 | New York (State). Court of Chancery, William Johnson - 1824 - 748 páginas
...XII., Reference to a Master, and the case of Remsen v. Remsen, 2 JCR 495. ACTION. 1. If one person makes a promise to another, for the benefit of a third person, thru third person may maintain an action at law, on the promise. Cumberland v. Codrington,3J.CR229.254.... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery, Clement Tudway Swanston - 1827 - 762 páginas
...making a lease to the Plaintiff; and it is certain that if one person enters into an agreement with another for the benefit of a third person, such third person may come into a court of equity and compel a specific performance; and there are many instances where stewards... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1881 - 748 páginas
...no necessity for their doing so. If one person make a promise to another, on lawful consideration, for the benefit of a third person, such third person may maintain an action, even at law, upon it Joslin v. Oar Co., 7 Vr. 141. And if suit is brought in equity, the promisee is... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1896 - 776 páginas
...591, Chancellor Runyon said : " If one person makes a promise to another, on lawful consideration, for the benefit of a third person, such third person may maintain an action, even at law, upon it. Joslin v. Car Company, 7 Vr. HI." The citation of other cases in support of this... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1877 - 748 páginas
...DEXIO, J., the judgment of the court was put distinctly " upon the broad principle, that if one person makes a promise to another, for the benefit of a third person, that third person may maintain an action on it." This principle, in its application to simple contracts,... | |
 | Philip Eastman - 1849 - 790 páginas
...the one actually incumbered by the mortgage. Schillinger v. McCtuuL, vi. 364. 7. Where one promises another, for the benefit of a third person, such third person may maintain an action of assumpsit, therefor, in hw own name. HinJcley v. Foteler, xv. 285. See ATTORNEY, II. 4. IV. WHAT... | |
 | Connecticut. Supreme Court of Errors - 1883 - 658 páginas
...them. Meech ». Ensign. Some of the cases seem to proceed " upon the broad principle that if one person makes a promise to another, for the benefit of a third person, that third person may maintain an action on the promise ; " and that without regard to the question... | |
 | Asa Kinne - 1854 - 358 páginas
...benefit it is alleged it was made. Parker and Reed, contra. — The rule is well settled, that where one makes a promise to another, for the benefit of a third person, that third person may maintain an action on sucli promise. The leading case is Dutton and Wife v. Poole,... | |
 | Joseph Chitty - 1855 - 1120 páginas
...Niagara Ins. Co., 1 Hall, 247 ; Jackson ». Mayo, 11 Mass. (Rand's ed.) 1Д2, n. (a). Where one promises another for the benefit of a third person, such third person may bring an action of aesumpsift Many of the older authorities support the proposition, that a PLAINTIFF... | |
 | Hiram Denio - 1863 - 692 páginas
...horses which he purchased. This involves the question, whether in cases of simple contracts, where one makes a promise to another, for the benefit of a third person, he can maintain an action upon it, though the consideration does not move from him. Upon this question,... | |
| |
that where one person makes a promise to another for the benefit of a third person, that third person may maintain an action upon it. 
