Modern Tort Law: Liability & Litigation, Volumen2Callaghan, 1977 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 81
Página 19
... jury determination : " Admiralty was a strongly centralized and royal court with valuable emolu- ments ; it followed the civil law and operated without a jury , and hence was regarded with great jealousy by the courts of common law ...
... jury determination : " Admiralty was a strongly centralized and royal court with valuable emolu- ments ; it followed the civil law and operated without a jury , and hence was regarded with great jealousy by the courts of common law ...
Página 154
... jury . ' But due care of the employee may exist as a matter of law . 1 1 45 USC 53 . Pattern jury instructions illustrate the meaning of the Act : Illinois Pattern Jury Instruction , IPI - 160.02 : " Contributory negligence on the part ...
... jury . ' But due care of the employee may exist as a matter of law . 1 1 45 USC 53 . Pattern jury instructions illustrate the meaning of the Act : Illinois Pattern Jury Instruction , IPI - 160.02 : " Contributory negligence on the part ...
Página 162
... Jury . The respective functions of court and jury were spelled out in Rogers v . Missouri Pacific R. Co. ' Where the probative facts support with reason a verdict favorable to the plaintiff or the defendant , the decision is exclusively ...
... Jury . The respective functions of court and jury were spelled out in Rogers v . Missouri Pacific R. Co. ' Where the probative facts support with reason a verdict favorable to the plaintiff or the defendant , the decision is exclusively ...
Contenido
Volume | 2 |
ATTORNEYS | 33 |
SUBSTANTIVE MARITIME TORT | 43 |
Derechos de autor | |
Otras 13 secciones no mostradas
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
admiralty affd App3d applied assumption of risk brake breach CA 2nd CA 5th Cal App2d Cal Rptr Cal2d Cal3d cargo carrier cause of action CCA 2nd CCA 9th cert Code collision contributory negligence damages death decedent defendant defendant's doctrine Drano duty Ed2d employee evidence expert testimony express warranty F Supp failure federal Ford Motor Ford Motor Co foreseeable held Hospital Ill App2d Ill2d injury inspection issue Jones Act jurisdiction jury L Ed liability in tort malpractice manufacturer maritime Motors Corp navigation NE2d nuisance NW2d NYS2d Ohio operation particular patient person physician plaintiff privity proximate cause railroad reasonable recovery Restatement 2d result Rev Stats rule Safety Appliance SDNY SE2d ship So2d Southern Pacific Co standard Sterling Drug strict liability Supreme Court SW2d Tex Civ App tion Uniform Commercial Code United vessel violation warning