No. 507, Misc. POLLINO v. NEW YORK. Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department. Certiorari denied. Petitioner pro se. Isidore Dollinger for respondent.

No. 749, Misc. GAITHER v. CALIFORNIA. Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied. Caryl Warner for petitioner. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Philip C. Griffin, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

No. 824, Misc. DEAL v. WARDEN, MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Certiorari denied.

No. 636, Misc. DANIELS v. UNITED STATES. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion certiorari should be granted. Melvin M. Feldman for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States. Reported below: 106 U. S. App. D. C. 324, 272 F. 2d 553.

No. 593, Misc. CROSS v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA. Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied. THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this application. Petitioner pro se. Alan B. Aldwell for respondent.

No. 711, Misc. HICKS v. NEW YORK. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, and other relief, denied.

Rehearing Denied.

May 23, 1960.

362 U.S.

No. 696. FEDERAL BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL., ante, p. 935;

No. 736. TUCKER V. ILLINOIS, ante, p. 950;

No. 614, Misc. SMITH ET AL. v. UNITED STATES, ante, p. 954;

No. 634, Misc. UNITED STATES EX REL. HELWIG V. MARONEY, SUPERINTENDENT, WESTERN STATE PENITENTIARY, ante, p. 954;

No. 652, Misc. WHITING v. SACKS, WARDEN, ante, p. 946;

No. 705, Misc. LIVESAY v. ELLIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS Department of CORRECTIONS, ante, p. 946; and

No. 853, Misc. MACKIEWICZ v. FLORIDA, ante, p. 965. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Dismissal Under Rule 60.

No. 467. MoUNSEY V. NEW YORK. Certiorari, 361 U. S. 812, to the Court of Appeals of New York. Writ of certiorari dismissed upon stipulation of counsel pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court. Walter Gellhorn for petitioner. Louis Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, for respondent.

INDEX

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE. See Aliens; Constitutional
Law, V, 1; Federal Power Act; Federal Trade Commission;
Labor, 1-7; Reconstruction Finance Corporation Act.
ADMIRALTY. See also Constitutional Law, I, 2; Labor, 7.

Temporary unseaworthiness—Injury to seaman-Knowledge or
negligence of shipowner.-Shipowner liable for personal injuries to
member of crew resulting from temporary unseaworthiness of ship:
knowledge or negligence of shipowner not necessary. Mitchell v.
Trawler Racer, Inc., p. 539.

AGGREGATE VALUE. See Criminal Law.

AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES.

See Antitrust Acts, 2.

AGRICULTURAL MARKETING AGREEMENT ACT. See Juris-
diction, 8.

AIR POLLUTION. See Constitutional Law, I, 2.

ALABAMA. See Civil Rights Act.

ALIENS. See also Constitutional Law, V, 1; Procedure, 3.

Deportation Communism

-

-Sufficiency of evidence. Evidence
sufficient to support finding that alien had become member of Com-
munist Party after entering United States and was deportable under
Act of October 16, 1918, as amended by § 22 of Internal Security Act
of 1950. Niukkanen v. McAlexander, p. 390.

ANTITRUST ACTS. See also Labor, 3.

1. Sherman Act-Drug manufacturer-Resale price maintenance.-
In civil suit under § 4 of Sherman Act charging drug manufacturer
with combining and conspiring to maintain resale prices of its products
in areas having no "fair trade" laws, the District Court erred in
dismissing complaint on ground that Government had not shown
right to relief. United States v. Parke, Davis & Co., p. 29.

2. Sherman Act-Clayton Act-Application to dairy cooperative.-
Cooperative marketing association of milk producers subject to prose-
cution for some violations of §§ 2 and 3 of Sherman Act and § 7 of
Clayton Act, notwithstanding exemptions granted by Capper-Volstead
Act and §6 of Clayton Act; civil adjudication of violating § 3 of
Sherman Act and §7 of Clayton Act affirmed; decree sustained.
Maryland and Virginia Milk Producers Assn. v. United States, p. 458.

APPEAL. See Jurisdiction, 1-3.

ARREST. See Constitutional Law, V.

ASSIGNMENTS. See Copyrights.

ATTORNEY GENERAL.

See Constitutional Law, III.

AVOCADOS. See Jurisdiction, 8.

CALIFORNIA. See Constitutional Law, II, 2; IV; Jurisdiction, 8.
CAPPER-VOLSTEAD ACT. See Antitrust Acts, 2.

CARRIERS. See Admiralty; Employers' Liability Act; Labor,
6-7; Transportation.

CERTIORARI. See Procedure, 4.

CITIZENSHIP. See Procedure, 3.

CIVIL RIGHTS ACT. See also Constitutional Law, III; Juris-
diction, 5.

Negroes-Denial of right to vote-Action by United States against
State. Under Civil Rights Act of 1960, United States may bring
action against State for declaratory and injunctive relief against
county election board depriving Negroes of voting rights by racially
discriminatory practices. United States v. Alabama, p. 602.

CLAYTON ACT. See Antitrust Acts, 2.

COERCION. See Labor, 2, 4, 7.

COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL. See Procedure, 3.

COMMERCE. See Constitutional Law, I; Criminal Law; Federal
Trade Commission; Jurisdiction, 8; Labor, 5; Transportation.
COMMUNISM. See Aliens; Constitutional Law, II, 2; V, 1; Pro-
cedure, 2.

CONDEMNATION. See Federal Power Act.

CONFLICT OF LAWS.

See Constitutional Law, I, 2; Labor, 3, 6.
CONSPIRACY. See Antitrust Acts; Constitutional Law, V, 1;
Criminal Law.

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. See also Jurisdiction, 1-3, 5, 8; Pro-
cedure, 1-3.

I. Commerce.

1. State taxation-Use of goods shipped into State-Requiring
nonresident seller to collect from resident purchaser.-Florida statute
taxing use of goods shipped into State and requiring nonresident
seller to collect tax from resident purchaser did not violate Com-
merce Clause of Constitution or Due Process Clause of Fourteenth
Amendment. Scripto, Inc., v. Carson, p. 207.

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-Continued.

2. State smoke abatement code-Ships in port-Federal license.—
Criminal provisions of Detroit Smoke Abatement Code constitutional
as applied to ships docked in port, though they operate in interstate
commerce and have been inspected, approved and licensed by
Federal Government. Huron Cement Co. v. Detroit, p. 440.
II. Due Process.

1. Federal courts—Public trial-Summary conviction of contempt
for refusal to answer grand jury's questions.—In circumstances, exclu-
sion of public from courtroom when witness was summarily convicted
of criminal contempt and sentenced for refusal to answer grand jury's
questions did not violate Due Process Clause of Fifth Amendment or
public-trial requirement of Sixth Amendment. Levine v. United
States, p. 610.

2. State action-Discharge of public employee for refusal to answer
questions about subversion.-Summary discharge of temporary county
employee, solely on grounds of insubordination and violation of state
statute, for refusing to answer before congressional investigating com-
mittee questions concerning subversion, did not violate Due Process
Clause of Fourteenth Amendment. Nelson v. Los Angeles County,
p. 1.

3. State courts-Convictions totally lacking in evidentiary sup-
port.-Conviction in city police court for "loitering" and "disorderly
conduct" violated Due Process Clause of Fourteenth Amendment
when the record was totally lacking in evidentiary support.
Thompson v. City of Louisville, p. 199.

4. State courts-Denial of counsel-Suppression of evidence.—
When state prisoner applied to state court for habeas corpus and
alleged that he was denied counsel at his trial for murder and that
prosecutor suppressed evidence favorable to defendant, he was
entitled to hearing. Wilde v. Wyoming, p. 607.

5. State courts-Sufficiency of allegations. - Petition to State
Supreme Court for habeas corpus on ground that confinement vio-
lated Due Process Clause of Fourteenth Amendment alleged sufficient
facts to entitle petitioner to hearing, and it was error to deny writ
without hearing. Sublett v. Adams, p. 143.

6. State taxation-Use of goods shipped into State-Requiring non-
resident seller to collect from resident purchaser.-Florida statute
taxing use of goods shipped into State and requiring nonresident seller
to collect tax from resident purchaser did not violate Due Process
Clause of Fourteenth Amendment. Scripto, Inc., v. Carson, p. 207.