Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

TABLE OF CASES.

[ocr errors][merged small]

880

657

.

Rayburn v. Comstock (Mich.) (45 N. W. Rep. 318 [1890))

688 Rasmer v. Stone (2 Eden 128)..

706 Raynor v. Drew (Cal.) (13 Pac. Rep. 866)...

10) Rayner v. Linthorne (2 C. & P. 124).

745 Rra, appeal of (27 Alb. Law Jour. 138)

315 Read v. Dunsmore (9 C. & P. 588)..

801 v. Hutchins (71 Me. 590 [1890]).

67, 563 Reading & P.R. Co. v. Balthaser (Pa.) (13 Atl. Rep. 91 (188-]).

885 Rrast v. Donali (Tex.) (19 S. W. Rep. 795)..... 885 Rromad v. San Gabriel Val. Land & Water Co. (Cal.) (50 Pac. Rep. 561)....

1 Rectur v. McDermott (Ark.) (13 S. W. Rep. 331 (1890))....

257, 703, 704, 720 t. Pierce (3 Thopnp. & C. [N. Y.] 416).. 854 Rector, etc., v. Wood (Ore.) (31 Pac. Rep. 18) 707 Rrildil v. Gates (5? la. 210) Ree r. Ins. Co. (138 Mass. 57-2)

405 Ried v. Board (i N. Y. )

69, 701 u. Brewer (Tex.) (36 S. W. Rep. 99, 37 S. W. Rep. 118).

70, 87 Reedie v. Lond. & N. W. Ry. Co. (4 Wels., Hurl. & Gord. 244, 4 Exch. 214),

641, 611a, 666, 667 Reedy v. Smith (12 Cal. 245)

310, 796 Rees v. Lilies (8 Car. & P. 1:26).

567 v. Pettizer (75 III. 175)

816 Reese v. Rrese (90 Pa. St. 89 [1879])..

891 Rerve o. Bank (N. J.) (-3 Atl. Rep. 853)

30 Reeves v. Barlow (L. R 12 Q. B. D. 436 (1881)),

272, 273 v, McGlochlin (2 Mo. App. Rep. 1154).. 521 Regina v. Cimon (93 Canada Sup. Ct. 62) 395 v. Starrs (17 Can. Sup. Ct. 118),

3:9, 395, 414, 553 Reichard v. Warren Co. (31 Iowa 381)

557 Reichenbach v. Sage (Wash.) (13 Pac. Rep.

318, 324 Reid Ice Cream Co. v. Stephens (62 Ill. App. 331)

807 Reier v. Detroit St. & Sp. Wks. (Mich.) (67 N. W. Rep. 1:30)

662 Reilly v. City of Albany (112 N. Y. 30 (1889]).

445, 446 v. Daly (Pa.) (28 Atl. Rep. 493).

794 v. Jones (1 Bing. 30?).

3:20
v. Lee (61 Hun (N. Y.) 6:27, 16 N. Y.
Supp. 313 (1891]).

481, 506
v. Mayor (111 N. Y. 473, 54 N. Y. Super.
Čt. 403, 18 N. E. Rep. 633 (1889]).

54, 149, 154
R-ischenbach v. Sage (Wash.) (43 Pac. R-p.
35:).

678 Rennie v. Wynn (1 Exch. 691 (1819]).

814 Rpsr. Gravid Rapids (73 Mich. 237, 41 N. W. Rep. $3 (1889))...

324, 428, 553, 554, 595 Renton v. Monnier (77 Cal. 449)... 16, 380, 819a Reusch v. Amer. Brew. Assn. (11 La. Ann. 1111, 11 So. Rep. 719).

187 Reuting v. City of Titusville (Pa. Sup.) (34 Atl. Rorp. 916)..

173, 507 Rere. Peto (1 Y. & J. 37)..

379, 552, 5.53 R-ynolds v. Jordan (6 Cal. 108 (1856]). 400, 619 v. Celiwell (51 Pa. St. 298 (1865)),

407, 415, 41, 428, 415, 482
v. Nelson
Wend. 20)

39 v. Van Beuren (31 N. Y. Supp. 8:27) 865 Rhodes v. Cleveland Roll. Mill. Co. (17 Fed. Rep. 406)

124 v. Thomas (Ind.) (3 Carter 638). Rice v. Board of Trustees (Cal.) (10 Pac. Rep. 5:51)

$$ Richardson v. Mahon (L. R. 4 Ir. C. P. 486). 407, 408 v. Shaw (1 Mo. App. 234).

677 Richardson & Co. v. Hampton (la.) (31 N. W. Rep. 871)....

563
Richardson Co. v. School Dist. (Neb.) (64 N.W.
Rep. 218)...

31
Richlands, etc., Co. v. Hilteleitel (Va.) (22 S.
E Rep. 806)..

620
Richmond v. Robinson (12 Mich. 193)..

817 Richmond & D.R. Co. v. Hissong (Ala.) (13 So. Rep. 209).

876 Richter v. Meyer (Ind.) (31 N. E. Rep. 582).. 693 Ricker v. Collins (81 Tex. 662, 17 S. W. Rep.

378 [1891])... ..384, 390, 415, 48! v. Cutter (8 Gray 248)

223 v. Fairbanks (40 Me. 43 (1855]).

730
Ricketts v. Joliff (62 Miss. 440 (1684]).

25
Ridgway v. Grace (Com. Pl.) (21 N. Y. Supp.
934)..

61
Rigby v. Bristol (29 L. J. Exch. 359).

678
Rigdon v. Coules (III.) (30 N. E. Rep. 1060, 31
Ill. App. 630). ...

796
Rigney v. Dution (C. C.) (77 Fed. Rep. 175) 816
Riley v. Black (16 N. Y. Supp. 206 [1891]). 583

v. Brooklyn (56 Barb. (N. Y.) 559). 584
v. Hicks (Ga.) (1 8. E. Rep. 173)

795
v. State Line Sieamship Co. (19 La. Anu.

79).
Rim v. Electric P. Co. (3 App. Div. [N. Y.) 305
(Sup.), 38 N. Y. Supp. 345 (1896])

862
Ripley Co. v. Hill (Ind.) (16 N. E. Rep. 156
(1888])..

429
Rippe v. C. D. & M. R. Co. (23 Minn. 18 (1876]). 891
Risley v. I. B. & W. Ry. Co. (1 Hun 202 11864). 42
v. Sinith (64 N. Y. 516 (1870])

66
Rison v. Moon (Va.) (22 S. E. Rep. 165).....318, 319
Ritchie v. Dist. of Columbia (18 Ct. of Cl. 78).. 757
Ritters' Appeal (9 P. F. Sm. 9)..

25
Robbins v. Chicago (4 Wallacé 679)

611
Robbins v. Mount (33 How. Pr. 24 (1867])

241
Robert v. Sadler (N. Y.) (10 N. E. Rep. 4!
[1887])

266
Roberts v. Berry (2 DeG. M. & G. 284)

326 v. Brett (6 C. B. N. S. 69:-)

169 v. Bury Commrs. (L. R. 4 C. P. 310,

5 C. P. 325), 397, 649, 720, 724, 733, 746
v. Drehmer (Neb.) (59 N. W. Rep.' 11). 691
v. Havelock (3 B. & Ad. 401)..

674
v. Minneapolis Th. Mch, Co. (S. D.) (67
N. W. Rep. 607)

696
v. Myers (+3 Law Rep. 396).

818
v. The Loan & Abstract Co. (63 Iowa
76 (1884))

836
v. Watkins (32 L. J. (N. S.] C. P. 291

[1863). s. c. 14 C. B. (N.'s.) 592)... 473
v. Wilkinson (34 Mich. 1:29)...

69
Robertson v. Lion Ius. Co. (C.C.) (13 Fed. Rep.
929).

427
Robinson v. Baird (Pa.) (30 Atl. Rep. 1010).475, 552
v. Campbell (47 Iowa 625 (1878]).

836 v. Chamberlain (34 N. Y. 389 (1866]),

180, 834
v. Davidson L. R. (6 Exch. 269)

10
v. Donahon (Ga.) (25 S. E. Rep. 491). 794
v. Fiske (25 Me 401
v. Grimes (33 N. Y. Sunp. 291)

629
v. Hyer (Fla.) (17 89. Rep. 745) 561
v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co

(Mich.) (61 N. W. Rep. 1014) 325 v. Mollett (L. R. 7 H. L. 902)

553
v. Parish (62 m. 130 (1891]).

691
v. Patterson (Mich.) (39 N. W. Rep.
21 (1888]).

428

567

152 v. Candle (11 Ga. 605)

695 r. Roberts (24 Wis, 461)

106 r. Williams (2 Fed. Rep. 437 (1887]) 87 Rich r. City of Minneapolis (37 Alb. Law Jour. 58119**))..

266 Richard u. Stanton (16 Wend. (N. Y.] 25)...... 91 V. Warren Co. (31 Iowa 381)

557 Richards o. May (10 Q. B. D. 400 [1843]),545, 552, 595 Richardson o. Abendroth (13 Barb. 16)

863 v. Anderson (1 Camp. 43).

553 v. Grant Co. (Ind) (27 Fed. Rep.

...47, 143

42, 74 v. Rohr (Wis.) (10 N. W. Rep. 668 (1888])

180 v. Shanks (Ind.) (20 N. E. Rep. 713 [1899]).

..437, 491 v. Snyder (25 Peun. St. 203)

677 v. United States (13 Wall. 363 (1871]).

623, 627 v Webb (11 Bush 464 (1875])

667 Robinson & Rea Mfg.Co. v. Mellon (139 Pa. St.

257 (1891]. 21 Atl. Rep. 91 (1890])......483, 483, 187 Robson v. Drummond (2 B. & A. D. 303).

296, 682, ww

496 (1883)).

Robson v. Godfrey, Holt N. P. Cas. Stark. 275)...

$$ 236 (1 .572, 573 678 891

v. Miss. R. Log. Co. (61 Fed. 893) Rochester v. Chester (3 N. H. 349, 365) Rochester W. Ld. Co. v. Rochester (3 Comst. [N. Y ] 463 [1850]).. ..247, 248 574

Rockcliffe v. Pearce (1 F. & F. 300)
Rockland, Mt. D. & S. S. B. Co. v. Fessenden
(Me.) (8 Atl. Rep. 550 [1887]).

629
739

814

Rodemer v. Gonder (9 Gill [Md.] 288)..
Roeder v. Bensberg (6 Mo. App. 415)
Roderiquez v. State (Tex.) (22 S. W. Rep. 978). 879
Rodick v. Gandell (1 De G. M. & G. 763)
Roemer v. Striker (21 N. Y. Supp. 1090)
Roesuer v. Herman (3 Fed. Rep. 782)
Roettingers v. United States (26 U. S. Ct. of
Cl. 591 [1891])

295 640a 864

Rogers v. Allen (47 N. H. 529)...

v. Hogan (58 Me. 205 [1871])...

v. Rogers (139 Mass. 410)

v. Straub (26 N. Y. Supp. 1066). v. Walsh (12 Neb. 28).

....

.584, 684 627

v. Florence R. Co. (S. Car.) (9 S. E. Rep. 1059 [1889], s. c. 40 Alb. L. Jour. 223)..

667

601

573

124

..65, 90 602 240

Rohr v. Baker (13 Oreg. 350 [1886]).
Rohrman v. Steese (9 Phila. 185).
Roloson v. Carson (8 Md. 208 [1855]),
432, 433, 436, 498,[527
Rome & D. R. Co. v. Chasteen (Ala.) (7 So.
Rep. 94)

654 812

Romeyn v. Sickles (108 N. Y. 650 [1888])..
Roosevelt . Thurman (1 Johns. Ch. 220 [1814]). 486
Roosevelt H. v. N. Y. El. R. Co. (21 N. Y. Supp.

205).

880 127

17

887

86

125

702

726

Root et al. v. Johnson (26 Vt. 64)

Ropes v. Arnold (830 N. Y. Supp. 997)
Roreback v. Penna. Co. (Conn.) (20 Atl. Rep.
465 [1890])

Rose v. Des Moines R. (39 Iowa 246, 20 Am.
Ry. Rep. 326)

v. Eclipse Carb. Co. (60 Mo. App. 28)
v. O'Riley (111 Mass. 57 [1872])....
v. Trestrail (1 Mo. App. Rep's 540)
Rosenberger v. Pacific Coast Ry. Co. (Cal.) (43
Pac. Rep. 963).
Ross v. Bd. of Ed. (12 Ohio St. 374)

v. McArthur (85 Iowa 203, 52 N. W. Rep.
125)
.8385, 428, 445
v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. (5 Hun 488 [1875]).. 644
v. Stackhouse (114 Ind. 200 [1887])

174

v. Union Pac. R Co. (1 Woolw. [Ü. S.] 26). 706 Rossiter v. Cooper (23 Vt. 522) 310 Rossvally v. City of New Orleans (19 La. Ann. 7 [1867]) 7:20, 744 Rothwell v. Dean (1 Mo. Rep. 309). 675 Rourke v. W. M. Colliery Co. (1 C. P. D. 556).. 655 Rousseau v. Poitras (62 Ill. App. 103).. 473 Rowe v. Addison (34 N. H. 306, 312) 853, 858 Roy v. Boteler (40 Mo. App. 213, 224) .477, 478 Roval Ins. Co. v. Parlin & O. Co. (Tex.) (34 S. W. Rep. 401) 428 Rude v. Mitchel (97 Mo, 365, 11 S. W. Rep 225 [1889]) 439. 564, 595 Ruege v. Gates (Wis.) (38 N. W. Rep. 181 [1888]) 559 Rugg v. Moore (110 Pa 236).. 674 Rulge v. Gates (Wis.) (38 N. W. Rep. 181 [1881]) 69 Rulof v. People of N. Y. (213).. Rush v Able (90 Pa. St. 153).

880

862

702

611

v. Wazner (12 N. Y. Supp. 2) Rushforth v. Hadfield (7 East 224)... Rusling & Union Pipe & Const, Co. (Sup.) (39 N. Y. Supp. 216). 414, 421, 686 697 Russell v. Barry (115 Mass. 300 [1874]) v. Buckhout (Sup.) (34 Ñ. Y. Supp 271) 10 v. Horn, etc.. Mfg. Co. (Neb.) (59 N. W. Rep. 901)

704

v. Sa Da Bandeira (13 C. B. [N. S.] 149), 324. 478, 545, 546, 670 v. Seery (Kan.) (35 Pac. Rep. 812).. 429, 526 Ryan v. Blount (1 Dev. Eq. 382). 436

v. Curran (64 Ind. 345)....
v. Fowler (24 N. Y. 410)

v. Lynch (68 III. 160)

v. Rogers (Cal.) 31 Pac. Rep. 244)

809

173

654 644

40

678

$$

Ryder v. Kinsey (Minn.) (64 N. W. Rep. 91), Rylands v. Fletcher (L. R. 3 H. of L. 106).... 613

244, 613, 644

S.

Sadler v. Eureka Co. Commrs. (15 Nev, 39)
v. Henlock (4 El. & Bl. 570)

Safety Insulated Wire and Cable Co. v. Balti-
more (C. C. A.) (66 Fed. Rep. 140).
Sage v. Central R. Co. (99 U. S. :34).
Saginaw Gas & Light Co. v. Saginaw (U. S.
Cir. Ct. [Mich.], 22 The Reptr. 579 [1886])........ 81
Sainter v. Ferguson (7 C. B. 716)

.654, 655

St. Albans Bk. v. Dillon (30 Vt. 122).
St. Clair v. Bowles (9 B. & C. 92)
St. Helen's Mill Co. ( Sawy. 88)

St. Johns & H. R. Co. v. Shalley (Fla.) (14 So.
Rep. 890).

St. John v. Potter (Com. Pl) (19 N. Y. Supp
230)

370,397, 569, 591

St. Joseph I. Co. v. Halverson (48 Mo. App. 33) 445 St. L. v. McDonald (10 M6. 609),

v. Von Phul (Mo. Sup.)(4 S. W. Rep. 843)

17, 756, 763

St. L. & C. Ry. Co. v. Drennan (26 Ill. App. 263 [1887])

St. L. & P. R. Co. v. Kerr (11.) (38 N. F Rep. 638)

421. 440, 445

St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Bradley (54 Fed. Rep. 630)

St. L., etc.. R. Co. v. Willis (33 Kan. 330),.663, 666
St. L. & T. Ry. v. Johnston (Tex.) (15 S. W. Rep.
104 [1891]).

St. L., etc., Ry. Co. v. Yonley (Ark.) (13 S. W.
Rep. 333)

St. L. B. & J. Co. v. St. L. Brew. Assn. (Mo.)
(31 S. W. Rep. 765).

St. Louis G. L. Co. v. City of St. L. (46 Mo. 121) 580 St. L.,I. M. & S. Ry. v. Lyman (Ark.) (22 S. W. Rep. 170, 213

[ocr errors]

St. Mary's Market Co. v. New Orleans (La.) (16 So. Rep. 831

St. Martin v. Thrasher (40 Vt. 461 [1868]

St. P. & N. P. Ry. Co. v. Bradbury (42 Minn. 222), (44 N. W. Rep. 1 [1890])

St. Paul . Seitz (3 Minn, 297)

St. Paul Water Co. v. Ware (16 Wall 566)
Salb v. Campbell (Wis.) (27 N. W. Rep, 45)
Salt Creek v. Bridge Co. (Kan.) (23 Pac. Rep.

303

429.589

********

Salters v. Ralph (15 Abb. Pr. 273)

Salvin v. N. Brancepeth Coal Co. (L. R. 9 Ch.
App. 705 [1874]) -
Samuell v. Howarth (3 Mer. Ch. 272)...
Sanborn Map & Pub. Co. v. Dakin Pub. Co. (39
Fed. Rep. 266)
Sanders v. Hutchinson (26 Ill. 633 [1887]).

259, 370, 445, 479, 877 v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co. (N. Y. App.) (39 N. E. Rep. 75).

91,

Sanderson v. Cockersmouth, etc., Ry. Co. (11
Beav. 497)

v. Pa. C. Co. (86 Pa. St. 401)

Sands v. Potter (Ill. Sup.) (46 N. E. Rep. 282), 25, 691 Sanford v. Commercial T. Mut. Ace. Assn.

(Sup.) (33 N. Y. Sup, 512), (N. Y. App.) (41 N. E. Rep. 694)..

8:22

797

344

v. Emery (634 II. 458)

v. 1st Natl. Bank (Iowa) (63 N. W.
Rep. 459)

.316, 319 v. Pawtucket St. Ry. Co. (R. I.) (35 Atl. Rep. 67) .646, 654 627 v. Rawlings (43 III. 92) v. Sanford (49 Hun (N. Y.) 540) 859a Sang v. Duluth (Minn.) (59 N. W. Rep. 878)..76, 689 Santa Cruz e. Enright (Cal.) (30 Pac. Rep. 197) 883 Santa Cruz Pav. Co. v. Heaton (Cal.) (38 Pac. Rep. 693) 51, 138, 220 Santa Cruz Rock Pavement Co. v. Broderick (Cal.) (45 Pae. Rep. 863)..... 138, 141, 157 Sarles e. Sharlow (Dak.) (837 N. W. Rep. 749 [1888] 103

Sarony v. Burrow Giles Lith. Co. (17 Fed. Rep. 591)..

818

[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors]

384, 684 6:27

[ocr errors]

667

601

573

121 ....65, 90 602 .... 240

Rep.

Am.

498,1527 ¡ So. 654 812

$149.486 app.

880 127

17

) (43 809 173

[ocr errors]

887

86

125

702

726

Rep. 48.445 59.. 644 174 26). 706 310

nin. 780.744 675 3).. 655 473

[blocks in formation]

St. L. &C. Ry. Co. v. Drennan ( Ill. App S
[1887])

St. L. & P. R. Co. v. Kerr (Ili.) (N. F. Rej
638)
St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Bradley (54 Fed. Rf
630)

th

St. L., etc.. R. Co. r. Willis (33 Kan.
St. L&T. Ry. v. Johnston (Tex.) (15 S. W. Bp
104 [1891])

St. L., etc., Ry. Co. v. Yonley (Ark.) (13&
Rep. 333)

CA

St. L. B. & J. Co. v. St. L. Brew. Assn. (M
(31 S. W. Rep. 765).

A

St. Louis G. L. Co. v. City of St. L. (46) Me. 127088
St. L.,I. M. & S. Ry. v. Lyman (Ark) (28
Rep. 170, 213

St. Mary's Market Co. v. New Orleans (La.
So. Rep. 831

St. Martin . Thrasher (40 Vt. 461 [1868]
St. P. & N. P. Ry. Co. r. Bradbury (12 M
2:2). (44 N. W. Rep. 1 [1890)

St. Paul v. Seitz (3 Minn, 297)

702 611

49
1,696

697

1) 10
704

St. Paul Water Co. r. Ware (16 Wall 560)
Salb r. Campbell (Wis) (27 N. W. Rep. 4
Salt Creek v. Bridge Co. (Kan.) (83 Pac. Rep.

$

303
Salters e. Ralph (15 Abb. Pr. 273)
Salvin e. N. Brancepeth Coal Co. (L. R. 9 Ch.
App. 705 (1874))

Samuell r. Howarth (3 Mer. Ch. 279...
Sanborn Map & Pub. Co. v. Dakin Pub, Co.,

*

Fed. Rep. 266)
259, 370, 445, 478 87
Sanders v. Hutchinson (26 Ill. 633 [1857]).
91.8
v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co. (N. Y
App) (39 N. E. Rep. 75)
Sanderson v. Cockersmouth, etc., Ry. Co. (
Beav. 497)

"F

v. Pa. C. Co. (86 Pa. St. 401)
Sands r. Potter (Ill. Sup.) (46 N. E. Rep. 25
Sanford r. Commercial T. Mur. Ace. Assi
(Sup.) (33 N. Y. Sup, 319, X. Y
App.) (41 N. E. Rep. (91).....

r. Emery (4TH, 458)

e. 1st Natl. Bank (Iowa) (63 N. W
Rep. 459)

v. Pawtucket St. Ry Co. (R. L

24.9 646 634

[blocks in formation]

Ryder v. Kinsey (Minn.) (64 N. W. Rep.

366 Rylands v. Fletcher (L. R. 3 H. of L. 1...

S.

7

Sadler v. Eureka Co, Commrs, (15 Ner r. Henlock (4 El. & Bl. 570) Safety Insulated Wire and Cable Co. r. Fabmore (C. C. A.) (66 Fed. Rep. 190 Sage v. Central R. Co. (99 U, S 30 Saginaw Gas & Light Co. v. Saginaw Cir. Ct. [Mich.), The Reptr. 579 (1980) Sainter v. Ferguson (7 C. B. 716) St. Albaus Bk, v. Dillon (0 Vt. 129). St. Clair v. Bowles (9 B. & C. 92) St. Helen's Mill Co. ( Sawy.

St. Johns & H. R. Co, r. Shalley (Fla.):148) Rep. 890).

St. John r. Potter (Com. Pl) (19 N. Y. Sur 37037,803 2300 St. Joseph L. Co. v. Halverson (48 Mo. App. X St. L. v. McDonald (10 Mo. 600,

v. Von Phul (Mo. Sup.)(4S.W.RT S

[ocr errors][merged small]

t. Sanford (4 Hun (N. Y.) 540)..

Sang r. Duluth (Minn.) (59 N, W. Rep. 87.76,689 51.18 Santa Cruz & Euright (Cal) (30 Pac. Ren, 197083 138, 141. 137 Santa Cruz Pav, Co. r. Heaton (Cal) ( Pac. Rep. 6931 103 Santa Cruz Rock Pavement Co. r. Broderick

(Cal) (45 Pac. Rep. 863)......
Sarles e. Sharlow (Dak.) (37 N. W. Rep. 749
[1888]
Sarony r. Burrow Giles Lith, Co. (17 Fed. Rep.

591).......

$18

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

345

Saucelito Ld. Co. v. C. U. A. Co. (66 Cal. 253 [1884].... Sauer v. City of New York (Sup.) (11 N. Y. Supp. 957) 638 127, 227, 580 Sault Ste. Marie v. Van Deusen (40 Mich. 429) 48, 142 Savannah, etc., R. Co. v. Decker (Ga.) (21 S. E. Rep. 372)

Saunders v. Clark (29 Cal. 299)

530

Savannah & W. R. Co. v. Phillips (Ga.) (17 S.
E. Rep. 82)

Saver . Nichols (5 Cal. 487)

664 30 627

Sawtelle v. Drew (122 Mass. 228)..

Sawtells r. Howard (Mich.) (62 N. W. Rep. 156) 370 87 Saxon v. Wood (Ind.) (30 N. E. Rep, 797). Saxton v. Sieberling (Ohio) (29 N. E. Rep. 179). 148 v. Texas. S. F. & N. R. Co. (N. M.) (16 32 Pac. Rep. 851 [1888]) 248 Sayler v. Harrisburg (87 Pa. St. 216 [1878]) 822 Sayre v. Moore (1 East 361). Sayre Lumb. Co. v. Union Bank (Colo. App.) (41 Pac. Rep. 844) 17, 758, 764 Scales v. Wiley (Vt.) (33 Atl. Rep. 771)..101, 106, 689 Scammon v. City of Chicago (25 III. 424 [1861]), 641, 644, 654, 663 v. Denio (72 Cal. 393, 14 Pac. Rep. 98 [1887]).... 595, 731 Scanlan v. Hodges (C. C. A.) (52 Fed. Rep. 354) 126 Scarbrough . Alabama Mid. Ry. Co. (Ala.) (10 So. Rep. 316).

Sceery v. Springfield (112 Mass. 512 [1873]). Schade v. Geruer (Mo. Sup.) (34 S. W. Rep. 576)...

866 43

Schanzenbach v. Brough (58 Ill. App. 526).
Schaper v. Gradner (84 Ill. 603)

836 809 791 Scheible v. Klein (89 Mich. 376, 50 N. W. Rep. 857). ..686, 699 Scheid v. Rapp (121 Pa. St. 593 [1888]). 761 Schenke r. Rowell (7 Daly 286, 3 Abb. N. Cas. 42 [1877]) .427, 428, 439, 478 Schenck v. Saunders (13 Gray 37). 232 Schin v. Pabst Brew. Co. (Minn.) (66 N. W. Rep. 3)..

Schlass v. Hewlett (Ala.) (1 So. Rep. 263)
Schlicht v. State (56 Ind. 173)
Schmidt v. Glade (126 I. 485 (1888))

644 74 892/1 491

428

318

123

557

v. North Yakima (Wash.) (40 Pac. Rep. 790).... Schmieder v. Kingsley (Com. Pl.) (26 N. Y. Supp. 31) Schneider e. Patterson (Neb.) (57 N. W. Rep. 398) Schofield v. Thompkins (95 Ill. 190).... 315, 317, 319 School Dist. v. Dauchy (25 Conn. 530).. 272, 669, 674 v. Lund (57 Kan. 31)... 698, 703 v. Randall (5 Neb. 408)... 412. 428, 480 v. Sage (Wash.) (43 Pac. Rep. 341), 436, 490 v. Sullivan (Kan.), (29 Pac. Rep. 1141)..... School Trustees v. Bennett (27 N. J. Law 513 (8 Dutch }) 237, 239, 240, 669, 674, 677 Schreiber . Thornton (17 Fed. Rep. 693).. Schroeder v. Galand (134 Pa. St. 277)... Schnenfeldt v. Junkerman (20 Fed. Rep. 357 [1884]). Schular v. H. R. R. Co. (38 Barb. 655 [1862]) 667 Schuler v. Eckert (90 Mich. 165, 51 N. W. Rep. 198 [1892]). 370, 411, 720 Schultz v. Lindell (30 Mo. 310).. 890 Schumm v. Seymour (24 N. J. Eq. 143).... 177, 555 Schurr v. N. Y. & B. Sub. Invest. Bo. (Com. Pl.) (18 N. Y. Supp. 454, 16 N. Y. Supp. 210).. 43 Schwander v. Birge (46 Hun 66).. Schwartz v. Gelmore (45 Ill. 455 [1867]),

818 762 58

885 654, 664, 665 v. Saunders (46 Ill. 18) 240, 676, 677, 686, 687, 689 Schwerin v. De Graff (21 Minn. 354 [1875]).. 370, 478 Schwiesau v. Mahon (Cal.) (42 Pac. Rep. 1065), 219, 220 Schwinger v. Raymond (N. Y.) (11 N. E. Rep. 952 [1887]).... Scofield v. Graw (63 Vt. 283)..

v. McGregor (1 Thomp. & C. [N. Y.]
404)...

885 703 685

SS

Scott v. Avery (5 H. L. Cases 811 [1855]), 86, 344, 345, 407, 408, 415 v. Davenport (Ia.) (34 la. 208). 47 v. Maier (56 Mich. 554 [1885]). 616, 812, 814 v. Liverpool Corporation (5 Jurist [N.S.] 105 [1800], 1 Gifford 216, 3 De G. & J. 334, 31 Law Times 147 [1858]). 344, 414, 415, 416, 421, 428, 446, 509, 510, 514, 520, 784, 744, 747 v. Norfolk & W. R. Co. (Va.) (17 S. E. Rep. 882)..

v. Raiment (1. R.) (7 Eq. 112). Scott, T. B.. L. Co. v. Hafner-Lothman Mfg. Co.(Wis.) (65 N. W. Rep. 513) Scoville v. Miller (40 Ill. App. 237)... v. Tompkins (95 I. 190). Scraggs v. Hill (W. Va.) (17 S. E. Rep. 185) Scrivner v. Pask (18 C. B. [N. S.] 785, L. R. 1 Com. Pleas Cas. 715 [1866]) 258, 589, 841 Scroeder v. Garland (134 Pa. St. 277) Searle v. Laverick (L. R.) (9 Q. B. 122). v. Parke (N. H.) (34 Atl. Rep. 744). Seaton v. Kendall (61 Ill. App. 289)... Seavey v. Shurick (Ind.) (11 N. E. Rep. 597 [1887]).. 601, 618 Secrist v. Board (100 Ind. 59). 766 Seguine v. Spaeth (Com. Pl.) (35 N. Y. Supp. 847). Seibert v. Householder (Pa.) (10 Atl. Rep. 784 691

762 652 707 525, 522

[blocks in formation]

Selby v. Hutchinson (4 Gilman [Ill.] 319), 439, 687, 090, 739 Selpho v. City of Brooklyn (Sup.) (59 N. Y. 168 Supp. 526) Seward v. City of Rochester (N. Y.) (16 N, E. Rep. 348 [1888]) 412 Sewer Commrs. v. Sullivan (Sup.) (42 N. Y. Supp. 358) Sexton v. Chicago (107 I), 323).

146 v. Cook Co. (Ill.) (114 Ill. 174 [1891]), 553, 554, 555, 556, 558 Seybolt v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. Co. (95 N. Y. 562)... 563 Seymour . L. D. Co. (20 N. J. Fq. [5 C. E. Green] 396 [1869])...242, 319, 435, 502, 503, 569, 587. 589, 596, 841 Sharkey v. McDermoth (Mo.) (4 S. W. Rep. 107) 105 Sharp v. Smith (32 Ill. App. 336). 30 Sharpe v. Johnson (C0 Barb. 144 [1871]). .310, 697 v. San Paulo Ry. Co. (L. R.) (8 Ch. App. 597 [1873])... 238, 348, 362, 363, 366, 370, 372, 378, 390, 395, 409, 414, 426, 428, 439, 446, 545, 553. 558, 589 Shaufelter v. Baltimore (Md.) (1 Atl. Rep. 439)..... .92a Shaver v. Ingraham (58 Mich, 649) 805 v. Murdock (36 Cal. 293).. 577

v. Penna. Co. (C. C.) (71 Fed. Rep. 931) 86 v. Sharp Co. (Ark.) (34 S. W. Rep. 261) 116 Shaw v. Andrews (9 Cal. 73 [C. C.], 62 Fed Rep. 460) 126, 514, 518 v. First B. C. (Minn.) (46 N, W. R. 146, 44 Minn. 22). 545, 555, 556, 585 v. Trenton (49 N. J. Law 339 (1887]), 139, 140, 155, 173 v. Wolverton W. W. Co. (6 Exch. 137). 372. 545, 553 Shea v. Town of Milford (Mass.) (14 N E. Rep. 764 [1888]). 39, 47 Shefbaur v. Board (N. Y.) (31 Atl. Rep. 454).. 171 Sheffield v. Clark (73 Ga. 92) Sheffield, etc.. Co. v. Gordon (151 U. S. 285. 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 343) .241. 428, 445 Sheffield C. Co. v. Sheffield & R. Ry. Co. (3Ry. & C. Cas. 121) Sheffield Fur. Co. v. Hull Coal & Coke Co. (Ala.) (14 So, Rep. 672)

531

97

89 683

Sheible 2. Klein (Mien.) (50 N. W. Rep. 857). Shelbyville, City of, e. Brant (61 Ill. App. 153), 892 Shelden . Fox (Kan.) (29 Pac. Rep. 759 (1892]) 135 Sheldon v. Leahy (Mich.) (69 N. W. Rep. 76)... 703 v. Pruessner (Kan.) (35 Pac. Rep. 201).... Sherman v. Bates (15 Neb. 18), (Neb.) (17 The Reporter 86 [1883]).... 242, 257, 678, 834

87

...428, 722

lxxii

[ocr errors]

.... 188

105

.

SS Sherman, City of, v. Conner (Tex.) (25 S. W. Rep. 321).

703 Shephard v. St. Charles W. P. Rd. Co. (28 Mo. 373 (1859))

590, 6:23 Shepherd v. Lincoln (17 Wend. (N. Y.] 250) 854 Sheppard v. Conquest (17(. B. 4:27)

8:20
Sherman v. Mayor (1 N. Y. 316 (1848])..382, 623, 679
Sherwin v. Nat. c. R. Co. (Colo. App.) (38 Pac.
Rep. 392)..

97 v. Salpaugh (24 Vt. 347 (1852)) 575 Sherwood v. Houtman (N. Y.) (73 Hun 544).... 702 Shibley v. Angel (37 N. Y. 626 [1868])...

49 Shields v. Hickey (26 Mo. App. 194 [1887]). 88 Shiells v. Blackburne (1 H. Bİ. 158)

838 Shines' Ex'r v. Heimburger (1 Mo. App. Rep. 111)....

674, 675 Shinn v. Hicks (Tex.) (45 S. W. Rep. 486 [1887])

377, 558 Shipley v. Fifty Associates (106 Mass. 194) 616 Shipman v. Dist. of Colm. (119 U.S. 148, 703) 580, 600 v. State (43 Wis. 381).

46, 812, E14, 88, 829, 837, 838, 839 Shirk v. Cox (Ind. Sup.) (40 N. E. Rep. 750) 859a Sbively v. Knoblock (Ind.) (33 N. E. Rep. 1028),

493, 494
Shoemaker v. Acker (Cal.) (48 Pac. Rep. 62), 694, 805
Shoenberger v. City of Elgin (Ill. Sup.) (45 N.
E. Rep. 434, 59 III. App. 381)

241 Shook v. Pate (50 Ala. 91 (1871])

891 Short v. McCarthy (3 B. & Ald. 626)

121 v. Statts (58 Ind. 29 (1871]).

111 Shreiner v. Miller (67 Ia. 91 (1885]). 837, 838 Shreve v. Brereton (51 Pa. st. 175 (1865])...317, 318 Shrewsbury v. Tuffts (W. Va.) (23 S. E. Rep. 699)

124 Shrump v. Parfitt (94 Hun (N. Y.] 311).... 479 Shufeldt v. Searing (59 III. App. 341)

885 Shular v. Hudson R. R. Co. (38 Barb. 653)...... 667 Shuite v. Hennesy (40 lowa 352 (1875]),

451, 491, 621, 891 Shute v. Hamilton (3 Daly (N. Y.) 46?)

324 Sibley v. Felton (Mass.) (31 N. E. Rep. 10). 89 Siboni v. Kirkman (1 M. & W. 418).

10 Sickle v. Pattison (14 Wend. 257)..

697 Sickles v. United States (1 Ct. of Cl. 214) 678 Siebe v. San Francisco (Cal.) (46 Pac. Rep. 456). 844 Siegel v. Eaton & Prince Co. (60 III. App. 639), (UI. Sup.) (46 N. E. Rep. 449 [1897]).

674, 677 Sievers v. San Francisco (Cal.) (41 Pac. Rep. 697).

.587, 858 Sigourney v. Sibley (21 Pick. (Mass.) 101). 561 Siler v. Gray (86 N. č. 566).

678 Silsby Mfg: Co. v. Allentown (Pa.) (20 or 26

Atl. Rep. 616)... ..163, 557
v. Town of Chico (24 Fed.
Rep. 893)..

340
Silver v. Conn. R. L. Co. (40 Fed. Rep. 192
[1889])....

365
Siinis v. Brookfield (34 N. Y. Supp. 695).

76 Simmons v. Lawrence (133 Mass. 298)... ..575, 690 Simonds v. Pearce (31 Fed. Rep. 137).

6717
Simonson v. Grant (36 Minn. 139 (1887]).....20, 761

v. Thori (Miun.) (31 N. W. Rep. 861
[1887])....

20
Simpson v. New York, etc., R. Co. (51 N. Y.
Super. Ct. 419). .

566 Sims v. Bice (67 n. 83)

794 v. Jones (S. C.) (20 S. E. R. 905).

126
Sinclair v. Bowles (9 B. & C. 92) 675, 699, 703

v. Tallmadge (35 Barbour 602 (1861)),
325, 326. 314, 369, 395, 411, 417, 445,

555, 698, 699, 701, 702
Sindlinger v. Kerkow (Cal.) (2 Pac. Rep.
932).

348
Singer v. McCormick (4 Watts & S. 265, 266).. 804
Singerly v. Thayer (108 Pa. St. 291)

310
Singleton v. Wilson (9 Tenn. 344)

695
Sinnott v. Mullin (82 Pa. St. ?83 [1876]). 674, 689
Sioux Falls v. Kirby (S. D.) (60 N. W. Rep.
156)

344, 404
Sipperly v. Stewart (50 Barb. 62 (1867]) 612, 619
Sisk v. Garey (27 Md. 101)

4.28 Skelly v. New York EI. R. Co. (IN Y. Supp. 301)

SP Skelsey v. United States (23 ci.of cl. 61). 3:20

Skelton v. Fenton Elec. L. & P. Co. (Mich.) (58
N. W. Rep. 609).

890
Skinner v. Bedell's Adm'r (32 Ala. 44)

310
Skym v. Weske Cons. Co. (Cal.) (47 Pac. Rep.
116)

794
Slantey v. Schwalby (Tex.) (19 S. W. Rep. 264
[1892])..

116
Slater v. Mersereau (64 N. Y. 138 (1876)),

244, 663, 666, 667
Sloan v. Hayden (110 Mass. 143)

340
Sloss Marblehead L. Co. v. Smith (11 Ohio Cir.
Ct. R. 213)

687
Slowinin v. Walter (1 Bro. Ch. 418)

317 Slusser T. Co. v. City of B. (47 Iowa 300 (1877]),

578, 579, 580
Small v. Howard (128 Mass. 131 [1880])

8:29
Small House v. Ky. & M. G. Co. (2 Mont. 443
(18761)

861
Smalley v. Mitchell (Mich.) (68 N. W. Rep. 978) 105
Smeltzer v. Miller (Cal.) (45 Pac. Rep. 264)
Smes v. Supt. (Mich.) (25 N. W. Rep. 485)
Smilie v. Fresno Co. (Cal.) (44 Pac. Rep. 556).. 45
Smith v. Aiken (75 Ala. 209)

123
V. Aiken (102 N. Y. 87)

369, 411
v. Alker (102 N. Y. 87 (1886])

417
v. Bd. Miami Co. (Ind) (33 N. E. Rep.
243)

558
v. B. C. & M. R. R. (36 N. H. 459 (1858]),

326, 340, 341, 121, 426, 428, 442, 511, 601, 602 v. Brady (17 N. Y. 173 (1858]),

388, 407, 415, 417. 428. 439, 697, 701, 702 v. Briggs (3 Denio [N. Y.) 73 (1846]),

407, 415, 476 v. Bristol (33 lowa 24)

212, 256, 572 v. City of Newburg (77 N. Y. 136). 35 v. Clark (58 Mo. 145 (1874])

257 v. Coal Co. (83 III. 498)

678 v. Coe (2 Hilt. 365)

573 v. Cooley (5 Daly 401)

428 v. Co-operative D. Assn. (12 Daly [N. Y.] 304)

33 v. Corn (Com. Pl.) (23 N. Y. Supp. 326),

581, 687,728, 730 v. Darby (L. R. 7 Q. B. 716)

643 v. Dickey (74 Tex. 61 (1889)).

813 v. District (20 Conn. 312 (1850])..

698 v. Farmers' Trust Co. (Iowa) (66 N. W.

Rep. 81)..
v. Firsi Cong. Ch. (8 Pick. (Mass.] 178).

698, 703 v. Flanders (129 Mass. 322 [1880]),

214, 222, 228 v. Foster (41 N. H. 220). ...

59 v. Goulding (6 Cush. (Mass.) 154). 107 v. Gugerty (4 Barb. 614)

.567, 701 v. Kron (N. C.) (13 S. E. Rep. 839).. v. Lowell M. H. (8 Piek. 181);

700 v. Mayor (10 N. Y. 504),

138, 139, 140, 156, 176, 427 v. Milne (1 Dowl, 290)

643 v. Milwaukee Build, and Traders' Exch. (Wis.) (64 N. W. Rep. 1041),

640a, 641, 641a, 663, 667 v. Moileson (74 Hun [N. Y.] 606, 26 N.

Y. Supp. 653), (N. Y. App.) (42 N. E.
Rep. 669).

. 20, 21, 271, 445, 739 Monroe (84 N. Y. 354).

794 v. Munch (Minn.) (68 N. W. Rep. 19).

326 v. Newbaur (Ind.) (42 N. E. Rep. 40) 675 v. New York (21 How. Pr. 1)

164 v. New York (Sup.) (31 N. Y. Supp. 783). (42 N. Y. Supp. 522).

138, 139, 140, 156, 176, 427 v. O'Donnell (Com. Pl.) (36 N. Y. Supp.

480). v. Philadelphia (13 Phila. [Pa.] 177. 2

Brews. (Pa.] 4435 ..168, 177, 522 v. Potter (27 Vt. 304 [1855]).. .483, 485 v. Robson (N. Y. App.) (42 N. E. Rep. 667)

814 v Roe (7 Col. 95)..

689 v. Sheltering Arms (35 N. Y. Supp. 62).. 702 v. Smith (28 III. 54 [1862]). v. Smith (45 VI. 133 (1873])..35, 439. 574, 515 v. Sorby (L. R. 3 Q. B. D. 552 [1978]).... 514

389, 468

436

[ocr errors]

797

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

703

[ocr errors]

702

348

595

89

504

340

19

Skelton v. Fenton Elec. L. & P. Co. (Mich

N. W. Rep. 609). Skinner v. Bedell's Adm'r (32 Ala. 44) Skym v. Weske Cons. Co. (Cal.) (47 Pac. Rep 116) Slantey v. Schwalby (Tex.) (19 8. W. Rep. [1892))... Slater v. Mersereau (64 N. Y. 138 [1876]),

3

244, 663,681, Sloan v. Hayden (110 Mass. 143). Sloss Marblehead L. Co. v. Smith (11 Ohio Or Ct. R. 213)

Slowman v. Walter (1 Bro. Ch. 418).

Slusser T. Co. v. City of B. (47 Iowa 300 [1877)

578 518

Small v. Howard (128 Mass. 131 [1880]) Small House v. Ky. & M. G. Co. (2 Mont. 41 (1876)

Smalley v. Mitchell (Mich.) (68 N. W. Rep. Smeltzer v. Miller (Cal.) (45 Pac. Rep. 54) Smes v. Supt. (Mich.) (25 N. W. Rep. 483). Smilie v. Fresno Co. (Cal.) (44 Pac. Rep. 556. Smith v. Aiken (75 Ala. 209) 26.41

v. Aiken (102 N. Y. 57)

v. Alker (102 N. Y. 87 (1886)
v. Bd. Miami Co. (Ind.) (33 N. E. Rep.)

243)

v. B. C. & M. R. R. (36 N. H. 459 (1858) 326, 340, 341, 421, 426, 428, 442,511,6,

v. Brady (17 N. Y. 173 [1838]). 388, 407, 415, 417, 4:28, 439, 69, 70, 78 v. Briggs (3 Denio [N Y.] 73 [1846]), 40%, 413€ 242,265

v. Bristol (33 lowa 24)

v. City of Newburg (77 N. Y. 136)..

v. Clark (58 Mo. 145 [1874])

v. Coal Co. (83 Ill. 498)

v. Coe (2 Hilt. 365)

v. Cooley (5 Daly 401)

v. Co-operative D. Assn. (12 Daly [N Y.] 304).

v. Corn (Com. Pl.) (23 N. Y. Supp. 581, 687,77

v. Darby (L. R. 7Q. B. 716)

v. Dickey (74 Tex. 61 [1889])..

v. District (20 Conn. 312 [1850]).. 389, 48 v. Farmers' Trust Co. (lowa) (66 N. W

Rep. 84).

v. First Cong. Ch. (8 Pick. [Mass.] 1)

v. Flanders (129 Mass, 322 [1880]),

[ocr errors]

v. Foster (41 N. H. 220)..

v. Goulding (6 Cush. [Mass.] 154)......

v. Gugerty (4 Barb. 614)

561

v. Kron (N. C.) (13 S. E. Rep. 839)..

v. Lowell M. H. (8 Pick. 181)

v. Mayor (10 N. Y. 504),

138, 139, 140, 156, 176,

v. Milne (1 Dowl, 290)

v. Milwaukee Build, and Traders' Exch

(Wis.) (64 N. W. Rep. 1041),
640a, 641, 641a, 66,
v. Molleson (71 Hun [N. Y.] 606, N.
20, 21, 271,445,
Y. Supp. 653), (N. Y. App.) (NE
Rep. 669).

v. Monroe (84 N. Y. 354).

TH

v. Munch (Minn.) (68 N. W. Rep. 19).....

v. Newbaur (Ind.) (12 N. E. Rep. 40) ...

v. New York (21 How. Pr. 1)

v. New York (Sup.) (31 N. Y. Supp. 78),
(42 N. Y. Supp. 522).

138, 139, 140, 156, 176,
v. O'Donnell (Com. Pl.) (36 N. Y. Supp.
480)....

e. Philadelphia (13 Phila. [Pa.] 177.
Brews. (Pa.) 443) 168, 177, 5

48,8

[ocr errors]

v. Potter (27 Vt. 304 (1855))...
v. Robson (N. Y. App.) (42 N. E. Rep.

667)

v Roe (7 Col. 95)....

v. Sheltering Arms (35 N. Y. Supp. 6).

******

v. Smith (28 Ill. 56 (1862).... v. Smith (45 V1, 433 (1873).3.5, 439 574, 53 v. Sorby (L. R. 3Q. B. D. 552 (1978)).... 5

§§

310

v. White (5 Neb. 408)..

4:28

606 439 256

v. Wilson (3 B. & Adol. 728 [1832]).. v. Wright (4 Hun 652)... Smith & Nelson v. Bristol (33 Iowa 24).. Smithmeyer v. United States (147 U. S. 342), 812, 814 Smythe v. Parsons (Kans.) (14 Pac. Rep. 445 [1887], 37 Kas, 79)... v. Ward (46 Iowa 339)

Smith v. Spratt Mach. Co. (S. C.) (24 S. E. Rep. 376.)..

620 627

Snaith v. Smith (25 N. Y. Supp. 513, s. c. 27
N. Y. Supp. 379)........341, 428, 445, 474, 477, 514
Sueda v. Libera (Minn.) (68 N. W. Rep. 36).883, 888
Snell v. Brown (71 III. 193 [1873]),

397, 428, 429, 430, 432, 445, 503, 504, 683, 742 v. Cottingham (72 Ill. 161 [1874]), 489, 601, 701, 704 v. Rogers (Sup.) (24 N. Y. Supp. 3:9)..... 111 Snelling's Will, In re (N. Y.) (32 N. E. Rep. 1006). Snodgrass v. Gavit (28 Pa. St. 221 [1857]). 402, 412, 414, 415

888

703 682 439

Spence v. Bd. of Com'rs (117 Ind. 573
N. E. Rep 513 [1889])
Spencer v. Harding (L. R. 5 C. P. 561

Snow v. Ware (13 Metc. [Mass.] 4).. Société, etc., v. Milders (49 L. T. 55) Soderberg v. Crockett (17 Nev. 410). Somerby v. Tappan (1 Wright (Ohio) 570 [1834]).... 256, 704, 834, 837 Sontag v. Brennan (75 Ill. 279 [1874]). 676 South's Adm'r v. South (70 Pa. St. 195). .385, 479 South, etc.. R. Co. v. Pilgreen (62 Ala. 305)....892a South Wales R. Co. v. Whythes (5 DeG. M. & G. 880)..

706
625

Soutier v. Kellman (18 Mo. 509 [1859])...
Soule v. Seattle (Wash.) (33 Pac. Rep. 384)...44, 47
Spader v. Lawler (17 Ohio 397)..

679

618

Spartali v. Benecke (10 C. B. 222)
Spear v. Bidwell (44 Pa, St. 23)..
Spearman v. Ward (8 Atl. Rep. 430)..
Spearman v. Texarkana (Ark. 24 S. W. Rep
883)

42

Specht v. Stevens (Neb.) (65 N. W. Rep. 879).. 183 Speck v. Phillips (5 M. & W. 283) 846 Speed v. Atl. & Pac. R. Co. (71 Mo. 303 [1879]), 645.653, 663 [1888], 18 222, 237, 579 [1870]), 182, 183, 187 685 v. St. Clair (57 N. H. 9) Sperry v. Fanning (80 Ill. 371 [1875]). 30, 326 Spilman v. Parkersburg (W. Va.) (14 S. E. Rep. 279) Spinney v. Downing (Cal.) (41 Pac. Rep. 797) 797 Spring v. Ansonia Clock Co. (24 Hun [N. Y.) 173)...

45

801 889

877

818

154

Spring Co. v. Edgar (99 U. S. 615 [1878]), Spring Garden Mut. Ins. Co. v. Evans (15 Md. 54 [1859]) Springer Lith. Co. v. Falk (C. C. A.) (59 Fed. Rep. 707) Springfield, City of, v. Mathus (124 Ill. 88 [1888]). v. Weaver (Mo. Sup.) (37 S. W. Rep. 509), 135, 168 Springfield C. A. v. Smith (82 III. 252 [1863)), 256, 257, 566, 831, 834 Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Payne (Kan. Sup.) (46 Pac. Rep. 315). 885 Springfield Milling Co. v. Lane Co. (5 Oreg. 265 (1874])... 52, 53 688

76

Sproessig v. Kental (17 N. Y. Supp. 839) Spurgeon v. McElwain (6 Ohio 442)... Stadhard v. Lee (3 B. & S. 364 [1863]).. 340, 720, 746 Staffon v. Lyon (Mich.) (68 N. W. Rep. 151, 62 N. W. Rep. 354). . . 755, 762, 765 Stafford v. City of Oskalose (64 Iowa 251 (1885]).. 645, 884 169 v. Lowe (16 Johns. [N. Y.] 67) Standard Gas Lt. Co. v. Wood (61 Fed. Rep. 74). 326, 670 Stanfield v. Knickerbocker Trust Co. (Sup.) (37 N. Y. Supp. 600) Stanley v. Sheffield & Co. (Ala.) (4 So. Rep. 34 [1888])..

878 38

428

58

Stannard v. Harrison (24 Law Times 570)..
Stanton v. Bell (2 Hawks [N. C.] 145)..... 805, 827
Stanwick v. Butler-Ryan Co. (Wis.) (67 N. W.
Rep. 723)...

887

Star Glass Co. v. Morey (108 Mass. 570 [1871]). 628 Stark v. Parker (2 Pick. 267). 699

Starkey v. DeGraff (22 Minn. 431 [1876]), 370, 386, 384, 388, 392, 895, 405, 421, 426, 439 Starkweather v. Goodman (48 Conn. 101 [1880]).... 370, 377, 553, 558 Starr v. G. C. Min. Co. (6 Montana 485). 445 State v. Atlantic City (N. J.) (9 Atl. Rep. 759 [1887])...

44

876

169, 178

v. Bayonne (N. J.) (8 Atl. Rep. 295)..135, 529 v. Bell (La.) (21 So. Rep. 724).

426, 709
173
426

v. Betts (4 C. C. [Ohio] 86)...
v. Bever (Ind.) (1 N. E. Rep. 80?).
v. Biddle (Com. Pl.) (8 Ohio N. P. 173)... 143
v. Board of Com'rs of Shawnee County
(Kan.) (45 Pac. Rep. 616)...
163, 164
v. Bd. of Ed. (42 Ohio St. 376),
146, 169, 172, 176, 178, 187
v. Bd. of Ed. (24 Wis. 683)..
178
v. Brown, etc., Mfg. Co. (R. I.) (1892).... 144
v. Bruner (Ind.) (35 N. E. Rep. 22)... 147
v. Canal &C. St. Ry. (La.) (10 So. Rep.
940 [1892])..

600

v. City of Trenton (49 N. J. Law 339, 12
Atl. Rep. 902 [1888])..
155, 161
669

v. Clark (73 N. C. 55).

v. Cunningham (Neb.) (59 N. W. Rep.
483)..

v. Directors (5 Ohio St. 234)

[merged small][ocr errors]

$$ 821

139

171

v. Dixon (La.) (16 So. Rep. 589)

891

v. Dixon Co. (Neb.) (37N. W. Rep. 936). 176 v. Elizabeth (35 N. J. Law 351)

v. Farrish (23 Miss, 483)

163 689

v. Frazier (Ind.) (14 N. E. Rep. 561 [1888]) 473 v. Gloucester Co. (50 N. J. Law 585).. 185 v. Governor (22 Wis. 110 [1867]) 146, 169 878 ...850, 851 .892a 38

v. Harr (W. Va.) (17 S. E. Rep. 794).... v. Harris (89 Ind. 363).

883 891 176

v. Kendall (15 Neb. 262)

v. Kern (51 N. J. Law 259 [1889])..36, 161, 179

v. Licking Co. (26 Ohio St. 531).

171 172

[blocks in formation]

v. McGrath (91 Mo. 386)

v. Michigan City (Ind.) (37 N. E. Rep.
1041)..
.38, 221
144

v. McNally (La.) (21 So. Kep. 27)..

v. New Orleans (La.) (19 So. Rep. 690).... 172 v. Owen (73 Mo. 440 [1881])...

v. Payssan (La.) (17 So. Rep. 481)

$91 164

v. Rulon (N. J.) (14 Atl. Rep. 881 [1888]). 486 v. Scott (17 Neb. 686)

v. Shelby Co. (36 Ohio St. 326)

176
175

v. St. Bernard (10 Ohio Cir. Ct. Rep. 74),
153, 173, 176
v. Stanton (N. C.) (19 S. E. Rep. 96)....... 878
v. Supervisors York Co. (17 Neb. 643).... 176
v. Tice (Oreg.) (48 Pac. Rep. 367)...
v. Treasurer (22 Wis. 660 [1868])..
v. Williams (1 Vroom. 102).

880 46 667

v. York Co, Commrs. (13 Neb. 57)....146. 178 State Nat. Bank v. Fink (Tex. Sup.) (24 S. W. Rep 256)

73

State, etc. v. Murphy (Mo.) (31 S. W. Rep. 781) 45 State of Penna, v. Wheeling Bdge. Čo. (13) .859a How. [U. S.] 518). 71 864

Staunton v. Parker (19 Hun 55 [1879])
Steamboat v. King (16 How. [U. S.] 469).
Steamship Co. v. McAlpine (69 Ga. 437 [1882])
610, 611

« AnteriorContinuar »