Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

GERMANY

GERMAN PROPOSAL FOR A PLEDGE OF PEACE AMONG THE POWERS INTERESTED IN THE RHINE

Date and number

Subject

Page

1922

Undated Memorandum by the Secretary of State of a Conversation with
the German Ambassador, December 15, 1922
German desire that United States ascertain acceptability of
proposal for pledge of peace among powers interested in Rhine.

203

204

Undated Memorandum by the Secretary of State of a Conversation with the
French Ambassador, December 18, 1922
Presentation of German proposal of peace pledge.

Undated Memorandum by the Secretary of State of a Conversation with the
German Ambassador, December 19, 1922
Secretary's suggestion that German proposal for peace pledge
be submitted in writing.

205

Undated [Rec'd Dec. 21]

From the German Embassy

205

German proposal that France, Great Britain, Italy, and Germany agree not to resort to war against each other for period of one generation, unless authorized by plebiscite of their own people.

206

Undated Memorandum by the Secretary of State of a Conversation with the
French Ambassador, December 21, 1922

French attitude toward German proposal of peace pledge;
discussion of U. S. position under proposed agreement.

Undated Memorandum by the Secretary of State of a Conversation with the
German Ambassador, December 22, 1922

Improbability of U. S. assumption of responsibility under
proposed peace pledge.

Undated Memorandum by the Secretary of State of a Conversation with the

French Ambassador, December 26, 1922

French disapproval of German proposal of peace pledge. Discussion of erroneous French press report of proposed 30year guaranty of German boundaries.

Undated Memorandum by the Secretary of State of a Conversation with the

207

208

209

German Ambassador, December 28, 1922

Discussion of French attitude toward German proposal of

peace pledge.

1923 Jan.

2

To the Ambassador in France (tel.)

211

Press announcement by Department (text printed) that French disapproval of German proposal made inadvisable its transmission to Governments concerned.

(Instructions to repeat to London, Berlin, Rome, Lausanne, and Brussels.)

Undated Memorandum by the Secretary of State of a Conversation with the

German Ambassador, January 6, 1923

Disinclination of the Secretary to comment on German and
French suggestions regarding proposed peace pledge.

211

GERMANY

DECISION BY THE UNITED STATES TO REDUCE ITS ARMY OF OCCUPATION IN GERMANY TO A FORCE OF ONE THOUSAND MEN

[blocks in formation]

Suggestion that final decision on withdrawal of U. S. troops from Germany be delayed pending consideration of desirability of leaving small force, in view of difficulty of collecting army costs.

[blocks in formation]

Mar. 24

Mar. 29 (63)

Advice that official announcement of withdrawal of troops
will not be made; possibility of leaving small force.
From the Unofficial Observer on the Rhineland High Commission
(tel.)

Attitude of observer and his associates on commission re-
garding withdrawal of U. S. troops from the Rhine. German
draft cable (text printed) requesting continuation of U. S.
occupation and urging official representation on Rhineland
Commission.

From the Chargé in Germany (tel.)

German note (text printed) requesting continuation of U. S. occupation and urging official representation on Rhineland Commission.

From President Harding

Page

211

213

213

214

Apr. 1

215

Decision that U. S. troops will not be completely withdrawn until final determination of program, in light of Allied attitude toward U. S. claim for army costs.

Apr. 25 (82)

From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)

216

Hope of Allied Rhineland Commissioners for retention of U. S. troops in Rhineland. Recommendation that sufficient force be retained to control Coblenz.

Apr. 26

From President Harding

217

Opinion that minimum of 1,000 troops should be retained in Rhineland so that withdrawals will not be completed in advance of definite decision.

May 22 (103)

From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)

217

German view that enough U. S. troops should be retained in
Rhineland to hold Coblenz.

June 3 (79)

To the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)

218

Note for German Government (text printed) conveying U. S. decision to retain force of 1,000 troops at Coblenz for time being.

GERMANY

EFFORTS BY THE UNITED STATES TO SECURE REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE COSTS OF THE AMERICAN ARMY OF OCCUPATION IN GERMANY

Date and number

Subject

Page

1922 Mar. 9 (71)

Mar. 14 (119)

Mar. 20 (90)

To the Ambassador in France (tel.)

For Boyden: Telegram, March 8, from Ambassador in
Great Britain (text printed) regarding agenda of Allied Finance
Ministers' conference of March 8. Instructions to notify
conference of U. S. claim for costs of its Army of Occupation.
From the Ambassador in France (tel.)

From Boyden: Letter of Allied Finance Ministers, March
11 (text printed) stating that U. S. rights have been protected
in arrangement as signed, but that question of rights should
be raised directly with Allied Governments.

To the Ambassador in France (tel.)

218

219

220

Note for French Government (text printed) stating U. S. position in claim for Army costs.

Mar. 20 (91)

Mar. 22 (92)

(Instructions to repeat to London, Brussels, and Rome for similar action. The same to the Ambassador in Japan for similar action, without instructions to repeat.)

To the Ambassador in France (tel.)

Instructions to deliver U. S. note on afternoon of March 22 to avoid premature publication in Europe; advice that similar instructions are being sent to London, Brussels, Rome, and Tokyo.

To the Ambassador in France (tel.)

Note for French Government (text printed) stating U. S. view that its right to receive payment of Army costs is unaffected by status of French account for Army costs as of May 1, 1921.

(Instructions to repeat to London, Brussels, and Rome for similar action. The same to the Ambassador in Japan for

224

224

similar action, without instructions to repeat.)

Mar. 29 (139)

From the Ambassador in France (tel.)

225

French note of March 28 denying any intention to contest U. S. right to be reimbursed for Army costs; and stating intention to consult other Allied Governments.

[blocks in formation]

Insistence on recognition of U. S. right to repayment of
Army costs on same footing as Allies. Tentative bases for
payment of past and current costs satisfactory to the United
States.

Belgian note (text printed) acknowledging U. S. right to repayment of Army costs and conveying intention to consult other Allied Governments.

[blocks in formation]

Apr. 10 (174)

From the Ambassador in Great Britain (tel.)

Foreign Minister's note (text printed) acknowledging validity of U. S. claim for Army costs and advising of steps toward agreement between Allied and Associated Governments for satisfaction of claim.

228

228

GERMANY

EFFORTS BY THE UNITED STATES TO SECURE REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE COSTS OF THE AMERICAN ARMY OF OCCUPATION IN GERMANY-Continued

Date and

Subject

Page

number

1922

May 19 (1906)

From the Ambassador in France

229

Note from Foreign Ministry, May 18 (text printed) stating French intention soon to convene Allied representatives to study question of satisfying U. S. claim for Army costs.

May 22 (320)

From the Ambassador in Italy

230

May 29 (216)

June 4 (175)

June 22 (255)

Foreign Minister's note, May 15 (text printed) stating that Italian Government has never contested U. S. right to reimbursement for Army costs, and that question is under discussion among Allied Governments.

From the Ambassador in France (tel.)

French intention to convene Allied representatives at Paris to examine question of reimbursement of U. S. Army costs.

To the Ambassador in France (tel.)

Instructions to state U. S. gratification at French action; authorization to make informal use of tentative basis for payment as described in telegram of April 6 to Ambassador in Great Britain.

From the Ambassador in France (tel.)

Information that no definite conclusions were reached at first meeting of Allied representatives to discuss question of U. S. Army costs.

231

231

231

Nov. 8

From the French, British, and Italian Embassies
Invitation to send representative to discuss question of
Army costs with Allied delegates at Paris.

232

232

Undated Memorandum by the Secretary of State of a Conversation_with

the French, Belgian, and British Ambassadors and the
Italian Chargé, November 8, 1922

Discussion of arrangements for repayment of U. S. Army
costs. Delay of definite U. S. response to invitation to send
representative to Paris.

[blocks in formation]

Acceptance of invitation to send representative to Paris to discuss question of Army costs.

(The same to the British and Italian Embassies.)

233

CESSATION OF AMERICAN PURCHASE OF GERMAN DYES FROM THE REPARATION

1922 Aug. 16

To President Harding

COMMISSION

234

1923 Jan. 3 (3)

Résumé of arrangements since 1919 providing for U. S. importation and distribution of German dyes; question of continuation of purchases; Allied agreement to application of proceeds of sales to repayment of U. S. Army costs in Germany.

From the Ambassador in France (tel.)

From Boyden: Reparation Commission decision to distribute to Allies dyes formerly taken by Textile Alliance; provision for possible later resumption of U. S. dyestuff orders.

240

GERMANY

AGREEMENT, AUGUST 10, 1922, BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND GERMANY FOR A MIXED CLAIMS COMMISSION

Date and

number

Subject

Page

1922 Feb. 22 (30)

Apr. 15 (51)

May 5 (87)

June 3 (113)

From the Chargé in Germany (tel.)

German view that commercial negotiations should not
depend upon claims settlement; request for U. S. suggestions
on composition of a mixed commission to settle claims.
To the Chargé in Germany (tel.)

Note for Foreign Office (text printed) stating that com-
mercial treaty should not delay claims settlement and pro-
posing early establishment of Mixed Claims Commission.
Instructions to urge orally desirability of prompt determina-
tion of amounts of debts and claims.

From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)

Discussion with Foreign Ministry concerning commercial
treaty and claims; Ambassador's insistence that claims agree-
ment must be reached before conclusion of commercial treaty.
From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)

Foreign Minister's letters, June 2 (texts printed) stating
German readiness to facilitate claims settlement and giving
views on bases of commercial treaty; proposal that Claims
Commission be established under chairmanship of an American.

240

241

242

243

June 21 (86)

To the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)

246

U. S. acceptance of German proposal regarding Claims
Commission.

June 22 (87)

June 23 (3055)

To the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)

246

Draft agreement regarding Claims Commission (text printed).

To the Ambassador in Germany

248

Instructions to communicate U. S. views on functions of Claims Commission; designation of American chairman to act as umpire.

July 17 (141)

From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)

250

Outline of Foreign Office revisions of draft agreement;
German expectation of return of property held in United
States.

July 21

From the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee
Request for views on bill to amend Trading with the Enemy
Act, providing for establishment of Claims Commission of
U. S. citizens and satisfaction of claims out of detained Ger-
man and Austrian property.

251

July 29

252

To the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee
Unfavorable opinion of bill to amend Trading with the
Enemy Act, in view of prospective conclusion of agreement
with Germany.

[blocks in formation]

Instructions to present U. S. reply to counterproposals regarding claims agreement, and to urge signature of agreement without alterations in order to forestall Congressional action. From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)

German acceptance of form of agreement approved in Department's telegram no. 104, July 29; German observations on scope of claims.

255

256

« AnteriorContinuar »