Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

Meeting of Ministers at Coventry. On the 6th instant, a Meeting of Ministers was holden at Coventry, and a religious service was performed in the great Meeting, in that city. The Rev. James Scott conducted the devotional parts; and the Rev. John Yates delivered the Sermon, from 2 Cor. vi. 1. It is not intended to analize this learned and singularly excellent discourse, nor will it be attempted to point out its numerous and various merits; but it may be permitted to say that it discovered an extensive acquaintance with the writings of the ancients, and the several systems of philosophy which have prevailed in the world; and which, however they may have been extolled by some, were yet clearly proved by the preacher to be as inferior to Christianity as the light of the twinkling star is to the refulgent light of the midday sun: Mr. Yates disapproved of our British youth learning their morality from the pages of Homer, (the beauties of whose poetry, however, he freely allowed) while the Christian religion furnished a far superior and purer system of moral conduct. And it was finely remarked, that sooner than the beroes of Homer could become disciples of the mild, the forgiving, the benevolent religion of Jesus, should Satan and Beelzebub and Moloch have retained their stations in heaven! The preacher pathetically described the wast difference between the effects produced by the orations of the Pagan philosophers and the discourses of the ministers of Christ; and while the former could boast the mighty consequences that followed their eloquence, the latter had often cause to lament the little influence which their labours had upon the conduct of their auditors! The reason of this difference is a subject of serious inquiry to both ministers and people. Some judicious and kind advice was given to the ministers on the subjects of their preaching; which, coming warm from the heart, and flowing from a quarter, in every point of view, so highly respectable, and delivered with so much energy and feeling, could not fail of making a deep impression on the hearts of those to whom it was addressed. Nor was the congregation overlooked; but exhorted diligently to improve the superior light and means of virtue and knowledge with which they were favoured: the hearers were respectable in point of number, and appeared unusually attentive. The following minis

ters

were present on this interesting occasion-Messrs. Bransby, of Dudley; Bull and Bristowe, of Hinckley; Davies, of Coventry, (who gave out the hymns); Field, of Warwick; Kell and Kentish, of Birmingham; Kenrick, of York College; Lloyd, of Kingswood; Scott, of Cradley;

[blocks in formation]

Unitarian Chapel, New Church, Rossendale.

[See M. Repos. X. 313. 392. 458. 461.

527. 596.660. 721. XI. 124. Donations in aid of liquidating the debt, (3507.) upon this Chapel, will be thankfally received by the Rev. R. Aspland, Hackney Road; Rev. R. Astley, Halifax; Rev. W. Johus, Manchester; Mr. W. Walker, Rochdale; and Dr. Thomson, Halifax.

It is intended to proceed to liquidate the debt as soon as may be, and as far as the liberality of the public may enable the above-mentioned gentlemen to do so; to whom all who have entrusted themselves in behalf of the Rossendale brethren are requested to sepost the Subscriptions in their hands without delay.

An accurate account of the Subscription and of its appropriation will be given in the Monthly Repository. Amount Reported, XI. 124. A Legacy from the late Mr. Mason, of Bolton. Unitarian Fund.

MISCELLANEOUS.

[ocr errors]

249 5 0

[ocr errors]

5 0 0 20 0 0

[blocks in formation]

Curious and Important Recent Religious Prosecution.

Religious liberty is so well established in Great Britain, that we rarely bear of persecutions or prosecutions on the ground of faith or worship. When Lord Grosvenor was lately charged with an indirect

Intelligence.-Curious and Important Recent Religious Prosecution.

persecution of some of his labourers who were Dissenters, his friends came forward to explain away the charge. How Lord Romney's friends will proceed remains to be seen his Lordship has acted the part of an Informer against, prosecuted and convicted, (not a Dissenter, but) a brother Churchman, for unlawful religious worship! The Penal Statutes regarding religion have been repealed with respect to Dissenters, and are in force only against the members of the Establishment!

But the reader will be better pleased with a history than a commentary, and therefore we extract the following account of this cnrions case from a pamphlet just published at Maidstone, entitled "A Narrative of the Prosecution of the Honourable Charles Noel-Intended as a Friendly Caution, by a Friend to Religion, Order and Law." The writer of the pamphlet appears to be a friend of Mr. Noel's, and to be intimately acquainted with all the circumstances of the case.

"The Honourable Charles Noel having travelled some time on the Continent for the recovery of his health; on his return to England, he came to reside at the family mansion, Barham Court, in the parish of Teston, where it was the first wish of his heart to render his influence, from his rank and situation, subservient to the best and most essential interests of all who were dependant upon him,tradesmen and labourers; and being duly sensible that family religion is a most important part of practical Christianity, and that family worship is a duty that may be practised by persons of every rank in life, and that without the observance of this privilege, as well as duty, every other duty will be regarded with luke-warmness:-it was a reasonable hope and expectation that example would have its use, and prove productive of religious improvement in the parish.

"It may here be necessary to remark, that it is Mr. Noel's constant practice, and his general rule of conduct, to assemble his domestics and servants the mornings and evenings of every day for the exercise of this duty. When alone, he is his own chaplain; when favoured with the company of any friend on whom with propriety it can devolve, it is resigned to such friend.

"Such a commitment of this duty occurred on Sunday the 31st of December, 1815, and on Sunday the 7th of January, 1816-the two Sundays named in the complaint and information made against him, when the family worship at Barham · Court devolved on Mr. Noel's friend: and from the attendance of this friend, twice on every Sunday, at the parish church, during the whole of his visit at Teston, it would justly have been thought a breach of Christian charity, to have considered

559

this friend of Mr. Noel's as a person hostile to the establishment, or to have suspected him of forming designs injurious to the interests of the church.

"But however pure and unmixed were Mr. Noel's motives, it has been proved that he erred in his judgment, in the intimation given to his tradesmen and the workmen upon his estate, that they were allowed the privilege of attending at his family worship; as the law prohibits any congregation or assembly of Protestants for religious worship, exceeding the number of twenty, in addition to servants and domestics in any unlicensed place; of which limitation Mr. Noel was not aware, and has expressed his regret that he should unintentionally, or from the purest motives have violated any law.

"What contributed to lead Mr. Noel into this error, was the constant, uninterrupted, unopposed practice of the late Lord Barham, who, for a considerable number of years, had himself attended some religions services on a Sunday evening, at a school his Lordship had erected in the village for the instruction of the poor of those parishes where he had any interest, at which the parents of the children, and any other of the inhabitants might attend, and where his Lordship was very generally accompanied by any friends, visitors at Barham Court.

"As no objections had ever been heard against this practice, and Mr. Noel's state of health not rendering it prudent to be out in the evening air, at that season of the year, he was not aware that the transferring this long continued practice at the school, countenanced by the presence of Lord Barham and his friends in general, to his own house for a few evenings, was in contradiction to any existing law.

"In Mr. Noel's first intentions, the privilege of attending the evening service at Barham Court was limited to his own dependants, and that it extended beyond this, arose from circumstances not under his control. But soon after this had occurred at Barbam Court, a rumour was in circulation, that a nobleman of high rank had commenced a prosecution against Mr. Noel, a report pretty generally discredited: strong reasons were urged by many against its being worthy of any credit, and it seemed to be dying away; when a second report positively stated that the same nobleman had called upon a most respectable solicitor, desiring to put into his hands the conducting the intended prosecution, which, by this solicitor was politely declined:-this second report seemed to rest on some evidence, but the solicitor applied to having declined the conducting the prosecution, it was supposed it would not be persevered in-when a third report came into circulation that a very respect,

able solicitor from Maidstone had actually been to Wateringbury to take the deposition of John King, lately a servant at Teston Vicarage, and who had asked and obtained permission to attend the family worship at Barham Court, on the two Sundays mentioned in the information. This report was soon proved to be founded on fact. By duplicates of a summons, one for each offence being served upon the Honourable Charles Noel, upon David Thompson, steward to the estate, upon the Rev. John Kennedy, vicar of Teston, upon the Rev. Richard Wood, curate of Nettlested, upon Nettlefold, parish clerk of Teston, upon John King, servant to the Rev. John Kennedy, and upon Gardiner Jeffery, of Yalding, gentleman, a copy of which is here added:-

"Kent to wit.-To the Constable of the Lower Half Hundred of Twyford; to Edward George Buds, and to all others His Majesty's Officers of the Peace for the said County, and to each and every of them.

"Whereas information and complaint have been made before us, his Majesty's justices of the peace for the said county, by the Right Honourable Charles, Earl of Romney, that the Honourable Charles Noel, of Barham Court, in the parish of Teston, in the said county, the occupier of the mansion house and premises called Barham Court aforesaid, situate in the said parish of Teston, and county of Kent aforesaid, did on Sunday the seventh day of January last past, knowingly permit and suffer a certain congregation or assembly for religious worship of Protestants (at which there were present more than twenty persons, (to wit) thirty or thereabouts, besides the immediate family and servants of the said Charles Noel), to meet in the said mansion house and premises, occupied by him the said Charles Noel as aforesaid, in the parish and county aforesaid, the said mansion house and premises not having been duly certified and registered under any former act or acts of parliament relating to registering places of religious worship, nor having been certified to the bishop of the diocese, nor to the archdeacon of the archdeaconry, nor to the justices of the peace at the general or quarter sessions of the peace for the county, riding, division, or place in which such meeting was held, according to the directions of the statutes in such case made and provided, whereby he, the said Charles Noel hath forfeited for the said offence a sum not exceeding twenty pounds, nor less than twenty shillings, at the discretion of the justices who shall convict the said Charles Noel of the said offence, if he shall be by them thereof convicted-and that the Rev. John Kennedy, vicar of

Teston aforesaid, the Rev. Richard Wood, curate of Nettlested, in the said county,

Nettlefold, clerk of the said parish of Teston, David Thompson, steward at Barham Court aforesaid, James Gardiner Jeffery, of Yalding, in the said county, gentleman, and John King, late servant to the said John Kennedy, and now servant to the Rev. Dr. Willis, of Wateringbury, in the said county, are material witnesses to be examined concerning the same. These are therefore to require you, or any one of you, forthwith to sammon the said John Kennedy, Richard Wood, Nettlefold, David Thompsou,

James Gardiner Jeffery, and John King, severally to be and appear before us, or such other of his Majesty's justices of the peace for the said county, as shall be assembled at the Swan, in West Malling, in the said county, on Monday the first day of April next, at the hour of eleven in the forenoon of the same day, then and there to testify their several knowledge coucerning the premises.-And be you then there to certify what you shall have done in the premises. Herein fail you not.-Given under our bands and seals, the fourth day of March, 1816. John Larking, Henry Hawley, G. Moore, Thomas Coub, H. W ́. Brooke.

"When this cause came before the bench of magistrates at their monthly meeting, held at the Swan Inn, Town Malling, the six witnesses attended, of whom, only Mr. Thompson, the steward of the estate, and the Rev. John Kennedy, vicar of Teston, were called.

"Mr. Thompson having proved the occupancy of the house by Mr. Noel, and delivered a letter from him to the chairman of the sitting-which being read, was, as far as can be recollected, expressive of regret that any mistaken views of his own privileges had led to the violation of any law enacted for the regulation of human conduct, and leaving to the decision of the bench to what degree of penalty, by his mistake, he had made himself liable: this, as far as can be recollected, was the substance of the letter.

"When Mr. Kennedy, being sworn, was asked by the chairman whether more than twenty persons, in addition to servants and domestics were present-and by Lord Romney, whether any persons besides the parishioners of Teston were present— To both which questions, he answered in the affirmative.

"As the witness from frequent conver sations with the Honourable Mr. Noel, was well acquainted with his principles, views, and sentiments, he requested permission of the bench to offer a few remarks to their observation; which being granted, he began by observing, that the name of

Intelligence.-Curious and Important Recent Religious Prosecution.

the Noble Lord at the head of the Paper he held in his hand

"Here Mr. Kennedy was interrupted by the Noble Lord himself, saying he could not permit Mr. Kennedy to proceed; and this interruption appeared to arise from an entertained idea that some censure was intended against his Lordship, for the part his Lordship had taken in this prosecution;— but such an idea, if entertained, was immediately removed by an immediate appeal from Mr. Kennedy to the Earl of Romney, whether in any one instance during the many years he had been known to his Lordship, he had ever given any ground for a suspicion, that he was capable of any disrespect to his Lordship; that what he meant to observe was that from the name of the Noble Lord at the head of the summons he held in his hand, it was impossible to ascribe any but the best motives that actuated his Lordship in this prosecution.-Here Lord Romney observed, that Mr. Kennedy's remarks had taken a different turn to what he expected, and he had no objection to his proceeding; but that he thought it necessary here to state, that as complainant and informer he took the whole matter upon himself, and added he had learned with surprise and astonishment that Mr. Kennedy and Mr. Wood, two clergymen of the church of England, should countenance by their presence the illegal proceedings at Barham Court. To this, Mr. Kennedy begged leave to impress upon the minds of his Lordship and the bench, that for the reasons assigned in the letter read by the chairman, he was equally unconscious with Mr. Noel, that the assembly at Barham court was illegal-and referred to what had been the practice at the school, during the life of Lord Barham.

"Here it was observed from the bench, that by Mr. Kennedy's reference to the practice of the school, Mr. Kennedy was injuring the cause he meant to serveand Lord Romney remarked, that the master of the school was not content with reading to his scholars a chapter in the New Testament, but that he actually preached.

"Mr. Kennedy was about to proceed in his observations, when Mr. Brooke, a magistrate, whose name is affixed to the summons, objected to his being heard any further upon the subject.

"As this required the determination of the bench, Mr. Kennedy was requested by the chairman to withdraw, and being soon recalled was informed that the bench acquiesced in his proceeding, as it was not his intention to justify any breach of the law, but merely to speak in mitigation of any penalty incurred.

"Mr. Kennedy now observed he had little more to say in addition to what Mr. Noel had addressed to the bench-that he

561

could assert from Mr. Noel's authority, and from the conversations with him, that no one could more venerate our laws, or was more desirous to pay all due respect to magistrates; that his error had been unintentional and arose from misconception, and respecting his public sentiments he need not intrude more upon their time. But as Mr. Noel was not present, being called to attend the death-bed of a beloved sister in a distant county, he requested the indulgence of the bench, to speak a few words upon his private character, to which, in his absence, he could speak more freely. He had known him from infancy to manhood, and hesitated not to say, that a person of more solid practical Christianity,' of more amiable manners, of more humane benevolence, of greater generosity of mind, or with a greater degree of the milk of human kindness, he had never known-and he was persuaded he might affirm, he would not knowingly do the least injury to any human being, but would rejoice in any opportunity of doing good to all, and more especially in that good that ended not with the present life : in a word, he was the gentleman and the Christian.

"With such dispositions, such views, and such intentions, the degree of crimi.. nality attached to an error in his judgment; and the degree of punishment it merited, might cheerfully be submitted to the judgment and decision of the bench.

"Mr. Kennedy now begged a further indulgence for a few moments, to make an observation he considered as due to himself.

"He must confess that when the summons was delivered to him by a clerk to Messrs. Burr and Hoar, he read the names of the selected witnesses with some degree of surprise, as being classed with his servant boy, to give evidence against Mr. Noel.

Here Mr. Kennedy was interrupted by Earl Romney, who remarked that Mr. Kennedy was the first person he had ever heard object against a servant and his superior being required to give evidence to a fact in a court of law; where, to prove the fact, a nobleman and his groom might be equally necessary, and he did not suppose Mr. Kennedy or Mr. Wood would appear as voluntary witnesses.

"Mr. Kennedy observed, that where a peer of the realm and his groom were equally necessary to prove a fact, certainly no objection could reasonably be made; but where more than an hundred other persons were equally competent to prove the fact, it had been thought singular by many that out of five selected witnessesMr. Kennedy, Mr. Noel's parish priest, Mr. Wood, his curate, Mr. Nettlefold, his parish clerk, and John King, his servant

boy, were four out of the five summoned to appear before the bench to give evidence against a person he considered as his patron and his friend.

"The Earl of Romney here remarked, that to exonerate Mr. Hoar, the solicitor in this cause, he thought it right to declare that he was the sole selector of the witnesses, as well as being the complainant and informant. It was his wish to have avoided all discussion ;-simply to have proved the offence, and to have left to the uagistrates the amount of the penalty; but on this point his mind was now changed:-Mr. Kennedy had objected to being called to give evidence against Mr. Noel, whom he termed his patron and his friend. Mr. Noel was not his patron, nor had Mr. Kennedy ever received any benefits from that family, as he well knew.

"To this Mr. Kennedy replied—that for every favour be bad received from Mrs. Bouverie, he stood indebted to the friendship of the late Lady Middleton.

"Here the discussion ended, and Mr. Kennedy and Mr. Thompson were desired to withdraw, but in a few minutes were recalled, and informed that the bench had convicted Mr. Noel in the full penalty of forty pounds, which was immediately paid into the hands of the chairman by Mr. Thompson, with an enquiry whether one moiety of the penalty did not belong to the poor of Teston parish; and was answered by the chairman, that when the expences of the prosecution were paid, of what remained, one half went to the informer, and the other half to the poor of the parish where the offence was committed."

MONTHLY RETROSPECT of PUBLIC AFFAIRS;

OR,

The Christian's Survey of the Political World.

THE conflict at Algiers is over, and it has terminated with a treaty of peace, highly honourable to this country. For the time it lasted, and the small space in which the combatants were engaged, it may be considered as one of the great actions for which an eventful period will be celebrated in the annals of history. The Algerines, confident in the strength of their batteries, kept up the fight for above six hours; but nothing could stand against the bravery and skill of the English sailor. Their batteries were demolished, their ships burnt, and great part of the town became a mass of ruins. This severe chastisement brought the sovereign to his senses, and fearing a worse disaster, he complied with the terms proposed to him.

The first article of the treaty abolishes The infamous traffic that had subsisted for many centuries, of selling for slaves the unfortunate persons that the chance of war had thrown into the hands of these barbavians. Whatever contempt we may cast upon the name of intidel in this country, it is a thousand fold greater at Algiers: but there the term of infidelity is appropriated to a confession of the Christian faith. Slavery in all its forms is wretched enough, but the Christian slave amongst the Alge rines was treated worse than and called by the name of a Christian dog. The system is now changed: the States of Barbary are no longer to indulge in this horrid custom : their prisoners of war are not to be subjected to the horrors of slavery. This article is beneficial to the conquered as well as the conquerors; for instead of their abominable piracy, the former may in time be brought to exercise their talents in honest industry.

A strict eye will of course be kept upon the execution of this article of the treaty; and it will be an honour to England to have acted more for the benefit of Europe than for its own-for few if any of the English had been kept in these disgraceful chains of bondage.

Many

Another article provided for the release of all the Christians held in slavery, who thus through our means have been restored to their country and their friends. a captive now made free will, whilst gratitude remains, enter up prayers for the welfare of that power which has conferred on him the greatest kindness; and the prayers of our fellow creatures are to the generous mind a source of the greatest satisfaction. Besides this the Dey was compelled to refund a considerable sum sent to bim by European powers for the redemption of slaves; and now for some time at least the Mediterranean will be freed from the ravages of the pirates. Its shores will bowever remain subject to the Mahometan name, and Christianity will lament that the bad conduct of its professors drove them from a country, which they disgraced by their contemptible disputes, and disregard of all that is most valuable in religion.

France presents to us a new picture. The sovereign seems at last to be sensible that he can no longer govern his country on the principles of faction: that the benefit of the whole must be consulted, not that of the few who arrogate to themselves the exclusive title of royalists. He has dissolved his parliament; a new one is to be called, according to the charter, which he now declares to be the rule of his conduct.

Germany is on the point of entering in

« AnteriorContinuar »