232

Re WILSON

142

442

55

205

538

536

Rogers Ex parte (15 Ch. D. 207, 43 L. T. 163, 29 W. R. 29) distinguished.

Ex parte EVANS. Re EVANS

32

Rolls v. St. George's Vestry (14 Ch. D. 785, 49 L. J. Ch. 691, 43 L. T. 140. 28 W. R. 867) considered. WANDSWORTH BOARD OF WORKS v. UNITED TELEPHONE CO.

271

Russell v. The Queen (7 App. Cas. 829) approved.

HODGE V. THE QUEEN

Reg. v. Fennell (7 Q. B. D. 147, 50 L. J. M. C.
126, 14 Cox, C. C. 607) followed.
REG. v. HATTS AND CULFFE
Reg. v. Geering (18 L. J. M. C. 215) followed.
REG. v. FLANNAGAN AND HIGGINS
Reg. v. Hughes (4 Q. B. D. 614, 48 L. J. M. C.
151, 40 L. T. 685) followed.
GRAY V. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS 232

Reg. v. Lords Commissioners of Treasury (4
A. & E. 286) disapproved.

Re NATHAN. REG. v. COMMISSIONERS
OF INLAND REVENUE

dissented from.

82

207

525

269

e