Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

ance. Such a renunciation on our part, would obviate the reason affigned in the inftruction to Mr. Genet before cited, of future, danger from the rapidly growing power of the United States. But if France infifts on the mutual guarantee, it will be neceffary to aim at fome modification of it.

The existing engagement is of that kind, which, by writers on the law of nations, is called a general guarantee; of courfe cafus fœderis can never except in a defenfive war. The nature of this obligation is understood to be, that, when a war really and truly defenfive exifts, the engaging nation is bound to furnish an effectual and adequate defence in co-operation with the power attacked whence it follows, that the nation may be required, in fome circumstances, to bring forward its whole force. The nature and extent of the fuccours demandable not being ascertained, engagements of this kind are dangerous on account of their uncertainty: there is always hazard of doing too much or too little, and of courfe of being involved in involuntary rupture. Specific fuccours have the advantage of certainty, and are less liable to occafion war. On the other hand, a general guarantee allows a latitude for the exercife of judgment and difcretion.

On the part of the United States, inftead of troops or fhips of war, it will be convenient to ftipulate for a moderate fum of money or quantity of provifions, at the option of France: the provifions to be delivered at our own ports, in any future defensive wars. The fum of money, or its value in provisions, ought not to exceed two hundred thousand dollars a year, during any fuch wars. The reciprocal ftipulation on the part of France may be to furnish annually the like fum of money, or an equivalent in military ftores and clothing for troops, at the option of the United States, to be delivered in the ports of France.

Particular caution, however, must be used, in difcuffing this fubject, not to admit any claims on the ground of the guarantee in relation to the exifting war; as we do not allow that the cafus fæderis applies to it. And if the war fhould continue after your arrival in France, and the question of the guarantee fhould not be mentioned on her part, you may your felves be filent on the fubject, if you deem it most prudent.

It will be proper here to notice fuch articles of the treaty of amity and commerce between the United States and France, as have been differently conftrued by the two governments, or which it may be expedient to amend or explain.

Article 2. The affent of the United States, in their treaty with Great Britain, to the doctrine of the law of nations refpecting enemies property in neutral ships, and ship timber and navai ftores, and, in fome cafes, provifions, as contraband of war, the French government has chofen to confider as a voluntary grant of favours, ia refpect to commerce and navigation, to Great Britain, and,

in

that

that confequently the fame favours have become common to France. This conftruction is fo foreign from our ideas of the meaning and defign of this article, it shows the neceflity of reviewing all the articles, and, however clear they may appear, of attempting to obviate future mifconftructions by declaratory explanations, or a change of terms.

Article 5 France has repeatedly contended, that the impofition of 50 per cent. per ton on French veffels arriving in the United States, is contrary to the 5th article of the treaty. The argument in fupport of this pretenfion is unknown; but it is prefumed to be unfounded. The reciprocal right of laying "duties or impofls of what nature foever," equal to thofe impofed on the most favoured nations, and without any other reftrictions, feems to be clearly fettled by the 3d and 4th articles., The 5th article appears to have been intended merely to define and qualify the rights of American velfels in France. It is however defirable that the question be understood, and all doubts concerning it removed. But the introduction of a principle of difcrimination between the veffels of different foreign nations, and in derogation of the powers of Congrefs to raife revenue by uniform duties on any objects whatever, cannot be hazarded. The naturalization of French veffels will of courfe be confidered as inadmiffible.

Article 8. The ftipulation of doing us good offices, to fecure peace to the United States with the Barbary powers, has never yet procured us any advantage. If, therefore, the French government lays any ftrefs on this ftipulation, as authorizing a claim for fome other engagements from us in favour of France, it may be abandoned; and efpecially if its abrogation can be applied as a fet-off against fome exifting French claim.

Article 14. If the alterations already propofed are made in the 230 and 24th articles, then the 14th article, as before observed, must be abolished.

Article 17. The conftruction put on this article by the government of the United States is conceived to be reasonable and juft, and is therefore to be infifted on. The tribunals of the respective countries will confequently be juftified in taking cognisance of all captures made within their refpective jurifdictions, or by illegal privateers; and thofe of one country will be deemed illegal which are fitted out in the country of the other remaining neutral: feeing, to permit fuch arming would violate the neutral duties of the latter.

It will be expedient to fix explicitly the reception to be given to public fhips of war of all nations. The French ministers have demanded, that the public fhips of the enemies of France, which at any time, and in any part of the world, had made prize of a French veffel, fhould be excluded from the ports of the United States, and although they brought in no prize with them. In

oppofition

oppofition to this demand, we have contended that they were to be excluded only when they came in with French prizes. And the kind of afylum to be afforded, in all other circumftances, is defcribed in Mr. Jefferfon's letter to Mr. Hammond, dated the 9th of September 1793, in the following words: "Thus, then, the public thips of war of both nations (English and French) enjoy a perfect equality in our ports; Ift, in cafes of urgent neceffity; 2d, in cafes of comfort and convenience; and 3d, in the time they choose to continue." And fuch fhelter and accommodation are due to the public fhips of all nations, on the principle of hofpitality among friendly nations.

It will alfo be expedient explicitly to declare, that the right of afylum ftipulated for the armed veffels of France and their prizes gives no right to make fale of thofe prizes.

But when prize fhips are fo difabled as to be incapable of putting to fea again until refitted, and when they are utterly difabled, fome provision is neceffary relative to their cargoes. Both cafes occurred last year. The government permitted, though with hefitation and caution, the cargoes to be unloaded, one of the veffels to be repaired, and part of the prize goods fold, to pay for the repairs; and the cargo of the veffel that was found unfit ever to go to fea again was allowed to be exported as prize goods even in neutral bottoms. The doubts on thefe occafions arofe from the 24th article of the British treaty, forbidding the fale of the prizes of privateers, or the exchanging of the fame in any man ner whatever. But as French prizes were entitled to an afylum in our ports, it was conceived to be a reasonable conftruction of it to allow of fuch proceedings as thofe above mentioned, to prevent the total lofs of veffels and cargoes. The 25th article of the British treaty demands attention; and it, is therein ftipulated, that no future treaty fhall be made that fhall be inconfiftent with that or the 24th article. Another doubt arofe, whether the British treaty did not, in good faith, require the prohibition of the fale of prizes made by the national fhips of France, as well as of those made by her privateers; efpecially feeing our treaty with France gave her no right to fell any prizes whatever; but upon the whole it was conceived, that the United States, having before allowed the fale of fuch prizes, and the prohibitions in the 24th article of the treaty being diftin&tly pointed against the sale of the prizes of privateers, it was thought proper to permit the former practice to continue, until the Executive fhould make and publish a prohibition of the fale of all prizes, or that Congrefs should pafs a prohibitory law.

Article 22. If, in new-modelling the treaty with France, the total prohibition of the fale of prizes in the ports of the partyremaining neutral fhould not be agreed on, at leaft the right of each power to make at its pleasure fuch prohibition, whether

they are prizes of national fhips or privateers, fhould be acknowledged for the reafon more than once fuggefted-to prevent a repetition of claims upon unfounded conftructions; fuch as under the prefent article, that a prohibition to an enemy of either party is a grant to the other of the thing forbidden.

Articles 23 and 24. These have been already confidered, and the alterations proposed have been mentioned.

There have been fo many unjuft caufes and pretences affigned for capturing and confifcating American veffels, it may perhaps be impoffible to guard againft a repetition of them in any treaty which can be devifed. To ftate the caufes and pretences that have been already advanced by the government of France, its agents and tribunals, as the grounds of the capture and condemnation of American veffels and cargoes, would doubtlefs give pain to any ingenuous mind who should be employed on the part of France to negotiate another treaty, or a modification of the treaties which exift. It is not defired, therefore, to go farther into detail on thefe matters, than fhall be neceffary to guard by explicit flipulations against future mifconftructions, and the mifchiefs they will naturally produce.

Under pretence that certain ports were furrendered to the Englifh by the treachery of the French and Dutch inhabitants, Victor Hugues and Lebas, the special agents of the Executive Directory at Guadaloupe, have declared, that all neutral veffels bound to or from fuch ports fhall be good prize.

Under the pretence that the British were taking all neutral veffels bound to or from French ports, the French agents at St. Domingo (Santhonax and others) decreed, that all American veffels bound to or from English ports fhould be captured; and they have fince declared fuch captured veffels to be good prize. The French confuls in Spain have, on the fame ground, condemned a number of American veffels, merely becaufe they were destined to or coming from an English port.

Under the pretence that the fea-letters, or paffports, prefcribed by the commercial treaty for the mutual advantage of the merchants and navigators of the two nations, to fave their veffels from detention and other vexations, when met with at fea, by prefenting fo clear a proof of the property, are an indispensable document to be found on board, the French confifcate veilels deftitute of them, even when they acknowledge the property to be American.

Because horfes and their military furniture, when destined to any enemy's ports, are by the 24th article of the commercial treaty declared contraband, and as fuch by themfelves only liable to confifcation, Hugues and Lebas decreed all neutral veffels hav ing horfes or any other contraband goods on board thould be good prize; and they accordingly condemned veffels and cargoes.

The

The ancient ordinances of the French monarchs required a variety of papers to be on board neutral veffels, the want of any one of which is made a caufe of condemnation; although the 25th article of the commercial treaty mentions what certificates fhall accompany the merchant veffels and cargoes of each party, and which, by every reasonable conftruction, ought to give them protection.

It will therefore be advisable to guard against abuses by defcending to particulars, to defcribe the fhip's papers which shall be required, and to declare, that the want of any other shall not be a caufe for confifcation: to fix the mode of manning veffels as to the officers, and the proportion of the crews who thall be citizens; endeavouring to provide, in respect to American veffels, that more than one third may be foreigners. This provifion will be important to the fouthern ftates, which have but few native feamen.

The marine ordinances of France will fhow what regulations have been required to be obferved by allies, as well as neutral powers in general, to afcertain and fecure the property of neu trals. Some of thefe regulations may be highly proper to be adopted, while others may be inconvenient and burdenfome. Your aim will be to render the documents and formalities as few and as fimple as will confift with a fair and regular commerce.

Articles 25 and 27. Thefe two articles fhould be rendered conformable to each other. The 27th fays, that, after the exhibition of the paffport, the veffel fhall be allowed to pass without moleftation or fearch, without giving her chafe, or forcing her to quit her intended courfe. The 25th requires, that, befides the palfport, veffels fhall be furnithed with certain certificates, which of courfe muft alfo be exhibited. It will be expedient to add, that if, in the face of fuch evidence, the armed veffel will carry the other into port, and the papers are found conformable to treaty, the captors fhall be condemned in all the charges, damages, and interefts thereof, which they fhall have caufed. A provifion of this nature is made in the 11th article of our treaty with the United Netherlands.

Article 28. The prohibited goods here mentioned have no relation to contraband, but merely to fuch as by the laws of the country are forbidden to be exported. Yet, in the cafe of exporting horfes from Virginia, which no law prohibited, in the winter of 1796, this article was applied by the French minifter to horfes, which by the French treaty are contraband of war. And a letter from the minifter to Victor Hugues and Lebas, informing them that the American government refufed to prevent fuch export of horfes by the Britith, is made one ground for their decree above mentioned.

VOL. VII.

A a

Article

« AnteriorContinuar »