223 U. S. Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court. Mr. George Hoadly for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendants in error. No. 62. DORSET CARTER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. J. GEORGE WRIGHT, COMMISSIONER, ETC. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. November 10, 1911. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. Wm. H. Robeson for the appellants. No appearance for the appellee. No. 58. AMERICAN RAILROAD COMPANY OF PORTO RICO, APPELLANT, v. CENTRAL SAN CHRISTOBAL. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for Porto Rico. November 13, 1911. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the sixteenth rule, on motion of Mr. Henry P. Blair for the appellee. Mr. Francis H. Dexter for the appellant. Mr. Henry P. Blair for the appellee. No. 592. CATHERINE LEHMAN ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN Error, v. THE STATE OF INDIANA ON THE RELATION OF CHARLES W. MILLER, ATTORNEY GENERAL. In error to the Appellate Court of the State of Indiana. November 4, 1911. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Ferdinand Winter for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Thomas M. Honan, for the defendant in error. No. 67. H. L. DENOON ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, V. THE TAX TITLE COMPANY OF RICHMOND. In error to the Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court. 223 U. S. Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia. November 14, 1911. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. S. S. P. Patteson for the plaintiffs in error. No appearance for the defendant in error. No. 78. THE UNITED STATES EX REL. LOUIS F. ALLARDT, APPELLANT, v. MATTHEW J. LONG, CRIMINAL SHERIFF, ETC. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. November 16, 1911. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. William Grant for the appellant. Mr. St. Clair Adams and Mr. Albert D. Henriquez, Jr., for the appellee. No. 135. THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO EX REL. ORA BUTLER MEECE, APPELLANT, v. IRA A. ABBOTT, ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, ETC. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of New Mexico. December 4, 1911. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the appellant. Mr. Neill B. Field for the appellant. No appearance for the appellee. No. 459. FRANK A. McCUMBER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. ALVA A. NICHOLSON ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa. December 4, 1911. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the appellants. Mr. Benjamin I. Salinger for the appellants. Mr. George Cosson for the appellees. No. 768. THE PULLMAN COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, 223 U. S. Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court. v. DAISY B. CALDER. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina. December 4, 1911. Dismissed with costs, per stipulation. Mr. W. Huger FitzSimons for the plaintiff in error. Mr. J. P. Kennedy Bryan for the defendant in error. No. 91. THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF SAN JUAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, V. JOSE E. SALDANA ET AL. Appeal from the Supreme Court of Porto Rico. December 7, 1911. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. C. M. Boerman for the appellants. No appearance for the appellees. No. 142. THE WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. HENRY GIBBS. In error to the Circuit Court of Nelson County, State of Virginia. December 12, 1911. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Henry D. Estabrook, Mr. George H. Fearons and Mr. Francis Raymond Stark for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant in error. No. 101. BETTIE LIGON ET AL., Appellants, v. DougLAS H. JOHNSTON ET AL. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. December 12, 1911. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. Webster Ballinger for the appellants. No appearance for the appellees. No. 105. PAUL H. KATZ, APPELLANT, v. MATTHEW J. Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court. 223 U.S. LONG, CRIMINAL SHERIFF, ETC. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. December 13, 1911. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. James J. McLoughlin for the appellant. Mr. St. Clair Adams and Mr. Albert D. Henriquez, Jr., for the appellee. No. 110. J. A. SCRIVEN COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. EDWARD MORRIS ET AL., TRADING AS MORRIS & COMPANY. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. December 14, 1911. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. Arthur v. Briesen and Mr. George W. Case, Jr., for the appellant. Mr. Edgar H. Gans and Mr. W. Calvin Chesnut for the appellees. No. 116. JAMES VAUGHAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. LYDIA STARR TABOR. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Michigan. December 15, 1911. Dismissed without costs to either party, per stipulation. Mr. William L. Carpenter for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Herschel H. Hatch for the defendant in error. No. 117. JAMES VAUGHAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. LYDIA STARR TABOR. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Michigan. December 15, 1911. Dismissed without costs to either party, per stipulation. Mr. William L. Carpenter for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Herschel H. Hatch for the defendant in error. 223 U.S. Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court. No. 229. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILWAY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. CHARLES A. HAMILTON. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa. December 18, 1911. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Hale Holden for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant in error. No. 126. THE CIENEGUITA COPPER COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. THOMAS FARISH, JR., ET AL. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona. December 18, 1911. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. Eugene S. Ives for the appellant. Mr. John F. Wilson and Mr. Walter Bennett for the appellees. No. 144. THE BELT RAILWAY COMPANY OF CHICAGO, PETITIONER, V. THE UNITED STATES. On writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. December 19, 1911. Dismissed pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. William J. Henley and Mr. William L. Reed for the petitioner. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the respondent. No. 275. THE AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE UNITED STATES. In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. December 21, 1911. Dismissed, on motion of counsel for the plaintiff in error. Mr. James M. Beck for the plaintiff in error. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the defendant in error. |