 | Fredric Jameson, Masao Miyoshi - 1998 - 420 páginas
...particulars — is that such relations are first and foremost ones of tension or antagonism, when not outright exclusion: in them each term struggles to...state claiming universality, for example, such as the United States or the West, and another claiming local particularity; or between particulars; or between... | |
 | J.C. Smart - 2000 - 578 páginas
...particulars — is that such relations are first and foremost ones of tension or antagonism, when not outright exclusion: in them each term struggles to define itself against the binary other (1998, p. xii). Globalization forces do not signify that there is no nationalism, no national sovereignty,... | |
 | Rebecca Saunders - 2003 - 320 páginas
...groups." Such relations are, he argues, "first and foremost ones of tension or antagonism, when not outright exclusion: in them each term struggles to define itself against the binary other." Jameson and Miyoshi, The Cultures of Globalization, xii. 28. Sassen, Globalization and Its Discontents,... | |
 | Gail A. Bulman - 2007 - 288 páginas
.... . . Such relations," he suggests, "are first and foremost ones of tension or antagonism, when not outright exclusion; in them each term struggles to define itself against the binary other" (1998, xii). While tension has always marked constructions of nation and national identity in Latin... | |
| |
... what we now need to add to the other qualifications implicit in the formulation — binary or point-to-point relations already being rather different from some plural constellation of localities and particulars — is that such relations are first... 