VIEWS AND OPINIONS OF AUTHORS AND STATESMEN ON THE

TREATY POWER OF THE CONSTITUTION FROM OUR EARLY

HISTORY TO THE PRESENT TIME

CHAPTER II

OPINIONS OF JUDGES, FEDERAL AND STATE, ON THE TREATY-

MAKING POWER, FROM DECIDED CASES

CHAPTER III

THE TREATY POWER Under the ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION

AS STRONG AS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION. THE CHIEF DIF-

FERENCE BEING THAT UNDER THE FORMER THERE WAS NO

JUDICIAL TRIBUNAL TO ENFORCE TREATIES

CHAPTER IV

TREATY POWER under the CONSTITUTION: ITS SUPREMACY CON-

SIDERED IN RELATION TO OTHER SUPREME POWERS. RULES

OF CONSTRUCTION

4

44

. 56

73

CHAPTER V

ANALYSIS OF THE VIEWS OF CHARLES HENRY BUTLER AS DIS-

CLOSED IN HIS BOOK, "THE TREATY-MAKING POWER UNDER

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES" - UNDER NINE

HEADINGS
CONSIDERED SERIATIM

279721

95

CHAPTER VI

THE CASES OF CHIRAC v. CHIRAC, HAUENSTEIN v. LYNHAM,

GEOFROY v. RIGGS, HOLD THAT THE TREATY POWER MAY

REMOVE THE BADGE OF ALIENAGE FROM FOREIGNERS, and

DO NOT HOLD THAT THIS POWER MAY ANNUL THE LAWS OF

DESCENT OF THE STATES.

PAGE

143

CHAPTER VII

WARE v. HYLTON. THIS CASE DID NOT DECIDE THat the De-

FINITIVE TREATY OF PEACE OF 1783 ANNULLED THE Law of

VIRGINIA OF OCTOBER, 1777

CHAPTER VIII

-

THE CLAIM OF SUPREMACY OF THE TREATY POWER OVER THE

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CONSIDERED. PRESIDENT

WASHINGTON'S CONTEST WITH THE HOUSE OVER THE JAY

TREATY. PRESIDENTS FROM JOHN ADAMS TO MCKINLEY

HAVE NOT FOLLOWED WASHINGTON'S PRECEDENT

CHAPTER IX

-

THE TREATY POWER IN ITS OBLIGATIONS TO FOREIGNERS.

VIEWS OF SECRETARIES WEBSTER, EVARTS, BLAINE,

Bayard, and OTHERS

CHAPTER X

THE RELATION OF THE TREATY-MAKING Power to THE POLICE

POWER OF THE STATES

173

202

238

284

CHAPTER XI

REPORT OF J. RANDOLPH TUCKER, CHAIRMAN OF THE JUDICIARY

COMMITTEE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, 49TH CON-

GRESS, ON THE HAWAIIAN TREATY, HOLDING THAT A

TREATY CANNOT CHANGE REVENUE LAWS WITHOUT THE

SANCTION OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

CONCLUSIONS. LIMITATIONS ON THE TREATY-MAKING POWER.

IF GREATER Power is required the REMEDY IS BY CONSTI-

TUTIONAL AMENDMENT

INDEX

420

435

L. ed.

=

TABLE OF CASES CITED

[References are to pages.]

ABBREVIATIONS

Lawyers' Edition United States Supreme Court Reports.

S. C. Supreme Court Reporter.

=

Ah Lung, In re, 18 Fed. 29

A

150

165

290, 311

Ahrens v. Ahrens, 144 Iowa 486, 123 N. W. 164
Alabama, Boyd v., 94 U. S. 645, 650, 24 L. ed. 302
Alger, Commonwealth v., 7 Cush. (Mass.) 85
Alling, Sherlock v., 93 U. S. 99, 103, 23 L. ed. 819
American Baptist Union, The, Turner v., 5 McLean's C. C. 344.

292, 320

303

49, 237, 346, 375

Appleby, Galena R. R. v., 28 Ill. 283.
Arkansas So. Rwy. Co. v. German Nat. Bank, 207 U. S. 270, 52 L. ed.
201, 28 S. C. 79
Attorney General v. Bishop of Manchester, Law Rep. 3 Eq. 436

Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U. S. 27, 31, 28 L. ed. 923, 5 S. C. 357. 391 Banks, Carneal v., 10 Wheat. 181

Barrie, Metropolitan Board of Excise v., 34 N. Y. 663
Barron v. Baltimore, 7 Pet. 247, 8 L. ed. 672
Beer Co. v. Massachusetts, 97 U. S. 32, 33, 24 L. ed. 989. 288, 290, 320
Berea College Case, The, 211 U. S. 45, 53 L. ed. 81, 29 S. C. 33 402
Bidwell, Downes v., 182 U. S. 318, 45 L. ed. 1088, 21 S. C. 770 .

47, 48, 123, 425

Bishop of Capetown, Long v., 1 Moo. P. C. (N. S.) 411. 111 Bishop of Manchester, Attorney General v., Law Rep. 3 Eq. 436 111 Bize, Bahuaud v., 105 Fed. 485.

Board of Education, Cisco v., 161 N. Y. 598, 56 N. E. 81.
Board of Education, Martin v., 42 W. Va. 514, 26 S. E. 348

401

401

Bofer, Siemssen v., 6 Cal. 250-253 .

49