THE B A R R E P O R TS, CONTAINING All the Cases Jrgued and Determined IN PARLIAJENT, THE COURT OF EXCHEQUER, MONIAL CAUSES, TOGETHER WITH A SELECTION OF CASES OF UNIVERSAL APPLICATION DECIDED IN THE SUPERIOR COURTS IN IRELAND AND IN SCOTLAND. HORACE Cox, 10, WELLINGTON-STREETSTRAND, W.C. The COURT OF BANKRUPTCY, by A. A. Doria and J. Morgax, Esqrs., Barristers-at-Law. IRISH BANKRUPTCY COURT, by J. LEVY, Esq., Bar rister-at-Law. LORD CHANCELLOR'S COURT, by T. BROOKSBANK and L STEWART Roche, Esqrs., Barristers-at-Law, COURT OF APPEAL IN CHANCERY, by T. BROOKSBANK and E STEWART Rocas, Esqrs., Barristers-at-Law. ROLLS COURT, by F. H. Daly and E. W. BYRNE, Esqrs., Barristers-at-Law. VICECHANCELLOR STUART'S COURT, by EDWARD WISSLOW, Esq., Barrister-at-Law. VI'ECHANCELLOR WOOD'S COURT, by W. H. BEISET and R. T. Bocit, Esqrs., Barristers-at-Law. VICE-CHANCELLOR MALINS' COURT, by G. T. Ev Abs, Esq., Barrister-at-Law. CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT, by T. E. BESLEY, Esq., COMMON LAW COURTS. The QUEEN'S BENCE. by T. W. SAUNDERS and J. SUORTT, Esqrs, Barristers-at-Law. The COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, by W. GRAHAM and 2. W. MCKELLAR, Esqrs., Barristers-at-Law. The COI'RT OF EXCHEQUER. by H. LEIGH and E. LEMLEY, Esqrs., Barristers-at-Law. of the Middle Temple, Barrister-at-Law, CRIMINAL APPEAL COURT, by Jony Tnoursos, Esq., of the Middle Temple, Barrister-at-Law. COURT OF PROBATE, by GEORGE CALLAGHIAN, Esq., Barrister-at-Law. COURT OF DIVORCE AND MATRIMONIAL CAUSES, by GEORGE CALLAGHAN, Esq., Barrister-at-Law. ECCLESIASTICAL COURTS, by Dr. Swaber, of Doctors commons. ADMIRALTY COURT, by H. F. PURCELL, Esq., of Doctors'-commons. REGISTRATION APPEALS in the COMMON PLEAS by W. GRAHAM, Esq, Barrister-at-Law. PRACTICE OF PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES, by FREDERICK CLIFFORD and PEMBROKE S. STEPILENS, Esqrs., Barristers-at-Law. ELECTION COMMITTEES, by F. O. CRUMP, Esq. page 671 ...... .................................. A. Barned's Banking Company (Limited), re Kellock and Co.'s claim Aberaman Ironworks v. Wickens and others (L. Rep., Barnett v. The Great Eastern Railway Company...... 408 5 Ch. 485) page 305 Baseley v. Forder .......... 756 Abrahams e. The Mayor, Aldermen, &c., of London... 811 Baumann v. Jones (L. Rep., 3 Cb. App. 508) 424 Adames v. Hallett....... ...................................... 789 Beadnell and others v. Beeson (37 L. J. 171, Q. B.; Adamson v. Gill 278 L. Rep., 3 Q. B. 439) 401 Agra Bank (Limited) ex parte; re Worcester Beer, er parte, re Moore and Thomas ................... 418 (L. Rep., 3 Ch. App. 555) 866 Bell, William, re 62 Alexandra Printing Ink Company (Limited), re ...... 18 Bell v. Aitken (37 L. J. 168, C. P.)................ 363 Allhasca and wnother v. Melgarejo (37 L. J. 169, Bell v. Bird 901 Q. B.; 3 ... Rep., Q. B. 340). 323 | Berthon and others v. Berthon ... 301 Alliance Bank, ex parte ; re The Xeres Wine Com- Betts v. De Vitre and others (37 L. J. 325, Ch. ; pany (Limited) (37 L. J. 415, Ch.)............ 177 671 L. Rep., 3 Ch. App. 429)...... 165 Ames e. Colnaghi (37 L. J. 159, C. P.; L. Rep., Betts v. Neilson and others (37 L. J. 321, Ch.; 3 C. P. 359)........... 327 L. Rep., 3 Ch. App. 429)......... ................... 159 Andersok • Anderson (37 L. J. 64, Prob. & Mat.)... 371 Bickerstaffe, re, ex parte Roche 169 Anopyinoas (an insolvent), re ......... 188 Biggs v. The Great Eastern Railway Company......... 482 Ap;eal between Joseph Watson (app.) and the Church- Bird u. Elwes (37 L. J. 91, Ex.; L. Rep., 3 Ex. wardens, &c., of the parish of Hessle (resps.)...... 556 225) 727 Arranging Trader, an, re.... 64 Birt v. Boutinez (falsely called Birt) (37 L. J. 50, Ashbury's case, re Smith, Knight, and Company 45 Prob. & Mat.; L. Rep., 1 Prob. & Div. 487)...... 586 Asbby (app.) v. Harris (resp.) (37 L. J. 230, C. P.; Blackborne v. Blackborne 450 164 Mag. Cas. ; L. Rep., 3 C. P. 523) 719 | Blackmore v. Mills (falsely called Blackmore)......... 586 Attorney-General x. Bunce 742 | Blakely Ordnance Company (Limited), re; re The Altoruey-General v. Dakin and others (37 L. J. 150, Claim of the New Zealand Banking Corporation Ex.; L. Rep, 3 Es. 288)... 829 (Limited) (37 L. J. 418, Ch.)............ 132 Attorney-General v. Edmunds 505 | Bland v. Bland and Stormont 535 Avenir, The 157 | Bloxam v. The Metropolitan Railway Company Arerne. Lloyd (37 L. J. 489, Cb.; L. Rep., 5 Ch. (L. Rep., 3 Ch. App. 337) 41 883). 282 | Bookham v. Potter; ex parte Rogers (an attorney) Avery v. Griffin...... 849 (37 L. J. 276, C. P.) 479 Ayles v. The South Eastern Railway Company (37 Booth v. Coltoo........ 384 LJ. 104, Ex ; L. Rep., 3 Ex. 146) 332 Bower o. Griffith and others...... 35 Bradford v. Brownjohn....... 388 Bradlaugh v. De Rin (37 L. J. 146, C. P.; L. Rep., B. 3 C. P. 286, 538,). 904 Bramble v. Moss (37 L. J. 209, C. P.; L. Rep., Baker, ex parte, ship". Isis," re ........... 313 3 C. P. 458).. 241 Barge's case, re Oriental Commercial Bank (L. Rep., Brauod v. The Earl of Derod (37 L. J. 463, 5 CL. 420) ....... 227 Ch.). 784 ......... ... |
0 Opiniones Las opiniones no están verificadas, pero Google revisa que no haya contenido falso y lo quita si lo identifica Escribir un comentario |