...decisions whether to accomplish or to prevent conception are among the most private and sensitive. "If the right of privacy means anything, it is the...right of the individual, married or single, to be free of unwarranted governmental intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person as the decision...

...Court of Appeals of the State of Maryland, discussed this articular contention: Stated another way, "(i)f the right of privacy means anything, it is the...right of the individual, married or single, to be free fron unwarranted governmental intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person as the decision...

...religious metaphor in Genesis, that man and wife are one flesh: ". . . the marital couple," he said, "is not an independent entity with a mind and heart of its own . . . ."38 Equal, but separate, each person had a constitutional right to procreative privacy. In dissent...

...impermissible. It is true that in Griswold the right of privacy in question inhered in the marital relationship. Yet the marital couple is not an independent entity...with a separate intellectual and emotional makeup. // the right of privacy means anything, it is the right of the individual, married or single, to be...

...impermissible. It is true that in Griswold the right of privacy in question inhered in the marital relationship. Yet the marital couple is not an independent entity...with a separate intellectual and emotional makeup. // the right of privacy mean» anything, it it the right of the individual, married or tingle, to be...

...thrown around personal intimacy and bodily integrity was not meant to protect only married persons : "If the right of privacy means anything it is the right of the iwiiridital, married or single, to be free from unwarranted governmental intrusion * « *." Ei»enstadt...

...438, 453 (1972), another contraception case, advances the proposition. "If the right of privacy menus anything, it is the right of the individual married or single, to !>e free from un warranted govern intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting« person ns the...

...impermissible. It is true that in Griswold the right of privacy in question inhered in the marital relationship. Yet the marital couple is not an independent entity with a mind and heart of its own, hut an association of two individuals euch with a separate intellectual and emotional makeup. If the...

...intrusion, the state has an interest. Surely it was not necessary for the Court to say, in that case, that "if the right of privacy means anything, it is the right of the individual ... to be free from unwarranted government instrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person...

...liberty of the unmarried. For the Court, Justice William Brennan, Jr., wrote, italicizing the key word, "If the right of privacy means anything, it is the right of an individual, married or single, to be free from unwarranted governmental intrusion into matters so...