« AnteriorContinuar »
for what I have not, I have no Reason to complain, Had God indeed given us only the Faculties of Men, and required of us the Service of Angels, we might then with some Justice have lamented the unequal Weight: But now that he requires nothing of us but what we are able to perform, and what, according to our present Degree of Understanding, it is highly reasonable we should perform, it is great Perverseness to hang back for want of more Light, and a greater Capacity to understand what it is no way necessary for us to understand. Our present Faculties,
to this great Motive to Obedience, because we are not able to know how the Soul can act: distinctly from the Body, or how it can be united to it again ? It would be altogether as reasonable for a Merchant not to trade to the Indies', though he is sure there is great Wealth and Riches there, till he can account to himself for the Nature of all the surprizing Objects in that other World; or for a Man not to eat, though he is sure it would nourish and support his Life, till he can see the Reason of Nutrition, and give an Account of all the secret Ways by which Nature performs the Work.
God has given us Knowledge sufficient to be the Foundation of our Duty; and, if we will use the Light we have, we shall be happy. The great Mistake which Men commit in reflecting upon these Matters, is, That they suppose they should havb better Evidence for the Things of another World, could they overcome these Difficulties, which cross them perpetually in the Search after Nature: And this would indeed be a real Advantage to Religion,, if it were so; but that it js not, will appear in the following Considerations: For,
Secondly, The Difficulties which arise in considering the natural Properties of Things, do no way affect the Certainty and Reality of their Existence: If they did, we could be certain of the real Existence of no one Thing; since there is nothing but what affords us very great Difficulties, when we come to account for the Nature and Properties of it: Let what will be the Subject, I think, there cannot be two more different Inquiries, than when we examine whether the Thing really is, and when we examine what it is: They are Inquiries which do not at all depend one upon the other. We can examine the Properties of some Things, without so much as reflecting whether there ever were such Things, or no. When the Mathematician considers the Properties of an exact Circle or Square, it matters him not whether there be such perfect Figures in the World, or no j nor does he trouble himself to inquire. So, on the other hand, we can examine and come to the Certainty of the Existence of Things, without knowing, or attempting to know, their Natures and Properties. The Peasant knows there is a Sun. and a Moon, as well as the Astronomers} and his Certainty, as to their Existence, is
as great and as well-grounded as theirs. Nor is this only true in Things which are Objects of Sense, but will hold likewise with respect to such Things, the Existence of which we collect from Reason. From visible Effects to invisible Causes the Argument is conclusive; though in many Gases it extends only to the Reality of the Cause, and does not in the least lead us to the Knowledge of the Nature of it. When we see Distempers cured by the Use of Plants or of Drugs, some Virtue we are sure there is in them, upon which the Effect depends, though what we seldom or never can tell. This being the Casse then, That we can arrive at the Knowledge of the Existence of Things, when we are perfectly ignorant of their Natures and Properties; and can, on the other side, examine and know the Properties of Things, without considering whether they exist, or no; 'tis plain that these are distinct Acts of Knowledge, which do not depend on each other, and that we may be certain as to the Reality of Things, however we may be puzzled and confounded when we enter into the Consideration of their Nature.
And now pray consider, as to the Casse
before us, what fort of Knowledge it is that is necessary to support Religion in the World. If we are sure there is a God who will judge the Worlds is not that a sufficient Foundation for Holiness? Does it signify any thing, as to the Necessity of our Obedience, to inquire into the Manner or Nature of his Being? Does not the whole of Religion evidently depend on this Question, Whether there certainly be a God who will judge the World? And, if it appears there is, is it of any Consequence to say there are great Difficulties in conceiving how these Things can be? For, if they certainly will be, they will be some Way or other, no doubt; and it concerns not us to know which Way. Since therefore our Saviour has given the greatest Evidence that can be of the Certainty of a future State, and the Soul's Existence after Death, 'tis impertinent and unphilosophical to confront this Evidence with Difficulties arising from our Conceptions as to the Nature and Manner of these Things: It is in truth to set up Ignorance against Knowledge; for Our Difficulties spring from our Ignorance of Nature, which is an Argument we ought rather to be ashamed of, than to bring into Competition with the clear Evidence we have for the Certainty and Reality of the