...nature and prior to the individual is that the individual, when isolated, is not self-sufficing ; and therefore he is like a part in relation to the whole....no need because he is sufficient for himself, must * II. ix. 63. b Cp. c. 8. § 12. c Cp. vii. 13. § 12. 15 be either a beast or a god : he is no part...

...nature and prior- to the ind1vidual is that the individual, when isolated, is not self-sufficing; and therefore he is like a part in relation to the whole....no need because he is sufficient for himself, must * II. ix. 63. *, Cp. c. 8. § 12. c Cp. vii. 13. § 12. 15 be either a beast or a god : he is no part...

...nature and prior to the individual is that the individual, when isolated, is not self-sufficing; and therefore he is like a part in relation to the whole....no need because he is sufficient for himself, must a II. ix. 63. " Cp. c. 8. § 12. o Cp. vii. 13. § 12. 15 be either a beast or a god : he is no part...

...nature and prior to the individual is that the individual, when isolated, is not self-sufficing ; and therefore he is like a part in relation to the whole....no need because he is sufficient for himself, must * II. ix. 63. b Cp. c. 8. § 12. c Cp. vii. 13. $ 12. 15 be either a beast or a god : he is no part...

...nature and prior to the individual is that the individual, when isolated, is not self-sufficing ; and therefore he is like a part in relation , to the whole. But he who is unable to live in society, or i who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must • II. ix. 63. '• Cp. c. 8. § 12....

...lose their humanity. As Aristotle says : " The individual when isolated is not self-sufficient ; and therefore he is like a part in relation to the whole....must be either a beast or a god; he is no part of a state."1 Or, as another writer puts it: "A man would no more be a man if he lived alone in the world,...

...when isolated is not self-sufficient; and therefore he is like a part in relation to the whole. Hut he who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must bo either a beast or a God; he is no part of a state."1 Or, as an ,:her writer puts it: "A man would...

...nature, and prior to the individual, is that the Individual, when isolated, is not self-sufficing ; and therefore he is like a part in relation to the whole....sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god." The great thinkers in economics and politics in all ages have been socialists in this general sense...

...nature, and prior to the individual, is that the individual, when isolated, is not self-sufficing ; and therefore he is like a part in relation to the whole....sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god." The great thinkers in economics and politics in all ages have been socialists in this general sense...

...nature, and prior to the individual, is that the individual, when isolated, is not self-sufficing ; and therefore he is like a part in relation to the whole....sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god. BELLAMY, EDWARD (Nationalist) : — Industrial self-government ia a very convenient and accurate definition...