 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - 1827 - 804 páginas
...the delivery to the sister was a good delivery : and he explained to them, that if the delivery was a parting with the possession, and of the power and control over the deed, for the benefit of Garnons, for the purpose of its being delivered to him, either in Wynne's lifetime,... | |
 | 1826 - 790 páginas
...second delivery to the sister was a good delivery ; and he explained to them, that if the delivery was a parting with the possession, and of the power and control over the deed, for the benefit of Garnons, delivered in his lifetime, the delivery "as good : but if it was delivered,... | |
 | Connecticut. Supreme Court of Errors - 1891 - 662 páginas
...that there must be a parting with the possession of the deed and with all power and control over it by the grantor for the benefit of the grantee at the time of delivery. Prestinan v. Baker, 30 Wis., 644. The delivery of a deed is as essential to the passing of... | |
 | 1903 - 1164 páginas
...power over the deed be restored; in which case the delivery is said to be contingent or conditional. An essential, characteristic, and indispensable feature...and of the power and control over the deed by the srantor for the benefit of the grantee, at the time of delivery." Porter v. Woodhouse, 59 Conn. 568,... | |
 | 1892 - 1158 páginas
...that there must be a parting with the possession of the deed, and with all power and control over it, by the grantor for the benefit of the grantee at the time of delivery. Prustsman v. Baker, 30 Wia. 644. The delivery of a deed is as essential to the passing of... | |
 | Robert Thomas Devlin - 1887 - 810 páginas
...it was held that the deed was valueless for the want of a delivery.1 be contingent or conditional. An essential characteristic and indispensable feature...whether absolute or conditional, is that there must bo a parting with the possession, and of the power and control over the deed by the grantor for the... | |
 | 1889 - 878 páginas
...т. Pitltburyk, etc. RR Co. (1864), 34 111. 13. § 10. Grantor Retaining Control over Inttrummt.—" An essential characteristic and indispensable feature...grantor, for the benefit of the grantee at the time of delivery : ' ' Pruttman v. Baker (1872), 30 Wil. 644. For if he retains any control over it, it is... | |
 | John Davison Lawson - 1890 - 944 páginas
...power over the deed be restored, in which case the delivery is said to be contingent or conditional. An essential characteristic and indispensable feature...grantor for the benefit of the grantee at the time of delivery. This is the legal definition and meaning of the term 'delivery,' as applied to such an instrument.... | |
 | 1891 - 930 páginas
...that there must be a parting with the possession of the deed and with all power and control over it by the grantor for the benefit of the grantee at the time of the delivery. Pruteman v. Baker, 30 Wie. 644. The delivery of a deed is as essential to the passing of the title... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1891 - 1038 páginas
...that there must be a parting with the possession of the deed, and with all power and control over it, by the grantor for the benefit of the grantee, at the time of delivery: Prutsma* T. Baker, 30 Wis. 644. The delivery of a deed is as essential to the passing of... | |
| |
But it is an essential characteristic and an indispensable feature of every delivery, whether absolute or conditional, that there must be a parting with the possession of the deed and with all power and control over it by the grantor for the benefit of... 
