 | Charles Bingham Penrose, Pennsylvania. Supreme Court, Frederick Watts, William Rawle - 1830 - 552 páginas
...ESHELMAN. IN PRROR. In a case of partnership, the joint effects belong to the firm, and not to the partners, each of whom is entitled only to a share of what may remain, after the payment of the partnership debts, and no greater interest can be derived from a voluntary assignment... | |
 | 1833 - 514 páginas
...right only to surplus.) In a case of partnership, the joint effects belong to the firm, and not to the partners, each of whom is entitled only to a share of what may remain, after the payment of the partnership debts, and no greater interest can be derived from a voluntary assignment... | |
 | 1888 - 564 páginas
...continues in existence, and not to the individuals who compose it. The right of each partner extends only to a share of what may remain after payment of the debts of the firm and the settlement of its accounts. Growing out of this right, or rather included... | |
 | 1916 - 502 páginas
...and American courts, that the property or effects of a partnership belong to the firm and not to the partners, each of whom is entitled only to a share...remain after payment of the partnership debts and after a settlement of the accounts between the oarting the principle of this decision and comparing it with... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1879 - 856 páginas
...continues in existence, and not to the individuals who compose it. The right of each partner extends only to a share of what may remain after payment of the debts of the firm and the settlement of its accounts. Growing out of this right, or rather included... | |
 | 1923 - 1092 páginas
...continues In existence, and not to the individuals who compose it. The right of each partner extends only to a share of what may remain after payment of the debts of the firm and, the settlement of Its accounts. Growing out of this right, or rather included... | |
 | 1893 - 1182 páginas
...hut it did not make his assignee a copartner with, or tenant in common iu the property with, theother two partners. She did not, by the assignment, become...partners, each of whom is entitled only to a share ol what may remain after payment of the partnership debts, and after settlement of the accounts between... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1884 - 966 páginas
...and American courts, that the property or effects of a partnership belong to the firm and not to the partners, each of whom is entitled only • to a share...remain after payment of the partnership debts and after a settlement of the accounts between the partners; consequently that no greater interest can be derived... | |
 | 1918 - 1214 páginas
...not entitled to the same priority. They have a right to his individual interest only, and this is his share of what may remain after payment of the partnership debts, and after a settlement of the accounts between the partners. 2. PABTNEBSHIP <§=>208(1, 5)— GABNISHMENT—... | |
 | Edward Warren Hines, William Pope Duvall Bush, John Cleland Wells, Frank L. Wells, Findlay Ferguson Bush, Horace C. Brannin, William Cromwell, W. J. Chinn, Walter G. Chapman, R. G. Higdon, Thomas Robert McBeath - 1885 - 914 páginas
...order attorney. Partnership — 1. The property of a partnership belongs to the firm, and not to the partners, each of whom is entitled only to a share...remain after payment of the partnership debts and after a settlement of the accounts between the partners; consequently no greater interest can be derived... | |
| |
The right of each partner extends only to a share of what may remain after payment of the debts of the firm and the settlement of its accounts. Growing out of this right, or rather Included in it, Is the right to have the partnership property applied... 
