CHAPTER II.

CROMWELL'S PARLIAMENTARY LIFE.

Cromwell's Election and First Appearance in Parliament-His Portrait-Tonnage and Poundage-Struggle in Parliament-Dissolution-John Hampden's Refusal-Absolutism and Popery installedEvangelical Ministers-Persecutions: Leighton, Prynne, Bastwick, Burton-Scotland and the Covenant-New Parliament-Strafford -Charles's Insincerity-Irish Massacre-Remonstrance-Militia Bill-Cavaliers and Roundheads-Charge against Five MembersBeginning of the Revolution - Cromwell and his Sons become Soldiers-Necessity-Hampden's Opinion of Cromwell.

On the 29th of January 1628, writs were issued for a new Parliament, in which, on the 17th of March, Cromwell took his seat as member for Huntingdon. His father also, in earlier years, had been returned for the same town. After a prorogation of three months, the legislature assembled again on the 20th of January 1629. On the 11th of February, the House of Commons resolved itself into a grand Committee of Religion, in which one of the new members, Oliver, then thirty years of age, rose to speak for the first time. All eyes were turned upon him, and the House listened to him with attention. He wore a plain cloth suit, which seemed to have been made by a bad country tailor: his linen was not of the purest white; his ruffles were old fashioned; his hat was without a band; his sword stuck close to his side; his countenance was swollen and reddish; his voice sharp and untunable; but his delivery was warm and animated: his frame, although exceeding the middle height, strong and well proportioned; he had a manly air, a stern look, a bright and sparkling eye.

*

Certain ecclesiastics were then gaining notoriety by their zeal in forwarding, within the pale of the Church, the * Memoirs of Sir Philip Warwick, 247. London, 1701.

power of the king and the doctrines of Rome. Cromwell complained that the bishops permitted and even recommended the preaching of "flat Popery." "If these are "the steps to church preferment," exclaimed he, "what are we to expect?"-What are we to expect?......asked Oliver; and this was in truth the great question of the age. The re-establishment of Popery was the object of the seventeenth century, and Cromwell's first public words were against it. He then set up the landmark which determined and marked out the course he had resolved to follow until his death. Even Hume, generally so hostile to him, is struck by seeing his first words correspond so exactly to his character. Cromwell, indeed, was from the beginning to the end of his life quite consistent; he was faithful to the one idea, which he proclaimed upon the housetops. And it is this man, so decided, so open, who has been termed a hypocrite! History was never guilty of a greater error.

The Commons did not for the present stop at the extravagant doctrines of such semi-papists as Mainwaring, Sibthorp, and Montague, whom the Bishop of Winchester had taken into favour. It was a different question that led to the dissolution of parliament. The king required that they should vote the duties of tonnage and poundage for life, which the Commons refused. The speaker Finch, a courtier, was desirous of adjourning the house immediately, according to the orders of his master; but some of the members, among whom was Mr Holles, resisted, and in despite of his supplications and tears, held him by main force in the chair. The king sent orders to the sergeantat-arms to withdraw with the mace, which would suspend all deliberation; but he also, like the speaker, was kept in his seat. At the same time the keys of the hall were taken from him, and the doors were locked. Shortly after, a knock was heard on the outside: "Open," said the usher of the black rod; 66 a message from the king.". It was of no avail the doors remained closed. Charles now grew furious, and sending for the captain of his guard, ordered him to force the door. But in the meanwhile, the Commons had carried three resolutions: the first, against Arminian

ism; the second, against Popery. In a portion of the Anglican clergy there was a combined tendency towards these two errors, and they are evils which possess in truth a great resemblance. Finally, by the third resolution, the house declared the levying of tonnage and poundage illegal, and those guilty of high treason who should levy or even pay such dues. When the captain of the guard arrived, he found the hall deserted. The house had adjourned in conformity with the king's order. On the 10th of March, Charles went down to the Lords and dissolved the parliament, complaining of the behaviour of the Lower House, particularly of "certain vipers, who must look for "their reward." In effect, Holles, Sir John Eliot, William Strode, and some others, were fined and imprisoned. This was the last parliament in England for more than eleven years. Cromwell returned to Huntingdon. He did not take part in these parliamentary debates; but erelong from the bosom of his family issued the spark that was destined to light up a vast conflagration.

One of Oliver's aunts, Elizabeth Cromwell, had married William Hampden of Great Kimble, in Buckinghamshire, and was left a widow with two sons, John and Richard. John was a quiet and amiable man; no great talker, but a good listener; yet under this moderation and simplicity lay concealed a will of iron and a most determined resolution. It was the destiny of this individual to give the signal of resistance to Charles's arbitrary measures. He was called upon for the sum of twenty shillings, his portion of the rate which the Commons had forbidden to be paid. He refused modestly, but firmly, being resolved to try the issue at law. The judges, who would have preferred being silent, decided against him by a majority of eight to four. But the people looked upon him as the victor, and he became dear to all true hearts in England. Thus it was the family of Cromwell that began the struggle against Charles.

In 1631, Oliver, who had left Huntingdon, settled at Saint Ives, and afterwards at Ely; and it was while busied with farming at this place, that he wrote the letter which we have quoted above; in which, laying down, as

it were, the future course of his life, he declares himself ready TO DO and TO SUFFER for the cause of God. To do and to suffer these are the two great works of every apostleship, and Oliver's career was in truth an apostleship-a great mission. It may be, however, that the simple obedience to the Word of God, which should be the essential characteristic of a Christian's practical life, does not stand forth in it with sufficient clearness, and that in its stead there is a somewhat mystic tendency. Cromwell afterwards became clearer and more sober in his views.

The agitation of England continued to increase. Charles was endeavouring to dispense with a parliament, and to govern his kingdom by drawing more or less near to France and Spain. His ministers drove him into violent measures, and with a view to augment their strength, they soon formed an alliance with an unsound prelatism. Laud, archbishop of Canterbury and primate of all England, to whom Rome had offered a cardinal's hat, restored many of the practices and ceremonies of Popery. The communion-table was replaced by an altar raised on several steps at the east end of the church; the crucifix, pictures, and tapers were restored; and the officiating clergy, in gaudy dresses, made genuflexions before the altar after the Romish custom.

Associations were

The middle classes took the alarm. formed for the propagation of the Gospel; funds were raised to send preachers into various places, where it would be their duty not only to proclaim Jesus Christ, but to combat the popish superstitions under which it was now attempted to reduce the nation. The evangelical Christians of London, among whom was Mr Storie, a friend of Cromwell's, supported Dr Wells, one of these "lecturers," at Saint Ives. He was a man of goodness "and industry, and ability to do good every way (as Cromwell writes to Mr Storie on the 11th January 1636), "not short of any I know in England." Wells's preaching and conversation advanced Cromwell and his family in the ways of true piety. "Since his coming, the Lord hath by "him wrought much good among us," adds Oliver.

66

Soon afterwards, the news of the cruel persecutions against Laud's victims reached Saint Ives. They were placed in the pillory (such was the report), their ears were cut off, they were heavily fined, and condemned to imprisonment for life; but they endured these sufferings with indomitable courage. On one occasion, as the executioner was driving back the crowd, the martyr, foreseeing the evils that Charles would bring upon his people, interfered, exclaiming: "Let them come, and spare not, that they may learn to suffer.”

66

Dr Leighton, father of the celebrated archbishop of that name, for publishing "an Appeal to the Parliament, or "Zion's Plea against Prelacy," was condemned to pay a fine of £10,000; to be set in the pillory at Westminster, and publicly whipped; to lose his ears, have his nostrils slit, and his cheeks branded with the letters S. S.--" Sower "of Sedition ". '-a sentence that was executed in all its severity.

Prynne, a very remarkable man, was a barrister of Lincoln's Inn. The first crime that he committed, and for which he lost his ears, was his having published a work entitled "Histriomastix,-the Player's Scourge," directed against all stage-plays, masques, dances, and masquerades. The king and queen were fond of masques and dances, and Henrietta of France often won loud applause in the court theatricals. Prynne was accordingly accused by Laud of sedition. His second crime was a work against the hierarchy of the Church. As he had already lost his ears by the first sentence, the stumps on this occasion were literally sawn off. "I had thought," said Lord Chief Justice Finch, feigning astonishment, "that Mr Prynne had had no ears!"-"I hope your "honours will not be offended," replied Prynne; "pray "God give you ears to hear."-Oliver's ear heard, and his heart throbbed with emotion.

As Dr Bastwick ascended the scaffold on which he was to suffer mutilation, his wife rushed up to him, and kissed the ears he was about to lose. Upon her husband exhorting her not to be frightened, she made answer: "Farewell, my dearest, be of good comfort: I am nothing dismayed."