Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

Mode

rate Intel.

ligencer,

Dec. 7,

1648.

dom of the parliament. Others, on the

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

6

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

con

fer as act, would but the godly party in the kingdom call us thereunto, and think themfelves preferved by it. But the people call to us for these things, and we to your excellency, your known worth inviting us hereunto: in profecution of which, as an unparalleled • inftrument, we shall live or dye with your excellency, having folemnly promised, in answer to the wonders God hath wrought amongst us, to attempt and attend these two last expedients through all hazards. We ⚫ cannot fo undervalue our God, and the rich experience we have had in behalf of this nation, as to fee them lie (like achar) under these finful burdens, our colds, • heats, nakedness, want, hunger, hardships, difficulties, dangers, cares, fears, out of which our bleffed and ever to be praised God, hath brought us, fuggefting these things unto us, for that flock of flaughter in this kingdom. Sir, we can dye, but not endure to fee our mother England dye before us (4).From this addrefs is eafily to be collected the fpirit of the army, the principles on which it acted, the authority it affumed, and the hazard of contefting with it. It appears to have looked on itself as an independant body, capable of advifing, directing and giving the law to the fenate and people of England. This was the effect of the felfdenying ordinance, which was foreseen by many, and now felt by all. What was alledged in defence of these proceedings of the army, will be found in the following note. I cannot but obferve here to the reader, the fpirit, of the English royalifts at this time. The Scots had raifed an army in aid of the King, the parliament was garbelled for treating of a peace with him-was not this meritorious in the eye of a cavalier? Far from it at this very time, both Scots and parliament were treated with the utmoft virulence and contempt by thofe very perfons, for whose mafter they had fubjected themfelves to the greatest inconveniencies. Speaking of the army under Hamilton, and its defeat, a writer of this

contrary, have attempted to vindicate it, and

apo

time has the following expreffions. It was never yet 'known that the blew bonnet would enter lifts upon 'the gilded promises of a public faith, or the huxters 'cold hopes of best be trust. And when all this is done; be confident, their hands will be more ready to re'ceive it, than their hearts to earn it. It has ever been ' obferved of the peafantry of that nation, that they • could feed better than fight. Plundering was their • only master piece: which they could finger with fuch dexterity, as if they had been nurfed and bred up in that trade from their infancy.'And again-What ⚫ else could be expected by Calidon, being by chronologifts rendered to be the emblem of difloyalty; a ftran(m) The ger to equity; an harbour for injury; the magazine loyal Sacriof iniquity; the counterfeit of amity (m).—With fice prefentrespect to the members of parliament excluded by the ed in the army, they were treated in the like fcurrilous manner by Deaths of the fame party in the following verses.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

• Farewell ye race of Judas that betray'd
The King your royal mafter; and have lay'd
Such burthens on our fhoulders, God on high
⚫ Grant you a dire and bloody tragedie.
• You were the champions of a wicked caufe;

• You have unthron'd your fovereigne; and the laws
By you are quite fubverted: you have rent

In pieces a moft bleffed government.

Now let their juft and woful cries and tears,
Whom you made widowes pierce th' Almighties ears;
And let those orphans, who by your expreffe
Have loft their fathers, and are fatherleffe;
Roare loud for deadly vengeance, and God grant
As they, your wives and children may know want.
We'll to your graves your herfes laughing bring,
Inftead of dirges we will carolls fing:
In joyful strains we'll pen your elegies,
And chronicle your ftinking memories.

• Say

Lives and

Sir Charles Lucas and Sir George Lifle, p. 27. 38. 12mo. 1648.

apologize for Cromwell, the author and abet

tor

[merged small][ocr errors]

Saying here lies, (and no man doth lament)
The rotten members of a parliament (n).' -

ríus Pragmaticus,

Dec. 19,

1648.

V. p. 114.

and 240.

(p) Tenure

Lord Clarendon's treatment of thefe gentlemen, as (o) See vol. well as the Scottish nation, is not much more decent (0). -Milton therefore feems to have had reafon for cautioning them To beware an old and perfect enemy, who though he hope by fowing difcord to make them ⚫ his inftruments, yet cannot forbear a minute the open threatning of his defperate revenge upon them, when of Kings they have served his purposes (p). A caution howand Magiftrates, in his ever reafonable, yet neglected by thofe concerned, till Works, vol. their old and perfect enemy had opportunity of sati i. p. 357. ating the desperate revenge he had threatned. But to proceed, in all this affair of the exclufion of the members, Cromwell's name appears not. Nay Mr. Ludlow tells us, that lieutenant-general Cromwell the night after the interruption of the house arrived from Scotland and lay at Whitehall, where, and at other places, he declared he had not been acquainted with this defign; yet fince it was done, he was glad of it, and would endeavour to maintain it (q). Others fay, it

(g) Vol. i. P. 272.

(+) See Flagellum, p.

66.

6

was done by Cromwell's command (r). However this be, we need not doubt but Ireton, and the other chief officers concerned, were fully fatisfied they had Cromwell's approbation. They would not have taken fuch a step without it. For though Fairfax was easy and manageable, Cromwell was very different, nor would he have failed fhewing his refentment against those who fhould have prefumed to have acted oppofite to his will. His declarations on this head are not, I think, much to be regarded. Politicians have a language of their own. They abound with quirks, fubtelties and diftinctions; they explain away and interpret as they imagine will beft fuit their circumftances and conveniences. To all this, if we add Cromwell's known diffimulation, we fhall fee little caufe to rely much on them. I will close this note

tor of it. Their reasons will be found below (FF). What followed is well knownSuffice

with obferving that the houfe of commons having notice of the feizing of their members, with great feeming earneftnefs applyed to the general for their release, and declared it to be their pofitive pleasure that they be forthwith difcharged; but no answer fatisfactory being returned, they were forced to fubmit, perhaps not unwillingly, to the lofs of them. This was on the seventh of December, when it was Refolved to give hearty thanks to Cromwell for very great and eminently faithful fervices performed by him to this parliament and kingdom, both in this kingdom and the kingdom of Scotland, and Mr. Speaker did accordingly give him the very hearty thanks of this house ($).'

[ocr errors]

(FF) The reafons for purging the house of commons, and the apology for Cromwell on that head, are here to be given.] On the 11th of December the fecluded and fecured members published a printed paper, intituled A folemne proteftation of the imprifoned and fecluded members of the commons houfe: against the horrid force and violence of the officers and foldiers of the army, on Wednefday and Thursday laft, the 6th and 7th of December, 1648. In this proteftation They folemnly proteft and declare to the whole kingdom, that this execrable force and open violence upon their perfons, and the whole houfe of commons, by the officers and army under their command, in marching up against their command and placing ftrong armed guards of horfe and foot upon them, without, and against their order, 'was the highest and most deteftable force and breach of priviledge and freedom ever offered to any parliament of England; and that all acts, ordinances, votes and proceedings of the faid houfe made fince the 6th of December aforefaid, or hereafter to be made during their restraint and forcible feclufion from the house, and the continuance of the armies force upon it, were no way obligatory, but void and null to all intents and,

[ocr errors]

pur

(s) Journal.

Walker's History of Independen

P. 35.

Suffice it therefore to say that the votes of no

more

purposes. And that all contrivers of, actors in, and affiftants to this unparalleled force and treasonable armed violence, were open enemies to, and profeffed • fubverters of the priviledges, rights and freedom of parliament, and difturbers of the peace and fettlement of the kingdom; and ought to be proceeded against as fuch: and that all members of parliament and commoners of England, by their folemn covenant and duty, under pain of deepeft perjury and eternal infamy, were • obliged unanimonfly to oppofe and endeavour to their < utmost power to bring them to exemplary and condigne punishment for this tranfcendent offence, tending to the diffolution of the prefent, and fubverfion of all future parliaments, and of the fundamental government and laws of the land (t).' This bold procy, part ii. teftation being complained of in the houfe of commons, and the house of lords, produced a joint declaration from them, in which They judged and declared, the faid printed paper to be falfe, fcandalous and feditious, and tending to deftroy the vifible fundamental government of the kingdom: and therefore ordered and ordained the faid printed paper to be fuppreffed; and all perfons whatfoever that had had any hand in, or given confent unto the contriving, framing, printing or publishing thereof, were adjudged uncapable to beat any office, or have any place of truft or authority in the kingdom, or to fit as members of either houfe of parliament. And they farther ordered, that every member of either houfe that were then abfent, upon his first coming to fit in that houfe whereof he was a member, for the manifeftation of his innocency, should difavow and difclaim, his having any hand in, or giv⚫ing consent unto the contriving, framing, printing or publishing of the faid paper, or the matter therein • contained (u).'—Here are no reasons we fee given to justify the exclufion. We must seek them elsewhere then, that is, in the writings of the advocates for

(x) Id. p.

36.

the

7

« AnteriorContinuar »