation of Adam's Sin to his Posterity con.
sidered, That such Imputation is unjust and unreasonable, inasmuch as
Adam and his Posterity are not one and the same : With a brief Reflec-