688 Richardson v. Mahon (L. R. 4 Ir. C. P. 486).407, 468 v. Shaw (1 Mo. App. 234). 677 Raymer v. Stone (2 Eden 128).. 706 Raynor v. Drew (Cal.) (13 Pac. Rep. 866)... 105 Richardson & Co. v. Hampton (la.) (31 N. W. 563 Rayner v. Linthorne (2 C. & P. 124). 785 Richardson Co. v. School Dist. (Neb.) (64 N.W. Rea, Appeal of (27 Alb. Law Jour. 188). 345 Rep. 218)... 31 Read v. Dunsmore (9 C. & P. 588).. 804 [1890])... v. Hutchins (7) Me, 590 [1880])... Reading & P. R. Co. v. Balthaser (Pa.) (13 Atl. Reast v. Donald (Tex.) (19 S. W. Rep. 795)... v. Pierce (3 Thomp. & C. [N. Y.] 416).. Rector, etc., v. Wood (Ore.) (34 Pac. Rep. 18) Reddit v. Gates (52 Ia. 210) 67, 563 Richlands, etc., Co. v. Hiltebeitel (Va.) (22 S. 620 885 Richmond v. Robinson (12 Mich. 193).. 317 885 Rep. 209) 876 1 W. Rep. 331 Richter v. Meyer (Ind.) (31 N. E. Rep. 582). Ricker v. Collins (81 Tex. 662, 17 S. W. Rep. 378 [1891])... 695 ..384, 390, 445, 482 257. 703, 704, 720 854 707 v. Cutter (8 Gray 248) v. Fairbanks (40 Me. 43 [1855]). Ricketts v. Joliff (62 Miss. 440 [1884]). Ridgway v. Grace (Com. Pl.) (21 N. Y. Supp. Rigdon v. Conley (Ill.) (30 N. E. Rep. 1060, 31 Rigney v. Dutton (C. C.) (77 Fed. Rep. 175) 223 780 25 61 678 796 816 583 584 795 567 v. State Line Steamship Co. (29 La. Ann. 816 891 30 v. Pettizer (75 Ill. 475) Reese v. Reese (90 Pa. St. 89 [1879]).. 272, 273 v. McGlochlin (2 Mo. App. Rep. 1154).. 521 395 Regina v. Cimon (23 Canada Sup. Ct. 62) v. Starrs (17 Can. Sup. Ct. 118), 379, 395, 414, 553 557 Reichard v. Warren Co. (31 Iowa 381) Reichenbach v. Sage (Wash.) (43 Pac. Rep. 354) Reid Ice Cream Co. v. Stephens (62 Ill. App. 331) 79) 657 Rim v. Electric P. Co. (3 App. Div. [N. Y.] 305 [Sup.], 38 N. Y. Supp. 345 [1896]) 862 Ripley Co. v. Hill (Ind.) (16 N. E. Rep. 156 [1888]).. 429 25 318, 324 Robbins v. Chicago (4 Wallace 679) 611 24 807 Reier v. Detroit St. & Sp. Wks. (Mich.) (67 N. W. Rep. 120) 266 662 326 Reilly v. City of Albany (112 N. Y. 30 [1889]). 169 445, 446 v. Daly (Pa.) (28 Atl. Rep. 493).. 794 v. Jones (1 Bing. 302).. 3:20 481, 506 678 814 v. Lee (61 Hun [N. Y.] 627, 16 N. Y. v. Mayor (111 N. Y. 473, 54 N. Y. Super. Reischenbach v. Sage (Wash.) (43 Pac. Rep. Rennie v. Wynn (4 Exch. 691 [1849]). Robertson v. Lion Ius. Co. (C. C.) (73 Fed. Rep. 324, 428, 553, 554, 595 16, 380, 849a Renton v. Monnier (77 Cal. 449)... Reusch v. Amer. Brew. Assn. (44 La. Ann. 1111, 11 So. Rep. 719)... Reuting v. City of Titusville (Pa. Sup.) (34 Atl. Rep. 916).. 427 928)...... Robinson v. Baird (Pa.) (30 Atl. Rep. 1010).475, 552 v. Campbell (47 Iowa 625 [1878]). v. Chamberlain (34 N. Y. 389 [1866]), 836 180, 854 400, 619 v. Davidson L. R. (6 Exch. 269) v. Donahoo (Ga.) (25 S. E. Rep. 491). 794 v. Fiske (25 Me, 401: 10 428 v. Grimes (33 N. Y. Supp. 291) ... 629 *39 885 Rhodes v. Cleveland Roll. Mill. Co. (17 Fed. Rep. 406)... v. Hyer (Fla.) (17 So. Rep. 745) v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co (Mich.) (61 N. W. Rep. 1014) 561 825 124 v. Mollett (L. R. 7 H. L. S02) 553 v. Thomas (Ind.) (3 Carter 638).. 567 v. Parish (62 Ill. 130 [1871]) 691 Rice v. Board of Trustees (Cal.) (40 Pac. Rep. 551) 152 v. Candle (71 Ga. 605) 695 v. Patterson (Mich.) (39 N. W. Rep. 21 [1888]) v. Rohr (Wis.) (40 N. W. Rep. 668 .42, 74 v. Roberts (24 Wis. 461) 106 [1888]) 180 v. Williams (32 Fed. Rep. 437 [1887]).. 87 v. Shanks (Ind.) (20 N. E. Rep. 713 Rich v. City of Minneapolis (37 Alb. Law Jour. 58 [1887]).. [1889]). ..437, 491 266 Richard v. Stanton (16 Wend. [N. Y.] 25).. 94 v. Warren Co. (31 Iowa 381) Richards v. May (10 Q. B. D. 400 [1883]).545, 552, 595 863 v. Anderson (1 Camp. 43). 553 v. Grant Co. (Ind.) (27 Fed. Rep. 557 v. Snyder (25 Peun. St. 203) v. United States (13 Wall. 363 [1871]). v Webb (11 Bush 464 [1875]) Robinson & Rea Mfg. Co. v. Mellon (139 Pa. St. 257 [1891], 21 Atl. Rep. 91 [1890]).. Robson v. Drummond (2 B. & A. D. 303). 667 483, 485, 487 677 623, 627 296, 682, 1xx 236 (1 .572, 573 678 891 Ryder v. Kinsey (Minn.) (64 N. W. Rep. 91), 643 S. .247, 248 574 (Me.) (8 Atl. Rep. 550 [1887]).. 6:29 Rodemer v. Gonder (9 Gill [Md.] 288). 739 Roeder v. Bensberg (6 Mo. App. 445) 814 Roderiquez v. State (Tex.) (22 S. W. Rep. 978). 879 Saginaw Gas & Light Co. v. Saginaw (U. S. Rodick v. Gandell (1 De G. M. & G. 763). 295 Roemer v. Striker (21 N. Y. Supp. 1090) Roesuer v. Herman (3 Fed. Rep. 782) ..640a Cir. Ct. [Mich.], 22 The Reptr. 579 [1886]).... 81 Sainter v. Ferguson (7 C. B. 716) 316 864 St. Albans Bk. v. Dillon (330 Vt. 122). 20 Roettingers v. United States (26 U. S. Ct. of St. Clair v. Bowles (9 B. & C. 92) 697 Cl. 391 [1891]). .584, 684 St. Helen's Mill Co. ( Sawy. 88) 535 Rogers v. Allen (47 N. H. 529). 627 v. Florence R. Co. (S. Car.) (9 S. E. Rep. 1059 [1889], s. c. 40 Alb. Jour. 223).. L. v. Hogan (58 Me. 205 [1871]). 667 601 St. John v. Potter (Com. Pl) (19 N. Y. Supp 230) St. Johns & H. R. Cò. v. Shalley (Fla.) (14 So. 667 v. Rogers (139 Mass. 440) 573 370,397, 569, 591 St. Joseph I. Co. v. Halverson (48 Mo. App. 383) 445 St. L. v. McDonald (10 Mo. 609). v. Straub (26 N. Y. Supp. 1066). 124 v. Walsh (12 Neb. 28). .65, 90 Rohr v. Baker (13 Oreg. 350 [1886]). Rohrman v. Steese (9 Phila. 185). Roloson v. Carson (8 Md. 208 [1855]), 602 240 670 17, 756, 765 St. L. & C. Ry. Co. v. Drennan (26 Ill. App. 263 [1887]) v. Von Phul (Mo. Sup.)(34 S. W. Rep. 843) 275 432, 433, 436, 498,[527 Rome & D. R. Co. v. Chasteen (Ala.) (7 So. Rep. 94) St. L. & P. R. Co. v. Kerr (Ill.) (38 N. F. Rep. 638) Romeyn v. Sickles (108 N. Y. 650 [1888]).. 654 812 421. 440, 445 St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Bradley (54 Fed. Rep. 630) 883 St. L., etc.. R. Co. v. Willis (33 Kan. 330)...663, 666 St. L. & T. Ry. v. Johnston (Tex.) (15 S.W. Rep. 104 [1891]). 891 880 St. L., etc., Ry. Co. v. Yonley (Ark.) (13 S. W. Root et al. v. Johnson (26 Vt. 64) 127 Rep. 333) 654 Ropes v. Arnold (30 N. Y. Supp. 997) 17 Roreback v. Penna. Co. (Conn.) (20 Atl. Rep. 465 [1890]) St. L. B. & J. Co. v. St. L. Brew. Assn. (Mo.) (631 S. W. Rep. 765). 580 887 Rose v. Des Moines R. (39 Iowa 216, 20 Am. Ry. Rep. 326) 86 St. Louis G. L. Co. v. City of St. L. (46 Mo. 121) 580 891 v. Eclipse Carb. Co. (60 Mo. App. 28) v. O'Riley (111 Mass. 57 [1872]).. 125 702 St. Mary's Market Co. v. New Orleans (La.) (16 So. Rep. 831 767 726 809 v. Trestrail (1 Mo. App. Rep's 540) Rosenberger v. Pacific Coast Ry. Co. (Cal.) (43 Pac. Rep. 963). v. McArthur (85 Iowa 203, 52 N. W. Rep. St. Paul Water Co. v. Ware (16 Wall 566) St. Martin v. Thrasher (40 Vt. 461 [1868] St. P. & N. P. Ry. Co. v. Bradbury (42 Minn. 22). (44 N. W. Rep. 1 [1890]) 522 .429, 589 St. Paul v. Seitz (3 Minn. 297) 654 638 99 45 Salters v. Ralph (15 Abb. Pr. 273) 720 Rossiter v. Cooper (23 Vt. 522) 340 Rossvally v. City of New Orleans (19 La. Ann. 7:20,744 7 [1867]) Salvin v. N. Brancepeth Coal Co. (L. R. 9 Ch. App. 705 [1874]). 869 Rothwell v. Dean (1 Mo. Rep. 309). 675 Rourke v. W. M. Colliery Co. (1 C. P. D. 556).. 655 473 Rousseau v. Poitras (62 Ill. App. 103).. 853, 858 .477, 478 Samuell v. Howarth (3 Mer. Ch. 279). 20 8:22 Roval Ins. Co. v. Parlin & O. Co. (Tex.) (34 S. W. Rep. 401) 428 Rude v. Mitchel (97 Mo. 365, 11 S. W. Rep. 225 [1889]) 439, 564, 595 Ruege v. Gates (Wis.) (38 N. W. Rep. 181 [1888]) 559 Rugg v. Moore (110 Pa. 236)... 674 Rulge v. Gates (Wis.) (38 N. W. Rep. 181 [1881]) 69 Rulof v. People of N. Y. (213).. 880 Sanders v. Hutchinson (26 Ill. 633 [1887]). 259, 370, 445, 479, 877 v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co. (N. Y. 91, 797 App.) (39 N. E. Rep. 75).... Sanderson v. Cockersmouth, etc., Ry. Co. (11 Beav. 497) v. Pa. C. Co. (86 Pa. St. 401) Sands v. Potter (Ill. Sup.) (46 N. E. Rep. 282), 25, 691 (Sup.) (33 N. Y. Sup. 512), (N. Y. 706 615 314 Rush v. Able (90 Pa. St. 153).. 862 v. Emery (334 Ill. 458) v. Wagner (12 N. Y. Supp. 2). 702 Rushforth v. Hadfield (7 East 224).. 611 v. 1st Natl. Bank (Iowa) (63 N. W. Rep. 459) 316, 319 Rusling v. Union Pipe & Const. Co. (Sup.) (39 N. Y. Supp. 216) 414, 421, 686 Atl. Rep. 67) Russell v. Barry (115 Mass, 300 [1874]) 697 v. Rawlings (43 Ill. 92) v. Buckhout (Sup.) (34 N. Y. Supp 271) 10 Ryan v. Blount (1 Dev. Eq. 382). 704 v. Curran (64 Ind. 345).. 654 v. Fowler (24 N. Y. 410). 644 v. Lynch (68 III. 160) 40 v. Rogers (Cal.) (31 Pac. Rep. 244) 678 v. Pawtucket St. Ry. Co. (R. I.) (35) v. Sanford (49 Hun (N. Y.) 540) .. Sang v. Duluth (Min.) (59 N. W. Rep. 878)..76, 689 Santa Cruz . Enright (Cal.) (30 Pac. Rep. 197) 883 Santa Cruz Pav. Co. v. Heaton (Cal.) (38 Pac. 51, 138, 220 Rep. 693) Santa Cruz Rock Pavement Co. v. Broderick 138, 141, 157 (Cal.) (45 Pac. Rep. $63).. Sarles . Sharlow (Dak.) (37 N. W. Rep. 749 [1888] Sarony v. Burrow Giles Lith. Co. (17 Fed. Rep. 591)........ .646, 654 627 859a 103 818 $$ Sayler v. Harrisburg (87 På. St. 216 [1878]) Sayre r. Moore (1 East 361).. 218 822 Sayre Lumb. Co. v. Unioú Bank (Colo. App.) (41 Pac. Rep. 844) 17, 758, 764 Scales v. Wiley (Vt.) (33 Atl. Rep. 771)..101, 106, 689 Scammon v. City of Chicago (25 III. 424 [1861]), 641, 644, 654, 663 v. Denio (72 Cal. 393, 14 Pac. Rep. 9s [1887]).... 595, 731 Scanlan v. Hodges (C. C. A.) (52 Fed. Rep. 354) 126 Scarbrough . Alabama Mid. Ry. Co. (Ala.) (10 ... Scott v. Avery (5 H. L. Cases 811 [1855]). v. Norfolk & W. R. Co. (Va.) (17 S. E. v. Raiment (1. R.) (7 Eq. 112). v. Tompkins (95 III. 190). 122 438 Mfg. 256, 277 381 317 Scraggs v. Hill (W. Va.) (17 S. E. Rep. 185) 124 238, 589, 841 762 652 767 525, 522 601, 618 Secrist v. Board (100 Ind. 59). 766 Sewer Commrs. v. Sullivan (Sup.) (42 N. Y. 146 v. Cook Co. (Ill.) (114 Ill. 174 [1891]), 553, 554, 555, 556, 558 Seybolt v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. Co. (95 N. Y. 562)... 563 Seymour v. L. D. Co. (20 N. J. Fq. [5 C. E. Green] 396 [1869])...242, 309, 435, 502, 503, 569, 587. 589, 596, 841 Sharkey v. McDermoth (Mo.) (4 S. W. Rep. 107) 105 Sharp v. Smith (32 Ill. App. 336). Sharpe v. Johnson (0 Barb. 144 [1871]). v. San Paulo Ry. Co. (L. R.) (8 Ch. App. 597 [1873])... 238, 348, 362, 363, 366, 370, 372, 378, 390, 395, 409, 414, 426, 428, 439, 446, 545, 553. 558, 589 Shaufelter v. Baltimore (Md.) (31 Atl. Rep. 439).. Shaver v. Ingraham (58 Mich. 649) v. Murdock (36 Cal. 293).. 30 .310, 697 ...92a 805 577 v. Penna. Co. (C. C.) (71 Fed. Rep. 931) 86 v. Sharp Co. (Ark.) (34 S. W. Rep. 261) 116 Shaw v. Andrews (9 Cal. 73 [C. C.], 62 Fed Rep. 460) 126, 514, 518 v. First B. C. (Minn.) (46 N. W. R. 146, 44 Minn. 22). 545, 555, 556, 595 v. Trenton (49 N. J. Law 339 [1887]), 139, 140, 155, 173 v. Wolverton W. W. Co. (6 Exch. 137), 372, 545, 553 Shea v. Town of Milford (Mass.) (14 N E. Rep. 764 [1888]). 39, 47 Shefbaur v. Board (N. Y.) (31 Atl. Rep. 454).... 171 Sheffield v. Clark (73 Ga. 92) 885 531 Sheffield, etc.. Co. v. Gordon (151 U. S. 285. 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 343) .241, 428, 445 Sheffield C. Co. v. Sheffield & R. Ry. Co. (3 Ry. & C. Cas. 121) 97 89 683 654, 664, 665 e. Saunders (46 Ill. 18) 240, 676, 677, 686, 687, 689 Schwerin z. De Graff (21 Minn. 354 [1875]).. 370, 478 Schwiesau e. Mahon (Cal.) (42 Pac. Rep. 1065), 219, 220 Schwinger . Raymond (N. Y.) (11 N. E. Rep. 95211887).. Scofield . Graw (63 Vt. 283).. 885 703 v. McGregor (1 Thomp. & C. {N. Y.] 404)...... 685 Sheffield Fur. Co. v. Hull Coal & Coke Co. (Ala.) (14 So. Rep. 672) Sheible v. Klein (Mien.) (50 N. W. Rep. 857). Shelbyville, City of, v. Brant (61 Ill. App. 153). 892 Shelden v. Fox (Kan.) (29 Pac. Rep. 759 [1892]) 135 Sheldon v. Leahy (Mich.) (69 N. W. Rep. 76)... 703 v. Pruessner (Kan.) (35 Pac. Rep. 201).. 87 Sherman v. Bates (15 Neb. 18), (Neb.) (17 The Reporter 86 [1883]).... ..242, 257, 678, 834 .428, 722 lxxii Skelton v. Fenton Elec. L. & P. Co. (Mich.) (58 890 Skinner v. Bedell's Adm'r (32 Ala. 44). 310 794 116 Slater v. Mersereau (64 N. Y. 138 [1876]), 244, 663, 666, 667 v. Salpaugh (24 Vt. 347 [1852]). Sherwood v. Houtman (N. Y.) (73 Hun 544). Shibley v. Angel (37 N. Y. 626 [1868])... Shields v. Hickey (26 Mo. App. 194 [1887]).. Shiells v. Blackburne (1 H. Bl. 158). 575 Sloan v. Hayden (110 Mass. 143) 340 702 49 Sloss Marblehead L. Co. v. Smith (11 Ohio Cir. 687 88 Slowman v. Walter (1 Bro. Ch. 418). 317 838 Slusser T. Co. v. City of B. (47 Iowa 300 [1877]), Shines' Ex'r v. Heimburger (1 Mo. App. Rep. 111).... 578, 579, 580 Small v. Howard (128 Mass. 131 [1880]) 674, 675 Small House v. Ky. & M. G. Co. (2 Mont. 443 [1876]) 377, 558 Shinn v. Hicks (Tex.) (45 S. W. Rep. 486 [1887]), 646 Shipley v. Fifty Associates (106 Mass. 194) Shipman v. Dist. of Colm. (119 U. S. 148, 703) 580, 600 v. State (43 Wis. 381), 46, 812, 14, 828, 829, 837, 838, 839 Shirk v. Cox (Ind. Sup.) (40 N. E. Rep. 750) .859a Shively v. Knoblock (Ind.) (33 N. E. Rep. 1028), 493, 494 Shoemaker v. Acker (Cal.) (48 Pac. Rep. 62), 694, 805 Shoenberger v. City of Elgin (Ill. Sup.) (45 N. E. Rep. 434, 59 Ill. App. 384) Shook v. Pate (50 Ala. 91 [1874]) 8:29 861 138 105 Smalley v. Mitchell (Mich.) (68 N. W. Rep. 978) 105 v. Aiken (102 N. Y. 87) v. Alker (102 N. Y. 87 [1886]) 123 369, 411 417 558 v. Bd. Miami Co. (Ind.) (33 N. E. Rep. 243) ... v. B. C. & M. R. R. (36 N. H. 459 [1858]), 326, 340, 341, 421, 426, 428, 442, 511, 601, 602 v. Brady (17 N. Y. 173 [1858]). 388, 407, 415, 417. 428. 439, 697, 701, 702 v. Briggs (3 Denio [N Y.] 73 [1846]), 407, 415, 476 242, 256, 572 v. City of Newburg (77 N. Y. 136). v. Bristol (33 lowa 24) 35 Shrump v. Parfitt (84 Hun [N. Y.] 341).... Shufeldt v. Searing (59 Ill. App. 341) Shular v. Hudson R. R. Co. (38 Barb. 653).. Shulte v. Hennesy (40 Iowa 352 [1875]), 479 v. Clark (58 Mo. 145 [1874]) ... 257 885 v. Coal Co. (83 Ill. 498) 678 667 v. Coe (2 Hilt. 365) 573 v. Cooley (5 Daly 401) 428 484, 491, 621, 891 Shute v. Hamilton (3 Daly [N. Y.] 462) Sibley v. Felton (Mass.) (31 N. E. Rep. 10). Siboni v. Kirkman (1 M. & W. 418).. Sickle v. Pattison (14 Wend. 257). 324 Y.] 304) 89 10 697 Sickles v. United States (1 Ct. of Cl. 214) 678 Siebe v. San Francisco (Cal.) (46 Pac. Rep. 456). 844 Siegel v. Eaton & Prince Co. (60 II. App. 639), (Ill. Sup.) (46 N. E. Rep. 449 [1897]). Sievers v. San Francisco (Cal.) (47 Pac. Rep. 697) 674, 677 v. Co-operative D. Assn. (12 Daly [N. v. Corn (Com. Pl.) (23 N. Y. Supp. 326), v. Darby (L. R. 7 Q. B. 716) v. Dickey (74 Tex. 61 [1889]).. v. District (20 Conn. 312 [1850]). v. Farmers' Trust Co. (Iowa) (66 N. W. Rep. 84)... v. First Cong. Ch. (8 Pick. [Mass.] 178), .587, 858 Sigourney v. Sibley (21 Pick. [Mass.] 101). Siler v. Gray (86 N. C. 566). 561 v. Flanders (129 Mass. 322 [1880]), 678 698, 703 214, 222, 228 Silsby Mfg. Co. v. Allentown (Pa.) (20 or 26 Atl. Rep. 646)... v. Foster (41 N. H. 220). .163, 557 v. Town of Chico (24 Fed. Rep. 893).. v. Goulding (6 Cush. [Mass.] 154). v. Gugerty (4 Barb. 614) 59 107 .567, 701 340 Silver v. Conn. R. L. Co. (40 Fed. Rep. 192 [1889]).... 365 v. Kron (N. C.) (13 S. E. Rep. 839).. v. Lowell M. H. (8 Pick. 181). v. Mayor (10 N. Y. 504), Simis v. Brookfield (34 N. Y. Supp. 695). Simmons v. Lawrence (133 Mass. 298). Simonds v. Pearce (31 Fed. Rep. 137). Simonson v. Grant (36 Minn. 439 [1887]).....20, 761 v. Thori (Minn.) (31 N. W. Rep. 861 [1887])..... 76 ..575, 690 677 436 .. 700 138, 139, 140, 156, 176, 427 643 v. Milne (1 Dowl. 290) v. Milwaukee Build. and Traders' Exch. (Wis.) (64 N. W. Rep. 1041), 20 Simpson v. New York, etc., R. Co. (51 N. Y. Super. Ct. 419).. 566 640a, 641, 641a, 663, 667 v. Moileson (74 Hun [N. Y.] 606, 26 N. Y. Supp. 653), (N. Y. App.) (42 N. E. ..20, 21, 271, 445, 739 Sims v. Bice (67 Ill. 88) 794 v. Monroe (84 N. Y. 354). 794 v. Jones (S. C.) (20 S. E. R. 905). Sinclair v. Bowles (9 B. & C. 92) 126 675, 699, 703 v. Tallmadge (35 Barbour 602 [1861]), 325, 326. 344, 369, 395, 411, 417, 445, 555, 698, 699, 701, 702 Sindlinger v. Kerkow (Cal.) (22 Pac. Rep. 932)... v. Munch (Minn.) (68 N. W. Rep. 19).. v. Newbaur (Ind.) (42 N. E. Rep. 40). v. New York (21 How. Pr. 1) 326 675 164 v. New York (Sup.) (31 N. Y. Supp. 783). (42 N. Y. Supp. 522). 348 Singer v. McCormick (4 Watts & S. 265, 266).. 804 Singerly v. Thayer (108 Pa. St. 291) 340 Singleton v. Wilson (5 Tenn. 344) 695 Sinnott v. Mullin (82 Pa. St. 233 [1876]) 674, 689 138, 139, 140, 156, 176, 427 797 v. O'Donnell (Com. Pl.) (36 N. Y. Supp. 480)... v. Philadelphia (13 Phila. [Pa.] 177. 2 Brews. [Pa.] 443) ..168, 177, 522 .483, 485 v. Potter (27 Vt. 304 [1855])... Sioux Falls v. Kirby (S. D.) (60 N. W. Rep. 156) 344. 404 v. Robson (N. Y. App.) (42 N. E. Rep. 667) 804 Sipperly v. Stewart (50 Barb. 62 [1867]) 612, 619 v Roe (7 Col. 95). 689 Sisk v. Garey (27 Md. 401) 428 Skelly v. New York El. R. Co. (27 N Y. Supp. 304) v. Sheltering Arms (35 N. Y. Supp. 62).. 702 v. Smith (28 III. 56 [1862]).. 428 892a Skelsey v. United States (23 Cr. of Cl. 61).... 326 v. Smith (45 Vt. 433 [1873])..325, 439. 574, 575 v. Sorby (L. R. 3 Q. B. D. 552 [1878]).. 514 703 682 439 706 625 620 6:27 v. Ward (46 Iowa 339) Snaith v. Smith (25 N. Y. Supp. 513, s. c. 27 N. Y. Supp. 379)... .341, 428, 445, 474, 477, 514 Sneda v. Libera (Minn.) (68 N. W. Rep. 36).883, 888 Snell v. Brown (71 Ill. 133 (1873]), 397, 428, 429, 430, 432, 445, 503, 504, 683, 742 v. Cottingham (72 Ill. 161 [1874]). 439, 601, 701, 704 v. Rogers (Sup.) (24 N. Y. Supp. 3:9)..... 111 Snelling's Will, In re (N. Y.) (32 N. E. Rep. 1005).... 888 Snodgrass v. Gavit (28 Pa. St. 221 [1857]). 402, 412, 414, 415 Snow v. Ware (13 Metc. [Mass.] 4). Société, etc., v. Milders (49 L. T. 55) Soderberg v. Crockett (17 Nev. 410). Somerby v. Tappan (1 Wright (Ohio) 570 (1834]).... 256, 704, 834, 837 Sontag v. Brennan (75 Ill. 279 [1874]). 676 South's Adm`r v. South (70 Pa. St. 195)....385, 479 South, etc.. R. Co. v. Pilgreen (62 Ala. 305)....892a South Wales R. Co. v. Whythes (5 DeG. M. & G. 880).. Soutier v. Kellman (18 Mo. 509 [1859]).. Stannard v. Harrison (24 Law Times 570).. 821 Stanton v. Bell (2 Hawks [N. C.] 145).... 805, 827 Stanwick v. Butler-Ryan Co. (Wis.) (67 N. W. Rep. 723)... 887 Star Glass Co. v. Morey (108 Mass. 570 [1871]). 628 Stark v. Parker (2 Pick. 267). 699 Starkey v. DeGraff (22 Minn. 431 [1876]), 370, 386, 384, 388, 392, 395, 405, 421, 426, 439 Starkweather v. Goodman (48 Conn. 101 [1880])... 370, 377, 553, 558 Starr v. G. C. Min. Co. (6 Montana 485). State v. Atlantic City (N. J.) (9 Atl. Rep. 759 [1887])... 44 v. Baldwin (Kan.) (12 Pac. Rep. 318 v. Bartley (Neb.) (70 N. W. Rep. 367), 445 876 169, 178 v. Bayonne (N. J.) (8 Atl. Rep. 295)..135, 529 v. Bell (La.) (21 So. Rep. 724). 426, 709 v. Betts (4 C. C. (Ohio 86).. 173 v. Bever (Ind.) (1 N. E. Rep. 802). v. Biddle (Com. Pl.) (3 Ohio N. P. 173)... 143 v. Board of Com'rs of Shawnee County (Kan.) (45 Pac. Rep. 616)........ 163, 164 v. Bd. of Ed. (42 Ohio Št. 376), 426 146, 169, 172, 176, 178, 187 v. Bd. of Ed. (24 Wis. 683). v. Brown, etc., Mfg. Co. (R. I.) (1892). v. Bruner (Ind.) (35 N. E. Rep. 22).. v. Canal & C. St. Ry. (La.) (10 So. Rep. 940 [1892]).. 178 144 147 600 v. City of Trenton (49 N. J. Law 339, 12 Atl. Rep. 902 [1888]).... 155, 161 |