 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1853 - 732 páginas
...against the property attached, ordering so much to be sold as was necessary to discharge the judgment. The first error assigned is, that the Court erred in overruling the defendant's motion to dismiss the suit. But the motion, if any was made, was not made a part of the... | |
 | Connecticut. Supreme Court of Errors - 1892 - 664 páginas
...case was then tried on its merits, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant appealed. The first error assigned is, that " the court erred in overruling the claim of the defendant and denying the motion for disclosure." The motion for a disclosure was a proceeding... | |
 | Florida. Supreme Court - 1871 - 808 páginas
...given to the jury. MD Papy for Appellant. Sanderson & L'Engle for Appellees. RANDALL, CJ, delivered the opinion of the court. The first error assigned is that the court admitted, on the part of the plaintiff, the introduction of the deed of the Trustees of the Internal... | |
 | Iowa. Supreme Court - 1872 - 660 páginas
...defendant appeals. With/row (& Wright for the appellant. AH Stutsman for the appellee. MILLER, J. — I. The first error assigned is, that " the court erred in overruling the defendant's motions to set aside the i. NEW TKIAL: general and special verdicts" of the iury. These... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1875 - 678 páginas
...taken. Proceedings were then had, which resulted in an injunction against the appellants. Appeal to this court. The first error assigned is, that the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the complaint. This error is well taken. No written instrument, unless some pleading is... | |
 | West Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals, Edgar P. Rucker - 1876 - 806 páginas
...assigned in his said petition for an appeal &c., since the abandonment of the said third and tourth. The first error assigned is that the court erred in overruling the appellant's (Claudius B. Pease,) motion to quash the attachment "because the affidavit upon which the... | |
 | Oregon. Supreme Court, William Wallace Thayer, Joseph Gardner Wilson, Thomas Benton Odeneal, Julius Augustus Stratton, William Henry Holmes, Reuben S. Strahan, George Henry Burnett, Robert Graves Morrow, James W. Crawford, Frank A. Turner, Bellinger, Charles Byron - 1876 - 620 páginas
...Vinyard, for Appellant. B. Hat/den and Myers & fialy, for Respondent. By the Court, McABTHUB, J. : The first error assigned is that the court erred in overruling the demurrer. As has been stated, the demurrer is a general one, and the rule is well settled that if,... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1910 - 688 páginas
...court dismissing the case as against the defendant Birch. We shall consider the city's appeal first. The first error assigned is that the court erred in overruling the motion for a nonsuit interposed by the city. Counsel for the city contend that when plaintiff rested... | |
 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1884 - 1012 páginas
...Sheffey & Bumgardner, and JH McCue, for the appellant. ES Brown, for the appellees. LEWIS, P., delivered the opinion of the court. The first error assigned is that the appellant in the settlement of his administration accounts was not credited with the amount of taxes... | |
 | 1897 - 1158 páginas
...defendant Greenwood, be adjudged to yield and deliver possession of said premises to said plaintiffs." The first error assigned is that the court erred in overruling the mixtion of the defendants to require the plaintiffs to separately state and number their several causes... | |
| |
SHOPE delivered the opinion of the Court: The first error assigned is, that the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the amended bill. 
