Manufacturing Co. v. Bagley..........Mich.; 85 N. W. 568...... Mapes v. Union R. R. Co. of New York City.... Mather v. Lowell, Lawrence & Haver- Maydole v. Denver & Rio Grande R. R. PAGE .n560 .56 App. Div. (N. Y.) 508; 67 N. Y. ..Colo.; 62 Pac. 964.. ..... .Mass.; 59 N. E. 77...... . 296 n61 61 644 Merritt v. Great Northern R'y Co...... Minn.; 84 N. W. 321. Meyer's Sons v. Falk.... Miller v. City of Springfield.. Mining Co. v. Schmidt.... Missouri, Kansas & Texas R'y Co. of ....... Texas v. Chumlea..... .........Tex. Civ. App.; 61 S. W. 524..... 624 Montgomery v. Buffalo R'y Co........165 N. Y. 139.. Oddy v. West End Street R'y Co......Mass.; 59 N. E. 1026.. O'Leary v. Brockton Street R'y Co.... Mass.; 58 N. E. 585. Pursley v. Edgemoor Bridge Works.:.56 App. Div. (N. Y.) 71. R Radjaviller v. Third Avenue R. R. Co...58 App. Div. (N. Y.) 11; 68 N. Y. Railroad Co v. Beason. R. R. Cov.. Bodine Supp. 617.. .Ga.; 37 S. E. 863. .Ky.; 59 S. W. 740 R. R. Co. v. Bowler & Burdick Co....Ohio; 58 N. E. 813.. R. R. Co. v. Cargille.... R. R. Co. v. Coleman.. .Tenn.; 59 S. W. 141. .Ky.; 59 S. W. 13. .... 135 R. R. Co. v. Crockert..... R. R. Co. v. Fox.... R. R. Co. v. Fox.... R. R. Co. v. Frey.. R. R. Co. v. Hedges.. R. R. Co. v. Holsom back.... R. R. Co. v. McCarty.. R. R. Co. v. Yost.... R'y Co. v. Ford.. R'y Co. v. Laws..... R'y Co. v. Linam. R'y Co. v. Moore.. ..Tex. Civ. App.: 6. S. W. 524.... 624 Tex. Civ. App.; 61 S. W. 726...... 586 .Tex. Civ. App.; 60 S. W. 680... Tex.; 60 S. W. 543... 376 ..n377 ...Tex. Civ. App.; 61 S. W. 528..,...n640 Rohan v. Metropolitan Street R'y Co..59 App. Div. (N. Y.) 250; 69 N. Y. Rutherford v. Texas & Pacific R'y Co..Tex. Civ. App.; 61 S. W. 422....... 620 St. John v. New York Central & Hudson ..... S .......165 N. Y. 241; 59 N. E. 3.. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern ..Ark.; 60 S. W. 951. .n476 ... St. Louis Southwestern R'y Co. of Co............ Seward v. Draper.. ..App. Div. (N. Y.).. ....... .Ga.; 37 S. E. 978.. Shanke v. United States Heater Co.... Mich.; 84 N. W. 283.. 74 Shipley v. Proctor...... Silvia v. Sagamore Mfg. Co..... Silvia v. Wampanoag Mills... .Mass.: 59 N. E. 119. 304 Small v. Allington & Curtis Mfg. Co...Me.; 48 Atl. 177. . Ga.; 37 S. E. 861.. Smith v. Bibb Mfg. Co....... .n280 514 .n467 Sullivan v. Consolidated Traction Co.. Pa.; 47 Atl. 944 · .Ky.; 61 S. W. 8.... 482 ...N. J.; 47 Atl. 427. .Ga.; 38 S. E. 204. n21 .471 520 ...164 N. Y. 553: 58 N. E. 662.. ... 132 .n379 Tesch v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co....... Terrill v. City of Faribault..... Texas Central R. R. Co. v. Fox.. Texas Midland R. R. Co. v. Frey. Texas & Pacific R'y Co. v. Elliott Wis.; 81 N. W. 823. ..... .... PAGE 388 n35 205 587 Tex. Civ. App.; 61 S. W. 442. ...Tex. Civ. App.; 61 S. W. 726........... 586 Thomas v. Atlanta Machine Works.....112 Ga. 666; 37 S. E. 885.. Thomas v. Western Union Tel. Co..... Tex. Civ. App.; 61 S. W. 501...... 633 Thompson v. Dotterer, Receiver of New Orleans & Western R'y Co....... Toledo & Ohio Central R. R. Co. Bowler & Burdick Co...... Tompsett v. Glade Township v. .La.; 29 So. 483 . ..Ohio; 58 N. E. 813..... .... Kan. App.; 63 Pac. 273. ...n467 ..n431 156 .n374 Topeka v. Myers....... ....n256 Uppington v. City of New York........165 N. Y. 222.. Walker v. St. Louis City R'y Co................. Minn.; 84 N. W. 222. West Chicago Street R'y Co. v. Torpe.. Ill.; 58 N. E. 607... .Tex. Civ. App.; 60 S. W. 1023..... 631 Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Bryson.. Tex. Civ. App.; 61 S. W. 548...... 627 Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Rag .Tex. Civ. App.; 61 S. W. 422...... 630 Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Rice..Tex. Civ. App.; 61 S. W. 327...... 626 White v. New York, Philadelphia & Norfolk R. R. Co.... Va.: 38 S. E. 180.. Wild v. Union Pacific R. R. Co........Utah; 63 Pac. 886. 621 636 n69 PAGE Willet v. Goetz.... NOTES. Presumption of Negligence in Live Stock Killing Cases...... .12-18 .87-41 181-184 .249-252 408-416 .552-556 Liability of Municipal Corporations for Injuries Caused by Exca- ..... 557 ......554-556 Contributory Negligence in Crossing Street-car Tracks Liability of Railroad Companies for Accidents to Children on Turntables..... ...611-616 English Rule on the Liability of Landowner for Erection of Nuisance by Licensee on Highway. .... ........800-304 English Rule on Liability of Owner and Independent Contractor for ...... ...... ......... ...... ENGLISH RULE ON LIABILITY OF CARRIER FOR LOSS of MerchanDISE IN AB- NOTES OF RECENT CASES ARISING OUT OF EXPLOSIONS. .657-660 639-640 256-257; 311-314; 374-375 NOTES OF RECENT "TELEGRAM Cases ". NOTES OF RECENT CASES ON ACCIDENTS TO CHILDREN ON TRACK.. .627-635 ...25-28 74-76; 377-380 |