Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

title of Lord Protector of the commonwealth

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

prefented to the parliament, that all fuch as are or fhall be approved for publick preachers of the Gospel in the publick meeting places, fhall have and enjoy the maintenance already fettled by law; and fuch other encouragement, as the parliament hath already appointed, or hereafter fhall appoint: and that where any fcruple payment of tythes, the three next juf⚫tices of the peace, or two of them, fhall, upon complaint, call the parties concerned before them; and, by the oaths of lawful witneffes, fhall duly apportion the value of the said tythes,' to be paid either in money, or land by them to be fet out according to the faid value, to be held and enjoyed by him that was to have the faid tythes: and in cafe fuch apportioned value be not duly paid, or enjoyed, according to the order of the faid juftices, the tythes fhall be paid in kind, and fhall be recovered in any court of record. Upon hearing and confidering what hath been offered to this committee touching propriety in tythes of • incumbents, rectors, poffeffors of donatives, or propriate tythes, it is the opinion of this committee, and refolved to be fo reported to the parliament, that the faid perfons have a legal propriety 'in tythes (q).' So that a regulation in tythes we fee was the thing intended, which yet raised a clamour against, and fixed a character on this parliament, as enemies to the miniftry, to learning, and every thing valuable in fociety. Such is the hatred of ecclefiaftics againft all who would reform their laws and customs, however unjust and tyrannical. 'Tis not forgotten how zealous thefe men were against the Quakers tythe bill in the year 1736. A bill founded (r) Answer on ftrict juftice and perfect equity, and opposed through to the Coun- intereft, prejudice, or worfe views, as was then fhewn, Plea against to a demonstration, in one of the beft written tracts of the Quakers the age, by Lord Hervey (r).—The parliament foon Tythe Bill, after refigned back their power into the hands of Cromwill. The account given of it in the Journals is as

(g)

Journal,

Dec. 2,

1653

try Parfon's

8vo Lond.

1736.

[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors]

wealth of England, Scotland and Ireland.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

The

follows: Monday, 12th of December, 1653. It being moved in the house this day, that the fitting of this parliament any longer, as now conftituted, will not be for the good of the commonwealth; and that therefore it was requifite to deliver up unto the lord general Cromwell the powers which they received ⚫ from him; and that motion being feconded by feveral other members; the house rofe: and the Speaker, with many of the members of the house, departed out of the house to Whitehall; where they, being the greater • number of the members fitting in parliament, did, by a writing under their hands, refign unto his excellency their faid powers: and Mr. Speaker, attended with the members, did prefent the fame to his excellency, accordingly.' The following extract from á letter of Buffy Manfel, E'q; one of the members of this parliament, to his brother Edward Pritchard, Efq; will give us a clearer idea of this affair. Since I writ my

[ocr errors]

laft to you, and some days before, wee were about a report from the committee of tieths, about fending ' commiffioners to the feveral circuits to caft out all that they judged to be unfit to be minifters, and to put in all they judged to be fit upon the last day of the weeke. This power and its appurtenances came to the question, and it was carried in the negative. Hereupon those gentlemen, that were for the report, came fooner than their ufual hower upon Munday to the house, and there spoke of the unlikelihood of doing good, and inftanced in feveral things, that they judged evill, that was don; and therefore defired that they would goe, and returne that power they had from whence they received it; and thereupon about forty, and the Speaker went to the generall, and did accordingly. Twenty feven stayed in the house a little time fpeaking to one another, and going to fpeak to the Lord in prayer, coll. Goff and liet. coll. White came into the house, and defired them that were there Z 2

[ocr errors]

The grounds and reafons of this new fettle

• (3) Thurloe, vol. i. p. 637.

[ocr errors]

ment

to come out. Some answered, that they were there by a call from the generall, and would not come out by their defire, unless they had a command from him. They returned noe answer, but went out, and fetched two files of mufquetiers, and did as good as force them out; amongst whom I was an unworthy one (s).' Ludlow, fpeaking of this refignation, attributes it to the ambition and artifice of Cromwell in the following words: The perfidious Cromwell having forgot his most folemn profeffions and former vows, as well as the blood and treasure that had been spent in this conteft, thought it high time to take off the mafque, and refolved to facrifice all our victories and deliverances to his pride and ambition, under colour of taking upon him the office as it were of a high conftable, in order to keep the peace of the nation, and to re• ftrain men from cutting one another's throats. One difficulty yet remained to obftruct his defign, and that was the convention, which he had affembled and invefted with power, as well as earnestly follicited to reform the law, and reduce the clergy to a more evangelical conftitution. And having fufficiently alarmed thofe interefts, and fhown them their danger from the convention, he informs them farther, that they can<not be ignorant of the confufion that all things are brought into by the immoderate zeal of thofe in authority, and to what extremities matters might be reduced, if permitted to go on; poffibly, faid he, to the utter extirpation of law and gofpel from amongst us; and therefore advised that they would join their interefts to his, in order to prevent this inundation. His propofition was readily embraced by the corrupt part of the lawyers and clergy, and fo he became their protector, and they the humble supporters of his tyranny. But that his ufurpation might feem lefs horrid, he fo contrived it by his inftruments, that fome of the convention muft openly manifeft their difap'pro

[ocr errors]

.

[ocr errors]

ment will deferve (zz) the attention of the curious

[ocr errors]

mentary Hiftory, vol. xx. p. 244.

'probation of their own proceedings, and under divers ⚫ fpecious pretences put a period to their fitting (t).'— (t) Vol. ii. When the inftrument of refignation figned as above P. 471. • mentioned in the journal, was brought to Cromwell, 'tis faid he lifted up his eyes with astonishment; and, with no lefs feeming modefty refused to receive it; • but, at length, through the importunity of major-general Lambert and others, reprefenting to him that the welfare of the nation abfolutely required his acceptance of the parliament's refignation, he thought fit to comply with their request.'Cromwell indeed in a speech made to the enfuing parliament, September 12, 1654, pofitively affirms in the moft folemn manner, That (4) Parliahe was fo far from having any hand in this project, that he was an abfolute ftranger to the defign, till the Speaker, with the major part of the houfe, came to him with the inftrument of their refignation (z).' For my own part, I much doubt of the ftrict truth of count of this this. Can it be fuppofed that his creatures and favou- Parliament rites would have ventured on fuch a thing without being fatisfied of his approbation? Or that the officers would have dared to bring in a file of mufquetiers, and in a manner force the non-refigners out of the house, if they had not been well affured that it would be acceptable to him '--But be this as it may, the lord general having the power of the nation thus formally refigned up into his hands, he embraced the opportunity of exercifing it in his own name, in order to preferve the peace and fecure the laws and religion of the nation as he profeffed, though poffibly the luft of sway might have fome small influence on his determination *.

(zz) The grounds and reasons of this new fettlement deferve attention.] Cromwell having accepted the parliaᏃ 3

ment's

Mr. Hume, in order I fuppofe to divert the readers, on mentioning Praise God Barebone, has informed them, that It was ufual for the ↑ pretended Saints at this time to change their names from Henry, Ed

In this vol.

is the compleatest ac

extant.

ward,

* Cambden's Re

mains, p. 42. 410. Lone. 1629.

curious reader. But how blameworthy foe

ver

ment's inftrument of refignation, called a council of officers and others, who after feveral days confultation, refolved that a council fhould be named, to confist not of more than 21, nor less than 13 perfons, and that the general fhould be chofen lord protector of the three nations. On the 16th of December, 1653, Oliver with great pomp was inaugurated in Westminster-Hall, after having first folemnly fworn to an inftrument of government prepared by his council, and others. It is well drawn, and fhews much judgment. By it the fupream legiflative authority of the commonwealth was placed in one perfon, and the people affumbled in parliament; but the executive was to be in the lord protector, affifted with a council, who fhould difpofe of all magiftracy and honor, and have the power of pardons and benefit of forfeitures. In him likewife, with confent of parliament when fitting, was vefted the power of the militia, and forces by fea and land, as well as the preJogative of making war and peace. So that Cromwell, who by this inftrument was conftituted lord protector, was in a manner vefted with the old real rights of the English Kings, and had the authority conferred on him. But that provifion might be made for the people, and their benefit and advantage confulted, it was declared,

[ocr errors]

ward, Anthony, William, which they regarded as Heathenifh, inta others more fanctified and godly even the new Teftament names James, Andrew, &c. were not held in fuch regard as thofe borrowed from the Old Teftament, Hezekiah, Habbakuk, Jofhua, Zorobabel. Sometimes a whole odly fentence was adopted for a name.' In proof of this be gives a lift of names of a jury in the county of Suflex about this time, on the authority of one Brome, an obfcure and inconfiderable writer. This gentleman, however, fhould have known that this practice, (not of changing their names, as he fuppofes, but of giving fanctified and godly ones to their children) how ridiculous foever, was in ufe long before thefe times; and alfo that it was not more common then, than it had before been. Cambden would have informed him of the one, and the great variety of lifts of names ftill remaining in Thurloe, Scobel, and other collectors, of the other.

That

« AnteriorContinuar »