Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

104

Laughlin M'Lean. show a bad spirit, another might be an evidence of ignorance: the first proved that our forefathers in some cases were bigotted and persecuting; the second, that the march of intellect was at a stand still, destroy them therefore, without mercy! Perish all recollections of blindness and ignorance! If this Assembly had the government of Rome, I greatly fear we should see them directing the demolition of the Arch of Titus, because it might give offence to the Jews. No more of such childish proceedings. The page of history records the charge, and the impartial voice of succeeding ages has acquitted the Catholics,-was there, then, any fear of the inscriptions reviving it, or did the Common Councilmen imagine that, with the inscription, the very remembrance of the charge would be effaced? The next exercise of their liberalism might consistently be to tear from their journal the leaf which contains the words they have ordered to exist no longer! Yours, &c.

Mr. URBAN,

E. I. C.

Gray's-inn, Feb. 4.

YOUR Correspondent Mr. Barker, in your last Supplement, page 579, has misnamed Mr. M'Lean, whose Christian name was Laughlin, not Lachlan. According to my recollection of his hand-writing, it bore no resemblance to that of Junius, as given in the fac-simile copies published by Mr. Geo. Woodfall. M'Lean was a man of talent, but I have no conception of his having been able to write the Letters of Junius. That he was connected with Lord Shelburne, there is no doubt. It is not likely, therefore, that he should have written against his Lordship; but Junius in some of his Letters has spoken contemptuously of that nobleman, who was never held in much esteem as a political character, and was long known by the nick-name of Mulagrida.

It is said, in the letter quoted by Mr. Barker, that whenever Junius mentions Lord Temple's brother-inlaw, Lord Chatham, it is evidently with great caution and hesitancy. Now surely the writer could not have seen the early letters of Junius, written under other signatures, in which Lord Chatham is grossly abused for his support of the American Colonists (whom Junius considered as rebels), and for his Lordship's opposition to

[blocks in formation]

the Stamp Act. Junius even goes so far, as to treat Lord Chatham as a lunatic, nor is he much more civil to Lord Camden.

Junius beyond all question was a decided Grenvillite, and I am thoroughly persuaded he was known to the Grenville family. Indeed, I have heard, on very good authority, that the Law Citations, contained in one of Junius's Letters to Lord Mansfield, were furnished by Counsellor Darell, and were sent by him from Stowe to Mr. Woodfall, the printer of the Public Advertiser; and yet I have never heard that any such animosity existed between the Grenvilles and Lord Mansfield, as could warrant their giving countenance to the severe and inhuman attacks made by Junius on the latter great man.

I cannot agree with Mr. Barker's correspondent, that the French Revolution grew out of the principles of Junius; but I think it sprung in a great measure from the resistance of the Americans, to whom, as I have already signified, Junius was fiercely inimical.

In reference to the letter of MELAS, page 592, it may be remarked, that his derivation of the word noon is not new. Dr. Pettingal noticed it in his Inquiry respecting Juries, published in 1769. He observes, that among the Romans causes were not heard, nor business transacted in the afternoon, namely, after the ninth (the dinner) hour, hora nona, reckoning from six o'clock in the morning, our three o'clock. Hence, he says, that the term noon, though it now means 12 o'clock, which was formerly our dinner hour, as it still is that of the working classes, now designated ope

ratives.

P. R.

CLUTTERBUCK, in Hist. of Herts, mentions Ethelreda, dau. of Edw. Harrison, Esq. of Balls, co. Herts, by Fra. dau. of Reginald Bray, Esq. of Barrington, county of Gloucester, as mother of the Viscount de Townshend. In the same page this lady is called Audrey; and so likewise in the British Compendium and other Peerages, and on her monument at Hertford. Presuming that Ethelreda and Audrey are therefore synonymous, I would yet ask, are Mr. C. and the editors of the Peerages correct in calling her the granddaughter of Bray? or had Edward Harrison two wives? because he is represented in Gent. Mag. for 1732, to have married daughter of Thomas Whorwood, Esq. of Oxfordshire. J. L.

[merged small][merged small][graphic][merged small][merged small][merged small][graphic][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

1831.]

St. Peter's Church, Hammersmith.

NEW CHURCHES.-No. XXIX. ST. PETER'S CHURCH, HAMMERSMITH.

Architect, Lapidge.

IN continuation of our series of views of the new Churches in the metropolis and its vicinity, we this month lay before our readers as the first subject in the accompanying engraving (see Plate I.) a north-west view of this building. It will be seen that the architect has adopted the Grecian style in his design. The plan is a parallelogram, with a tower and lobbies at the western end. The superstructure is built of Suffolk brick, with Bath stone dressings. The tower is entirely of stone.

The west front consists of a tetrastyle portico of the Grecian Ionic order, surmounted with a pediment, the columns being fluted. The intercolumniations are solid, the central being wider than the lateral ones, and containing the principal entrance, which is surmounted by a pediment resting on trusses, over which is a sunk panel. In each of the flanks is a lintelled doorway, with a circular window over it. Above the portico the elevation is carried on, in an attic, supported at the flanks with trusses, and relieved by a break in the centre, and pilasters at the ends; above the centre of the attic rises the tower, which commences with an octagonal pedestal, having unequal faces; in the four larger ones, which correspond with the different fronts of the main erection, are circular apertures for dials. The succeeding portion of the design is cylindrical, being broken at equal intervals by four antæ, which rise from above the smaller faces of the octagon basement, between which are arched windows; the whole is erowned with an entablature and blocking course, the latter broken by circular headed blocks placed over the antæ. The finish of the structure is a graduated cupola, consisting of three steps, the highest sustaining a gilt cross. The portico being of less width than the body of the Church, the western wall forms a small wing at each side, to which the entablature and blocking-course, continued from the portico, constitute a crowning member, The flanks are uniform. The face of the wall is made by breaks into a central and lateral division, and is GENT. MAG. February, 1831.

105

crowned with the entablature and blocking course as before. The archi trave and frieze are brick; the mouldings and cornice only being of stone. Each flank has five semicircular arched windows enclosed in architraves of stone. The east end is plain, the face of the wall relieved with breaks; it has a segment arched window in the centre, and also two doors, used as subordinate entrances to the Church. The elevation is finished with the continued entablature, and above the centre is an attic flanked with trusses, corresponding with the principal front. The roof is slated.

THE INTERIOR

is approached by three lobbies in the portico; the central is the basement story of the tower, and forms a porch to the principal entrance; the others contain stairs to the galleries. The body of the Church is not divided into nave and ailes, but presents an unbroken area; it has consequently no striking architectural features. The walls are finished with an architrave; and the ceiling, which is horizontal, is panelled by flying cornices into compartments, in four ranges longitudinally, and three in breadth. Each of the central compartments are subdivided into a large square and two narrow oblong panels, the first containing expanded flowers. A gallery occupies the west end and the two sides of the Church; it is sustained on Doric columns unfluted; the front is composed of an entablature and attic. The altar-screen, situated against the eastern wall, is painted in imitation of veined marble. It has a large panel in the centre, inscribed with the decalogue; and in side panels are the creed and paternoster. The whole is sur mounted by an entablature, the frieze charged with flowers, and an attic, the several mouldings being continued from the galleries: over the side divisions are pediments with acroteria. The pulpit and reading-desk, in obedience to the Commissioners' directions, but in direct opposition to authority and propriety, are alike; they are varnished in imitation of oak, octagonal in plan, and sustained on pillars of the same form. The organ is placed in the centre of the western portion of the gallery. The case is oak, and ornamented with two Ionic columns and two antæ, crowned with

106

St. John's Chapel, Bethnal Green.

an entablature, with a pediment and acroteria over the centre. The font, situated beneath the west gallery, is a shallow vase of a circular form, designed from the antique, and sustained on a cylindrical pedestal.

Taken as a whole, this Church presents a very fair specimen of modern Grecian architecture. The tower has considerable merit. The design is novel and pleasing, and the proportions are harmonious. The interior is however chaste and formal, displaying even a presbyterian nakedness, the dullness of which is increased by the purple furniture of the altar. The best Church which may be designed in this style, only proves the difficulty of appropriating Grecian architecture to such buildings; its coldness may suit the heartless school of the philosopher, but it chills the fervour of the devotion of the Christian.

This Church will accommodate 1001 persons in pews, and 690 in free seats, making a total of 1691. The amount of the contract was 12,2231. 88. 4d. The site was given by George Scott, Esq. The first stone was laid on the 16th May, 1827, and the Church was consecrated on the 15th of October, 1829. The Bishop of London preached on the occasion.

ST. JOHN'S CHAPEL, Bethnal GREEN. Architect, Soane.

The second subject in the same engraving is a view of this Chapel, taken from the south-west.

The plan is divided into nave and ailes, with vestries at the east end, and a tower and lobbies at the opposite extremity. The spaciousness of the building is its most distinguishing feature; there is little to admire either in its architecture or decorations, and it is moreover nearly a copy of the Walworth Church, built by the same architect (described in vol. xcvi. pt. ii. p. 201). It is lamentable to see a man of acknowledged talent and genius, eminent in his profession, and distinguished by his admiration of the fine arts, building church after church from one and the same design, as if he were unable to produce the least variety. It is true that the works of Mr. Soane are not the only ones to which this remark applies, but the frequency of the defect is no palliation of it. It might be fairly inferred, from the monotony so striking in the works of

[Feb.

our leading architects, that an utter dearth of talent and genius alone distinguished the professors of this branch of the fine arts. In the course of our criticisms on the new Churches, we have not hesitated to point out this glaringly tasteless practice; and our plates show that the charge is not unfounded; but from Mr. Soane we augured better things, and therefore it is with regret that we are compelled to record our disappointment.

The west front differs from Walworth in the absence of the portico, the place of which is supplied by four unsightly antæ, placed at unequal distances. In the central interval, which is the widest, is a door covered with a pediment, resting on consoles; and in the smaller intervals are subordinate entrances. Each of the wings or lateral subdivisions of the front, has a large arched window, divided into two heights, the lower being inclosed in a stone panel. The elevation is finished by a cornice, over which is a blocking course, and above the centre an attic, the cornice of which, as well as the main building, is ornamented at the angles, or rather defaced, by those nondescript blocks of stone, with handles, which are to be found in all the works of this architect. Above the attic rises the tower, and how shall we describe appropriately this monstrous excrescence? It assimilates with no Church tower we have ever seen, and more resembles the castles which figure on the backs of elephants in public-house signs. This tower is in two stories; the first is square in plan, and has in each face an arched window, with a circular aperture, surrounded with a wreath over it to contain a dial. At each of the angles are two heavy insulated square antæ, one placed behind the other, the front ones appearing a continuation of those attached to the main structure. These appendages are capped with the architect's favourite blocks, and appear to be designed to give an useless and inadequate breadth to the side view of the tower, and are peculiarly unsightly in this point of view, from whence our view is taken. The finish to this ponderous basement is so diminutive, in comparison with the substructure, and so devoid of elevation, as to form a "most lame and impotent conclusion" to the dwarfish structure. This portion consists of a small circular plinth,

« AnteriorContinuar »