190 U. S. 197; Rassmussen v. United States, 197 U. S. 520; Dorr v. United States, 195 U. S. 138; Trono v. United States, 199 U. S. 521; Grafton v. United States, 206 U. S. 333. Mr. William J. Rohde for the plaintiff in error. The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Harr for the defendant in error. No. 361. ROBERT GILLAND, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE UNITED STATES. In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Dakota. Argued October 12, 1911. Decided October 24, 1911. Per Curiam. Judgment reversed, upon confession of error by counsel for the defendant in error, and cause remanded for further proceedings in conformity to law. Mr. Louis W. Crofoot for the plaintiff in error. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the defendant in error. No.Original. Ex parte: IN THE MATTER OF J. WESLEY GLASGOW, PETITIONER. Motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Submitted October 23, 1911. Decided October 30, 1911. Per Curiam. Denied. Ex parte Mirzan, 119 U. S. 584; Riggins v. United States, 199 U. S. 547; In re Lincoln, 202 U. S. 178. Mr. John C. Fay for the petitioner. No. 14. JOSEPH R. MOORE ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, V. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. In error to the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey. Argued for the plaintiff in error and submitted for the defendant in error October 26, 1911. Decided October 30, 1911. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 100; David Kaufman & Sons Company v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Simon v. Craft, 182 U. S. 427; Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 111; Felts v. Murphy, 201 U. S. 123. Mr. Thomas P. Fay for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Edmund Wilson for the defendant in error. No. 571. DAVID A. COLLIER ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. J. G. SMALTZ AND IOWA RAILROAD LAND COMPANY. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted October 23, 1911. Decided October 30, 1911. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Hannis Distilling. Co. v. Baltimore, 216 U. S. 285, 288, and cases cited; Turner v. New York, 168 U. S. 90; Terry v. Anderson, 95 U. S. 628. Mr. F. T. Hughes for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. T. M. Zink for J. G. Smaltz, and Mr. Charles A. Clark for the Iowa Railroad Land Company. No. 12. THE MERCANTILE TRUST COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Submitted October 23, 1911. Decided October 30, 1911. Per Curiam. Decree affirmed with costs. Herndon v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway, 218 U. S. 135, 158, and cases cited. Mr. Murphy J. Foster and Mr. William W. Green for the appellants. Mr. John F. Dillon, Mr. Chas. E. Fenner, Mr. W. B. Spencer and Mr. Chas. Payne Fenner for the appellees. Mr. Walter Guion filed a brief as amicus curiæ. No. 23. ROGER SHERMAN, SUCCESSOR IN TRUST, AND D. H. PINNEY, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. LIBBIE GOODWIN. In error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona. Submitted October 26, 1911. Decided November 6, 1911. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Idaho & O. Land Improvement Co. v. Bradbury, 132 U. S. 509, 513; Garzot v. Rios de Rubio, 209 U. S. 284. Mr. Walter Bennett and Mr. D. H. Pinney for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. J. F. Wilson for the defendant in error. No. 762. W. H. TOLLIVER ET UX., APPELLANTS, V. THE GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Motion to dismiss submitted October 30, 1911. Decided November 6, 1911. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Weir v. Rountree, 216 U. S. 607, and cases cited. Mr. Miles Poindexter and Mr. O. C. Moore for the appellants. Mr. E. C. Lindley for the appellee. No. 555. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. C. W. BRADBURY. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa. Motions to dismiss or affirm and for damages submitted November 6, 1911. Decided November 13, 1911. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. McGrew, 188 U. S. 291, 308; Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 100; Southern Ry. Co. v. United States, 222 U. S. 20; Schlemmer v. Buffalo &c. Ry. Co., 205 U. S. 1; and 220 U. S. 590. Mr. Carroll Wright for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Horatio F. Dale and Mr. John G. Myerly for the defendant in error. No. 57. CONRAD T. STRUCKMANN AND ERNST C. H. W. WAEGE, APPELLANTS, v. THE UNITED STATES. Appeal from the Court of Claims. Argued November 13, 1911. Decided December 4, 1911. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed. United States v. Heinszen, 206 U. S. 370. Mr. Edward S. Hatch, Mr. Vincent P. Donihee and Mr. Walter F. Welch for the appellants. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the appellee. No. 148. WILLIAM BAIRD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. ALLEN P. HOWISON ET AL. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Alabama. Motion to dismiss submitted December 4, 1911. Decided December 11, 1911. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Dewey v. Des Moines, 173 U. S. 193, 198, and cases cited; Haire v. Rice, 204 U. S. 291, 301; Thomas v. Iowa, 209 U. S. 258; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, 118; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79. Mr. Alexander M. Garber for the plaintiff in error. Mr. John P. Tillman for the defendant in error. No. 306. C. L. VAN SICE, APPELLANT, V. THE IBEX MINING COMPANY. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted December 11, 1911. Decided December 18, 1911. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Company, 212 U. S. 477; Macfadden v. United States, 213 U. S. 288, 293; Pope v. Louisville, New Albany &c. Railway Company, 173 U. S. 573, 577, and cases cited. Mr. Edwin H. Park for the appellant. Mr. Charles Cavender and Mr. Gerald Hughes for the appellee. No. 106. WILSON-MOLINE BUGGY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. C. B. E. HAWKINS. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas. Submitted for the plaintiff in error December 11, 1911. Decided December 18, 1911. Per Curiam. Judgment reversed. International Textbook Company v. Pigg, 217 U. S. 91. Mr. Almon W. Bulkley and Mr. C. E. More for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant in error. No. 114. THE PITTSBURGH, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE STATE OF INDIANA. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana. Argued and submitted December 15, 1911. Decided December 18, 1911. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs. Chicago, R. I. & Pac. Ry. Co. v. Arkansas, 219 U. S. 453. Mr. Samuel O. Pickens and Mr. Lawrence Maxwell for the plaintiff in error. Mr. James Bingham, Mr. Martin M. Hugg and Mr. Thomas M. Honan for the defendant in error. No.. Original. Ex parte: IN THE MATTER OF LOUIS CELLA ET AL., PETITIONERS. Motion for leave to file submitted December 18, 1911. Decided January 9, 1912. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of prohibition denied. Mr. Howard Taylor, Mr. A. S. Worthington and Mr. Charles L. Frailey for the petitioners. The Attorney General, The Solicitor General, Mr. Clarence R. Wilson and Mr. Henry S. Robbins opposing. No. 574. THE BORNN HAT COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE UNITED STATES. In error to the Circuit |