Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

lxix

[ocr errors][merged small]

880

657

.

Rayburn v. Comstock (Mich.) (45 N. W. Rep. 318 [1890))

688 Rasmer v. Stone (2 Eden 128)..

706 Raynor v. Drew (Cal.) (13 Pac. Rep. 866)...

10) Rayner v. Linthorne (2 C. & P. 124).

745 Rra, appeal of (27 Alb. Law Jour. 138)

315 Read v. Dunsmore (9 C. & P. 588)..

801 v. Hutchins (71 Me. 590 [1890]).

67, 563 Reading & P.R. Co. v. Balthaser (Pa.) (13 Atl. Rep. 91 (188-]).

885 Rrast v. Donali (Tex.) (19 S. W. Rep. 795)..... 885 Rromad v. San Gabriel Val. Land & Water Co. (Cal.) (50 Pac. Rep. 561)....

1 Rectur v. McDermott (Ark.) (13 S. W. Rep. 331 (1890))....

257, 703, 704, 720 t. Pierce (3 Thopnp. & C. [N. Y.] 416).. 854 Rector, etc., v. Wood (Ore.) (31 Pac. Rep. 18) 707 Rrildil v. Gates (5? la. 210) Ree r. Ins. Co. (138 Mass. 57-2)

405 Ried v. Board (i N. Y. )

69, 701 u. Brewer (Tex.) (36 S. W. Rep. 99, 37 S. W. Rep. 118).

70, 87 Reedie v. Lond. & N. W. Ry. Co. (4 Wels., Hurl. & Gord. 244, 4 Exch. 214),

641, 611a, 666, 667 Reedy v. Smith (12 Cal. 245)

310, 796 Rees v. Lilies (8 Car. & P. 1:26).

567 v. Pettizer (75 III. 175)

816 Reese v. Rrese (90 Pa. St. 89 [1879])..

891 Rerve o. Bank (N. J.) (-3 Atl. Rep. 853)

30 Reeves v. Barlow (L. R 12 Q. B. D. 436 (1881)),

272, 273 v, McGlochlin (2 Mo. App. Rep. 1154).. 521 Regina v. Cimon (93 Canada Sup. Ct. 62) 395 v. Starrs (17 Can. Sup. Ct. 118),

3:9, 395, 414, 553 Reichard v. Warren Co. (31 Iowa 381)

557 Reichenbach v. Sage (Wash.) (13 Pac. Rep.

318, 324 Reid Ice Cream Co. v. Stephens (62 Ill. App. 331)

807 Reier v. Detroit St. & Sp. Wks. (Mich.) (67 N. W. Rep. 1:30)

662 Reilly v. City of Albany (112 N. Y. 30 (1889]).

445, 446 v. Daly (Pa.) (28 Atl. Rep. 493).

794 v. Jones (1 Bing. 30?).

3:20
v. Lee (61 Hun (N. Y.) 6:27, 16 N. Y.
Supp. 313 (1891]).

481, 506
v. Mayor (111 N. Y. 473, 54 N. Y. Super.
Čt. 403, 18 N. E. Rep. 633 (1889]).

54, 149, 154
R-ischenbach v. Sage (Wash.) (43 Pac. R-p.
35:).

678 Rennie v. Wynn (1 Exch. 691 (1819]).

814 Rpsr. Gravid Rapids (73 Mich. 237, 41 N. W. Rep. $3 (1889))...

324, 428, 553, 554, 595 Renton v. Monnier (77 Cal. 449)... 16, 380, 819a Reusch v. Amer. Brew. Assn. (11 La. Ann. 1111, 11 So. Rep. 719).

187 Reuting v. City of Titusville (Pa. Sup.) (34 Atl. Rorp. 916)..

173, 507 Rere. Peto (1 Y. & J. 37)..

379, 552, 5.53 R-ynolds v. Jordan (6 Cal. 108 (1856]). 400, 619 v. Celiwell (51 Pa. St. 298 (1865)),

407, 415, 41, 428, 415, 482
v. Nelson
Wend. 20)

39 v. Van Beuren (31 N. Y. Supp. 8:27) 865 Rhodes v. Cleveland Roll. Mill. Co. (17 Fed. Rep. 406)

124 v. Thomas (Ind.) (3 Carter 638). Rice v. Board of Trustees (Cal.) (10 Pac. Rep. 5:51)

$$ Richardson v. Mahon (L. R. 4 Ir. C. P. 486). 407, 408 v. Shaw (1 Mo. App. 234).

677 Richardson & Co. v. Hampton (la.) (31 N. W. Rep. 871)....

563
Richardson Co. v. School Dist. (Neb.) (64 N.W.
Rep. 218)...

31
Richlands, etc., Co. v. Hilteleitel (Va.) (22 S.
E Rep. 806)..

620
Richmond v. Robinson (12 Mich. 193)..

817 Richmond & D.R. Co. v. Hissong (Ala.) (13 So. Rep. 209).

876 Richter v. Meyer (Ind.) (31 N. E. Rep. 582).. 693 Ricker v. Collins (81 Tex. 662, 17 S. W. Rep.

378 [1891])... ..384, 390, 415, 48! v. Cutter (8 Gray 248)

223 v. Fairbanks (40 Me. 43 (1855]).

730
Ricketts v. Joliff (62 Miss. 440 (1684]).

25
Ridgway v. Grace (Com. Pl.) (21 N. Y. Supp.
934)..

61
Rigby v. Bristol (29 L. J. Exch. 359).

678
Rigdon v. Coules (III.) (30 N. E. Rep. 1060, 31
Ill. App. 630). ...

796
Rigney v. Dution (C. C.) (77 Fed. Rep. 175) 816
Riley v. Black (16 N. Y. Supp. 206 [1891]). 583

v. Brooklyn (56 Barb. (N. Y.) 559). 584
v. Hicks (Ga.) (1 8. E. Rep. 173)

795
v. State Line Sieamship Co. (19 La. Anu.

79).
Rim v. Electric P. Co. (3 App. Div. [N. Y.) 305
(Sup.), 38 N. Y. Supp. 345 (1896])

862
Ripley Co. v. Hill (Ind.) (16 N. E. Rep. 156
(1888])..

429
Rippe v. C. D. & M. R. Co. (23 Minn. 18 (1876]). 891
Risley v. I. B. & W. Ry. Co. (1 Hun 202 11864). 42
v. Sinith (64 N. Y. 516 (1870])

66
Rison v. Moon (Va.) (22 S. E. Rep. 165).....318, 319
Ritchie v. Dist. of Columbia (18 Ct. of Cl. 78).. 757
Ritters' Appeal (9 P. F. Sm. 9)..

25
Robbins v. Chicago (4 Wallacé 679)

611
Robbins v. Mount (33 How. Pr. 24 (1867])

241
Robert v. Sadler (N. Y.) (10 N. E. Rep. 4!
[1887])

266
Roberts v. Berry (2 DeG. M. & G. 284)

326 v. Brett (6 C. B. N. S. 69:-)

169 v. Bury Commrs. (L. R. 4 C. P. 310,

5 C. P. 325), 397, 649, 720, 724, 733, 746
v. Drehmer (Neb.) (59 N. W. Rep.' 11). 691
v. Havelock (3 B. & Ad. 401)..

674
v. Minneapolis Th. Mch, Co. (S. D.) (67
N. W. Rep. 607)

696
v. Myers (+3 Law Rep. 396).

818
v. The Loan & Abstract Co. (63 Iowa
76 (1884))

836
v. Watkins (32 L. J. (N. S.] C. P. 291

[1863). s. c. 14 C. B. (N.'s.) 592)... 473
v. Wilkinson (34 Mich. 1:29)...

69
Robertson v. Lion Ius. Co. (C.C.) (13 Fed. Rep.
929).

427
Robinson v. Baird (Pa.) (30 Atl. Rep. 1010).475, 552
v. Campbell (47 Iowa 625 (1878]).

836 v. Chamberlain (34 N. Y. 389 (1866]),

180, 834
v. Davidson L. R. (6 Exch. 269)

10
v. Donahon (Ga.) (25 S. E. Rep. 491). 794
v. Fiske (25 Me 401
v. Grimes (33 N. Y. Sunp. 291)

629
v. Hyer (Fla.) (17 89. Rep. 745) 561
v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co

(Mich.) (61 N. W. Rep. 1014) 325 v. Mollett (L. R. 7 H. L. 902)

553
v. Parish (62 m. 130 (1891]).

691
v. Patterson (Mich.) (39 N. W. Rep.
21 (1888]).

428

567

152 v. Candle (11 Ga. 605)

695 r. Roberts (24 Wis, 461)

106 r. Williams (2 Fed. Rep. 437 (1887]) 87 Rich r. City of Minneapolis (37 Alb. Law Jour. 58119**))..

266 Richard u. Stanton (16 Wend. (N. Y.] 25)...... 91 V. Warren Co. (31 Iowa 381)

557 Richards o. May (10 Q. B. D. 400 [1843]),545, 552, 595 Richardson o. Abendroth (13 Barb. 16)

863 v. Anderson (1 Camp. 43).

553 v. Grant Co. (Ind) (27 Fed. Rep.

...47, 143

42, 74 v. Rohr (Wis.) (10 N. W. Rep. 668 (1888])

180 v. Shanks (Ind.) (20 N. E. Rep. 713 [1899]).

..437, 491 v. Snyder (25 Peun. St. 203)

677 v. United States (13 Wall. 363 (1871]).

623, 627 v Webb (11 Bush 464 (1875])

667 Robinson & Rea Mfg.Co. v. Mellon (139 Pa. St.

257 (1891]. 21 Atl. Rep. 91 (1890])......483, 483, 187 Robson v. Drummond (2 B. & A. D. 303).

296, 682, ww

496 (1883)).

lxx

SS

$$ Ryder v. Kinsey (Minn.) (61 N. W. Rep. 91),

941, 613, 641 Rylands v. Fletcher (L. R. 3 H. of L., 106).. 613

891

[ocr errors]

316

.65, 90

Robson v. Godfrey, Holt N. P. Cas. 236 (1
Stark. 275)..

.572, 573
v. Miss. R. Log. Co. (61 Fed. 893) 678
Rochester v. Chester (3 N. H. 319, 365)
Rochester W. Li, Co. v. Rochester (3 Comst.
[N. Y ] 463 (1850])...

.247, 248 Rockcliffe v. Pearce (1 F. & F. 300)

571 Rockland, Mt. D. & S. S. B. Co. v. Fessenden (Me.) (8 Atl. Rep. 550 (1887)).

6:29 Rodemer v. Gonuer (9 Gill (.d.] 288)..

139 Roeder v. Bensberg (6 Mo, App. 415)

814 Roderiquez v. State (Tex.) (22 S. W. Rep. 978). 879 Rodick v. Gandell (1 De G, M. & G. 763)

295 Roemer v. Striker (1 N. Y. Supp. 1090)

.....640 Roesuer v. Herman (3 Fed. Rep. 782)

S64
Rrettingers v. United States (26 U. S. Ct. of
CI. 591 [1891])

.584, 684 Rogers v. Allen (17 N. H. 5:29)..

6:27
v. Florence R. Co. (S. Car.) (9 S. E.

Rep. 1059 (1889), s. c. 40 Alb. L.
Jour. 9:23)..

667
v. Hogan (58 Me. 205 (1871])...

601 v. Rogers (139 Mass. 410)

573 v. Straub (96 N. Y. Supp. 1066).

121 V. Walsh (1 Veb. 28). Rohr v. Baker (13 Oreg. 350 (1880]).

602 Rohrman v. Steese (9 Phila. 185).

10 Roloson v. Carson (Md. 208 [18:55]),

432, 433, 436, 498,627 Rome & D. R. Co, v. Chasteen (Ala.) (So. Rep. 91)

651 Romeyn v. Sickles (109 N, Y. 650 [1588]).

812 Roosevelt v. Thurman (1 Johns. Ch.220 (1814]). 486 Roosevelt H. v. N. Y. El. R. Co. (21 N. Y. Supp. 205)

880 Root et al. v. Johnson (6 Vt. 61)

127 Ropes v. Arnold (30 N. Y. Supp. 997)

17 Roreback v. Penna. Co. (Conn.) (20 Atl. Rep. 465 (1890])

887 Rose v. Des Moines R. (39 Iowa 216, 20 Am. Ry. Rep. 320)

86 v. Eclipse Carb. Co. (60 MO. App. 28) 1:25 v. O'Riley (111 Mass. 57 (1872))..

702 v. Trestrail (1 Mo. App. Rep's 510) 726 Rosenberger v. Pacific Coast Ry. Co. (Cal.) (13 Pac. Rep. 963).

809 Ross v. Bd. of Ed. (12 Ohio St. 374)

173
V. McArthur (85 lowa 203, 52 N. W Rep.
125)

385, 428, 415
v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. (5 Hun 488 [1875]).. 044
v. Stackhouse (114 Ind. 200 [1887])

174 v. Union Poc. R Co. (1 Woolw. [U.S.] 26). 706 Rossiter v. Cooper (23 Vt, 522)

310 Fossvally v. Ciiy of New Orleans (19 La. Ann. 7 (1867])

7:20, 144 Rothwell v. Dean (1 Mo. Rep. 309).

675 Rourke v. W. M. Colliers Co. (1 C. P. D. 556).. 655 Rousseau v. Poitras (0)? III. App. 103)..

473 Rowe v. Addison (31 N. H. 306, 319)

853, 858
Roy v, Boteler (10 MO, APp. 213, 294) .477, 478
Royal Ins. (o. v. Parlin & 0. Co. (Tex.) (31 S.
W. Rep. 401)

• 428
Rucle 1. Mitchel (97 MO, 365, 11 S. W. Rep. 2:25
[1899])

439, 564, 595 Ruege v. Gates (Wis.) (38 N. W. Rep. 181 [1888]) 559 Rugg v. Moore (110 Pa 236)..

671 Rulge v. Gates (Wis.) (35 N. W. Rep. 181 (1881]) 69 Rulof v. People of N. Y. (213)..

880 Rush v. Able (90 Pa St. 153)...

862 v. Wagner (1?N. Y. Supp. 2)

704 Rushforth v. Hacfield (î East 24)..

611 Rusling v. Union Pipe & Const. Co. (Sup.) (39 N. Y. Supp. 216)

414, 421, 686 Russell v. Barry (115 Mass. 300 (1871])

697
v. Buckhout (Sup.) (34 N. Y. Supp. 271) 10
v. Horn, etc., Mfg: Co. (Neb.) (59 N. W.
Rep. 901)

701
v. Sa Da Bandeira (13 C. R. IN. S.) 149),

334. 178, 545, 516, 670
V. Seery (Kan.) (35 Pac. Rep. 812).. 429, 526
Ryan v. Blonni (i Dev. Eq. 392).
v. Curran (61 Ind. 315)..

051
v. Fowler (N. Y. 110).

6:1 V. Lynch (68 III. 160)

10 V. Rogers (Cal.) (31 Pac. Rep. 241) 678

Sadler v. Eureka Co. Commrs. (15 Nev, 39) 161
v. Henlock (4 EI. & Bl. 570)

051, 035
Safety Insulated Wire and Cable Co. v. Balti-
more (C. C. A.) (60 Fed. Rep. 110)

183 Sage v. Central R. Co. (99 U.S.:31).

135
Saginaw Gas & Light Co. v. Saginaw (U. S.

Cir. Ct. (Mich.), 2. The Reptr. 579 [1586]). 81
Sainter v. Ferguson (C. B. 710)
St. Albaus Bk. v. Dillon (30 Vt. 124).
St. Clair v. Bowles (9 B. & C. 92)

697
St. Helen's Mill Co. (3 Sawy. 89)

535 St. Johns & H.R. Co. v. Shalley (Fla.) (14 So. Rep. 890).

667 St. Johu v. Potter (Com. PI) (19 N. Y. Supp 230)

310.397, 509, 591 St. Joseph I. Co. v. Halverson (18 Jo. App. 33) 115 St. L. v. McDonald (10 Mo. 009).

070 v. Von Phul (No. Sup.)(51 S.W.Rp. 813)

17, 750, 763 St. L. & C. Ry, Co. v. Drennan (26 Ill. App. 263 (1887)

275 st. L. & P. R. Co. v. Kerr (III.) (8 N. F R-p. 638)

421. 410, 445 St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Bradley (51 Feu. Rep. 630)

883 St. L., etc., R. Co. . Willis (33 Kan. 33.))..66:1, 666 St. L. & T. Ry. v.Johnston (Tex.) (15 S.W.Rep. 101[1891])

801 St. L., etc., Ry. Co. v. Yonley (Ark.) (13 S. W. Rep. 333)

031
St. LB. & J. Co. v. St. L. Brew. Assn. (Mo.)
(31 S. W. Rep. 705).

550
St. Louis G. L. Co. v. City of St. L. (16 Mo. 121) 580
St. L, I, M. & S. Ry, v. Lyman (Ark.) (*? S. W.
Rep. 170, 213

891
St. Mary's Market Co. v. New Orleans (La) (10
So. Rep. 831

767 St. Martin v. Thrasher (10 VČ. 461 (1868) 522 St. P. & N. P. Ry. Co. v. Bradbury (12 Minn. 2:2). (14 N. W. Rep. 1 (18%)])

439, 589 St. Paul v, Seitz (3 Minn. 99)

6.14 St. Paul Water Co. v. Ware (16 Wall 566) Salb v. Campbell (Wis.) (N. W. Rep. 45) Salt Creek v. Bridge Co. (Kan.) (23 Pac. Rep. 303

45 Salters v. Ralph (15 Abh. Pr. 273)

720
Salvin 1. N. Brancepeth Coal Co. (L. R. 9 Ch.
App. 705 (1871])

S69
Samuell v. Howarth (3 Mer. Ch. 972)
Sanborn Map & l'ub. Co. v. Dakin Pub. Co. (39
Fed. Rep. 266).

812 Sanders v. Hutchinson (26 111. 633 [1851]).

259, 3.0, 415, 479, 8:7 v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co. (N. Y.

App.) (39 N. E. Rep. 75).... 91, 197 Sanderson v. Cichersmouth, etc., Ry. Co. (11 Beav. 497)

706 v. Pa. C. Co. (86 Pa. St. 401)

615 Sands v. Potier (Ill. Sup.) (16 N. E. Rep.28?), 25, 691 Sanford v. Commercial T. Mut. Acc. ASSO.

(Sup.) (33 N. Y. Sup. 512), (N. Y.

App.) (41 N. E. Rep. 691).. 311 v. Emery (31 II. 459) v. ist. Natl. Bank (Iowa) (63 X. W. Rep. 459)

316, 319 v. Pawtucket St, Ry, Co. (R. I.) (35 AU. Rep.67)

..616, 651 v. Rawlings (13 NI, 92)

027 v. Santorid (1) Hun (X, Y.) 510). 839 Sang v. Duluth (Min.) (59 N. W. Rep.878).. 76, 699 Santa Cruz 1. Enright (Cal.) (30 Pac. Ren. 197) 883 Santa Cruz Pav. Co. v. Heaton (Cal.) (38 Pac. Rep. 693)

51, 138. 220 Sunta Cruz Rock Pavement Co, v. Broderick (Cal.) (15 l'ac. Rep. 863)....

138, 111, 157 Sirles v. Sharlow (Dak.) (37 N. W. Rep. 7:19 (1888)

103 Sarony v. Burrow Giles Lith. Co. (17 Fed. Rep. 591).

818

639

436

Sancelito L. Co. v. C. U. A. Co. (66 Cal. 253
(1581)...

345 Saver r'. City of New York (Sup.) (11 N. Y. Supp. 957)

638 Saunders o. Clark (29 Cal. 299)

127, 2:37, 580 Sault Sie. Marie r. Van Deusen (40 Mich. 4:29) 43, 142 Siranuah, etc., R. Co. v. Decker (Ga.) (21 S. E. Rep. 379)

530 Savannah & W. R. Co. v. Phillips (Ga.) (17 S. E. Rep. 82)....

661 Saver r. Nichols (5 Cal. 487)

30 Siw telle r'. Drew (1?! Mass. 28).

6:27
Siwells r. Howard (Mich.) (62 N. W. Rep. 156) 370
Saxon r. Wood (Ind.) (30 N. E. Rep. 197).... 87
Saxton t'. Sieberling (Ohio) (99 N. E. Rep. 179). 148

'. Texas. S. F. & N. R. Co. (N. M.) (16
Puc. Rep. 851 (1885])

32 Sayler v. Harrisburg (87 Pa. Sc. 216 [1878]) 218 Savre r. Moore (1 East 361)...

8:22 Savre Lumb. Co. v. Uniou Bank (Colo. App.) (41 Pac. Rep. 844)

17, 158, 764 Scales r. Wiley (Vt.) (33 Atl. R+ p. 771)..101, 106, 689 Scammon r. City of Chicago (25 III. 424 [1861]),

611, 641, 654, 663
v. Denio (72 Cal. 393, 14 Pac. Rep.
95 (1857])..

595, 731
Scanlan r. Houges (C.C.A.) (5? Fed. Rep. 351) 126
Scarbrough 1. Alabama Mid. Ry.Co. (Ala.) (10
So. Rep. 316). ...

866
Stery r. Springfield (112 Mass. 512 (1873]). 43
Schale i. Geruer (Mo. Sup.) (31 S. W. Rep.
:3201...

836 Senanzenbach r. Brough (58 NI. App. 526). . 803 Schaper r. Gradner ( 4 111. 603)

791 Scheible v. Klein (89 Mich. 376, 50 N. W. Rep.

...680, 699 Schriev. Rapp (121 Pa. St. 593 [1883]).

761 Schenker. Rowell (7 Daly 386, 3 Abb. N. Cas. 4211510)

427, 428, 439, 478 Schenck r. Saunders (13 Gray 37).

232 Sain r. Pabst Brew, Co. (Minn.) (66 N. W. Rp.3)..

614 Strass r. Hewlett (Ala) (1 So. Rep. 263) Subicht v. State (56 Ind. 173)

892 Schuide v. Glade (1:26 III. 485 (1888))

491 v. North Yakima Wash.) (40 Pac. Rep. 790)....

428 Shmieder v. Kingsley (Com. Pl.) (26 N. Y. San P. 31)

318 Se?!! rider v. Patterson (Neb.) (57 N. W. Rep.

123 Schofield v. Thompkins (95 III. 190).. 315, 317, 319 Schoui Dist. r. Dauchy (45 Conn. 530).. 372, 669, 674 r. Lundi (67 Kan. 731)..

698, 703 v. Ran.tall (5 Neb. 408).. 412. 428, 450 t'. Sage (Wash.) (13 Pac. Rep. 311),

436, 490 r. Sullivan (Kan.), (29 Pac. Rep. 111)...

557 School Trustees r'. Bennett (7 N. J. Law 513 3 Dutch

237, 239, 240, 669, 674, 677 Sahrritarr. Thornton (17 Fed. Rep. 693). 818 Schrolerr. Galand (131 Pa. St.*).... 702 12136-nfeldt e. Junkerman (20 Fed. Rep. 357

58 Schular r. H. R. R. Co. (38 Barb. 655 [1869)) 667 Schulros r. Eckert (90 Mich. 165, 51 N. W. Rep. 121-9)

370, 411, 720 Srliz O. Lindell (30 Mo. 310).

890 Sumin . Sevmour (24 N. J. Eg. 143).... 177, 555 Surr v. N. Y. & B. Sub. Invest. Bo. (Com.

Pl.) (IR S. Y. Supp. 451. 16 N. Y. Supp. 210).. 43 Sehwandırr. Birge ( 16 Hmm 66)...

885 Schwartz u. Gelmore (15 III. 155 (1807]),

634, 664, 665 t. Saunders (46 III. 18)

210, 676, 677. 6.86, 687, 689 Schwerin r*. De Graff (1 Minn. 351 (875). 370, 418 Smjesu t. Mahou (Cal.) (12 Pac. Rep. 1067),

219, 220 Schwinger 7. Raymond (N. Y.) (11 N. E. Rep. 9:"is)..

895 Scofield r. Graw (63 Vt. 983)..

703 v. McGregor (1 Thomp. & C. (N. Y.1 401)...

693

SS Scott v. Avery (5 H. L. Cases 811 (1855)),

80, 314, 345, 407, 408, 415 v. Davenport (la.) (34 la. 208)...

47 v. Maier (56 Mich. 554 [1885]), 616, 812, 814 v. Liverpool Corporation (5 Jurist (N.S.)

105 (180), 1 Gifford 216, 3 De G. & J.
331, 31 Law Ties 147 (1858]),
314, 414, 415, 416, 421, 428, 446, 509, 510,

514, 520, 131, 744, 747 v. Norfolk & W.R. Co. (Va.) (17 S. E. Rep. 882).

122 v. Raiment (1. R.) (1 Eq. 112).

438 Scott, T. B., L. Co. v. Hafuer-Lothman Mfg. Co.(Wis.) (65 N. W. Rep. 513)

256, 277 Scoville v. Miller (40 lII. App. 37)...

891 v. Tompkins (95 111. 190).

317 Seraggs v. Hill (W.Va.) (17 S. E. Rep. 185) 124 Scrivier v. Pask (18 C. B. (N. S.) 785, L. R. 1 Com. Pleas Chs. 715 [1866])

238, 589, 841 Scroeder v. Garland (134 Pa. St. 277)

162 Searle v. Laverick (L. R.) (9 Q. B. 1:22).

652 v. Parke (N. H.) (34 Atl. Rep. 744). 767 Seaton v. Kendall (61 II. App. 289). 525, 522 Seavey v. Shurick (Ind.) (11 N. E. Rep. 597 (1887))....

601, 618 Secrist v. Board (100 Ind, 59).

766 Seguine v. Spaeth (Com. Pl.) (35 N. Y. Supp. 847)

111 Seibert v. Householder (Pa.) (10 Atl. Rep. 784 [18871)

691 Selby v. Hutchinson (1 Gilman [111.) 319).

439.687. C90, 739 Selpho v. City of Brooklyn (Sup.) (59 N. Y. Supp. 520)

168 Seward v. City of Rochester (N. Y.) (16 N. E. Rep. 318 [188]).

412 Sewer Commrs. v. Sullivan (Sup.) (12 N. Y. Supp. 358).

.428, 122 Sexton v. Chicago (107 III. 323).

146 v. Cook Co. (III.) (114 III. 174 (1891]),

553, 554, 555, 556, 558 Seybolt v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. Co. (95 N. Y. 56)...

563 Seymour v. L. D. Co. (20 N. J. Fq. [5 C. E. Greeu) 396 (1809])...242, 369, 435, 502, 503, 569,

587. 589, 596, 841 Sharkey v. McDermoth (Mo.) (4 S. W. Rep. 107) 105 Sharp v. Smith (332 III. App. 336). Sharpe r. Johnson (0 Barb. 144 (1871]) .310, 697

v. San Paulo Ry. Co. (L, R) (Ch. App.

597 (1873))... 238, 318, 362, 363, 366,
370, 372, 378, 390, 395, 409, 414, 4:6,

428, 439, 416, 545, 553. 558, 589 Shaufelter v. Baltimore (Md.) (31 At. Rep. 439).

.92a Shaver v. Ingraham (58 Mich. 649)

805 V. Murdock (36 Cal. 293).

577 v. Penna. Co. (C. C.) (îl Fed. Rep. 931) 86

v. Sharp Co. (Ark.) (34 S. W. Rep. 261) 116 Shaw v. Andrews (9 Cal. 13 [C. C.), 62 Fed Rep. 460)

126, 514, 518 v. First B. Ć. (Minn.) (46 N. W. R. 146, 44 Min.)

545, 553, 550, 555 v. Trentou (19 N. J. Law 339 (1887]),

139, 110, 155, 173 v. Wolverton W. W. Co. (6 Exch. 137),

372, 545, 553 Shea v. Town of Milford (Mass.) (14 N E. Rep. 761 (1888]).

39, 47 Shefbaur v. Board (V. Y.) (31 Atl. Rep. 454).... 171 Sheffield v. Clark (13 Ga. 92)

531 Sheffield, etc.. Co. v. Gordon (151 U. S. 285. 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 343)

241, 428, 445 Sheffield C. Co. v. Sheffield & R. Ry.Co.(3Ry. & C. Cas. 121)

97 Sheffield Fur. Co. v. Hull Coal & Coke Co. (Ala.) (14 So. Rep. 672)

89 Shrible v. hlein (Mien.) (50 N. W. Rep. 857). 683 Shelbyville, City of, v. Brant (61 IV. App. 153). 892 Shelden v. Fox (Kan.) (29 Pac. Rep. 759 (1892)) 135 Sheldon v. Leahy (Mich.) (69 N. W. Rep. 76)... 703

v. Pruessner (Kan.) (35 Pac. Rep.
201)...

87 Sherman v. Bates (15 Neb. 18), (Neb.) (17 The Reporter 86 [1883])....

243, 257, 678, 831 4.28 Skelly v. New York EI. R. Co. (IN Y. Supp. 301)

30

lxxii

[ocr errors]

.... 188

105

.

SS Sherman, City of, v. Conner (Tex.) (25 S. W. Rep. 321).

703 Shephard v. St. Charles W. P. Rd. Co. (28 Mo. 373 (1859))

590, 6:23 Shepherd v. Lincoln (17 Wend. (N. Y.] 250) 854 Sheppard v. Conquest (17(. B. 4:27)

8:20
Sherman v. Mayor (1 N. Y. 316 (1848])..382, 623, 679
Sherwin v. Nat. c. R. Co. (Colo. App.) (38 Pac.
Rep. 392)..

97 v. Salpaugh (24 Vt. 347 (1852)) 575 Sherwood v. Houtman (N. Y.) (73 Hun 544).... 702 Shibley v. Angel (37 N. Y. 626 [1868])...

49 Shields v. Hickey (26 Mo. App. 194 [1887]). 88 Shiells v. Blackburne (1 H. Bİ. 158)

838 Shines' Ex'r v. Heimburger (1 Mo. App. Rep. 111)....

674, 675 Shinn v. Hicks (Tex.) (45 S. W. Rep. 486 [1887])

377, 558 Shipley v. Fifty Associates (106 Mass. 194) 616 Shipman v. Dist. of Colm. (119 U.S. 148, 703) 580, 600 v. State (43 Wis. 381).

46, 812, E14, 88, 829, 837, 838, 839 Shirk v. Cox (Ind. Sup.) (40 N. E. Rep. 750) 859a Sbively v. Knoblock (Ind.) (33 N. E. Rep. 1028),

493, 494
Shoemaker v. Acker (Cal.) (48 Pac. Rep. 62), 694, 805
Shoenberger v. City of Elgin (Ill. Sup.) (45 N.
E. Rep. 434, 59 III. App. 381)

241 Shook v. Pate (50 Ala. 91 (1871])

891 Short v. McCarthy (3 B. & Ald. 626)

121 v. Statts (58 Ind. 29 (1871]).

111 Shreiner v. Miller (67 Ia. 91 (1885]). 837, 838 Shreve v. Brereton (51 Pa. st. 175 (1865])...317, 318 Shrewsbury v. Tuffts (W. Va.) (23 S. E. Rep. 699)

124 Shrump v. Parfitt (94 Hun (N. Y.] 311).... 479 Shufeldt v. Searing (59 III. App. 341)

885 Shular v. Hudson R. R. Co. (38 Barb. 653)...... 667 Shuite v. Hennesy (40 lowa 352 (1875]),

451, 491, 621, 891 Shute v. Hamilton (3 Daly (N. Y.) 46?)

324 Sibley v. Felton (Mass.) (31 N. E. Rep. 10). 89 Siboni v. Kirkman (1 M. & W. 418).

10 Sickle v. Pattison (14 Wend. 257)..

697 Sickles v. United States (1 Ct. of Cl. 214) 678 Siebe v. San Francisco (Cal.) (46 Pac. Rep. 456). 844 Siegel v. Eaton & Prince Co. (60 III. App. 639), (UI. Sup.) (46 N. E. Rep. 449 [1897]).

674, 677 Sievers v. San Francisco (Cal.) (41 Pac. Rep. 697).

.587, 858 Sigourney v. Sibley (21 Pick. (Mass.) 101). 561 Siler v. Gray (86 N. č. 566).

678 Silsby Mfg: Co. v. Allentown (Pa.) (20 or 26

Atl. Rep. 616)... ..163, 557
v. Town of Chico (24 Fed.
Rep. 893)..

340
Silver v. Conn. R. L. Co. (40 Fed. Rep. 192
[1889])....

365
Siinis v. Brookfield (34 N. Y. Supp. 695).

76 Simmons v. Lawrence (133 Mass. 298)... ..575, 690 Simonds v. Pearce (31 Fed. Rep. 137).

6717
Simonson v. Grant (36 Minn. 139 (1887]).....20, 761

v. Thori (Miun.) (31 N. W. Rep. 861
[1887])....

20
Simpson v. New York, etc., R. Co. (51 N. Y.
Super. Ct. 419). .

566 Sims v. Bice (67 n. 83)

794 v. Jones (S. C.) (20 S. E. R. 905).

126
Sinclair v. Bowles (9 B. & C. 92) 675, 699, 703

v. Tallmadge (35 Barbour 602 (1861)),
325, 326. 314, 369, 395, 411, 417, 445,

555, 698, 699, 701, 702
Sindlinger v. Kerkow (Cal.) (2 Pac. Rep.
932).

348
Singer v. McCormick (4 Watts & S. 265, 266).. 804
Singerly v. Thayer (108 Pa. St. 291)

310
Singleton v. Wilson (9 Tenn. 344)

695
Sinnott v. Mullin (82 Pa. St. ?83 [1876]). 674, 689
Sioux Falls v. Kirby (S. D.) (60 N. W. Rep.
156)

344, 404
Sipperly v. Stewart (50 Barb. 62 (1867]) 612, 619
Sisk v. Garey (27 Md. 101)

SP Skelsey v. United States (23 ci.of cl. 61). 3:20

Skelton v. Fenton Elec. L. & P. Co. (Mich.) (58
N. W. Rep. 609).

890
Skinner v. Bedell's Adm'r (32 Ala. 44)

310
Skym v. Weske Cons. Co. (Cal.) (47 Pac. Rep.
116)

794
Slantey v. Schwalby (Tex.) (19 S. W. Rep. 264
[1892])..

116
Slater v. Mersereau (64 N. Y. 138 (1876)),

244, 663, 666, 667
Sloan v. Hayden (110 Mass. 143)

340
Sloss Marblehead L. Co. v. Smith (11 Ohio Cir.
Ct. R. 213)

687
Slowinin v. Walter (1 Bro. Ch. 418)

317 Slusser T. Co. v. City of B. (47 Iowa 300 (1877]),

578, 579, 580
Small v. Howard (128 Mass. 131 [1880])

8:29
Small House v. Ky. & M. G. Co. (2 Mont. 443
(18761)

861
Smalley v. Mitchell (Mich.) (68 N. W. Rep. 978) 105
Smeltzer v. Miller (Cal.) (45 Pac. Rep. 264)
Smes v. Supt. (Mich.) (25 N. W. Rep. 485)
Smilie v. Fresno Co. (Cal.) (44 Pac. Rep. 556).. 45
Smith v. Aiken (75 Ala. 209)

123
V. Aiken (102 N. Y. 87)

369, 411
v. Alker (102 N. Y. 87 (1886])

417
v. Bd. Miami Co. (Ind) (33 N. E. Rep.
243)

558
v. B. C. & M. R. R. (36 N. H. 459 (1858]),

326, 340, 341, 121, 426, 428, 442, 511, 601, 602 v. Brady (17 N. Y. 173 (1858]),

388, 407, 415, 417. 428. 439, 697, 701, 702 v. Briggs (3 Denio [N. Y.) 73 (1846]),

407, 415, 476 v. Bristol (33 lowa 24)

212, 256, 572 v. City of Newburg (77 N. Y. 136). 35 v. Clark (58 Mo. 145 (1874])

257 v. Coal Co. (83 III. 498)

678 v. Coe (2 Hilt. 365)

573 v. Cooley (5 Daly 401)

428 v. Co-operative D. Assn. (12 Daly [N. Y.] 304)

33 v. Corn (Com. Pl.) (23 N. Y. Supp. 326),

581, 687,728, 730 v. Darby (L. R. 7 Q. B. 716)

643 v. Dickey (74 Tex. 61 (1889)).

813 v. District (20 Conn. 312 (1850])..

698 v. Farmers' Trust Co. (Iowa) (66 N. W.

Rep. 81)..
v. Firsi Cong. Ch. (8 Pick. (Mass.] 178).

698, 703 v. Flanders (129 Mass. 322 [1880]),

214, 222, 228 v. Foster (41 N. H. 220). ...

59 v. Goulding (6 Cush. (Mass.) 154). 107 v. Gugerty (4 Barb. 614)

.567, 701 v. Kron (N. C.) (13 S. E. Rep. 839).. v. Lowell M. H. (8 Piek. 181);

700 v. Mayor (10 N. Y. 504),

138, 139, 140, 156, 176, 427 v. Milne (1 Dowl, 290)

643 v. Milwaukee Build, and Traders' Exch. (Wis.) (64 N. W. Rep. 1041),

640a, 641, 641a, 663, 667 v. Moileson (74 Hun [N. Y.] 606, 26 N.

Y. Supp. 653), (N. Y. App.) (42 N. E.
Rep. 669).

. 20, 21, 271, 445, 739 Monroe (84 N. Y. 354).

794 v. Munch (Minn.) (68 N. W. Rep. 19).

326 v. Newbaur (Ind.) (42 N. E. Rep. 40) 675 v. New York (21 How. Pr. 1)

164 v. New York (Sup.) (31 N. Y. Supp. 783). (42 N. Y. Supp. 522).

138, 139, 140, 156, 176, 427 v. O'Donnell (Com. Pl.) (36 N. Y. Supp.

480). v. Philadelphia (13 Phila. [Pa.] 177. 2

Brews. (Pa.] 4435 ..168, 177, 522 v. Potter (27 Vt. 304 [1855]).. .483, 485 v. Robson (N. Y. App.) (42 N. E. Rep. 667)

814 v Roe (7 Col. 95)..

689 v. Sheltering Arms (35 N. Y. Supp. 62).. 702 v. Smith (28 III. 54 [1862]). v. Smith (45 VI. 133 (1873])..35, 439. 574, 515 v. Sorby (L. R. 3 Q. B. D. 552 [1978]).... 514

389, 468

436

[ocr errors]

797

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

428

[ocr errors]

Smith v. Spratt Mach. Co. (S. C.) (24 S. E.
Rep. 376.)..

310 u. White (5 Neb. 408)

428 v. Wilson (3 B. & Adol. 728 [18:32])... 606 v. Wright (+ Hun 632).

439 Smith & Nelson v. Bristol (33 Iowa 21).

256 Smithmeyer v.United States (147 U. S. 342), 812, 814 Smythe v. Parsons (Kaps.) (14 Pac. Rep. 145 (1887), 37 Kas. 79)...

620 v. Ward (16 lowa 339).

6:27 Snaith v. Smith (25 N. Y. Supp. 513, s. c. 27

N. Y. Supp. 379)........341, 428, 415, 474, 477, 514 Sneda r. Libera (Minn.) (68 N. W. Rep. 36).883, 888 Snell v. Brown (il nl. 1:3 (1873]),

397, 428, 429, 430, 432, 445, 503, 504, 683, 742 v. Cottingham (72 III. 161 (1874]),

439, 601, 701, 704 v. Rogers (Sup.) 24 N. Y. Supp. 3:9)..... 111 Snelling's Will, In re (N. Y.) (32 N. E. Rep. 100))...

888 Snodgrass v. Gavit (98 Pa. St. 221 (1857]).

402, 412, 414, 415 Snow v. Ware (13 Metc. (Mass.) 4').

703 Société, etc., v. Milders (19 L. T. 55)

682 Soderberg v. Crockett (17 Nev. 410)..

439 Somerhy v. Tappan (1 Wriglat (Ohio) 570 (1831!)...

256, 704, 834, 837 Sontag v. Brennan (75 III. 279 (1874)).

676 Souths Adm'r v. Sruth (10 Pa. St. 195). ...385, 419 South, etc., R. Co. v. Pilgreen (62 Ala. 305). .892a South Wales R. Co. v. Whythes (5 DeG. M. & G. SNO)..

706 Soutier c. Kellman (18 Mo. 509 (1859])..

625 Sule v. Seaitle (Wash.) (33 Pac. Rep. 381)...44, 47 Spad-r v. Lawler (17 Ohio 397).

679 Spartali v. Benecke (10 C, B. 222)

618 Spar r. Bijwell (14 Pa. St. 23).. Snearman v. Ward ( All. Rep. 430).

58 Spvarmau v. Texarkana (Ark. 24 S. W. Rep

42 Surcht r. Stevens (N-b.) (65 N. W. Rep. 879).. 18:3 Speck o. Phillips (5 M. & W. 283)

846 Speed v. Aul. & Pac. R. Co. (01 Mo. 303 (1879)),

615, 653, 663 Spence v. Bil, of Com'rs (117 Iud, 573 (1888), 18 N. E. Rep. 513 (1889)

22, 237, 579 Spencer v. Harding (L. R. 5 C. P. 561 (1870]),

182, 183, 187 r. St. Clair (57 W. H. 9)

695 Snerrr r. Fanning (80 III. 371 (1875))

30, 3:26 Spilman v. Parkersburg (W.Va.) (14 S. E. Rep. 279)

45 Spinneş v. Downing (Cal.) (41 Pac. Rep. 797) 797 Spring v. Ansonia Clock Co. (24 Hun (N. Y.) 111)

801 Spring Co. v. Edgar (99 U. S. 615

(1878]) 889 Spring Garden Mut. Ius. Cu, v. Evans (15 Md. 51 (1819))

877 Spruger Lith. Co. v. Falk (C. C. A.) (59 Fed. Rep. 107)

818 Springfield, City of, v. Mathus (121 III. 88

(1888]).

154 v. Weaver (Mo. Sup.) (37 S. W. Rep. 509),

135, 168 Springfield C. A. v. Smith (A2 III. 25.? [1883]),

256, 257, 566, 831, 834 Springfiek! Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Payne (Kan. Sup.) (16 Pau'. Rep. 315).

885 Springfieli Milling Co. v. Lape Co. (5 Oreg. 255 (1874))..

52, 53 Soroenig i. Kental (17 N. Y. Supp. 839) 688 Spurgeon r. McElwain (6 Ohio 41).

76 Sadhari r'. Lee (3 B. & S. 361 (1863]).. 310, 720, 746 S'afton t. 1.50n (Mich.) (69 N. W. Rep. 151, 62 S. W. R-p. 354). .

755, 762, 765 Stafford v. City of Oskalose (64 Iowa 251 (1885)).

645, 884 v. Low (16 Johns. (N. Y.) 67)

169 Standard Gas Lt. Co. v. Wood (61 Fed. R-. :).

320, 670 Stanfl-ld v. Knickerhocker Trust Co. (Sup.) 13 N. Y. Supp. 600)

878 Stanlev v. She Meld & Co. (Ala.) (4 So. Rep. 34 [166])..

38

SS Stannard v. Harrison (24 Law Times 570). .... 8:21 Stanton v. Bell (2 Hawks (N. C.] 145).... 805, 8:27 Stanwick v. Butler-Ryan Co. (Wis.) (07 N. W. Rep. 723)...

887 Star Glass Co. v. Morey (108 Mass. 570 (!871]). 628 Stark v. Parker (? Pick. 267).

699 Starkey v. DeGraff ( Mind. 431 (1876)),

370, 386, 384, 388, 39, 395, 105, 121, 426, 439 Starkweather v. Goodman (48 Conn. 101 (1880])..

370, 377, 553, 558 Starr v. G. C. Min. Co. (6 Montana 485).

445 State v. Atlantic City (N. J.) (9 All. Rep. 759

(1887))..
v. Baldwin (Kan.) (12 Pac. Rep. 318
[1887])...

876 v. Bartley (Neb.) (70 N. W. Rep. 367),

169, 178 v. Baronne (N. J.) (€ Atl. Rep. 295). .135, 529 v. Bell (La.) (21 So. Rep. 7:24). .

426, 709 v. Betis (4 C. C. (Ohiol 86)..

173 v. Bever (Ind.) (11 N. E. Rep. 80-2)..... 426 v. Biddle Pl.) (3 Ohio N. P. 3)... 14 v. Board of Com’rs of Shawnee County (Kan.) (45 Pac. Rep. 616)........

103, 164 v. Bd. of Ed. (12 Ohio St. 376),

116, 169, 172, 176, 178, 187 v. Bd. of Ed. (24 Wis. 683)..

178 v. Brown, etc., Mfg. Co. (R. I.) (1892). 144 v. Bruner (Ind.) (35 N. E. R-p. 2.2).. 147 v. Canal & C. St. Ry. (La.) (10 So. Rep. 910 (1892))....

600 v. City of Trenton (19 N. J. Law 339, 12 Atl. Rep. 90.2 (1888]). .

153, 161 v. Clark (9! N. C. :55).

669 v. Cunningham (Neb.) (59 N. W. Rep. 485)..

199 v. Directors (5 Ohio St. 231)

171 v. Dixon (La.) (16 So. Rep. 589)

891 v. Dixon Co. (Neb.) (378. W. Rep. 9:36). 176 v. Elizabeth (35 N. J. Law 351)

163 v. Farrish (3 Miss. 183)

689 v. Frazier (Ind.) (14 N. E. Rep. 561 (1888]) 473 v. Gloucester Co. (50 N. J. Law 585).. 185 v. Governor (22 Wis. 110 (1867)) 146, 169 v. Harr (W. Va.) (17 S. E. Rep. 791).. 878 v. Harris (89 Ind. 363).

..850, 851 v. Hayes (78 Mo. 307).

8920 v. Heckart (62 Mo. Apn. 427).

38 v. Hendel (Idaho) (35 Pac. Rep. 836). 883 v. Henderson (9 W. Va. 147)..

891 v. Kendall (15 Yeh. 262)

176 v. Kern (51 N. J. Law 259 [1899])..36, 161, 179 v. Licking Co. (26 Ohio St. 5:31).

171 v. Marion Co. (39 Ohin St. 188).

172 v. Marion Co. Ct. (Mo. (30 S. W. Rep. 103, 31 S. W. Rep. 103)

.892 v. Martin (S. C.) (25 S. E. 113).

891 v. McGuilmy (t Ind. 7 (1852]).

403, 718 v. McGrath (91 Mo. 386)

196 v. Michigan City (Ind.) (37 N. E. Rep. 1011)..

.38, 221 v. McNally (La) (21 So. Rep. 27).

141 v. New Orleans (La) (19 So. Rep. 690).... 172 v. Owen (73 Mo. 410 (1891])....

891 v. Payssan (La.) (17 So. Rep. 481)

161 v. Ruilon (N. J.) (14 Atl. Rep. 881 (1888]). 486 v. Scott (17 Neb. 686)

176 v. Shelby Co. (36 Ohio St. 326)

175 v. St. Bernard (10 Ohio Cir. Ct. Rep. 74),

153, 173, 176 v. Stanton (N. C.) (19 S. E. Rep. 96)....... 878 v. Supervisors York Co. (17 Noh, 613). 176 v. Tice (Oreg.) (18 Pac. Rep. 367).. 880 v. Treasurer (?! Wis. 660 (1868]).

46 v. Williams (1 Vroom. 10).....

667 v. York Co. Commrs. (13 Neh. 57) .116. 178 State Nai. Bank v. Fink (Tex. Sup.) (4 S. W. Rep 256)

73 State. pic. v. Murphy (Mo.) (31 8. w. Rep. 787). 15 State of Penna. v. Wheeling Bage. Co. (13 How. (U. S.) 518).

.859 Staunton v. Parker (19 Hun 55 (1879))

71 Steamboat v. King (16 How. [U. S.) 169). 864 Steamship Co. v. McAlpine (09 Ga. 437 [1882])

610, 611

..

« AnteriorContinuar »