Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

After the reader fhall have examined and difcovered the accuracy of the above ftatement, let him calculate the annual intereft of the purchale money, the expence attending the fettlement, protection and other incidental charges which the poffeffion of that country muft neceffarily occafion, and fay, if our government has doae wifely, to give fo vait a fum for ka tract of country which as our Minister obferves, can only be cultivated by flaves and not to advantage by them." It would appear, that nothing could juftity this departure from Democratic economy, unlefs it be the mathematical rule by which they demonftrate, that the falaries of public officers when bestowed on federalifts, were fhamefully extravagant, but, enjoyed by democrats, wonderfully mod

erate.

[ocr errors]

FROM THE U. S. GAZETTE.

IT is well known that one of the principal cenfures caft upon the adminiftration of gen. Washington was grounded upon the funding fyftem. It has been a theme of continual abufe in all the democratick papers. Yet thofe very papers are now extolling the wifdom of Mr. Jefferson in adding eleven millions of dollars to the funded debt of the United States. Great clamour was railed against the adminiftration of Mr. Adams because he did not effect a greater reduction of the national debt, though it was continually diminished, notwithstanding the enormous expenfe to which the country was fubjected in quelling the infurreétions of the democrats, and in protecting ourselves against their friends, the French plunderers. Now, in a time of profound tranquility, the national debt is to be increased fifteen millions of dollars in one year, for the purchase of a country moft of which is uninhabited and totally useless to the United States.

Be it our weekly task,

To note the passing tidings of the times.

Hudson, August 30, 1803.

The following afflicting circumftance lately occurred in the neigbourhood of Morris River, in Weft New-Jersey. A woman went in fearch of a hen's neft, and finding a hollow log, fuppofed the fowl might be in it, and fent a little girl, her daughter, to look for it;-the child no fooner entered the log than the informed her ||

mother the hen bit at her, and would not come off the neft; the mother told the child to pull her off-after waiting a short fpace, and hearing nothing of the child, the called to her but received no answer; the father of the child being called, fplit open the log, and found feveral rattle fnakes entwined round the body of the child, and one around her neck, and fhe had been bitten in feveral places, and quite dead. [New York paper.]

-

From a Raleigh, (N. C) buper of July 18. A little daughter of Capt. Ifaac M'Callum, of this county, met a premature death on Wednesday by the bite of a fnake or fome other poifonous reptile or infect. The child, while gathering blackberries in an adjoining field, a little before fun-fet, fuddenly cried out very bit terly. A negro went immediately to its affiftance, when fhe complained of being ftung by a nettle; but from the wound fequence which followed, it is believed which appeared, and from the fatal cona highly venomous fnake had bitten her in the inftep of one of her legs. Her limbs immediately began to fwell and look black, and fo rapid was the poifon (no effectual means having been taken to counteract it) that the next morning the child was--a corpfe.

LONDON, JUNE 24. Some private letters were yesterday received from the Hague and Bruffels, the contents of which are of confiderable importance. An Army of referve, to which has been given the name of the Army of der the command of General De folles ; England, is now forming at Daventer, unand the number of troops already affembled between that place and Fluthing, is eftimated at a little fhort of 80,000 men. An encampment is immediately to be formed upon the Downs, near Dunkirk, and feveral regiments are ftationed be. tween Calais and Boulogne. More troops are under orders for the fame quarter, and there is very little doubt of the whole being deftined for the meditated attack on this country. According to a letter from Bois le Duc, forty battalions were fhortly expected to pass through that place, to join the "Armies of England and Hanover ;" and a number of fresh troops have lately been marched to feveral parts of Holland. JUNE, 30.

We are extremely happy to find the unjuftifiable proceedings of the French Government in the feizure of Hanover, have at length induced thinifters to adopt that fpirited and decifive line of conduct, which can alone put a stop to aggreffions,

which would otherwife know no end. The following was ftuck up at Loyd's yesterday:

"Laft night Lord Hawkesbury communicated to the Foreign Minifters, that his Majefty had determined, that the entrance of the Elbe fhould be blockaded in the frictest manner."

MARRIED,

On Sunday evening, the 21st inst. at Claverack, PHILIP S. PARKER, Esq. Attorney at Law, of this city, to Miss JENNET MONELL, daughter of Dr. Monell, of Claverack.

To Readers.

Holt, in his last Bee, has made an attempt to get over his meanness towards his correspondent, "Cato," by a little wit-considerable prevarication-and a number of plurap falshoods. He says, Cato's essay" is composed of sophistry, slander, abuse, and libels on the president of the United States." A man must be possessed of an uncommon share of impudence, who can make such an assertion as this, when he must have known that the piece was to appear in the Balance, and that at least a part of his readers would have an opportunity of seeing it. The sophistry that Holt complains of, is sound and unanswerable argument, which he was afraid to lay before his readers. Of slander and abuse, the piece contains not a syllable. And so far from its containing libels on the president of the United States, it is well known, that the present president is not once mentioned in the piece. But even admitting that the piece is as bad as Holt represents it-is this any excuse for his altering the address, signature, &c. No! there is as complete a contrast between this conduct and what is honest and honorable, as there is between the characters of " Cato" and "Mark Anthony."

The writer in the Balance, who uses the signa. ture of "Calculator," perceives that in his second number he was incorrect, in stating that the sum, that has been promised for Louisiana, is more than all the gold and silver coin in the Union. According to Mr. Blodget's Statistical Table, the whole metalic medium circulating in the United States, is sixteen million and five hundred thousand dollars; which is one million two hundred and fifty thousand dollars more than the sum, which is said to have been engaged in the purchase of Louisiana.

There is, however, cause to conclude that the quantity of gold and silver coin has decreased, in the United States, since Mr. Blodget's Table was made; and that it is now decreasing.

NOTICE.

We are sorry to learn that the most unfounded reports have been circulated in the neighbouring towns with respect to the health of this city. It is conjectured that some person has attempted to give currency to the rumour from sinister motives. We assert, and we pledge ourselves for the correctness of the assertion, that the city, to our knowledge, was never more healthy than at this time. There is no person sick with a malignant fever, nor is there any prevailing epidemic within the city.

The Wreath.

FOR THE BALANCE.

Messrs. EDITORS,

The following production was actually picked up in Hudson a few days since. If it contains nothing objectionable, you will gratify a friend to your paper by giving it a place in the Wreath.

THE POST-MAN's SOLILOQUY.

IN the dry firm enclosure of a pair Of saddle-bags, a week's whole treasure lies, Of GAZETTES, BALANCES and BLES, fit stuft Tembroil the head of many a woeful wight, Who reads their whole contents, in ale-house, inn, Club-room, or 'mong some social band, made wise By such deep lore, where every nation's strength, Its rights and policies are found. Just so, In times e're this, Cervantes' frantic knight, From various reading, in book-knowledge deep, Went round his native land to make mankind Against their will be good, and bear the fame Of his fair Dulcines thro' the world.

Come, then, Gazette, wet yet from press-fall oft You've told me truth-henceforth continue thus: Be still to virtue's cause a constant friend; Nor give a page to party's lying tale.

Thou Balance, come-spread thy instructive page Wide as our land's extent ;-still watch the steps Our country's rulers take; nor suffer them, When wrong, t' escape the lash thy pen can give.

Come, thou, most servile, temporising Bee,
Of such materials form'd, as serves to shew
That bad must be with good cenabin'd, to make
A world. Nor peace or war thy love or hate;
But that which serves thy party's ends, serves thine.
A Bee, thou call'st thyself-thy honey such
As from the nettle or dire night-shade springs.
From ministerial papers copy fast-

For thy wax-head can't ooze a thought to light,
That thou, with certainty, canst call thy own.

Whilst STODDARD finds his way to many a friend,

And tells the passing tidings" as they rise;
The Bee, fraught full of trash, cull'd here and there,
From papers vile, whose authors hirelings are,
Vents weekly malice 'gainst the fed'ral band.
Hard on his heels the Balance treads-the lies
He notes, and them explodes, fast as they're told.
Stirgs more than honey this poor Bee delights.
The Balance blunts its sting and spoils its pow'r:
Nay, more-it weighs what's to the market brought
For sale, and finds two grains of sence will weigh
I: down. Thus fares when truth the balance holds.

Must I, whilst thus I ride the country round, Such fabricated falshoods spread 'mong men ? But such th' unhappy lot of poor mankind, That some will sooner hear such tales, than those Which virtue propagates. The lowly herd, Whilst they are railing 'gainst the rich and great, Are blindly making some vain, crafty man

A demagogue, to rule themselves at will.

Is there a Doctor rides around, that in
His saddle-bags such potent physic has ?
He may his jallaps, his emetics give :
They gripe and writhe a while; but none effect,
Save those who drink. But they who take one
dose

Of these, forthwith, as if electrified,
Their passions rise, their prejudice grows strong-
Nor for the hour, but length of time endures.

To me, poor hawking news-man, one will say,
IS CROSWELL guilty found! We hope he's not ;
For then our children must be lying taught,
And truth be banish'd to the Indian tribes,
To Hottentots, or Samoeida's land.
When great men can't bear truth-when to the laws
By tyrants made, they must resort, themselves
To justify, then is our government
To tyranny debas'd, our freedom's gone,

Thus he, another says, how dare that man Our president defame. Ought he not know, Like England's king, his person's sacred made; Nor to be sported with by such vile men, Who weaken confidence to our head supremePrison and fine-may they his portion be!

Another asks, if in Louisiana Adventurers can, at once, their fortunes make? Whether the president will patents grant? Or, if the great in power will sell the land, As formerly M'Comb's vast tract was bought? To satisfy, at once, these and much more, I pull the papers out, and let them readThen judge themselves-here my commission ends; For who so wise t'instruct half-learned fools?

By day my business urges, and I haste T'escape the tongue of ignorance and prate; But when, for night, I've to the tavern got, There oft I hear the learned demagogue, (For each small circle one of these can boast) In language blustering and loud, explain The fate of kingdoms, empires and great states. His silent hearers plac'd around, applaud, And, with loud noise, dethrone all Europe's kings. Such noise as once was heard at Windham town, When bull-frogs, in their march, put all to flight, And threaten'd revolution to the world. Glad, when the hour of sleep arrives, to bed I hie-and such great politicians leave.

Diversity.

LIMA, the capital of Peru, in SouthAmerica, is a place of immenfe riches.

"One remarkable fact is fufficient to de. monftrate the wealth of this city. When the viceroy, the Duke de la Palada, made his entry into Lima, in 1682, the inhabi. tants to do him honour, caufed the free to be paved with ingots of filver,amount ing to feventeen million fterling.

"All travellers fpeak with amazement of the decorations of the churches, with gold, filver, and precious flones, which load and ornament even the walls."

It is declared in a European Magazine, that the dress even of a private citizen's lady, at Lima, fometimes cofts more than forty thousand dollars. The ladies there are dreffed entirely in laces, instead of linen, and fparkle with rich diamonds What a Paradife for women!

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

AN

than Holland.* France is not quite a
fixth part fo large, in furface, as the Unit-
ed States her population is eftimated at
twenty-four million eight hundred thou-
fand which averages one hundred and
fifty-two inhabitants in each fquare mile.

is fill much more abundantly forceable. in its application to the United States.

The United States contain about one million fquare miles, and are inhabited by about five million white people; making only five perfons to a fquare mile; which is lefs than the thirtieth part of the population of France, apportioned to the ref

Germany, which lies in the neighbourhood of France, is fomething larger, in extent of territory, as well as in population.pective areas of each country. The wilNow, making the fuppofition that Germany were a wildernefs, and that France were offered the poffeffion of it, not in commutation for millions of dollars, but gratis; would it be wife policy in France, merely for the fake of poffeffing additional territory, to accept the gilt and confequently to difperfe her population in set

N enlargement of a nation's territory, that is already more than fufficiently extenfive, by diffipating its capi-tling this neighbouring wilderness ?-On tals, by difperfing and thinning its popula tion, and by "multiplying points of defence," tends to diminifh, rather than to increase its riches and firength. Mr. Livington, in his memorial, fagaciously re marks, "As one man is more ufeful by remaining at home, than two by removing at a diftance, a wife nation does not feek to colonize, until she has a fuperabundance of population, which fhe cannot employ in any other way." And applying this remark particularly to the French nation, he proceeds to say, Though very confiderable, the population of France is very far from having reached the term which renders colonies neceffary." Thefe fentiments of our honourable ambassador are undoubtedly juft.

66

France is populous, but not full; in proportion to her area or furface, fhe is a little more populous than Germany, England and Wales; but fhe is confiderably lefs populous than Italy, and much lefs.

derness North Weft of the Ohio bears, to all the reft part of the territory of the United States, a little more than the proportion of four to fix. Mr. Hutchins, late Geographer of the United States, estimated this tract (after deducting all the furface covered with water) to contain two hundred and twenty million acres. South of the Ohio, and in the neighbourhood of the Miffiffippi, are immenfe tracts of un

ry of Georgia, about twenty two million
acres of excellent land was fold, by the
government of that State, fo lately as the
year 1795, for the fum of five hundred
thousand dollars; which is from two to
three cents an acre. The population of
the State of Georgia, Kentucky and Ten-
neffee does not average two persons to a
fquare mile. In the State of Virginia,
the oldeft ftate in the Union, there are
(including the negroes) but about eleven
perfons to a fquare mile. In the States
of Pennfylvania and New-York, there are,
to each fquare mile, but about ten per-

the refpe&able authority of Mr. Living.
fton, we confidently fay, NO: accord-oecupied lands. In the Western territo-
ing to his conclufive reafoning, fuch a
meafure would be rather injurious, than
beneficial to France; becaufe, not hav-
ing a " fuperabundance of population,"
fhe can usefully employ all her people at
home; and "one man alone is more
ufeful by remaining at home, than two
by removing at a diftance."-Her fron-
tiers would be double in extent, and
would therefore require a double ex-
pence in defending them; and by thus
fpreading her capitals and her population
over twice the furface which fhe now pof.
feffes, he would be impoverished and
weakened in nearly the fame proportion.fons; which is lefs than a fifteenth part
But Mr. Livingfton's reafoning, which is
clear and conclufive as it refpects France,

*Holland has the average number of two hundred and thirty-fix perfons to each Square mile.

of the population of France. Maffachufetts (exclufive of the Province of Maine, most of which is yet a wilderness) has about forty inhabitants, to every fquare mile Connecticus about forty four.Thofe two States are, through mistake,

fuppofed to be fall; vaft emigrations from each of them, and efpecially from the latter, have been yearly preffing toward the South and Weft: yet the population of France, which, (as the memorial ftates) is very far from having reached its ultimate term, is much more than treble to theirs.

evil; and that it was high time its deftruc- "of the federal fong now is that Mr. Jef
tive progress should be arrested. Refpect" ferfon paid Callender for writing again
for public officers were neceflary; and if
He the
fuch papers as the Wafp was permitted to
be published, no good man would take an
office, &c.

"the late adminiftration."
read the publication, to wit:

"Holt says, the burden of the Federal song is that Mr. Jefferson paid Callender for writing against the late administration. This is wholly false. The

Mr. Spencer then called witneffes to prove that Mr. Crotwell was the publifh-charge is explicitly this :-Jefferson paid Callender for calling Washington a traitor, a robber, and a per er of the paper, called the Wasp, from jurer-For calling Adams ahoary-headed incendia one of which, (to wit, No. 7,) the pref-ry; and for most grossly slandering the private char ent libel was extracted. It was proved that fome of the papers had been printed at the pres of the defendant-that they

had been feen in his book-ftore. It was

alfo proved that a file of the Wafp from
No. 1 to 5, inclufive, had been fold by
the defendant; and the refidue, to No. 12,

In the United States, lands are "fuperabundant," but labourers are few and fcarce. They have not yet attained even to the twentieth part of a full population : therefore any more lands, for the mere purpose of fettlement and cultivation, they no more need, than they need plantations in the moon. Afide from the confideration that the fettlement of Louisiana or the Floridas, or either of them, might tend to bar off dangerous neighbours and perma-by one of his journeymen. Mr. Spencer nently to fecure the navigation of the Miffiffippi, it is questionable whether they would be worth receiving, if they were to be offered to this nation as a gift. If a promife of speedily fettling the bequeathed territory were made a condition in accepting the bequeft, national intereft would imperiously require its rejectinent. The truth of this fentiment will, I truft, be rendered apparent, from arguments and reafons, which will be offered hereafter.

CALCULATOR.

Liberty of the Press.

A CORRECT HISTORY OF HARRY CROSWELL'S TRIAL.

THE

[CONTINUED.]

It

acters of men, who he well knew were virtuous

These charges, not a democratic editor has yet dared, or ever will dare to meet in an open and manly dis cursion."

He contended that the publication was merely a correction of the above falfhood in the B-e-a true statement of what the "burden of the federal fong" actually then called a witnefs to prove the truth was; and a challenge to an open and man. of the inuendoes. To this, the counfelly difcuffion. There was not even a for the defendant objected; and the chief charge made by the defendant against the juflice over-ruled the objection. The wit-prefident. He fays, the charge made by nefs was then examined, and teflified that the federalias, was not as Hoit had repre he understood the words Washington, Adfented; and he then ftates what that charge ams and Jefferfon, contained in the alledg- really was-to wit that "the charge ed libel, to mean as flated in the inuen. made by the federalifts, is explicitly this, does in the indi&ment. He believed the &c.-Now, he asked, if fuch a charge had inuendoes to be corre&t; and he stated the not been made? Yes-it had rung through ground of his opinion to be, that he had every corner of the continent. It had frequently feen fimilar charges in other been published at the very feat of govern papers prior to the publication of the alledged libel in the Wafp.

ment.

"

Callender had published, repeated. ly, that Mr. Jefferion paid him for writ the Profpect before us." He had published a letter from Mr. Jefferson to himself, approving of the book, and offers

The evidence on the part of the profecu-ing tion being clofed, the defendant offered to prove that he neither wrote nor indited, or devifed the publication in queftioning him fitty dollars. He then took up that it was handed to a perfon in his employ, and printed in his abfence, and without his knowledge or confent. This was over-ruled by Judge Lewis.

The defendant's counfel then proceeded to address the jury.-Mr. Van Nefs began an argument of about one hour by itating that in cafes of libel, the jury had the power and the right to judge of the law and The fat. That they, and they alone, were the fole judges between the public and the defendant. That it was their province to determine, fift, Was the defendant the author or pubiither of the ailedged libel? Second, Was the publication in queftion calculated to disturb the peace of the peo ple of this ftate-to excite fedition ? And, third, Was it published with a malicious, feditious, and diabolical intent ? Mr. Van Nefs contended, that thefe queitions must be determined by the jury in the aflirmative, before they could ever pronounce the defendant guilty of the crime charged in the indictment. In a fpeech of fome length, he expatiated upon the above topics. He argued, with irrefillable force, that on the very face of the publication there was ample evidence against every prefumption of malice. It was introdu

HE court adjourned until the next morning, when the jury having been impannelled, Mr. Spencer opened the caule on the part of the profecution. is impoffible for us to give, from the few notes in our poffeffion, his fpeech with mach accuracy. This, however, was the purport of it-That libellers were a very criminal clafs of offenders. That the government must be protected from their attacks. That the libel then to be tried, was of a very heinous nature; and, if true, was fufficient to confign the name of Thomas Jefferfon to eternal infamy, &c. But, by the direction of the Court, it cer tainly was not a fubject of inquiry whether it was true or falfe... For, whether true or falfe, by the law of this state, it was certa.nly libellous; and he tufted that the jury would fhow their deteftation of fuch flanders, by a verdict of guilty. That there was a great difference between the liberty and the licentioufnefs of the prefs. The one was a moft invaluable privilege,ced to correct a falfe charge made against

which he would be the laft man to attack but the other was a growing and intolerable

the federalifts in the Bre. He read the
charge from the Bee, viz." The burden

[ocr errors]

the " Profpe&t before us," and flated that
in that book Washington and Adams were
charged with the very crimes mentioned in
the affidavit. Mr. Spencer objected to
the reading of any thing from the Prof
pe&t before us. The court enforced the
objc&tion; and determined that it fheud
not be read. Mr. Van Nefs then contend
ed, that fufficient appeared to do away ev
cry pretence of a malicious intent in the
defendant. That the charge had been
published in almoft every federal paper,
could not be denied. And all that the
publication in queftion Rated, was that
fa&t. Whether the charge was true of
falte, the publication did not determine.
It merely detected a falfhood in the Bee;
and corrected it by flating the nature of the
charge. It fated, that the federalifts charg
ed Jefferfon with paying Callender. This
was certainly true.
It might be found in

numerous papers.

The defendant him felt had never made the charge; nor had he declared it true. He was, therefore, not reiponfiole for it. He bad challenged

44

an open and manly cilcullion" of that charge, which he faid the federalifts bad made. And, he contended, that a malicious intent could never be inferred, either from the correction of the garbled statement in the Bee, or from his challenging a d cuffion of a charge again the character of

Thomas Jefferfon. We regret that it is not in our power to give more than this faint fketch of this argument. But we are not without hopes that we shall yet have it in our power to give it at length.

Mr. Van Vechten then rofe; and, in a fpeech which, for correctness and brilliancy of ftile, cogency of argument, and perfpicuity of arrangement, we have feldom, if ever, heard equalled, contended for principles fimilar to thofe advanced by Mr. Van Nefs. We fhall be able foon to give his argument to the public we fhall, therefore, refrain from mangling it by an attempted abridgement.

(TO BE CONCLUDED NEXT WEEK.)

Balance Closet.

TO C. HOLT.

To get rid of the charge of knavery, you are at length compelled to acknowledge yourself a very great dunce. You pretend that you declined publishing the production of “ Cato,” because it contained Libellous matter, which would subject you to indictment. If you really believed this, your manner of treating the piece, discovers your gross stupidity and ignorance. If you did not believe it, your total dis=regard for truth is equally apparent. With knavery,

sent it, you alone are guilty of being, in the eye of
the law, the author of it, and the sole cause of its
publication. In this case, your folly is proved. But,
if you misrepresented the contents of the piece, then,
indeed, the charge of knavery stands good against
you. We say, again, take your choice.

"Mark Anthony" says that "Cato" had set a

gull-trap to catch him. (Yes, reader, a gull-trap to
catch Holt!)-and then he boasts that the gull
was too cunning to be caught!

CALLENDER.

Some of the minor democrats make themselves
very merry, and indulge in the most ridiculous exul-
tation, on account of the death of Callender. A
gang of house-breakers, would not discover more
joy, on hearing of the death of a surly and watch-
ful mastiff. But do not these striplings know, that
every word which they utter concerning Callender,
is worse than a dagger to their masters? Do they
suppose that it is possible for the people to forget
who and what Callender was? Do they think that
any body will believe that he was a federalist? Did
he not uniformly, and to the last, declare himself to
be a democratic republican; and did not his writ-
Recorder" contain-
ings prove him so? Tho' his "
ed many charges against certain leading democrats,
did it not also in almost every number, abuse the fed.
eralists? Was not Callender the author of a slan-
derous tale against Judge Chase, which Holt pub-
lished as a fact a short time since? Did not Callen-
der write the " Prospect ;" and was not that book
published for the avowed purpose of promoting Mr.
Jefferson's election, and the cause of democracy?
Was not that book written, in part, at the house
of one the greatest democrats in Virginia Was
not Callender rewarded, countenanced, encouraged,

crats? The democrats have often declared Callen-
der to be a man of talents; and a leading man of
the party in Philadelphia has sworn that he was a
man of good moral character. The federalists have
neither declared the one, nor sworn the other.-
They have never approved, by reward or by, friend-
ly and familiar letters, the attacks of Callender on
Washington or Adams. They pitied his follies and
misfortunes; and if he was really, as the democrats
have declared and sworn, a man of talents and good
moral character, it is to be regretted that he did not
meet a better fate in the world.

therefore, on one side, and folly on the other, you
may make your choice. Let us suppose, for a mo-
ment, that you actually believed the piece in ques-
tion contained slander, abuse and libels on the presi-
dent, and that the fear of prosecution prevented
your publishing it. It should be premised, that ev-
ery person who aids, or in any way abets the publi-supported, patronized, and protected by the demo-
cation of a libel is equally amenable to the law, with
the writer or printer. When a piece so slanderous,
so abusive, so libellous fell into your hands, what
ought to have been your treatment of it? When the
foulest charges against a president whom you affect
to adore, were sent to you for publication, what
ought you to have done with them? Was it not your
duty, as an honest man and a good patriot, to sup-
press them-to commit them to the flames, and to
inform the author that you could never give publicity
to such vile trash? Was not this the only method
that could protect you from prosecution? Certainly.
But did you do this? No. On the contrary, you
lent your aid-you took uncommon pains to propa-
gate the abominable calumnies of which you com.
plain. When the piece was in your possession, it
was in your power to suppress or publish it-to
throw it into the fire, or to send it into the world.
You chose the latter. You durst not print it your-
self; but rather than lose such an opportunity to
slander, abuse, and libel the president, you took ex-
traordinary care to send the piece to a press which
issues almost twice as many papers as your own.
You even went so far as to alter, with your own
hand, several parts of the piece, particularly the
address and signature. Therefore, if the piece was
so slanderous, abusive and libeilous as you repre-

THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE;
OR, DEMOCRATIC CONSISTENCY !

"the

At the last presidential election, Col. Burr re-
ceived as many votes for the office as Mr. Jefferson.
He was then, without doubt, just as much
man of the people." Every democratic throat be.
came a trumpet to sound his praise. He was ca-
ressed in public. He was flattered in the newspa
pers. He was toasted at the festivals: He was, in
short, the idol of his party.-But, alas! within the
short space of three years, what a change has taken
place-(Not, indeed, in the character or conduct

[blocks in formation]

Toasts drank by the Democrats, in 1803. 1.] Aaron Burr, Vice president of the United States-to the right about face-3 flashes in the pan-rogue's march.

2.] Aaron Burr and Benedict Arnold-may traitors always meet their reward.

3.] The Vice president of the United States"Oh! fling away ambition, by that sin fell the angels."-Rogue's March.

4.] May the wheels of government never be clogged with Burrs.

5.] Aaron Burr-a tear on his infirmities, and let him and them be forgotten forever.

The prating dunce, who scribbles nonsense, falshoods and bad grammar for the Utica Gazette, at the salary of sixty-dollars per annum, is solicited to have mercy on us as well as on his readers. It is certainly ungenerous in him, (blessed as he is with the most transcendant talents, and fattening on such an enormous salary,) to bear down, with unrelenting fury, the humble editors of the Balance. Strange, that a large salary or income, will so soon puff a man up with pride! What shall we do to obtain the favor of this implacable.editor? Alas! alas ! What shall we do?

The late removal of Edward Livingston, Esq. from the office of Attorney of the United States for the district of New York, excites considerable curiosity; and many ask (besides our "Mark Anthony)”—What bas he done? We hope he was not appointed to office without giving satisfactory answers "Is he honest? Is he capable," to the questions, &c. We hope an officer of Mr. Jefferson's appointing, has shewn no “anti-revolutionary" disposition. But perhaps Mr. Livingston is a Burrite; and that, in the eye of some people, is worse than to be a federalist.

A neat quarto paper, entitled "THE HIVE," has lately been established at Northampton, Massachusetts, by Mr. THOMAS M. POMROY. It is to be devoted to Literature and Politics; and, as it bears every mark of Federalism, we sincerely wish it success.

« AnteriorContinuar »