Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

and the only one that, from a practical standpoint, can be agreed upon, you will disarm prejudice, will win commendation, and whether successful or not will at least remove any charge of narrowness and exclusiveness from us, and place the responsibility of further schism elsewhere. On the other hand, to advocate a change of Name, and the adoption of the title "The American Catholic Church," on the ground that the latter is "comprehensive"-and will "make for unity," etc., is simply ridiculous. Think of it! The title which unchurches more than one hundred millions of our fellow Christians, lauded as "comprehensive," exploited as an eirenicon! Nor could the immense loss sustained upon this side be compensated by any gain upon the other. For such action would be as useless in its overtures to Rome, as it would be insulting to our Protestant brethren. For be it remembered by all who are beguiled by such visions, that reunion with Rome can never be attained by any mere abandonment of our Protestant title, but only by complete submission to all her pretensions-in short, only by unconditional surrender. He who does not know this, simply does not know Rome. Right here, we venture to make a prediction, which we sincerely hope may not be true, but which we cannot persuade ourselves to believe is false. Brethren of the Anglican Communion, it may be that before these words are printed the principles for which the martyrs of England laid down their lives, those beacon-fires of the Reformation which old Hugh Latimer asserted even with his dying breath should

never be extinguished,—those PROTESTANT ideals and doctrines then stamped upon the Church of England, and ever since OFFICIAL in this Communion -Ay! Those Protestant Principles now falsely denounced as uncatholic, illiberal, obsolete, will be abundantly vindicated to a shocked and startled world. We say no more. He who hath the eyes to see, will see and comprehend. We speak here only our convictions. We make no pretension to prophetic vision. It may be that we are mistaken. If so, we believe we are mistaken only as to the time, not as to the fact. Be this as it may, the realization or non-realization of such an event in no wise affects the argument set forth in these pages. Under any circumstances, the truth of these principles remains unchanged, and the importance of their enunciation continues imperative. In a word, then, Brethren of the Protestant Episcopal Church, we have reached the parting of the ways. The principles of the Reformation and the principles of the "Catholic" party are admitted upon all sides to be mutually exclusive. The former are OFFICIAL in this Church, the latter are not; though their adherents are seeking earnestly to substitute them for the former, to have them recognized as official. We cannot longer defer the issue. You are compelled, this day, to choose between the two. There is no straddling a contradiction. You must choose between Protestantism and pseudo-catholicism; between the creed of the English Reformers and the creed of John Henry Newman; between the ideal which led the former out of Rome,

and the ideal which led the latter into Rome; between the doctrines which have been official and authoritative in this Church from the beginning, and those which were officially and authoritatively condemned by your Church at the time of the Oxford Movement; between a view of the Episcopate which is reasonable, defensible, and liberal, and one which is unreasonable, indefensible, and intolerant; between one which is comprehensive enough to recognize all Christian Bodies (the Roman included) as valid branches of the Catholic Church, and the other which is narrow enough to "unchurch" all that have not the Historic Episcopate; between an existing title which, because it is protestant only against all illiberal, intolerant, and exclusive theories respecting the limits of the Church Universal, is, for that reason, protestant only that it may be liberal, broad, and truly catholic in its conception of the Church, and a proposed title which, on the other hand, would be "Catholic" only that it might narrow the confines of the Church Universal, and exclude one fourth the Christian World from membership therein. In short, you have to choose between denominational pride and Church Unity, between bearing the arrogant title of an exclusive ecclesiastical set (The American Catholic Church) and becoming the peacemakers for universal Christendom.

INDEX

Act XIII. Elizabeth, 90, 107
Act of Uniformity (XIV. Carol.
II.) recog. For. Ref. Churches
and their Ministries, 85-96;
108-109; Acted upon by
Charles II., 96

Admission of For. Ref. Clergy
without re-ordination, 85-96;
106,107

Ælfric, Canons of, include Bishop

and Presbyter in same Order,
262; Pastoral of, includes
Bishop and Presbyter in same
Order, 262

Aerius, on identity of Bishop
and Presbyter, 256
Aix, Synod

of, pronounces
Bishop and Presbyter one
Order, 259, 260

Albertus Magnus, declares Bish-

op and Priest same Order, 263
Alcuin, on identity Bishop and
Presbyter, 259

Alexander Alensis, on identity
Bishop and Presbyter, 263
Alexandria, Church of, practised
Presbyterian Ordination, 248,
249, 254, 258

Alford, Dean, on Commission
given Matt. xxviii., 19, 298,

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Aquinas, Thomas, decl. Episco-
pate not an Order, 265
Arnold, opposes "catholic" the-
ory, 285

Articles of Religion, Thirty-

Nine, their authority, 177 et
seq.; seventeen proposed, 319,
note

Assembly, Second Resolution of,
108, 114

Augustine, St., on identity of
Bishop and Presbyter, 256, 257
Augustinus, Antonius, views
respec. Chorepiscopi, 263
Authority, Sovereign, vested in
entire body of the Church
(See Congregation)

Babington, Bishop, recog, non-
episcopal Churches, 56, 108
Bacon, Lord, on Church Govern-
ment, 216, 217
Bancroft, Archb., pronounces
Presbyt. Ordination valid, 47,
56, 59, 80, 81, 108, 114; final

Bancroft, Archb.-Continued
att. towards Episc. explained,
275, 277
Baptism, admission into Catho-
lic Church, 14 et seq.; 106;
Lay, authorities quoted, 18
et seq.; 106
Baxter, remarks

Government, 49

on Church

Bede, Bishop and Presbyter one
Order, 259

Bidding Prayer, 31, 32; refers
to Church of Scotland, 40
et seq.

Bilson, recog. non-episcopal
churches, 56, 108
Bingham, on re-ordination, 88,
89, 94; on Chorepiscopi, 257,
note; 263, 264
Bishop and Presbyter, same
Order, 61, 234-238; testimony
of Ordinal, 64-80; B. as Suc.
Apos. 288, 289; 295, note.
(See also, Episcopacy, Episco-
pate, Order, and Concluding
Chapter, 240-326)
Blunt, J. H., on Lay Baptism,
18-21; on Ch. of Scotland, 41
et seq.; Consec. Scot. Bishops,
48; on iden. Order Bish. and
Pr., 51 et seq.; 239, 273
Boardman, Dr. Henry A., testi-
fies as to view of Reformers,
291; Episcopacy an evolution,

291
Boethius, remarks on Culdees

of Scotland, 255, 257
Bonaventura, declares Episco-
pate not an Order, 264
Bradford, John, recog.

non-

episcopal churches, 56, 107
Bramhall, Archb., his recog.
non-epis. churches, 56; tes.
as to official attitude Ch.
England, 81, 82; 108, 278;
on re-ordination, 87, 88, 94
Bridges, Dr. John, recog. non-
epis. churches, 56; on Church
Government, 213, 214; Ch.
as reservoir of Divine Power,
297, note

Briggs, Dr. Charles A., on recog.
Presbyt. Ordination, 36, 37;
origin of Episcopate, 78, note,
285, 288, 289; remarks on
Lambeth Quadrilateral, 318
British Critic, on necessity of
Episcopate, 9, 129

Brown, Bishop W. M., cited,
269

Browne, on Thirty-Nine Articles,
cited, 247, 248, 256, 257, 258,
259, 260, 262, 263
Bucer, on ident. Bishop and
Presbyter, 273

Bugenhagen, on ident. Bishop
and Presbyter, 273
Bull, Unam Sanctam, 207
Burnet, Bishop, Admission of
non-epis. clergy, 34; recog.
non-epis. churches, 56, 108;
on re-ordination, 87, 94; re-
ference to Pope Eugenius,
267; his interpretation Art
XXIII., 300, 301, note

Cajetan, Cardinal, Bishop and
Presbyt. same Order, 268
Calderwood, on estab. Episco-
pacy in Scotland, 47
Calfhill, recog.

non-epis.

churches, 56, 107
Calvin, on ident. Bishop and
Presbyter, 272, 273

Canon, 30; Ch. of England, 38
Canons Ecclesiastical, 189; on
Church Government, 224
Carrick, J. C., Culdees of Scot-
land, 256; Wyclif, 265
"Catholic" Movement, real
purpose of, 146-154; Prin-
ciples, condemned by author-
ity, 282, et seq., View of Epis-
copate in conflict w. Modern
Scholarship, 284, et seq.
Catholicity, true, necessarily
Protestant, 161; C. of Church
of Eng., 180, et seq. and Pro-
testantism, not antithetical,
184
"Catholics" vs. Anglican Re-
formers, 184, et seg.

« AnteriorContinuar »