PEOPLE EX REL. BUFFALO & LAKE ERIE TRACTION CO. v. STATE BOARD OF TAX COMMISSIONERS. Order affirmed: 209 N. Y. 502. PEOPLE EX REL. BUFFALO & LAKE ERIE TRACTION CO. v. STATE BOARD OF TAX COMMISSIONERS. ............ Order affirmed: 209 N. Y. 496. PEOPLE EX REL. COLLINS v. MCANENY.. 156 App. Div. 466 156 App. Div. 923 155 App. Div. 923 Order affirmed: 209 N. Y. 525. 151 App. Div. 889 Order affirmed: 209 N. Y. 523. PEOPLE EX REL. COTTRELL v. WALDO........ PEOPLE EX REL. DOMENS v. WARDEN OF CITY PRISON. 154 App. Div. 728 Appeal dismissed: 209 N. Y. 519. PEOPLE EX REL. GOEHNER v. WARDEN OF THE DIS TRICT PRISON..... 156 App. Div. 937 Order affirmed on authority of People v. Frudenberg (209 N. Y. 219): 209 N. Y. 556. PEOPLE EX REL. GOLDING v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, Appeal dismissed: 209 N. Y. 536. 155 App. Div. 920 157 App. Div. 901 155 App. Div. 856 209 N. Y. 554. 158 App. Div. 906 PEOPLE EX REL. MURPHY V. KRAFT.. Order reversed and that of Special Term affirmed: PEOPLE EX REL. NEW YORK, BROOKLYN & MANHATTAN BEACH R. R. Co. v. PRENDERGAST. Order affirmed: 209 N. Y. 598. PEOPLE EX REL. NEW YORK CENTRAL & H. R. R. R. 158 App. Div. 894 Order affirmed: 209 N. Y. 6C0. PEOPLE EX REL. NEW YORK & ROCKAWAY BEACH R. Order affirmed: 209 N. Y. 599. PEOPLE EX REL. POLISH NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THE 157 App. Div. 496 156 App. Div. 936 Order affirmed: 209 N. Y. 578. PEOPLE EX REL. RAY v. MCANENY.... 153 App. Div. 884 Order affirmed: 209 N. Y. 533. 155 App. Div. 921 PEOPLE EX REL. SHANE v. GITTENS. Appeal dismissed: 209 N. Y. 527. PEOPLE EX REL. TITLE GUARANTEE & TRUST Co. v. GRIFENHAGEN...... PEOPLE EX REL. WILLARD v. GENERAL REDUCTION Co....... Order affirmed: 209 N. Y. 524. PETERS V. PETERS (IN RE CARTER)... 155 App. Div. 935 153 App. Div. 901 151 App. Div. 911 PULIS v. SCHMIDT. ROGERS v. HERALD COMPANY....... Judgment affirmed: 209 N. Y. 583. ROUSE v. LAKE SHORE & MICHIGAN SOUTHERN R. Co. 151 App. Div. 902 Judgment affirmed: 209 N. Y. 602. SCHMIDT V. PORTER SCREEN MFG. Co.............. Appeal dismissed: 209 N. Y. 562. 158 App. Div. 895 SIMONS v. INTERNATIONAL R. Co...... 152 App. Div. 953 Judgment affirmed: 209 N. Y. 548. SNELL V. SNELL..... 147 App. Div. 928 Judgment affirmed: 209 N. Y. 603. SPILA v. NEW YORK CENTRAL & HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD CO...... 154 App. Div. 907 Judgment affirmed: 209 N. Y. 510. STALKER V. NEW YORK CENTRAL & HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD Co.... ... 154 App. Div. 917 Judgment affirmed: 209 N. Y. 511. Appeal dismissed: 209 N. Y. 567. STALLO V. JONES... STEIN. WHITMAN.... Interlocutory judgment and order of Appellate Division reversed and judgment ordered for defendants on demurrer, on dissenting opinion of LAUGHLIN, J., below: 209 N. Y. 576. STILLMAN v. CITY OF OLEAN.. Judgment reversed and new trial granted: 210 N. Y. 168. 153 App. Div. 900 156 App. Div. 861 148 App. Div. 936 TITLE GUARANTEE & TRUST CO. v. SUGERMAN....... TOWN OF PELHAM v. SHINN....... Judgment affirmed: 209 N. Y. 531. TOWN OF WHITESTOWN v. TITLE GUARANTY & SURETY 153 App. Div. 912 149 App. Div. 956 Co...... 148 App. Div. 900 Judgment affirmed: 209 N. Y. 512. Judgment affirmed: 209 N. Y. 507. ULLMAN v. WORMER MACHINERY Co....... Judgment reversed: 210 N. Y. 41. 147 App. Div. 919 WARE BROTHERS CO. v. CORTLAND CART & CARRIAGE Co Order reversed and judgment of Trial Term affirmed: 210 N. Y. 122. WASHBURN-CROSBY Co. v. KINDERVATTER.... 148 App. Div. 546 147 App. Div. 114 Judgment affirmed: 209 N. Y. 604. WATSON v. BEAVER.... 157 App. Div. 917 Appeal dismissed: 209 N. Y. 563. WELD V. POSTAL TELEGRAPH-CABLE Co.... ....... 148 App. Div. 588 Judgment reversed: 210 N. Y. 59. WHITTAKER v. NEW YORK CENTRAL & HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD Co...... 153 App. Div. 934 Judgment affirmed: 209 N. Y. 511. WILDMAN V. JONES... 150 App. Div. 514 156 App. Div. 318 Appeal dismissed: 209 N. Y. 531. YONKERS NATIONAL BANK V. MITCHELL.. Appeal dismissed: 209 N. Y. 558. The attention of the profession is called to the fact that the Court of Appeals in many cases decides an appeal upon other grounds than those stated in the opinion of the court below. The affirmance or reversal of the judgment of the Appellate Division does not necessarily show that the Court of Appeals concurred in or dissented from the statements contained in the opinion of the Supreme Court (Rogers v. Decker, 131 N. Y. 490.)—[REP. Aljnuick v. American Mfg. Co.. 913 Atlantic, Gulf & Pacific Co., 903 258 920 Auburndale Realty Co., Dumas 909 V....... 637 August Belmont Hotel Co. v. 907 Alverson v. Marshall.... |