Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

guinary religious contentions. The The two auxiliary measures, blessings of the latter period were which followed in the train of the to be attributed solely to the na hill for the relief of the Roman ture of those laws, which granted Catholics, and were intended to toleration to all religious creeds, at facilitate its progress, require only the same time that they maintained a very brief notice. a just, a reasonable, and a moderate The one was a bill for regulating superiority in favour of the estab- the exercise of the elective franlished church. Their lordships chise in Ireland ; and it proceeded were now called upon to put Pro- upon the principle of raising the testants and Catholics on the same qualification of a voter to a freefooting; and if they consented to hold of 10l. annual value. It was do this, certain he was, that the introduced by Mr. Littleton on consequence would be religious dis- the 22nd of April; and on the sension, and not religious peace. 26th of that month, it was read a The present system had the expe- second time, 233 voting for it, and rience of its good results to recom 185 against it. Its opponents were mend it; and he preferred it, of a very mixed description : for therefore, to the experiment pro- Mr. Brougham, Mr. Denman, and posed in the present bill

, or to any Mr. Lambton, with several others other that he had yet heard sug- of a similar mode of thinking, regested.

sisted it as an unjustifiable disUpon a division, the numbers franchisement of a vast body of the were, Contents, present 84; proxies electors of Ireland, and on this 46—130: Not Contents, present question were found voting with 113; proxies 65-178: so that Mr. Peel and the high Tory memthere was against the bill a maó bers; while sir Francis Burdett jority of 48.*

and Mr. Plunkett were seen in

(Earl

List of the Majority and Minority.

MAJORITY.-Present. Duke of York Aylesford Lord Chancellor Bathurst Lord Privy Seal Digby

Dukes. Enniskillen Beaufort

Harewood Dorset

Home Newcastle Liverpool Richmond Longford Rutland

Macclesfield Wellinglou Mayo

MARQUIS8L6. O'Neil Anglesea

Penbroke Aylesbury

Pomfret Exeter

Radnor Hertford

Rochford Lothian

Scarborough Northampton Shaftesbury Salisbury

Stamford Thorond

Strange Winchester

VISCOUNTS. EARLS. Beresford Abergavenny Exniouth Abingdon

Lake

Lorton

Gifford
Sidmouth

Grantley
Sydney

Grey
LORDS. Hawke
Arden

Kenyon
Beauchamp

Kinnoul
Bexley

Lonsdale
Bolton

Mansfield
Boston

Meldrum
Browyılow

Aboyne)
Carbery

Middloton
Cathcart

Montagu
Cbarleville

Northwick
Clenbrassill (Earl Orford
Roden)

Penshurst
Colohester

Powis
Coinbermere

Ravensworth
Dalhousie (Earl) Rodesdale
De Clifford

Rodney
De La Zouch Rolle
Delamere

Saltersford (Eari
Dufferin

Courtoun)
Dyrevor

Sheffield
Falmouth

Stanhope
Gambier

Stuart (Earl Moray)

[ocr errors][ocr errors]

Ely

[ocr errors]

the opposite array. The bill went a majority of 168 to 53; but the
into a committee, and was there result of the discussion on the 17th
debated on the 10th of May, when of May in the House of Lords,
an amendment was negatived by caused it to be abandoned.
'Teynham

Durham

Waterford
Verulam
Exeter
Hereford

Winchester
Walsingham Gloucester
Willoughby de Lichfield

MINORITY.-Present.
Broke
Lincoln

Dake of Sussex Ormond
ARCHBISHOPS. Llandaff

Lord President Oxford
Armagh
London

DUKES.

Rosebery
Canterbury
Oxford
Argyll

Rosslyn
York

Peterborough Buckingham Somers
BISHOPS. St. Asaph

Devonshire

Spencer Bath and Wells St. David's

Grafton

St. Gerinain's
Bristol
Worcester
Leinster

Suffolk
Chester

Paired of
Portland

Tankerville
Chichester

LORDS.

MÁRQUISSES. Wicklow
Down
Bayning
Bute

Wilton
Elphin
Braybrooke
Camden

VISCOUNTS.
Proxies.

Conyngbam

Clifden
Downshire

Down
Dukes. Carleton

Lansdown

Dudley and Ward Clarence

Lords.

Londonderry Duncan
Cumberland
Bagot

Queensberry Hereford
Manchester

Brodrick(Midloton) EARLS. Maynard Marlborough Coventry

Aberdeen

Melville
MARQUIS.
Dormer
Albemarle

Torrington
Cholmondeley Douglas

Breadalbane

LORDS.
EARLS. Douglas (Earl Mor-

Bristol

Abercromby
Cardigan

ton)
Caledon

Auckland
Carrick
Fisherwick (Mar. Carnarvon

Calthorpe
Chatham

Donegal)
Charlemont

Cawdor
Chichester
Forbes
Clare

Dacre
Clancarty
Forrester
Clarendon

Dundas
Craven
Glenlyon
Cork

Ellenborough
Egremont
Gordon (M. of
Cowper

Foley
Errol

Huntley)
Darlington

Gage
Ferrers
Gort
Darnley

Grantham
Graham (D. of Mon- Harris

Donoughmore Holland
trose)
Le Despencer Essex

Howard of Effing-
Harcourt
Loftus (Marquis of Fitzwilliam

bam Howe

Ely)
Fortescue

Howard of Waldon
Kellie
Manners
Gosford

King
Malmesbury Newburgh

Grey

Lilford
Manvers
Oriel
Grosvenor

Lynedoch
Mount-Edgechunbe Ribblesdale

Hardwicke

Montford
Nelson
Rivers
Ilchester

Napier
Norwich (D. of Gor- Ross (Earl Glas Jersey

Selsey
don)
gow)
Kingston

Suffield
Paulett
Saltoun
Lauderdale

Yarborough
Plymouth
St. Helena
Limerick

BISHOP.
Romney
Stowell (Marq. of Minto

Norwich
Stradbroke

Waterford) Morley
Talbot
Vernon

Proxies.
Wemyss

Wodehouse Winchelsea

Bishops.

Dokes. Somerset VISCOUNTS. Bangor

Bedford

MARQUISES.
Arbuthnot
Carlisle
Hamilton

Headfort

The other auxiliary measure pense would be about 250,0001. was, to make a public provision per annum. The resolution was for the Catholic clergy. With carried by a majority of 205 to this view, lord Francis Leveson 162 : but no ulterior proceedings Gower, on the 29th of April mov were taken upon it. ed the following resolution :“ That it is expedient that a pro

The frequent discussion of the vision should be made by law to- Roman Catholic question, which wards the maintenance of the secu had been brought forward so relar Roman Catholic clergy exer- peatedly, that the public mind had cising religious functions in Ire- become comparatively insensible land." This resolution he pre

to any lively impression with refaced by a statement of the general spect to it; the dissipation of old outline of the plan which he was

terrors and alarms by the support to submit to the House. The given to the principles of concesnumber of Catholic priests in Ire- sion by men in whom the nation land amounted, he said, to about had great confidence; and the prea thousand, and that of the coad- valence of certain speculative opijutors or curates was nearly the nions concerning the origin and same; making the whole estimate nature of political rights, had unof parish priests about 2,000. He doubtedly diminished both the proposed to divide these into three keenness and the numbers of the classes, and to allot to 200 of them opponents of Catholic equalization. an annual stipend of 2001. each; In the course of the present sesto 800, a stipend of 120l. ; and to sion, however, the spirit of resist1,000, a stipend of 601. The four ance to the Catholic claims seemed archbishops were to have each to gain strength. Though many 1,500l. per annum; the 22 bishops, petitions in their favour were pre1,000l. ; and the 300 deans, 3001. sented, yet the petitions against each. The total amount of ex them were much more numerous ;

and they increased in number, the Sligo

VISCOUNTS.

longer the subject occupied the Stafford

Anson Tweedale

public attention ; and the failure Granville Wellesley Melbourne

of the proposed measure was geneEARIS.

LORDS. rally acceptable both in England Belmore Alvanley

and Scotland. Besborough Amherst

There is one remark which apBlesington

Belharen Buckinghamshire Carrington

plies to sir Francis Burdett's bill, Carlisle Churchill

and indeed to every other which Carysfort Clinton

has been brought forward on the Cassilis

same subject. The reasonings of Cornwallis Ducio

the advocates of the Catholics, if De La Warc

Erskine Derby Grenville

good for any thing, destroy the Egremont Gwyder

principle of exclusion in its full Elgin Hill

extent, and raise the Catholics to Garnard Hutchinson

an equality with Protestants in all Harrington Maryborough

respects. But the details of the Hopeloun

Saye and Sele
Lucan
Sondes

bill speak a very different doctrine: Mulgrave

Bishop,

for they exclude the Catholics Waldegravo Rochester

from a few offices, while they ad

Crewe

mit them to all the rest. Thus to perfect equality, so that they the fundamental principle of ex may now gain such a vantage clusion is practically admitted ; and ground, as may hereafter render then what becomes of the reasonings resistance to the utmost of their on that side of the question ?- If a demands altogether unavailing. Catholic is excluded from wearing If the apparent contradiction bethe crown, from intermarrying with tween the principles of the advothe sovereign, from being chane cates of the Catholics and the meacellor, and from being lord lieute sures which they propose proceeds nant of Ireland; what are the from the latter cause, the country grounds upon which it is proved, has some reason to complain. In that it is unjust not to admit him questions of such vast importance, to fill the situation of prime mi. policy ought to give way to the nister, president of the council, most complete frankness and holord chief justice, lord president of nesty; measures like this ought the court of session, or to hold any not to be brought forward partially other of the higher offices of state? or carried by piece-meal: the whole Do the Catholics admit the pro- extent of the required concession priety and justice of a limited ex should be avowed openly and at clusion, such as that contained in

For the legislature must sir Francis Burdett's bill? Or do walk in blindness and error, if it they and their friends deem it deliberates on a bill as a complete prudent not to carry as yet their and final measure and decides on principles to their full extent, but it in that view, when in truth the to soothe alarm and bribe opposition bill is merely a portion of a wider into quiescence by not laying claim scheme.

once.

CHAP. IV.

Cornmittee of the Lords appointed to inquire into the State of Ireland

Evidence given before the Committee--Subdivision of Farns-Extreme Poverty of the Peasantry-Their want of Employment-Their absolute Dependence on their LandlordsThe

Operation of the Tithe System in Ireland-Abuse of legal Proceedings-Distraining the growing Crops---Civil Bill Ejectment-Abuse of the Process of Custodiam and the "Civil Bill Process Miscellaneous Topics of Investigation before the Committee-Motion on the State of Ireland with respect to Religious Animosities--Misrepresentation of Lord Liverpool's Conduct-Mr. Hume's Motion against the Irish Church Establishment - State of the Irish Charter Schools.

IN N the former session, a commit- sustaining animal existence by a

tee of the Lords had been ap- very insufficient quantity of food pointed to inquire into the state of the most wretched kind. In of those districts in Ireland, which this state of misery they were the were subject to the operation of absolute slaves of their landlords ; the Insurrection act.

and their dependence, poverty, deEarly in the present session a moralization and degradation were committee was appointed, upon increased still further by the mode the motion of lord Liverpool, to in which tithes were collected, and inquire into the state of Ireland by the defective administration generally; and this committee was of justice by the local tribunals. composed of the same members as Such were the general features of that of the preceding year, with the condition of the rural populathe exception of lord Aberdeen, tion of the greater part of Ireland, who was abroad, and earl Fitz as delineated by the best-informed william, who wished to withdraw of the witnesses. But on a topic from the labours of the investiga- of so much importance, we cannot tion. The duke of Devonshire do better than allow some of those and lord Fitzgibbon were substi- witnesses to speak for themselves. tuted for these two peers.

The result of the labours of the The following is the language of committee was a very brief and Mr. Blackburn, an active and vague report; accompanied, how- learned magistrate, who had meever, by a most voluminous mass rited the confidence and esteem of of evidence, which threw great all parties by the firmness and light upon the condition of the prudence with which he had sugeneral body of the Irish pea- perintended the operation of the santry. It showed that they lived Insurrection act in the county of in the most degraded state--with- Limerick. “ The population in out property, without the possi- Ireland has been, at least, in that bility of acquiring property, barely part of Ireland to which my testi

« AnteriorContinuar »