phrase of several Passages in Holy Writ, which treat of the birth, sufferings, resurrection, ascension, and glorification of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ," was printed at Bath, "for the Author," in 1799. It appears from the preface and the poem to have been written by one of the early members of the New Church. Is the name of the writer, a lady, known? The preface is :-"The following sheets being chiefly a Paraphrase of some of the most beautiful and poetic passages of Holy Writ, the writer hopes it will not be thought she has destroyed any of the beauty or elegant simplicity of the original. She does not presume to view herself in the light of an author, but, as an editor, is ready to cast in her mite towards stemming the mighty torrent of infidelity which at this day threatens to overwhelm and swallow up all Divine truth and heavenly excellence. This humble attempt was primarily written without the most distant intention of ever introducing it to the public; but should its contents lead any soul to seek after the knowledge of its God and Saviour, may all the glory redound to Him, whose high and holy name is above every name in heaven and in earth. Amen." The following "Song of Praise," one of the poetic pieces appended to the poem, is worthy of preservation. I have ventured to omit two couplets and to alter another, which seemed to me to disfigure the poem. The rest of the book, as poetry, is worthless. BATH. ISAAC PITMAN. Yes, I quite agree with you that "Outlines" is the book for the clergy, and I am taking measures to reprint it, and post it, and make the clergy pay for it! You will ask, How? I have a promise of £40 to start with. This will set, stereo., and print 4000. I shall send out seven copies, Speirs' edition, to as many clergymen with whom I am somewhat intimately acquainted, and ask their opinion of my scheme, and, if they approve of it, to favour me with a subscription. I shall then set to work (whether the reply be favourable or not), using their names if permitted and favourable, and send out thousand after thousand as fast as the funds come in, asking the receivers, who approve of the book, to assist me in sending it to the rest of the clergy. If you think the poetry accompanying this will profitably fill a page or two of the Repository, I shall be glad to see it there. 2 SAMUEL, ch. xxii., and PSALM XCVII. "O THOU, to whom angelic strains belong, Vouchsafe to teach my heart, my hand, my tongue, Single to Thee, my heart, my hand, my eye, And stately waves rebound from shore to shore. The ponderous mountains smoke with love Divine; With sacred rapture at His footstool fall, Our Sun appears, and, with prolific ray, O Thou, to whom seraphic lays belong, DR. ADAM CLARKE'S CREED. "WHEN I came forth among my fellows as apostolic minister, I felt the importance of not making any man my model, and not making any particular creed the standard of my faith. As I was to explain and enforce Scripture on my own responsibility, I resolved that all should be the result of my own examination. The Scriptures I read through repeatedly in their primitive languages, with all the collateral helps of ancient tongues which I could command. I analyzed, compared, sifted, and arranged; I stretched my intellect to its widest grasp of comprehension to understand the nature and attributes of God, together with the reasons and demands of His Word. But there was a necessity that all this should be reduced to some kind of creed,— that it should not be a scattered host of unconnected thoughts, but a combined and irrefragably deduced series of incontrovertible doctrine, agreeing with truth and fitted for use. This so impelled me to arrange my particulars under generals, to concentrate my forces, and call in my stragglers; nor did I ever cease to condense my creed until I had reduced its several parts under two grand heads, LOVE TO GOD, and LOVE TO MAN. Here I found that I had a rule to which I could refer all my conceptions of the great and holy God, and all my endeavours for the welfare of mankind; it was a creed of practice and not of theory, capable of being drawn into use at a moment's notice." IN MEMORIAM. JOHN CRAWFORD BELL, NORWICH, OBIIT July 10, 1877. MEMORY, thou magic record of the past, Best tablet to THE GOOD when they depart, To deeds of duty, sympathy, goodwill; JESMOND LODGE, MALTON, 23rd July 1877. 432 Reviews. REV. JOSEPH COOK'S MONDAY LECTURES. London: Dickenson, AMONG the subjects of Mr. Cook's lectures are the Trinity, the Atonement, Immortality, Sin, Righteousness. He maintains the doctrine of the absolute and personal unity of God. "For one, I had rather go back to the Bosphorus, where I stood a few months ago, and worship with the Emperor who lately slit his veins and went home by suicide, than to be in name only an orthodox believer, or in theory to hold there is but one God, but in imagination to worship three Gods. Mohammedan paganism contains one great truth-the Divine unity. And I never touch this majestic theme of the Divine triunity without remembering what that single truth, as I heard it uttered on the Bosphorus, did for me, when I knelt there once in a mosque, with the Emperor and with the peasants, with the highest officers of State and with the artizans, and saw them all bow down and bring their foreheads to the mats of the temple, and heard them call out, from the highest to the lowest, as they prostrated themselves, Allah el akbar'—' God is one, and God is great." So prostrating themselves, they three times called out, 'Allah el Akbar,' and then remained silent, until I felt that this one truth had in it a transfiguration. "At what should we arrive, however, if we should adopt the bare idea of the Divine unity without taking also that of the trinity? Should we thus be faithful to the scientific method? Should we thus be looking at all the facts? Should we obtain by this method the richest conception of God, or should we see from such a point of view only a fragment of that portion of His nature which man may apprehend?" After stating several scientific axioms, as he would call them, he comes to this conclusion: "A personal Triunity, of which Creator, Redeemer, and Saintifier are but the other names, is therefore scientifically known to exist. This is the Trinity which Christianity calls Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, and of all parts of whose undivided glory it inculcates adoration in the name of what God is, and of what He has done, and of what man needs." What is the nature of this Trinity? and how does he represent it by illustration? Adopting Whateley's statement that in God there is one substance and three subsistences, and that each has some peculiar and incommunicable properties, he says: "Take the mysterious palpitating radiance which at this instant streams through the solar windows of this temple, and may we not say, for the sake of illustration, that it is one substance? Can you not affirm, however, that there are in it three subsistences? It would be possible for me by a prism to produce the colours sown on a screen. I should have colour there, and heat there, and there would be luminousness everywhere. But in colour is a property incommunicable to mere luminousness or to heat; in luminousness is a property incommunicable to mere heat or to colour. In heat is a property incommunicable to mere colour or to luminousThese three-luminousness, colour, heat-are, however, one solar radiance. Heat subsists in the solar radiance, and colour subsists in the solar radiance, and light subsists in the solar radiance. The three are one; but they are not one in the same sense that they are three." ness. This is an approximation to a correct illustration of the Trinity, but we do not find any of the analysis that men ought to find in man, who was created in God's image, as of will, understanding, and action; soul, body, |