Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

INTERNATIONAL LAW

CHIEFLY AS INTERPRETED AND
APPLIED BY THE UNITED STATES

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Copyright, 1922,

BY LITTLE, BROWN, AND COMPANY.

All rights reserved

Norwood Press

Set up and electrotyped by J. S. Cushing Co.,
Norwood, Mass., U.S.A.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

PREFACE

SOME years ago Professor John H. Wigmore, Dean of the Law School of Northwestern University, suggested to the author the preparation of a treatise reflecting what might be called the American conception of international law. That work was then begun. Out of it have grown the present volumes. They embody the results of a study of international law chiefly as it has been interpreted and applied by the United States. They express an attempt primarily to portray what the United States, through the agencies of its executive, legislative and judicial departments, has deemed to be the law of nations.

It is not suggested that in legal contemplation there exists an American international law as distinct from that which necessarily prevails throughout the society of civilized States. It is believed, however, that the views of the Department of State (embracing by implication those of the President), of the Congress, and of the Courts of the United States, together with those of certain other governmental agencies, give expression to an authentic American understanding of what the principles of international law really are. Such an understanding is entitled to thorough examination and critical analysis; for it constitutes the only scientific basis for the formulation of principles in reliance upon which the United States, whether at the Hague or elsewhere, may participate intelligently and worthily in the common effort to render the law of nations closely responsive to the just and changing demands of civilization. Clearness of thought concerning rules which any State may soundly press for adoption in a codification designed for general approval imposes, as a condition precedent, an exact enunciation of what are conceived to be the existing requirements of international law.

The scope of the present work necessarily calls for the treatment of numerous matters which, however closely associated with the international obligations of the United States, refer primarily to the domestic activities of an independent State in pursuance of its fundamental law. Thus, in relation to topics bearing,

« AnteriorContinuar »