Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

of Southern gentlemen whose voice is soft and placid when he is quiet, but like that of a bellowing bull when he is aroused-he added to the natural loquacity of a Virginia birth the expressive vocabulary of a Western railroad man. The vigorous and impulsive Colonel has pounded the table in many languages clearing up international disputes which had reached an impasse, utterly unsolvable by the parties themselves without our disinterested intervention, and has been no small factor in keeping the wheels going around for he is still in Austria as the Government's Technical Advisor in Transportation.

Having in mind our trouble at Trieste and our desire to secure a route through Germany from Hamburg into the heart of central Europe by train and canal, Hoover found the opportunity of arranging it with the Germans. He had sold them some two hundred odd millions of dollars worth of American food for gold in hand paid, but made a condition for transportation across Germany of our food-stuffs. We used Hamburg as a base port, thence up the Elbe through the canals and across the border of Bohemia at Schandau. There we established, another Interallied Commission consisting of one of our transportation men, Major Burke, of Boston, one German, and one Czechoslovak. Thus we ensured ourselves against being tied up by international troubles, relieved the congestion at Trieste, and improved our deliveries. As time went on our men were spotted in the seaports, important railway centres, along boundary lines, and at national capitals, all hooked up to the central Vienna office by private wire, both telephone and telegraph. The wires hummed, for we had no time to write letters-the movements of everything were too fast, but every morning at his desk in Paris, Hoover knew to the ton the amount of foodstuffs imported or which we had bought in that great territory during the preceding day; he knew exactly what the starving people would get at five o'clock in the morning who lined up as early as four o'clock the evening before, and who fought at times like beasts for their places in those lines.

With our close knit and comprehensive organization well in hand, I at once lashed out for the commodity surpluses of each country, despatched an expedition to the Ukraine in southern Russia, and took stock in each of the several countries of the commodities which might be exchanged: potatoes in the twenty

five thousand ton lot, steel bridges, furniture by train loads, gasolene, oil, sugar, salt, pigs, arms, munitions, but principally wheat and maize.

Meanwhile we had been working over problems of finance. They were as badly complicated as those already referred to along other lines. Inter-state jealousies were so bitter that practically all financial relations had been broken off; more than that the various currencies of the several states had a depreciated and often uncertain value, and no state would receive the money of another on any terms. It must suffice in this space to say that there was a complete break-down of international exchange; yet, because there were commodities in every state useful to some other state, it was absolutely necessary to arrange some method by which exchanges could be effected. I resorted to the most primitive financial system of history-barter and trade. To take care of balances of credit I established clearing houses in Vienna and Zagreb and, with incredible difficulty finally managed to effect satisfactory bases of exchange on balances, so that in the end the tremendous business that we were shortly doing was conducted in an orderly fashion and every debt and obligation was eventually paid up.

Simple as it sounds to say that barter and trade was the basis for the conduct of the bulk of our business, it was astonishing and at times disheartening to encounter the difficulties we did. The plain fact was that all the economic machinery of the whole area was smashed. Again, a concrete example may serve to show the involved nature of our transactions.

I

RESTAMPED MONEY

HAVE already indicated that large stores of wheat were held in the fertile Banat region, now divided between Greater Serbia and Rumania, and this food we early set about possessing for the relief work in other states that were without agricultural territories, primarily in Montenegro and along the Dalmatian coast. At the outset the Serbs were bitterly opposed to the exportation of any of this grain, though at the time they were so new at government that few of their amateur officials had any broad notion of policy whatsoever and none of them knew exactly what stores the country had. Several meetings with the ministry resulted finally in an agreement to release one thousand tons; these we began

[ocr errors]

moving at once by trucks. But for the large transaction I had in mind it became necessary to arrange a more complex deal: our first stumbling block was the absolute refusal of Serbia to accept payment for the grain in Austrian currency-between fifty and one hundred million kronen-because Serbia wanted no more of that money within her borders than she had. To meet this objection the American Relief Administration took over fifty million kronen from the Austro-Hungarian bank at Zagreb, sent it to Jugo-Slavia by a special train under the care of American officers-they were corporals and sergeants, by the way, but they wore the American uniform, so that, in practice, they were as imposing as generals-and delivered it to the Jugo-Slavs for stamping with their official Jugo-Slav imprint. Once stamped this money was turned over to an Austrian purchasing agent, who paid for the wheat.

and

In the meantime the Jugo-Slavs and the Austrians had gotten into one of their periodic bitter feuds over a boundary matter and military operations had started on both sides. But we could not permit one war, more or less, to interfere with the feeding of the starving: despite furious diplomatic interchanges we told both sides that we were going through with that wheat. It developed at this point that the Serbs needed salt; in a manner of speaking we coerced them with salt. Against all these obstacles train movements were started and food moved and the starving were fed. Over 80,000 tons of foodstuffs were transported in this transaction; 82,000 tons were purchased and ready to move, and cattle, pigs, and 3,000 head of horses were sent forward. The horses, I am compelled to say, were shipped and killed for meat. And, as though we had not difficulties enough, many of our stock trains were stopped and military inspectors of three or four states took turn and turn about, at the various borders, in commandeering horses for their military needs. It was only with the greatest effort that we succeeded in checking this insolence, but eventually the horses arrived.

BOLSHEVISM AT THE RAMPARTS

unnecessarily persistent in his thankless task; but it must be remembered that he was looking beyond the momentary needs of these countries that he was feeding and succoring Balkanized central Europe only as an incident to the fight he was making to throw back the red wave of Bolshevism that, all this time, was threatening the puny and chaotic states. And even despite his efforts, and ours in the field, Bolshevism did, in the end, get a foothold, and the battle became a hand-to-hand conflict instead of a long distance economic war of prevention. Bolshevism stormed the ramparts at last, and we closed in for the death grapple!

The scene shifts from Vienna, whence all our activities were directed and from where they continued to be carried on, as regards food and the economic rehabilitation, during the succeeding weeks, to Budapest. Hungary had been a half-hearted adherent of the Prussian cause from the first; one of the men who brought about her final surrender and withdrawal was Count Michael Karolyi, a Hungarian aristocrat and a man of great wealth, cultured, traveled, and as proud and commanding a figure as there was in all central Europe. Karolyi, when Hungary could fight no longer and fell prostrate under the feet of the French, had spoken in behalf of his beloved land; he had been heard patiently because it was a well-known fact that he had always been anti-German. The Allies, through the French, assured Karolyi and the Hungarian people that, if he were put at the head of the Government, he would be given the moral support of the Allies and the proud Magyars would be enabled to save their national life. Boundaries were fixed after long arguments-Hungary lost much territory, but she retained enough to make existence possible.

Karolyi was chosen first President of the Hungarian Republic. Hungarian Republic. His people believed in him; their hearts began to beat again. with hope for the future. But their jealous and pugnacious neighbors began almost at once to slight and insult them. Jugo-Slavia crowded in from the south; on the north the Czechs made unwarranted advances; from the

THIS was a sample of our experiences in east, suddenly, came the Rumanians, boldly

attempting to restore these very peoples to a place where their governments could function, where they could get work and earn money for food, and where that food could be delivered to them. It was trying work. At this distance it may seem that Mr. Hoover was

the

crossing the boundary line laid down Paris conference, and moving westward into rich Hungarian territory. Karolyi's power began to wane at once. He pleaded with his people for tolerance and patience, he appealed frantically to Paris for help-for the fulfillment

of its promises. Paris moved weakly in the matter; the Rumanians flouted its edicts and made still another advance. Karolyi, the friend of the Allies, could not hold Magyar territory inviolate from the despised Czechs thus the word went about. Karolyi held on tenaciously, fighting for time, protesting to the Czech Government, calling frantically on Paris; seeking to arouse in his own people the fortitude and faith they had held throughout the bitter years of war. But no help came; no response was given from any quarter. The Hungarians were fascinated by the Bolshevist promises and pictures that were now flung openly before them in the very streets of Buda

pest. Labor joined the forces of the Reds in small, but increasing numbers. Secretly plans were made for the disruption of the Karolyi Government, and on the evening of March 21st, with the republican army going over to Bolshevism by battalions, Karolyi's grip relaxed and his administration fell. The Reds, who had been hard at work with money and propaganda, at once leaped into the saddle. Bela Kun, getting into instant wireless connection with Lenin in Moscow, promptly and effectively threw entire Hungary under the Bolshevist régime, and there began a new reign of terrorism and its attendant economic disintegration.

Next month, Mr. Gregory will describe his battle with Bela Kun and Bolshevism in Hungary.

S

WHAT RUSSIA THINKS OF
THE BOLSHEVIKI

The Economic Struggle in Russia As Viewed By One Who
Has Taken Part in It. Shall We Trade with Russia?

BY SIR PAUL DUKES

Late Chief of British Secret Intelligence Service in Soviet Russia

TOLEN GOLD," "Compromise with murder," "Degradation of our national dignity." Yes, this is all true -except that perhaps the last is only a half truth, for there is another side to the question, which I am going to put. Postulating the proposition that foreign enterprise is indispensable to the eventual reconstruction of Russia, the first essential in all matters relating to that country is a clear understanding of the present position and an accurate estimation of the principles of what is termed "Communism" and the degree to which those principles have actually been applied, successfully or unsuccessfully. That is what I want first to elucidate.

The fundamental principle of Communism, as interpreted by the Bolsheviki, is the forced suppression of private enterprise, individual initiative, and personal ambition based on hope of profit. Yet the only means the Bolsheviki ever possessed of persuading the Russian workers and peasants to support the Bolshevist régime was the promise of something

for nothing. And this being contrary to Communist principle, it follows that Communism has not been established. Trouble began way back in 1918. Before Communism (a conception unintelligible to the peasantry who form four fifths of the Russian population) could be introduced, a means had to be devised to enlist the favor of a majority of the peasant class. So the poor peasants were promised enrichment at the expense of the well-to-do. For nearly a year provincial Russia was ruled by so-called "Committees of the Village Poor," bodies to which only the non-possessing peasants might be deputed, which were authorized to seize the property of the wealthier peasants and divide it among themselves. For this purpose the peasants were classified, as rich, middle, and poor. The first were such as by industry, enterprise, and thrift had raised themselves to positions of independence; the second consisted of those who were well on the way to attaining this position; while the third were such as by misfortune, incompetence, or idleness were possessed of nothing. The

third category coincided largely with the mass of stupid and illiterates, and included furthermore the class of tramps, slackers, and goodfor-nothings.

The "Committees of the Village Poor," drawn exclusively from the third category, set to work with a will, dispossessed the rich, and distributed their goods amongst themselves, a portion going to the Government. The middle peasants at first sided with the poor in despoiling the rich, until it was their turn to be despoiled, when they became enemies of the Bolshevist system. The extraordinary phenomenon was eventually witnessed of the rich peasants being driven into the Bolshevist camp, because, the tables being turned, Bolshevist policy afforded them an opportunity of revenging themselves on those who had become rich at their expense. The imposition of a war tax at the end of 1918, however, finally alienated the sympathies of the entire peasantry, for the rich "poor" would not pay poor" would not pay because they were technically poor, while the poor "rich" could not pay because they had nothing left. This was the end of Communism in the villages. Chaos reigned, the Committees were dissolved by the Government and replaced by new Soviets, while the latter, packed with Communist nominees, ceased to be "Soviets," becoming mere committees of the Communist Party. In view of peasant

could be completely suppressed. The most marked effect of the forced closing down of private business houses has been merely to transfer trade from the stores and shops to the sidewalks, streets, and market-places. It is estimated that tens of thousands of people daily turn out into the streets to dispose of wares in exchange for money or food, or to buy up food and goods, especially jewelry and other valuables, for purposes; of speculation. While the workers in the factories were starving I have purchased on the marketplaces of Moscow the finest white flour, butter, sugar, eggs, tea, and even candy. Sellers and buyers alike are denounced by the Government as "counter-revolutionaries" and "enemies of the people," and periodically the marketplaces are raided by armed bands who seize the goods and arrest a few dozens of the thousands of traders. None the less this private commerce has continued on such a scale that only a small percentage of the "sackcarriers" (as private traders are called, carrying their goods in sacks) are arrested daily at the stations. The majority storm the platforms en masse regularly every morning, and despite their speculative prices they are regarded as heroes and benefactors by the harassed citizens.

SUPPRESSING THE COOPERATIVES

IN SUPPRESSING the coöperative organ

hostility the Government renounced the policy Ntions the Bolshevist Government met

of socialization of the land, but the peasantry would still have broken into open revolt against what was called "Commissarocracy" (that is, the tyranny of local Commissars) were it not that the fear of the restoration of their newly acquired land to the landlords who supported Kolchak, Denikin, and Wrangel made them passively acquiesce in the present administration and even actively oppose the militarist counter-revolution.

Meanwhile, the chief measure of Bolshevist administration designed to establish Communism in the towns was the suppression of private trading. This took two forms: (1) the prohibition of trading by individual dealers, either wholesale or retail; and (2) the suppression of the coöperative organizations. The former measure has never succeeded. Private illicit trading, often carried on under conditions of extreme difficulty and even danger, continue in the teeth of the Bolshevist authorities to this day, and on such a scale that, although armed force is employed against it, it never

continue

with greater success. As little appears to be known on this side of the Atlantic regarding the Russian coöperatives, and as they are destined to play a conspicuous part in the reconstruction of Russia, I will dwell for a moment on their origin and development.

At the commencement of the Bolshevist régime there existed three distinct branches of coöperative organizations in Russia: the Coöperative Union of Consumers, the Credit Cooperative, and the Coöperative Union of Producers, all acting in close harmony with one another. The first of these originated just over twenty years ago with a capital of 800 roubles, representing 800 members, each contributing one rouble. In 1914 this union. numbered 319,479 members, with a yearly turnover of more than ten million roubles, while a phenomenal growth during the war left it in 1917 with a membership of 10,269,757 with a turnover of more than two hundred million roubles. About fifty million people,

including members' families were served by this union alone. It possessed thirty factories and industrial concerns. It had its own flour mills, confectionery works, fisheries, tobacco, soap and boot factories,, chemical works, and paper mills. The combined membership of all cooperative unions in Russia in 1917 amounted to one third of the fotal population.

The motives of the Bolshevist Government in suppressing free coöperation were obvious. Despite many defects, due to its mushroom growth, Russian coöperation represented a widespread popular democratic movement, under popular control, and embracing all classes without distinction. It was thus the antithesis of Bolshevism. It was obvious that if Bolshevist propaganda was to have any success the field must be kept absolutely clear of competition.

In January, 1920, the British Government made a proposal to trade with Russia, through the medium of the coöperative unions, independently of the Bolshevist Government. The Bolsheviki promptly arrested and imprisoned the last remaining coöperative leaders, deposed their accredited foreign representatives, and proclaimed that the coöperative unions had voluntarily" amalgamated themselves with the Bolshevist Commissariat of Food and had become a state institution.

[ocr errors]

LENIN'S DECEITFUL TACTICS

ENSATIONAL rumors recently emanat

Helsingfors now depict Lenin in the light of a leopard proclaiming his intention to the world at large of changing his spots. After four years of fulmination against society in general, of denunciation of capitalist and bourgeois "dictatorship," and advocation of a bloody worldrevolution which shall open the sluices of lawlessness, pillage, and crime, Lenin suddenly appears in the guise of a peacemaker, extending an olive branch to the "vicious bloodsuckers" of the foreign capitalist class! "Communism," he says in effect, "cannot cannot restore Russia. So we will get foreign capitalists to reconstruct Russian industry and make of Soviet Russia a garden."

for the Constituent Assembly? Yet it was he who dispersed that gathering at the point of the bayonet. Did not Lenin socialize the land, but, finding the entire peasantry against him, made his first "concession to capitalism" by restoring private land ownership, "temporarily," hoping to be strong enough later to abolish it again? Was it not Lenin who advocated the establishment of workers' committees in the factories? Yet it was he who abandoned those committees, introduced "iron labor discipline," the ten and twelve hour working day, censored strikes as "counter-revolutionary," and deprived the workers of the right of free speech and free meeting. Did not Lenin also encourage the formation of army committees to disintegrate the former army, and subsequently abolished them to reinstate Czarist officers? Lenin it was who cried, in 1917, "All power to the Soviets!" But it was he who turned those "Soviets" into committees of the Communist Party, forbidding admission to any but Bolsheviki. For propagandist purposes Lenin now calls his Government the "Soviet Government," whereas according to his own definition of a "Soviet" as a "freely elected council representative of labor" there is today not a single Soviet from end to end of Russia. For propagandist purposes also Lenin adopts for his Government the title of "Government of Workers and Peasants," when in reality the country is ruled by a Communist camarilla, with a following (according to Lenin's own estimate) of not more than of 1 per cent. of the Russian population, while the workers and peasants are mercilessly deprived of every vestige of participation in the administration of their affairs. "We will pay the peasants for their food in paper money," says Lenin, but privately he adds, "for paper money will soon be worthless, so we shall really get the peasants' produce without paying for it at all." These are all Leninist tactics—in other words, deliberate, calculated, and systematized deceit and so is his olive branch to capitalism.

No. Tactics may change, but Lenin remains the same. We will not be deceived by his efforts to scrape off his red paint. The Bolsheviki have prophesied the world revolution as regards revolution daily since they came into power. power. I personally participated in huge demonstrations in Petrograd celebrating the outbreak of the world revolution on July 20, 1919. No one was so bewildered as the Bolshevist demonstrators when it was subse

We must not be misled by Lenin's strategical acrobatics. Lenin may swerve as regards tactics, but not in his goal. Indeed, he has constantly swerved in his tactics. Was it not Lenin who demanded universal suffrage? Yet free elections are now completely suppressed. Was it not Lenin who loudest of all clamored

« AnteriorContinuar »