...the powers not re1832.] [APEU linquishcd, and bind themselves as a distinct and separate community. The language used in treaties with the Indians should...tenor of the treaty, they should be considered as used onlv in the latter sense. To contend that the word "allotted," in reference to the land guarantied...

...may exercise the powers not relinquished, and bind themselves as a distinct and separate community. The language used in treaties with the Indians should...latter sense. To contend that the word " allotted," in reference to the land guaranteed to the Indians in certain treaties, indicates a favour conferred,...

...may exercise the powers not relinquished, and bind 'themselves as a distinct and separate community. The language used in treaties with the Indians should...latter sense. To contend that the word " allotted," in reference to the land guaranteed to the Indians in certain treaties, indicates a favor conferred,...

...Georgia, 6 Pet. 515 at 582. At the page to which the court refers, the following statement appears : The language used in treaties with the Indians should...should be considered as used only in the latter sense. The court next refers to pages 87 and 89 of Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. United States, 248 US 78, where...

...'>f these rules, Chief Justice Marshall says: "The language used in treaties with the Indians shall never be construed to their prejudice, if words be...their plain import as connected with the tenor of their treaty."-}Applying this principle to the case in hand, is it not evident that the words " levy,...

...L. ed. 483, may be taken as an example. The language of Justice McLean is quoted, in which he said: "The language used in treaties with the Indians should...should be considered as used only in the latter sense. . . . How the words of the treaty were understood by this unlettered people, rather than their critical...

...fact the words of Mr. Justice McLean in his concurring opinion in that case) the following: "The î? language used in treaties with the Indians * should...should be considered as used only in the latter sense." Mr. Justice McLean further said: "How the words of the treaty were understood by this unlettered people,...

...Worcester v. Georgia, G Pet. 515, 582 : " The language used in treaties with Opinion of the Court. the Indians should never be construed to their prejudice....should be considered as used only in the latter sense. . . . How the words of the treaty were understood by this unlettered people, rather than their critical...

...Georgia, 6 Peters, 582 [31 U. 8. bk. 8, L. ed. 5081: " The language" used in [M] treaties with the Indiana should never be construed to their prejudice. If words...should be considered as used only in the latter sense. * * * How the words of the treaty were understood by this unlettered people, rather than their critical...

...been said in the case of Worcester v. Georgia, 6 Pet. 582: • "The language used in treaties with'the Indians should never be construed to their prejudice....extended meaning than their plain import, as connected witli the tenor of thetreaty, they should be considered as used only in the latter sense. * * • How...