TABLE OF CASES REPORTED. [For convenience of reference the official citations of the cases reported herein so far as the same have appeared to date of publication of this volume, together with citations of other systems of Reports, are added to this Table. Notes of current cases are designated by the letter n preceding the number of the page on which the same appear in this volume, as, for instance: Abbott v. Del. Lack & W. R. R. Co. (N. J.), 47 Atl. 588... ....n74.] Barry v. New York Biscuit Co....... Mass.; 59 N. E. 75. Bell v. Incorporated Town of Clarion. Iowa; 84 N. W. 962.. ....... Berry v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co.. .n306 256 196 599 Biggs v. Consolidated Barb-Wire Co.......Kan.; 63 Pac. 740.... Bodwell v. Nashua Manufacturing Co..N. H.; 47 Atl. 613. Bolin v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis 263 198 .n410 184 Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co. v. Yost Chicago & Erie R. R. Co. v. Thomas.. Ind.; 58 N. E. 1040. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton R. R. Co. v. Hedges.... Clark v. Zarniko. Clarke v. Western Union Tel. Co.. .Ohio; 58 N. E. 568. ...Ohio; 58 N. E. 804... n70 ...Tex. Civ. App.; 60 S. W. 680.. 376 572 .Ohio; 58 N. E. 568.. 184 Kan. App.; 63 Pac. 287. 264 . Kan. App.; 63 Pac. 273. ..n256 .. Valley R. R. Co. Construction Co. v. Sunderland .......Ill.; 58 N. E. 928. Coyle v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chi- v. Marsh...... Coburn v. Philadelphia, Wilmington Baltimore R. R. Co..... Collier v. Collins.. D PAGE De Forge v. New York, New Haven & Mass.; 59 N. E. 669.. 501 ...... 293 Hartford R. R. Co... Dickinson v. West End Street R'y Co.. Mass.; 59 N. E. 60. Dillon v. Nassau Electric R. R. Co.....App. Div. (N. Y.); 68 N. Y. Supp. Donnelly v. City of Rochester.........166 N. Y. 315; 59 N. E. 989........ 550 Dorsey v. Kansas City, Pittsburgh & Easler, et al. v. Southern R'y Co.... S. C.: 37 S. E. 938. ..n582 605 Tenn.; 59 S. W. 141. 200 ..App. Div. (N. Y); 68 N. Y. Supp. 457..351 Enright v. Pittsburg Junction R. R. Co. Pa.; 47 Atl. 938.. 364 639 ..n346 59 App. Div. (N. Y.) 114; 69 N. Y. Supp. 47. .... Wis.: 84 N. W. 420 Frank v. Metropolitan Street R'y Co... 58 App. Div. (N. Y.) 100; 68 N. Y. Supp. 537. Freeman v. Sand Coulee Coal Co......Mont.; 64 Pac. 347.. Gaffney v. St. Paul City R'y Co Gallegher v. Manchester Street R'y.... N. H.; 47 Atl. 610. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio ....... ....... R. R. Co.... R. R. Co...... Gardner v. Wasco County.... Georgia Cotton-Oil Co. v. Jackson.....Ga.; 37 S. E. 873. River R. R. Co Grady v. Georgia R. R. & Banking Co..Ga.; 37 S. E. 861... Gray v. Fort Pitt Traction Co...... Gretzner v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. R. Co..... Griffen v. Manice.... .La.; 29 So. 496..... ..Ohio; 59 N. E. 99. 357 . n35 4€6 .....166 N. Y. 289; 59 N. E. 921........ 547 Wis.; 84 N. W. 419. n71 470 Grimaldi v. Lane.. Guenther v. Fohey... 575 336 .n657 252 Hall v. Emerson-Stevens Mfg. Co...... Me.; 47 Atl. 924. Halton v. Southern R'y Co.... Ham v. City of Lewiston.... Hamel v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co..59 App. Div. (N. Y.) 135; 69 N. Y. Haner v. Northern Pacific R'y Co.....Idaho; 62 Pac. 1028. Harder & Hafer Coal Mining Co. of Sullivan County, Indiana v. Schmidt.. U. S. C. C. A.; 104 Fed. 282... Hari v. Ohio Township, Saline County..Kan.; 62 Pac. 1010....... Harobine v. Abbott Hattaway v. Atlanta Steel & Tin Plate Co....... H. Channon Co. v. Hahn... Supp. 166.. 581 12 335 227 32 ng 196 ... 644 son River R. R. Co........ .... 166 N. Y. 280; 59 N. E. 914..... Henry v. City of Wiliamsport.........197 Pa. St. 465; 47 Atl. 740.. Henry v. Grant Street Electric R'y Co.. Wash.; 64 Pac. 137. 345 374 589 Holdridge v. Mendenhall, Receiver.... Wis.; 83 N. W. 1109. Hudson v. Lynn & Boston R. R. Co...Mass.; 59 N. E. 647... Tex.; 60 S. W. 429.... 383 Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. Coleman.. Ky.; 59 S. W. 13.. PAGE n66 ...n269 .n415 Jacobs v. West End Street R'y Co..... Mass.; 59 N. E. 639..... Jarvis v. Coes Wrench Co.... Johnson v. City of Cincinnati... .Mass.; 58 N. E. 587. 20 Ohio C. C. 657. K 490 n58 187 Kansas City Suburban Belt R'y Co. v. Keen v. Mayor, etc., of City of Havre Kennedy v. Southern R'y Co Kopelka v. City of Bay City. Kriwinski v. .Kan. App.; 62 Pac. 543...... ..... .Md.; 48 Atl. 444.. ... n25 487 .n582 532 476 310 Street .Pa.; 47 Atl. 850...... .n378 .n310 .... Pennsylvania R. R. Co...N. J.; 47 Atl. 447. Kulman v. Erie R. R. Co.. .N. J.; 47 Atl. 497. L Lamb v. City of Worcester... ...Mass.; 58 N. E. 474.. Lammers v. Great Northern R'y Co.... Minn.; 84 N. W. 728... Lamson v. American Ax & Tool Co....Mass.; 58 N. E. 585.. Bodine.... Lydston v. Boston Ice Co...... 53 322 55 |