Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

that the oaths of supremacy were thus understood by the bulk of the nation, when they were first promulgated, this, the writer considers, at best, extremely doubtful. He cannot reconcile such construction of them, either with that, which the monarchs and their parliaments themselves repeatedly put on them, by their conduct, or with the powers which the legislature has very frequently attributed to them. Hume*, says expressly, that Elizabeth always pretended that, in "quality "of supreme head of the church, she was fully empowered by her prerogative to decide "all questions which might arise with regard "to doctrine, discipline, or worship; and would never allow her parliaments so much as to take "these points into consideration." This appears to the writer to afford a conclusive argument for supposing, that, when the acts conferring the supremacy on the crown were passed, they were not generally understood in the sense contended for by those, who deem it lawful for catholics to take them. "the Scottish catholics, was chiefly judged expedient in order "to preserve the government against the attempts or efforts of "those persons, who then did, or were supposed to acknow"ledge the temporal superiority or power of the pope or see " of Rome, over that part of the realm of Great Britain called "Scotland."-In the debate on the catholic question, in the last session of parliament, an account of which will also be inserted in the same volume of this work, several important observations were made, both on the general question of the king's spiritual supremacy, and on the construction of the several oaths, in which it is asserted. They have confirmed the author in the opinion, which he has intimated in this chapter. Chap. xl.

*

The subject is ably discussed by Mr. Neale, in his History of the Puritans*. His arguments, to show that the acts in question were intended to confer on the monarchs some powers merely spiritual, and belonging of right to the church, appear to the writer to be incontrovertible.

That the acts are at this time so understood, both by the general body of catholics, and by the general body of protestants, the writer considers quite undeniable.

"These things," (to use the language of sir John Winter, in his Observations on the Oath of Supremacy, in which he contended, in the reign of Charles the second, with great force of argument for the construction of it in the sense suggested by its advocates,)" These things have made it to "be firmly believed by the catholics, and those of "their profession over all christendom, that in taking the said oath, with what explanation soever,—

[ocr errors]

(if such explanation be not publicly made known and declared), they give just scandal, (which is "malum in se,)-that they renounce their religion as indeed the common acceptation of the words "of the oath do import no less."

66

* Chap. iv.

CHAP. XXV.

EFFECT OF THE LEGAL ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PROTESTANT RELIGION ON THOSE WHO ADHERED TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.

THUS, "the revolution which has been men"tioned in church affairs," to use the language of the writers of the Parliamentary History*, "took “ place in a very surprising manner; and popes, "with cardinals, were banished this realm. On the "rising of the parliament, the new liturgy in the "vulgar tongue, which by their authority had been "established, was introduced into all churches and "chapels of the kingdom: images were once more "taken down and removed out of them, with as "little disturbance as possible; and some of the 66 clergy themselves underwent the same fate; for "the oath of supremacy being tendered to them, "such as refused were deprived of their bishoprics, "livings, and all other ecclesiastical preferments: "but the numbers of the conscientious clergy "were but small, in comparison of the whole body. "In England, there were then computed nine "thousand four hundred ecclesiastical prefer

66

[ocr errors]

ments; of those, there went off no more than

eighty parish priests, fifty prebendaries, fifteen "heads of colleges, twelve archdeacons, as many "deans, six abbots and abbesses, and fourteen * Vol. iii. p. 436.

r bishops; which last number, except the bishop "of Landaff, were all that then were living. In "this, the heads of the clergy showed much more "conscience than the tail of them. Other bishops, "&c. were elected and substituted in the places "of the deprived; and these alterations in religion 66 were done with so little noise and bustle in England, as was, says Camden, to the astonish"ment of the whole christian world."

[ocr errors]

To the list of ecclesiastics who are said, in the foregoing extract, to have been deprived of their livings, in consequence of their non-conformity, the names of about fifty deprived prebendaries, and thirty-seven fellows of colleges, mentioned by Dodd*, may be added. But there is the strongest reason to suppose, that the number of non-conformists was considerably greater than that mentioned in the extract which we have inserted from the Parliamentary History. Seventeen fellows only of New College are noticed in the lists of the non-conformists which have reached us: but Wood informs us, that their whole number amounted

[ocr errors]

of

* Church Hist. vol. ii. p. 319. So lately as 1563, the speaker of the house of commons complained, that many the schools and benefices "were seized, the education of youth disappointed, and the succours for knowledge cut off. For "I dare aver," said he, "that the schools in England are fewer "than formerly by one hundred; and those, which remain, are many of them but slenderly stocked; and this is one reason, "the number of learned men is so remarkably diminished. "The universities are decayed, and great market towns "without either school or preacher." Coll. Ecc. Hist. vol. ii. p. 480.

[blocks in formation]

to twenty-three; and he says, of the university of Oxford at large, that "after the catholics had left "it, upon the alteration of religion, it was so empty, "that there was very seldom a sermon preached in "it in the university church;-the university," he adds, "seemed to be destroyed*."

[ocr errors]

At the accession of queen Elizabeth, there were in England, including the Isle of Man, twentyseven episcopal sees; ten of these were vacant; all the prelates, who filled the remaining sees, except Kitchen, of Landaff, whom Camden calls "the "calamity of his see," on account of his dismemberment of its possessions, refused the oath of supremacy, and were displaced and imprisoned; but the imprisonment was gently managed, and the greater part of them were left prisoners at large.

Some were permitted to cross the seas, and died abroad. In consequence of some real or alleged imprudence, Watson of Lincoln was placed in strict confinement at Wisbeach castle; he appears to have been the only prelate, against whom government proceeded with severity.

We have seen, in a preceding page, that the number of ecclesiastics was computed at nine thousand four hundred. Most of the regulars who disobeyed the new regulations, fled to the convents of their several orders on the continent,their natural asylums: two religious establishments only preserved the continuity of their respective com

* See a short chronological account of the religious establishments by English catholics on the continent, by the abbé Mann, Archæologia, vol. xiii. p. 251.-And see Appendix, Note IV.

« AnteriorContinuar »