...which hung about 2 feet from the ground, until just before it struck his horse's knees. Counsel allege that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant, asserting that the record conclusively shows that the plaintiff knew that the defendant was stringing...

...Defendant asks this court to reverse the judgment of the trial court for several reasons, chief of which is that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant. It was the claim of plaintiff that Kittie Levering gave him the ring while he and his wife were on...

...various of the instructions to the jury, and argues in this court three propositions, which are: "(1) That the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant. "(2) That, if the evidence presented a question of fact for the jury, the instructions given were nevertheless...

...sufficient for teams to pass each other. The material errors assigned and relied upon by defendant are that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant, in allowing the amendments of the declaration whereby the charge against defendant was changed from...

...actually paid, were from moneys derived from the sale of stock. It was claimed by the defendant's counsel that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant: « (1) Because the representations were matters of opinion merely. (2) Because they were made in good...

...the. expectancy of life and ability to work. The more important questions involved are: 1. Whether the court erred in refusing to direct a. verdict for the defendant. 2. The measure of damages. Counsel for the defendant assert that there was noevidence tending to prove...

...the record has been brought before us for review. The errors argued by the plaintiff in error are, that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant, in giving instructions for the plaintiff and in refusing instructions asked by the defendant. The declaration...

...rely, in our opinion the appellee must be held to have assumed the risk of injury from the pole falling and that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for appellant. It follows from this, necessarily, that the judgments of the Appellate and circuit courts...

...opinion there should be no recovery in this case. The petition fails to state a cause of action, and the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant below. The judgments of both the lower courts are reversed, and the plaintiff in error is entitled...

...argued, except in connection with group D, which, giving it in counsel's own language, is as follows: "The court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant and in overruling the motion for a new trial. The verdict is contrary to law and paragraph one of the...