...kinds are found, but not in such quantity as to justify expenditures in the effort to extract them. lt is not to such lands that the term 'mineral' in the sense of the statute is applicable. ln the first section of the act of 1806 no designation is given of the character of mineral lands which...

...except in the states of Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Missouri, and Kansas. The court say, (page 404:) "We say ' land known at the time to be valuable for...mineral,' in the sense of the statute, is applicable. * * * We also say lands known at the time of their sale to be thus valuable, in order to avoid any...

...which minerals of different kinds are found, but not in such quantity as to justify expendituresin the effort to extract them. It is not to such lands...'mineral,' in the sense of the statute, is applicable. * * * We also say lands known at the time of their sale to be thus valuable, in order to avoid any...

...minerals," as there are vast tracts of public land in which minerals of different kinds are found, butnot in such quantity as to justify expenditures in the...'mineral,' in the sense of the statute, is applicable. In the first section of the act of ISIiG, no designation is given of tlie character of mineral lands...

...contain precious metals iu small quantities, but not sufficient to justify the expense of attempting to extract them. It is not to such lands that the term "mineral," In the sense of the statute relating to mill sites, is applicable. Davis v. Wiebbold, supra.. Works for the reduction of ores are...

...the sale of such lands, except in the States of Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Missouri and Kansas. We say " land known at the time to be valuable for...mineral " in the sense of the statute is applicable. In the first section of the act of 1866 no designation is given of the character of mineral lands which...

...valuable for its minerals," as there are vast tracts of public land in which minerals of diiTerent kinds are found, but not in such quantity as to justify...mineral " in the sense of the statute is applicable. In the first section of the act of 1866 no designation is given of the character of mineral lands which...

...there are vast tracts of public land in which minerals of different kinds are found, but not in sucli quantity as to justify expenditures in the effort..."mineral," in the sense of the statute, is applicable. In the first section of the act of 1866 no designation is given of the character of mineral lands which...

...in the States of Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Missouri, and Kansas. The court say (page 404) : " "We say ' land known at the time to be valuable for...mineral ' in the sense of the statute is applicable. . . . We also say lands known at the time of their sale to be thus valuable, in order to avoid any...

...different kinds are found, but not in such quantities as to justify expenditure.» in the •eflbrt to extract them. It is not to such lands that the term mineral is applicable We therefore use the term known to be valuable at the time of sale to prevent any doubt...