Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

LECTURE XIX.

WE

Second Commandment.

E are now come to the fecond Commandment, which the Church of Rome would perfuade Men is only Part of the firft. But they plainly relate to different Things. The firft appoints, that the Object of our Worship be only the true God; the next, that we worship not him under any vifible Refemblance or Form. And befides, if we join these two into one, there will be no tenth left; though the Scripture itfelf hath called them ten to avoid which Abfurdity, the Ro manifts have committed another, by dividing the tenth into two. And they might as well have divided it into fix or feven; as I fhall fhew you, in difcourfing upon it. For these Reafons, the oldest and most confiderable,! both of the Jewish and Chriftian Writers, who diftinguifh the Commandments by their Number, diftinguish them in the fame Manner, that we do. Perhaps it may feem of fmall Confequence, how that before us is counted, provided it be not omitted. And we muft own, that fome Perfons before the Rife of Popery, and fome Pro teftants fince the Reformation, have, without any ill Defign, reckoned it as the Papifts do. as the Papifts do. But what both the former have done, by mere Miftake, thefe laft endeavour to defend out of Policy: well knowing, that when once they have got the second to be confidered as only a Part of the firft, they can much more eafily pafs it over, as a Part of no great feparate Meaning or Importance, than if it were thought a diftin&t Precept...

1 Exod, xzxiv. 28. Deut. iv. 13; X. 4
G &

And

And accordingly, in fome of their fmall Books of Devotion, they pass it over, and leave it out entirely 2. But it deferves, as I fhall now fhew you, another Sort of Regard.

The Prophet Ifaiah very jufly puts the Queftion: To whom will ye liken God? Or what Likeness will ye compare unto him? He is an invifible Spirit; therefore reprefenting him in a vifible Shape, is representing him to be fuch as he is not. He is every where prefent : therefore a Figure, confined by its Nature to a particuJar Place, muff incline Perfons to a wrong Conceptionof him. He is the living, wife and powerful Governor of the World: therefore to exprefs him by a dead Lump of Matter must be doing him Difhonour. We are unable indeed, at beft, to fpeak or think worthily of him : and we cannot well avoid ufing fome of the fame Phrases, concerning him and his Actions, which we do concerning the Parts and Motions of our own Bodies. But we can very well avoid making vifible Images of him and the plaineft Reafon teaches, that we ought to avoid it; because they lower and debafe Mens Notions of God; lead the weaker Sort into fuperftitious and foolish Apprehenfions and Practices; and provoke thofe of better Abilities, from a Contempt of fuch childish Reprefentations, to difregard and ridicule the Religion, into which they are adopted.

Therefore, in the early Ages of the World, many of the Heathens themselves had no Images of the Deity. Particularly, the ancient Perfians had none. Nor had the firft Romans, Numa, their fecond King, having, as the Philofopher Plutarch, himself a Roman Magiftrate, though a Greek by Birth, tells us, forbidden them to reprefent God in the Form, either of a Man or any other Animal. And accordingly, he faith, they had neither any painted

2 This they do in the Latin Office of the Virgin, and in fome of their English devotional Books. Indeed there they omit likewife all but the first Sentence of our fourth Commandment, and the Promife in our fifth; perhaps to palliate their preceding Omiffion.

3 Ifa. xl. 18.

4 Herodot. 1. 1. fec. 131. A

nor

nor engraved Figure of him for 170 Years; but Temples, void of any Image of any Shape: thinking it impious to liken a fuperior Nature to inferior ones; and impoffible to attain the Notion of God otherwife, than by the Understanding. And Varro, one of the most learned of their own Authors,. after acknowledging, that during more than 170 Years they worshipped the Gods without any visible Reprefentation, added that had they never had any, their Religion had been the purer: for which Opinion, amongst other Evidences, he brought that of the Jewish People: and fcrupled not to fay in Conclufion that they who first fet up Images of the Gods in the feveral Nations, leffened the Reverence of their Countrymen towards them, and introduced Error concerning them 2. So much wifer were these Heathen Romans in this Point, than the Chriftian Romans are now.

But when fome of the Eastern Kingdoms had fallen into this Corruption; particularly the Egyptians, who claimed the Invention as an Honour3, the great Care of God was to preserve or free his own People from it. The Words of this Commandment exprefs that Purpofe very ftrongly, and very clearly forbid not only, making and wolfhipping Reprefentations of falfe Gods, but any Reprefentation of God at all. And to fhew yet more fully, that even, thofe of the true God are prohibited by it, Mofes, in Deuteronomy, immediately after mentioning the Delivery of the ten Commandments, adds with refpect to the fecond: Take therefore good Heed unto yourselves: for ye Jaw no Manner of Similitude, on the Day that the Lord Spake unto you in Horeb, out of the Midft of the Fire: left ye corrupt yourselves, and make you the Similitude of any Figure And when the Ifraelites made a golden Calf in the Wilderness, though evidently their Design was

Plut, in Num. p. 65. Ed. Par. 1624.

L... I

2 Aug. de Civ. Dei, 1 4. c. 31. Dionyfius Halicarnaffenfis indeed faith, 1. 2. c. 15, p. 87. that Romulus erected Images. But as he mentions them no otherwife than incidentally, amongst the Provisions made by that Prince for divine Worship, his Affertion is not fo much to be regarded, as the two contrary more formal ones. Or we may fuppofe that Numa took them down. 4 Deut. iv. 12) 5, 16v

3 Herodot 1. 2. §. 4.

to

to reprefent by it, not a falfe Object of Worship, but the Lord (in the Original it is Jehovah) who brought them out of the Land of Egypt; yet they were charged with it, and punished for it, as a Breach of their Covenant with God: and Mofes accordingly broke, on that Occafion, the two Tables of the Commandments, which were, on their Part, the Conditions of that Covenants. Again, in After-times, when the Kings of Ifrael fet up the fame Representation of the fame true God at Dan and Bethel; the Scripture conftantly fpeaks of it, as the leading Sin, from which all the rest of their Idolatries, and at laft their utter Deftruction, proceeded. For, from worshipping the true God by an Image, they foon came to worship the Images of falfe Gods too; and from thence fell into all forts of Superftition, and all Sorts of Wickedness.

Yet the Church of Rome will have it, that we may now very lawfully and commendably practise what the Jews were forbidden. But obferve: not only the Jews but the Heathens alfo, who never were fubject to the Law of Mofes, are condemned in Scripture for this Mode of Worship. For St. Paul's Accufation against them is, that when they knew God, they glorified him not as God; but became vain in their Imaginations; and changed the Glory of the incorruptible God into an Image, made like to corruptible Man. And in another Place he argues with the Athenians thus. Forafmuch as we are the Offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto Gold or Silver, or Stone, graven by Art and Man's Device. And the Times of this Ignorance God winked at: but now commandeth all Men every where to repent".

Where then is, or can be, the Allowance of that Image Worship in the Bible, for which Multitudes of the Romish Communion are as earneit, as if it was commanded there? Nor is Antiquity more favourable: to it, than Scripture. For the primitive Chriftians abhorred the very mention of Images: holding even the 7 Acts xvii. 29, 30.

5 Exod. xxxi

Rom. i. 21. 23

Trade

Trade of making them to be utterly unlawful. And indeed pretending to frame a Likeness of God the Father Almighty, whom no Man hath ever feen, or can fee, as fome of that Church have done, without any Cenfure from the Rulers of it, liberal as they are of Cenfures on other Occafions, is both a palpable and a heinous Breach of this Commandment. For, though we find in the Old Teftament, that an Angel hath fometimes appeared, reprefenting his Perfon, as an Ambaffador doth that of his Prince; and though in a Vifion of the Ancient of Days, his Garment was white as Snow, and the Hair of his Head like pure Wool; yet thefe Things gave the Jews no Right then, and therefore can give us none now, to make other, or even the like, Reprefentations of him, contrary to his exprefs Order.

Our bleffed Saviour indeed exifted in a human Form, but we have not the leaft Knowledge of any one Part or Feature of his Perfon. And therefore all Attempts of exhibiting a Likeness of him are utterly vain. Befides, he hath appointed a very different Memorial of himself, the Sacrament of his Body and Blood: and we ought to think that a fufficient one. These others can ferve no good Purpofe, but what, by due Meditation, may be attained as well without them. And there is great and evident Danger of Evil in them, from that unhappy Proneness of Mankind to fix their Thoughts and Affections on fenfible Objects, instead of railing them higher which if any one doth not feel in himfelf, he muft however fee in others. But particularly in this Cafe, long Experience hath given fad Proof, that from fetting up Images of our gracious Redeemer, the holy Virgin, and other Saints, to remind Perfons of them and their Virtues, the World hath run on to pay fuch imprudent and extravagant Honours to the Figures themselves, as by Degrees have arifen to the groffeft Idolatry.

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
« AnteriorContinuar »