Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

▼. Miller, 221 U. S. 408, 416, 55 L. ed. 789, | of Criminal Procedure, 30 Stat. at L. 1253, 796, 31 Sup. Ct. Rep. 534. Judgment affirmed.

1290, chap. 429; Comp. Laws of Alaska § 2152), it was declared that "the indictment must charge but one crime, and in

Mr. Chief Justice White concurs in the one form only; except that where the crime

result.

(235 U. S. 276)

UNITED STATES, Plff. in Err.,

v.

JOHN WIGGER, alias Moose John.

TERRITORIES (§ 20°)-LEGISLATIVE POWERS - AMENDING CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLA

TION - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE "ESTABLISHING EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENTS."

Congressional legislation regulating criminal procedure in Alaska, such as the provisions of the act of March 3, 1899 (30 Stat. at I. 1253, chap. 429), tit. II. § 43, that an indictment must charge but one crime and in one form only, is not a law "establishing the executive and judicial departments in Alaska," within the meaning of the act of August 24, 1912 (37 Stat. at L. 512, chap. 387), § 3 [Comp. St. 1913, § 3530], and is therefore not put beyond the amendatory power of the territorial legislature by the declaration of that section that all such laws shall continue in full force and effect until amended or repealed by act of Congress.

[Ed. Note.-For other cases, seo Territories, Cent. Dig. 117: Dec. Dig. 20."]

[No. 349.]

Argued October 23, 1914. Decided November 30, 1914.

N ERROR to the District Court of the United States for the District of Alaska, Fourth Division, to review a judgment sustaining a demurrer to an indictment upon the ground that more than one crime was charged therein. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

The facts are stated in the opinion. Assistant Attorney General Warren for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error. Mr. Justice Pitney delivered the opinion of the court:

The grand jury returned an indictment against defendant in error containing three counts, charging him with as many different violations of the criminal laws in force in Alaska. He demurred upon the ground (among others) that more than one crime was charged. The demurrer was sustained by the district court upon this ground, and the case comes here under the criminal appeals act of March 2, 1907. (34 Stat. at L 1246, chap. 2504.) The other grounds of the demurrer need not be further noticed. By 43 of title II. of the act of Congress approved March 3, 1899 (Alaska Code

† Comp. St. 1913, § 1704.

may be committed by use of different means the indictment may allege the means in the alternative." And by § 90 of the same Code (30 Stat. at L. 1294, chap. 429; Comp. Laws of Alaska, § 2199), the defendant was entitled to demur where more than one crime was charged. But by an act of the legislature of Alaska, approved April 26, 1913 (Sess. Laws, p. 65), it was enacted that 43 of title II. of the act just mentioned should be amended to read (like 1024, Rev. Stat. U. S. Comp. Stat. 1901, p. 720) as follows:

"When there are several charges against any person for the same act or transaction, or for two or more acts or transactions connected together, or for two or more acts or transactions of the same class of crimes or offenses, which may be properly joined, instead of having several indictments the whole may be joined in one indictment in separate counts; and if two or more indictments are found in such cases, the court may order them to be consolidated."

The sole question presented for decision is whether this act of the territorial legislature was efficacious to amend the act of Congress. In Summers v. United States, 231 U. S. 92, 105, 58 L. ed. 137, 141, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 38, the validity of the territorial act was assumed: but no question had been raised about it.

Local powers of legislation were first conferred upon Alaska by act of Congress of August 24, 1912 (37 Stat. at L. 512, chap. 387), of which the most pertinent clauses are set forth in the margin.1 The scope of the authority of the territorial legislature, so far as the present question is concerned, depends especially upon the true intent and meaning of the clause contained in $ 3, "that all the laws of the United States

heretofore passed, establishing the executive and judicial departments in Alaska, shall continue in full force and effect until amended or repealed by act of Congress."

1 An Act to Create a Legislative Assem

bly in the Territory of Alaska, to Confer Legislative Powers Thereon, and for Other Purposes.

Sec. 3. Constitution and laws of United States extended.-That the Constitution of the United States, and all the laws thereof which are not locally inapplicable, shall have the same force and effect within the said territory as elsewhere in the United States; that all the laws of the United

•For other cases see same topic & § NUMBER in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep'r Indexes

In order to determine what laws were by this language preserved from interference at the hands of the local legislature a brief review is necessary.

The territory in question having been ceded to the United States by the Emperor of Russia by treaty of March 30, 1867 (15 Stat. at L. 539), Congress in the following year extended to it certain of the laws of the United States, at the same time enacting that, until otherwise provided, violations of the act should be prosecuted in any district court of the United States in California or Oregon or in the district courts of Washington (act of July 27, 1868, 15 Stat. at L. 240, 241, chap. 273, § 7).* By act of May 17, 1884, entitled, "An Act Providing a Civil Government for Alaska" (23 Stat. at L. 24, chap. 53), the territory was declared to constitute a civil and judicial district; the appointment of a governor with executive authority was provided for, and by the 3d section it was enacted: "There shall be, and hereby is, established a district court for said district, with the civil and criminal jurisdiction of district courts of the United States, and the civil and criminal jurisdiction of district courts of the United States exercising the jurisdiction of circuit courts, and such other jurisdiction, not inconsistent with this act, as States heretofore passed establishing the executive and judicial and judicial departments in Alaska shall continue in full force and effect until amended or repealed by act of Congress; that except as herein provided all laws now in force in Alaska shall continue in full force and effect until altered, amended, or repealed by Congress or by the legislature: Provided, That the authority herein granted to the legislature to alter, amend, modify, and repeal laws in force in Alaska shall not extend to the customs, internal-revenue, postal, or other general laws of the United States, or to the game, fish, and fur-seal laws and laws relating to furbearing animals of the United States applicable to Alaska, or to the laws of the United States providing for taxes on business and trade, or to the act entitled, "An Act to Provide for the Construction and Maintenance of Roads, the Establishment and Maintenance of Schools, and the Care and Support of Insane Persons in the District of Alaska, and for Other Purposes," approved January twenty-seventh, nineteen hundred and five [33 Stat. at L. 616, chap. 2771, and the several acts amendatory thereof: Provided further, That this provision shall not operate to prevent the legislature from imposing other and additional taxes or licenses. And the legislature shall pass no law depriving the judges and officers of the district court of Alaska of any authority, jurisdiction, or function exercised by like judges or officers of district courts of the United States.

may be established by law." Provision was made for the appointment of a district judge and four commissioners, whose jurisdiction and powers were prescribed, and for appellate review.

But the act of March 3, 1899, already mentioned (30 Stat. at L. 1253, chap. 429), Congress provided an elaborate Criminal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure, of which title I. contains 219 sections, defining crimes and offenses, and providing for their punishment, and title II. contains 481 sections, dealing for the most part with proceedings for the punishment and prevention of the crimes defined in title I. By act of June 6, 1900, entitled, "An Act Making Further Provision for a Civil Government for Alaska, and for Other Purposes" (31 Stat. at L. 321, chap. 786), further provision was made, under title I., for the establishment of the executive and judicial departments in the territory.2 Title II. contains 1,048 sections, constituting a Code of Civil Procedure (31 Stat. at L. 333494, chap. 786; Comp. Laws of Alaska, §§ 378-638). Title III. contains 368 sections, and is called the Civil Code (31 Stat. at L. 494-552, chap. 786; Comp. Laws of Alaska, §§ 277-362). In the Code of Civil Procedure, a chapter (31 Stat. at L. 442, chap. 786, §§ 698 et seq.) is devoted to the islative power and authority of said territory shall be vested in a legislature, which shall consist of a senate and a house of representatives.

Sec. 9. Legislative power-limitations.The legislative power of the territory shall extend to all rightful subjects of legislation not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States, but no law shall be passed interfering with the primary disposal of the soil [here follow numerous express limitations none of which has reference to the present subject.]

Sec. 20. Laws shall be submitted to Congress.-That all laws passed by the legislature of the territory of Alaska shall be submitted to the Congress by the President of the United States, and, if disapproved by Congress, they shall be null and of no effect.

[blocks in formation]

"Sec. 4. There is hereby established a district court for the district, which shall be a court of general jurisdiction in civil, criminal, equity, and admiralty causes; and three district judges shall be appointed for the district, who shall, during their terms of office, reside in the divisions of the 'district to which they may be respectively Sec. 4. The legislature.-That the leg-assigned by the President.

courts of justice, and contains sections prescribing their jurisdiction, powers, and authority. By an act approved March 3, 1909 (35 Stat. at L. 839, chap. 269, § 2), the act of 1900 was amended with respect to the jurisdiction of the district court.

act of June 30, 1906 (34 Stat. at L. 669, chap. 3913), making it a misdemeanor for any person, firm, or corporation, or officer, agent, or employee thereof, knowingly or of the marks, stamps, tags, labels, or other wrongfully to alter, deface, or destroy any identification devices provided for therein, As already remarked, legislative power or in and as directed by the rules and regu was first conferred upon the territory by lations prescribed thereunder by the Secrethe act of August 24, 1912 (37 Stat. at tary of Agriculture on any carcasses, parts L. 512, chap. 387). From the provision of of carcasses, or the food product or conthis act, "That all the laws of the United tainers thereof, subject to the provisions States heretofore passed, establishing the of the act, cannot be construed as relating executive and judicial departments in Alas-only to those engaged in the business of carrying or assisting in the carrying of such preparing meats for transportation, and the meats in interstate transportation. [Ed. Note.-For other cases, see Food, Cent. Dig. 3. 4: Dec. Dig. § 3.1

[No. 380.]

ka, shall continue in full force and effect until amended or repealed by act of Congress," the district court, after a review of the other legislation to which attention has been called, drew the conclusion that the laws concerning procedure in actions prosecuted in the name of the United States and by its officers are an essential and integral Argued October 22, 1914. Decided Novempart of the laws establishing the executive and judicial departments, and that therefore

fore these can be amended or repealed only

by act of Congress.

With this view we are unable to concur. It seems to us that by the language employed, Congress intended to draw a clear distinction between those laws by which the executive and judicial departments had been established in the territory and those minor regulations that had to do with practice and procedure. Those enactments by which Congress had provided for the appointment of executive and judicial officers for the territory, and had marked out the powers, authority, and jurisdiction of each, and provided safeguards for their maintenance, are properly within the category of laws "establishing" those departments. These laws, and not those merely regulating the procedure, were by the act of 1912 continued in force until amended or repealed by act of Congress. The section respecting the form of indictments was open to amendment by the territorial legislature, and the act of April 26, 1913, passed for that purpose, is

therefore valid.

Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

Mr. Justice McReynolds took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

(235 U. S. 282)

v.

UNITED STATES, Plff. in Err.,
CHARLES LEWIS, Lewis Howard, Fred
Withers, and James McBee.

FOOD (§ 3o)—MEAT INSPECTION-BREAKING
GOVERNMENT SEALS.

ber 30, 1914.

United States for the District of Kandietment for an alleged violation of the sas to review a judgment quashing an inmeat inspection law. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

IN ERROR to the District Court of the

The facts are stated in the opinion. Assistant Attorney General Underwood for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendants in error.

Mr. Justice Pitney delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendants in error were indicted for an

alleged violation of the so-called meat inspection law, which is a part of the "Act Making Appropriations for the Department of Agriculture," etc., approved June 30, 1906 (34 Stat. at L. chap. 3913, pp. 669, 674, etc.). Upon motion of defendants the district court quashed the indictment, basing its decision upon the construction of the statute, and the government has brought this writ of error under the criminal appeals act of March 2, 1907 (34 Stat. at L. chap. 2564, p. 1246 [Comp. St. 1913, § 1704]).

The pertinent portions of the meat inspection law are set forth in the margin. 1

use in interstate or foreign commerce, as 1 That for the purpose of preventing the hereinafter provided, of meat and meat food products which are unsound, unhealthful, unwholesome, or otherwise unfit for human food, the Secretary of Agriculture . . . shall cause to be made by inspectors appointed for that purpose, as hereinafter provided, a post-mortem examination and inspection of the carcasses and parts thereof of all cattle, sheep, swine, and goats to be prepared for human consumption at any slaughtering, meat-canning, salting, packing, rendering, or similar establishment in any state, terri

The meat inspection provisions of the *For other cases see same topic & § NUMBER in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep'r Indexes

Pursuant to the authority conferred by it, the Secretary of Agriculture made certain rules and regulations, effective May 1, 1908, among which was the following:

"An official establishment may ship from the said establishment to any other official establishment any meat or meat food product which has been inspected and passed under these regulations without marking the same 'Inspected and passed,' if such shipment be placed in a railroad car which is sealed by an employee of the Bureau of Animal Industry, and provided that not less than 25 per cent of the contents of each tory, or the District of Columbia for transportation or sale as articles of interstate or foreign commerce; and the carcasses and parts thereof of all such animals found to be sound, healthful, wholesome, and fit for human food shall be marked, stamped, tagged, or labeled as "Inspected and passed;" and said inspectors shall label, mark, stamp, or tag as "Inspected and condemned," all carcasses and parts thereof of animals found to be unsound, unhealthful, unwholesome, or otherwise unfit for human food; and all carcasses and parts thereof thus inspected and condemned shall be destroyed for food purposes by the said establishment in the presence of an inspector, and the Secretary of Agriculture may remove inspectors from any such establishment which fails to so destroy any such condemned carcass or part thereof.

That for the purposes hereinbefore set forth the Secretary of Agriculture shall cause to be made by inspectors appointed for that purpose an examination and inspection of all meat food products prepared for interstate or foreign commerce in any slaughtering, meat-canning, salting, packing, rendering, or similar establishment, and for the purposes of any examination and inspection said inspectors shall have access at all times, by day or night, whether the establishment be operated or not, to every part of said establishment; and said inspectors shall mark, stamp, tag, or label as "Inspected and passed" all such products found to be sound, healthful, and wholesome, and which contain no dyes, chemicals, preservatives, or ingredients which render such meat or meat products unsound, unhealthful, unwholesome, or unfit for human food; and said inspectors shall label, mark, stamp, or tag as "Inspected and condemned" all such products found unsound, unhealthful, and unwholesome, or which contain dyes, chemicals preservatives, or ingredients which render such meat or meat food products unsound, unhealthful, unwholesome, or unfit for human food, and all such condemned meat food products shall be destroyed for food purposes, as herein before provided, and the Secretary of Agriculture may remove inspectors from any establishment which fails to so destroy such condemned meat food products.

car consists of meat or meat food products not marked 'Inspected and passed.'" (Reg. 25, § 12, T1).

The indictment charged, in substance, that defendants knowingly and wrongfully altered, defaced, broke, and destroyed a certain government seal, then being upon a certain railroad freight car containing meat and meat products then under government supervision for inspection and offered for transportation in interstate commerce, the seal having been affixed to the car in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Secretary of

That when any meat or meat food product prepared for interstate or foreign commerce which has been inspected as hereinbefore provided, and marked "Inspected and passed" shall be placed or packed in any can, pot, tin, canvas, or other receptacle or covering in any establishment where inspection under the provisions of this act is maintained, the person, firm, or corporation preparing said product shall cause a label to be attached to said can, pot, tin, canvas, or other receptacle or covering, under the supervision of an inspector, which label shall state that the contents thereof have been "inspected and passed" under the provisions of this act; and no inspection and examination of meat or meat food products deposited or inclosed in cans, tins, pots, canvas, or other receptacle or covering in any establishment where inspection under the provisions of this act is maintained shall be deemed to be complete until such meat or meat food products have been sealed or inclosed in said can, tin, pot, canvas, or other receptacle or covering under the supervision of an inspector.

That on and after October first, nineteen hundred and six, no person, firm, or corporation shall transport or offer for transportation, and no carrier of interstate or foreign commerce shall transport or receive for transportation from one state or territory or the District of Columbia to any other state or territory or the District of Columbia, or to any place under the jurisdiction of the United States, or to any foreign country, any carcasses or parts thereof, meat, or meat food products thereof which have not been inspected, examined, and marked as "Inspected and passed," in accordance with the terms of this act and with the rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Agriculture.

[ocr errors][merged small]

guage of the statute so limited an application. The plain object of the clause is to safeguard the food products in question against alteration or substitution, and thus enable the oflicials of the government to systematize and render effective the process of inspection; an object that is interfered with if the tags or other identification devices are destroyed, whether they be destroyed by those engaged in the business or by others. Morcover, one of the other prohibitions of the act is in terms limited to those engaged in the interstate commerce of meat or meat food products.

Agriculture. The clauses of the statute up-, transportation. We are unable to discern on which the indictment rests are those any sufficient reason for giving to the lanwhich declare: "That no person, firm or corporation, or officer, agent, or employee thereof, shall . . . knowingly or wrongfully alter, deface, or destroy . . . any of the marks, stamps, tags, labels, or other identification devices provided for in this act, or in and as directed by the rules and regulations prescribed hereunder by the Secretary of Agriculture, on any carcasses, parts of carcasses, or the food product, or containers thereof, subject to the provisions of this act," and "That any person, firm, or corporation, or any officer or agent of any such person, firm, or corporation, who shall violate any of the provisions of this act, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor." The district court construed the prohibition as relating alone to those engaged in the business of preparing meats for transportation, and the carrying or assisting in the carrying of such meats in interstate

scribed hereunder by the Secretary of Agriculture, on any carcasses, parts of carcasses, or the food product, or containers thereof, subject to the provisions of this act, or any certificate in relation thereto, authorized or required by this act or by the said rules and regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture.

That no person, firm, or corporation engaged in the interstate commerce of meat or meat food products shall transport or offer for transportation, sell or offer to sell, any such meat or meat food products in any state or territory or in the District of Columbia, or any place under the jurisdiction of the United States, other than in the state or territory or in the District of Columbia or any place under the jurisdiction of the United States in which the slaughtering, packing, canning, rendering, or other similar establishment owned, leased, operated by said firm, person, or corporation is located unless and until said person, firm, or corporation shall have complied with all of the provisions of this act.

That any person, firm, or corporation, or any officer or agent of any such person, firm, or corporation, who shall violate any of the provisions of this act, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be punished on conviction thereof by a fine of not exceeding ten thousand dollars, or imprisonment for a period not more than two years, or by both such fine and imprisonment, in the discretion of the court.

Said Secretary of Agriculture shall, from time to time, make such rules and regulations as are necessary for the efficient execution of the provisions of this act, and all inspections and examinations made under this act shall be such and made in such manner as described in the rules and regulations prescribed by said Secretary of Agriculture not inconsistent with the provisions of this act.

It seems to us clear that the prohibition upon which the present indictment is founded has an effect as broad as its language, and applies to any and every "person, firm, or corporation, or officer, agent, or employee thereof." See United States v. Portale (decided November 2, 1914), 235 U. S. 27, 59 L. ed., 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1

Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

Mr. Justice McReynolds took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

(235 U. S. 211) MINIDOKA & SOUTHWESTERN RAIL ROAD COMPANY and Utah Construction Company, Appts.,

V.

UNITED STATES.

PUBLIC LANDS (§ 135*)- RIGHTS BEFORE
PATENT GRANT FOR RAILROAD RIGHT OF
WAY-RECLAMATION LANDS.

Homesteaders without patents, but lawfully in possession of irrigable land in a reclamation area, were empowered to grant a right of way over their settlements to a railway company by U. S. Rev. Stat. § 2288, U. S. Comp. Stat. 1901, p. 1385, which, as amended by the act of March 3, 1905 (33 Stat. at L. 991, chap. 1424, U. S. Comp. Stat. Supp. 1911, p. 592), gives any bona fide settler the right to convey by warranty against his own act any part of his claim for a railway right of way; and such right was not in any way affected by the provisions of the reclamation act of June 17, 1902 (32 Stat. at L. 388, chap. 1093, U. S. Comp. Stat. Supp. 1911, p. 662), that when the Secretary of the Interior determines upon an irrigation project he must define its limits, and "withdraw the irrigable lands therein from all forms of settlement except under the homestead law," and that all settlements therein shall be "subject to the limitations, charges, terms, and conditions" provided in that act to meet the

For other cases see same topic & § NUMBER in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep'r Indexes

« AnteriorContinuar »