Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

the fierce excitement that ran through every vein whilst it lasted. It was during '97, and I was in one of the Samana forts, a few days after they had been relieved by General Yeatman Biggs. One night I was on duty, and had to visit the sentries. I was about half-way round the horn work when I heard a slight noise, as though some one had slipped on a loose stone outside. With visions of a strong hostile party of Afridis at the very least, I drew my revolver, and very cautiously peeped over the wall, only to find that a donkey had somehow got inside the wire entanglement which surrounded the fort, and had stumbled whilst reaching up to pull at a tuft of grass. That, however, as Kipling puts it, is another story. I should have liked to stay up in the machan, as the tiger might have come back, for there can be no doubt he was very hungry, since he had been baulked of all his meals for over forty-eight hours; and I have known a case of a tiger returning no less than three times in one night to his kill, though two barrels were fired at him on each occasion. Still it was unlikely he would do so soon, as on the sound of my shot an elephant and lights had been sent out from camp. Time was just what I could not spare, as we were at some distance from the little railway, the thread that connected us with civilisation, whilst the only train left at six in the morning, so very reluctantly I left the machan.

Discussing the evening's in

cidents around the camp-fire a little later, I learned I might have sat up with safety when I first saw the tiger, and had I done so it is possible I could have had a less chancy shot, as whilst he was stalking up the slope I could see the line formed by the white fur of the under part of the body where it meets the tawny upper portion, whilst the light had not then gone quite so completely. It is also probable that had I withheld my fire a little longer he would have come to the bullock, in which case he would have been almost directly below me, and there would have been less room to miss. Still, when all's said and done, he gave me a very easy shot as it was, and I ought to have got him. It was over-excitement probably, and perhaps just a trifle of over-certainty, for when he came I had no thought of missing, and already looked upon his skin as adorning my walls.

Shortly after dinner my wife and I bade good-bye to our hospitable friends and started for the station on an elephant, hoping for a decent night's rest in the train, having sent off all our belongings hours before. Reminiscences of the week's doings and conversation with the mahout kept us amused for about an hour, but after that our sentences began to get a bit disjointed, and I can vouch that I, at all events, was longing for the station lights. We arrived and dismissed the mahout and his elephant, and, though rather surprised at seeing nothing of our servant, concluded he must

I routed out a peculiarly sleepy babu, but could get no news. Then I thought that probably the carts would be amongst some we had seen outspanned near where we left the main road to turn down to the station, so went off to look. No sign and close on midnight; things were getting serious.

be waiting at the carriage. details, remarking, "I am God Threading our way through of train," and we discovered scattered bales of goods and that, far from wishing to snoring recumbent forms which impersonate the Deity, the littered the platform, we owner of the voice was trying reached the train, only to find to explain he was the guard of no trace of our belongings or the train. He turned out to be of our servant. a small wizened old man, with a pronounced limp, and was at least three-parts native. He had little more than a bowing acquaintance with the English language, but he was SO proud of this acquaintanceship that it was impossible to get him to resort to the vernacular Hindostani, his mother tongue, in which he would have been far more intelligible. In answer to my inquiries, he told me there was a cart parao, or camping-ground, in the village, and directed me to it. I placed my wife in his care whilst I went forward to prosecute my search. He proved to be most faithful to his trust, as he made her walk just before him all the way back to the train, and shut her up in the carriage, leaving her his lantern. Then, apparently having got ready himself After we had covered about for bed, his heart smote him, half a mile we saw a light and fearing she might be cold, coming towards us, and I hailed he turned up again at the it hopefully in Hindostani, carriage door with a couple of thinking it was probably our rezais (wadded cotton quilts), servant in search of us. The which he insisted on leaving light stopped, but there was with her. Not only that, but no reply, so I called again, he took the trouble to wrap this time in English, "Who's them round her and tuck them there?" Out of the darkness under her as she lay on the came a voice saying, "I am bunk, absolutely refusing to God." We were both a bit listen to her protests. These, taken aback, and again I in- I may say, were honestly quired with some amazement, sincere, as the quilts were not "Who are you?" The voice in the first blush of youth, and then condescended to further but the loan was kindly

There was a village about three-quarters of a mile on where there was a dak bungalow and a police thana, so I returned to the train to let my wife know I was going up to make inquiries there. She flatly declined to be left by herself, and insisted on coming with me, so, taking a lamp from the station, which, I may mention incidentally, went out just when it was most needed, we started to walk to the village.

-

meant, so perhaps it would be better to draw a veil.

I myself went on into the village, where I discovered the elephant that had brought us from camp, and was enabled to communicate with our friends and inform them of our plight, so that search might be made if the things did not turn up before the train left, for it was impossible for us to delay our return. About three in the morning I was awakened by one of our friend's chuprassies, who informed me that we should find everything at the next station, as the carts had gone there by mistake. Sure enough, as the train pulled up some twenty minutes after starting, before a red-brick shanty in the heart

of the jungle, I saw my servant at the side of the line, for platform there was none. tween us we bundled everything into the carriage, as the place did not boast of coolies, and the train sauntered on.

So concluded almost the most pleasant ten days I have ever spent. Given fine weather and congenial company, there is a charm in the jungle and camp during an Indian cold season that puts all the attractions of civilisation and social gaieties into the shade. Out in the open-air all day, one feels fitter than the proverbial fiddle, and there is not a single waking hour which is not replete with interest and excitement.

E. F. KNOX.

[blocks in formation]

THE PALACE OF PEACE-MR ANDREW CARNEGIE, PHILANTHROPIST -WHAT IS WORTH FIGHTING FOR?. THE EXAMPLE OF THE DUTCH REPUBLIC-THE ENGLISH NOVEL.

THE Palace of Peace, which has lately been opened at The Hague, might more properly be called the Palace of Cant. In other words, it is acclaimed chiefly by those generous and foolish souls who cannot distinguish between "is" and ought to be," who pretend to themselves, in true hypocrisy, that we live in a world wherein all passions, save commercial greed, are extinct, and that there is nothing more left for mortal man to desire than to make as much money and as quickly as he can. If we may trust the descriptions afforded by the public prints, the Palace resembles nothing so much as a very costly and rather vulgar hotel. It is surrounded by a "well-timbered "park, in which obscure diplomatists may spend a happy day. It boasts a restaurant, whose cooking is said to be "unexceptionable." And if these material advantages do not bring peace to the world, then will man remain a fighting animal unto the end of time.

The Palace is the gift of that eminent philanthropist, Mr Andrew Carnegie, and this fact is enough of itself to place it under a well-merited suspicion. The old superstition that money does not smell should long ago have been renounced. Money never loses its scent, and upon every sovereign of

Mr Carnegie's giving there is the taint of hatred and hostility. His chief claim to notoriety was won by the production of an insolent book, 'Triumphant Democracy.' This masterpiece of impertinence is dedicated "to the beloved republic, under whose equal laws I am made the peer of any man, although denied political equality by my native land." Thus he strikes the note of enmity, and while he does not tell us for what transgression he was deprived of political equality by his native land, it is plain that he boasts when he proclaims himself the peer of any man. He is the peer only of millionaires precisely as successful as himself. The one kind of warfare which he tolerates is the bitter, grinding warfare of commerce, in which more gold than blood is shed, and in which not a minute is lost, for those who are resolved to grow rich by the labour of others. Mr Carnegie, as far as we know, has never done anything, or invented anything by his own endeavours. He has understood the task of making a trust, and therefore he is in an excellent position to teach the rest of the world manners and morals. The words "throne" and "king"-ridiculous words he calls them throw this wealthy democrat into a fury

of uncontrollable anger. "A royal family," says he, "is an insult to every other family in the land." A poor man, perchance, might find an insult in the flaunting of millions. But the great Mr Carnegie is gracious. He likes nothing better than poverty-in others. "Give us poverty, honest poverty," says he, with a tear rolling down his rugged cheek; and you may be quite sure that he will not devote his millions to destroying that lack of pence which he finds beneficial in his inferiors.

He

Queen of England insulted
labour every moment of her
life." He holds his sides with
laughter when he thinks of
"the great democratic contin-
ent of Australia really subject
to the little island, and to
the funny monarchy and its
antiquated forms.' Ameri-
cans, he tells us, would not
tolerate the abuse of a royal
family for an instant. "Turn
the rascals out," they would cry,
and thus prove themselves more
than a match in urbanity for
Mr Carnegie himself. But
what filled Mr Carnegie's
sturdy pate fullest of disgust
was the idea that any one
should be "required to kiss " the
Prince of Wales's hand when
he came to the throne.
did not entertain a lofty view
of the honour of English states-
men. He believed that there
was not a man in Britain of
the rank of a Cabinet Minister
"but would have bowed, and that
low and repeatedly, if desired,
to Gesler's cap." A life spent
in the barren collection of dol-
lars no doubt justifies Mr Car-
negie in imputing cowardice
to others. But the Prince of
Wales's hand seemed to him a
far worse object to salute than
Gesler's cap. "The first man
who feels as he ought to feel,"
says our money-bag, "will
either smile when the hand is
extended, at the suggestion that
he should so demean himself,
and give it a good hearty
shake, or knock his Royal
Highness down." Neither Mr
Carnegie's ignorance nor Mr
Carnegie's wealth can excuse
this kind of effrontery. Eng.
land is bound to the throne

For money that is inherited he can find no excuse. To be Mr Carnegie's equal you must have toed his line; you must have made your money by the familiar methods; you must have lived for the rest of your life on the proceeds of a fortunate manœuvre. For "the average peer" Mr Carnegie has a profound contempt. He is "a wretch, concentred all in self," who "doubly dying, shall go down To the vile dust, from whence he sprung, Unwept, unhonoured, and unsung." What Mr Carnegie does not know about the making of money may not be worth knowing. He has not discovered the elementary truth that there are other less reputable ways of making it than by inheritance. However, as we have said, he reserves his choicest insults for thrones and their occupants. He condemns with an unctuous pomposity all "thrones and royal families, and the influences necessarily surrounding them the vile brood they breed." He declares amiably that "the by centuries of immemorial

« AnteriorContinuar »