Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

foreknown, are of authority and weight enough to stand against the consequences.

I humbly lay these my sentiments before the County. They are not taken up to serve any interests of my own, or to be subservient to the interests of any man or set of men under heaven. I could wish to be able to attend our Meeting, or that I had time to reason this matter more fully by Letter; but I am detained here upon our business ---What you have already put upon us is as much as we can do. If we are prevented from going through it with any effect, I fear it will be in part owing not more to the resistance of the enemies of our cause, than to our imposing on ourselves such tasks as no human faculties, employed as we are, can be equal to. Our worthy Members have shown distinguished ability and zeal in support of our Petition. I am just going down to a Bill brought in to frustrate a capital part of your desires. The Minister is preparing to transfer the cognizance of the publick accounts from those, whom you and the Constitution have chosen to control them, to unknown persons, creatures of his own. For so much he annihilates Parliament.

Charles-street, 12th April, 1780.

I have the honour, &c.

EDMUND BURKE.

TRACTS,

RELATIVE TO THE

LAWS AGAINST POPERY IN IRELAND *.

I

I.

Fragments of a Tract on the Popery Laws.

THE PLAN.

PROPOSE, first, to make an Introduction, in

order to show the propriety of a closer inspection into the affairs of Ireland; and this takes up the first Chapter; which is to be spent in this introductory matter, and in stating the Popery Laws in general as one leading cause of the imbecility of the Country.

Ch. II.

*The condition of the Roman Catholicks in Ireland appears to have engaged the attention of Mr. Burke at a very early period of his political life. It was probably soon after the year 1765, that he formed the plan of a work upon that subject, the fragments of which are now given to the Publick. No title is prefixed to it in the original manuscript; and the Plan, which it has been thought proper to insert here, was evidently designed merely for the convenience of the Author. Of the

[blocks in formation]

Ch. II. states particularly the Laws themselves in a plain and popular manner.

Ch. III. begins the Remarks upon them, under the heads of, 1st. The object, which is a numerous people. 2dly. Their means, a restraint on Property. 3dly. Their instruments of execution, corrupted morals; which affect the national prosperity.

Ch. IV. The impolicy of those Laws as they affect the national security.

Ch. V.

first Chapter some unconnected fragments only, too imperfect for publication, have been found. Of the second there is a considerable portion, perhaps nearly the whole; but the Copy, from which it is printed, is evidently a first rough draught. The third Chapter, as far as it goes, is taken from a fair corrected Copy; but the end of the second part of the first head is left unfinished; and the discussion of the second and third heads was either never entered upon, or the Manuscript containing it has unfortunately been lost. What follows the third Chapter appears to have been designed for the beginning of the fourth, and is evidently the first rough draught; and to this we have added a fragment, which appears to have been a part either of this or the first Chapter.

In the Volume, with which it is intended to close this posthumous publication of Mr. Burke's Works, we shall have occasion to enter into a more particular account of the part, which he took in the discussion of this great political question. At present it may suffice to say, that the Letter to Mr. Smith, the second Letter to Sir Hercules Langrishe, and the Letter to his Son, which here follow in order the Fragment on the Popery Laws, are the only writings upon this subject found amongst his papers in a state fit to appear in this stage of the Publication.

What remain are some small fragments of the Tract, and a few Letters containing no new matter of importance.

Ch. V. Reasons, by which the Laws are supported, and answers to them.

CHAP. II.

In order to lay this matter with full satisfaction before the reader, I shall collect into one point of view, and state, as shortly and as clearly as I am able, the purport of these Laws, according to the objects, which they affect, without making at present any further observation upon them, but just what shall be necessary to render the drift and intention of the Legislature, and the tendency and operation of the Laws, the more distinct and evident.

I shall begin with those, which relate to the possession and inheritance of landed property in Popish hands. The first operation of those Acts upon this object was wholly to change the course away the of descent by the common Law; to take right of primogeniture; and, in lieu thereof, to substitute and establish a new species of Statute Gavelkind. By this Law, on the death of a Papist possessed of an estate in fee simple, or in fee tail, the land is to be divided by equal portions between all the male children; and those portions are likewise to be parcelled out, share and share alike, amongst the descendants of each son, and so to proceed in a similar distribution ad infinitum. From this regulation, it was proposeb, that some

Y 4

important

important consequences should follow. First. By taking away the right of primogeniture, perhaps in the very first generation, certainly in the second, the families of Papists, however respectable, and their fortunes, however considerable, would be wholly dissipated, and reduced to obscurity and indigence, without any possibility, that they should repair them by their industry or abilities; being, as we shall see anon, disabled from every species of permanent acquisition. Secondly. By this Law the right of testamentation is taken away, which the inferiour tenures had always enjoyed; and all tenures from the 27th Hen. 8th. Thirdly. The right of settlement was taken away, that no such persons should, from the moment the Act passed, be enabled to advance themselves in fortune or connexion by marriage, being disabled from making any disposition in consideration of such marriage, but what the Law had previously regulated; the reputable establishment of the eldest son, as representative of the family, or to settle a jointure, being commonly the great object in such settlements, which was the very power, which the Law had absolutely taken away.

The operation of this Law, however certain, might be too slow. The present possessors might happen to be long lived. The Legislature knew the natural impatience of Expectants, and upon this principle they gave encouragement to children to anticipate the inheritance. For it is

provided,

« AnteriorContinuar »