Regeneration, what men profess in it, 57.
Relics prohibited, 320.
Religious Education universal in Ed- ward VI.'s reign, 49; discontinued, 49; Services in the vulgar tongue, 50; in Latin only, 51. Reviling against Ridley, 222. Rial or royal, 382.
Ridley, Nicholas, biographical notice of, i; origin of the name, i; his descent, ii; at school at Newcastle upon Tyne, ii; entered at Pembroke College, ii; B.A., ii; elected Fellow of University College, Oxford, but declined the honour, ii; Fellow of Pembroke College, Cambridge, ii; M.A., iii; College agent for Tylney, Soham, and Saxthorpe Churches, iii; went to Paris, and studied at the Sor- bonne, iii; returned to England, Jun. Treasurer of Pembroke College, iv; Senior Proctor, iv; signed the decree against the Pope's supremacy at Cambridge, iv; B.D., iii; Chaplain to the University, and Public Orator, iii; Chaplain to Archbishop Cranmer, iii; Vicar of Herne, iv; Master of Pembroke College and D.D., v ; Chaplain to Henry VIII., v; Pre- bendary of Canterbury, iii; Pre- bendary of Westminster, iii; Vicar of Soham, iii; Bishop of Rochester, v; Commissioner to visit Cambridge, iii; Bishop of London, v; nominated Bishop of Durham, iii; excepted from the amnesty by Mary, iii; com- mitted to the Tower, July 1553, iii; sent to Oxford to dispute, iii; Mar- tyrdom, Oct. 16, 1555, iii; preaches the funeral sermon of Francis I., v; his personal appearance, vi; his learning, vi; his courtesy to Bishop Heath, vi; his domestic arrange- ments, vii; kindness to Bishop Bon- ner's mother, viii; persecuted by Bonner, viii; how converted to the Reformation, viii; his interview with the Princess Mary, x; his foreboding of his own death, xi; his character, xii; Quarles' lines concerning, xii; his share in the Book of Common Prayer, xii; his influence with Ed- ward VI., xiii; causes the king to found Bridewell, Christ's Hospital, and St Bartholomew's Hospital, xiii; list of his works from Tanner, xiii; which of his works preserved, xvi; his treatise 'de abominationibus se- dis Romanæ,' 371; his annotations on Tonstall, 373; his collection of Writings, 373; sends his disputation in writing to Dr Weston, 375; re- quests Weston to shew his written replies to the higher House of the Convocation, 376; his opinion con- cerning Transubstantiation, 15; care of souls committed to, 15; in danger of death from the laws, 15; careless
as to being called a Protestant, 15; his treatise against Transubstantia- tion, 1; his Piteous Lamentation, 47; his treatise on Image-worship, 81; declares the office of God's word, 56; speaks not to the contemner, 58; entreats Latimer to pray for him, 146; declaration concerning Tran- substantiation, 171; his Præfatio et Protestatio in English, 192; his con- scientious dissent from Romanism, 193; complains of lack of books, 193; submitteth to the Church of Christ, 193; is answered by Dr Wes- ton touching the lack of books, 193; is permitted time to prepare his an- swers, 194; demands notaries to re- port his answers, 194; chooses Jewel and Mounson as reporters, 194; an- swers to the first proposition and de- nies Transubstantiation, 194; ex- plains his answer to the first propo- sition aforesaid, 195; proposes three doubts, 195; interrupted in his pre- face by Dr Weston, 195; confirms his answer to the first proposition aforesaid, 197; proves Transubstan- tiation inconsistent with Scripture, 197; with the articles of the Faith, 199; with the Institution of the Lord's Supper, 199; to profane holy things, 199; interrupted by Pie, 199; accused of blasphemy by Weston, 200; is forced to leave the read- ing of his "Præfatio," 200; proves Transubstantiation to maintain need- less miracles, 200;-to give occasion for heresy, 200;-to be inconsistent with the Fathers, 200; his confession of Faith, 201; quotes the Fathers in support of his Confession of Faith, 201; the second proposition brought against him at Oxford, 202; replies to the second proposition, 202; ex- plains his reply to the second propo- sition, 202; confirms his reply to the proposition aforesaid, 203; speaks of the Analogy of the Sacraments, 205; commends the works of Bertram, 206; brought to a right knowledge of the Sacrament, 206; the third pro- position brought against him at Ox- ford, 206; answers to the third pro- position, 206; explains his answer to the third proposition, 207; confirms his answer to the proposition afore- said, 208; proves that no priest but Christ can sacrifice for sin, 208;- that there is but one sacrifice of the Church, 208; distinguishes between the order of Aaron, and that of Mel- chisedek, 208; shews the vanity of the Mass, 208; disproves the neces- sity of a daily oblation, 209;-the propitiatory character of the Mass, 209; adduces further arguments con- cerning the Mass, 209; quotes scrip- ture to the same effect, 209; notes the distinction between the bloody
and unbloody sacrifice, 209; quotes the opinion of the Fathers as to the "unbloody sacrifice," 211; appeals to a more competent tribunal, 212; appeals to Almighty God, 212; op- posed by Dr Smith, 212; speaks of Christ's ascent into Heaven, 213; reproves the illogical argument and equivocations of Dr Smith, 214; ar- gues as to the perpetual sitting_of Christ at the right hand of the Fa- ther, 214; passages from his own MS., 217-221; explains the opinions of Chrysostom and Bernard as to the Ubiquity of Christ, 215 et seq.; ex- plains how Christ took up his body and yet left it with us, 224; quali- fies some remarks of St Chrysostom, 224; reproves the reviling of Dr Weston, 225; asserts that he com- pelled no man to subscribe to the Catechism, 226; put forth no Cate- chism, 227; set his hand to the Cate- chism, but did not write it, 227; said by the judges to have had the Cate- chism attributed to him by Cranmer, 227; expresses his disbelief that Cranmer so asserted, 227; cites the opinion of Theophylact on the Sa- craments, 229; answered by Ogle- thorpe, 229; speaks English in his disputation, 225; shews how we are sprinkled with Christ's blood, 225; his answers termed ridiculous by the judges, 225; asserts that Christ gave us really and truly his flesh, 234; disputed against by Dr Glyn, 234; contumeliously treated by Dr Glyn, 235; called a shifter away of Scrip- ture and the Fathers, 235; worship- ped Christ in the Sacrament, 235; held the true body of Christ to be sacramentally in the Eucharist, 236; explains the meaning of the word "worship," 236; hissed at by the people, 238; appeals to God's judge- ment, 238; declares the Eucharist to be a Sacrament, 239; rejects the Council of Lateran, 246; accepts the Council of Nice, 248; asserts the Lamb of God to be in Heaven, 248; denies an alleged Canon of the Coun- cil of Nice, 249; disputed against by one whom he knew not, 249; denies any agreement about Transubstantia- tion between the Eastern and Western Churches at the Council of Florence, or elsewhere, 249; contradicted on this point by Dr Cole, 250; reasserts his previous statement, 250; his ex- planation of the words 'unbloody sacrifice,' 250; his sentiments as to worshipping the body of Christ, 251; his last examination, 255; his last examination conducted by the Bi- shops of Lincoln, Gloucester and Bristol, 255; tried first, before La- timer, 256; stood bareheaded to hear his accusation, 256; put on his cap
at the naming of the Pope, 256; re- fuses to acknowledge the authority of the Legate, 256; reproved by the Bishop of Lincoln for not putting off his cap, 256; replies to the Bishop of Lincoln, 257; reverences the per- son, but not the Legacy, of Cardinal Pole, 257; reverences not the Pope, 258; his cap taken off by one of the Beadles, 259; exhorted to recant, 259; replies again to the Bishop of Lincoln, 261; notes three points in the Bishop of Lincoln's discourse, first, that the See of Rome was found- ed by Peter, 261;-secondly, that the Fathers agree to this, 261;—that Ridley himself was once of the same opinion, 261; replies to the first point, 261; declares the Church to be founded on Christ's truth, 262; expounds the words of Christ to Peter, 262; notes the lineal descent of the Roman Bishops, 262; notes why the Roman Bishops have been esteemed more than other Bishops, 262; notes the precedency in England of the See of Lincoln, 263; concedes honour to Rome so long as Rome was worthy, 263; proves by the tes- timony of Gregory that the Pope is Antichrist, 263; notes the four Pa- triarchs of St Augustine's time, 263; replies to the charge of apostasy, 264; cites St Paul as having been once a persecutor, 264; sent by the Council to exhort Gardiner, Bishop of Winchester, 264; severe against Anabaptists, 264; never a favourer of Transubstantiation, 264; defends and explains his Sermon at Paul's Cross, 265; argues with the Bishop of Lincoln as to the meaning of St Augustine with respect to Ro- man supremacy, 265; rebukes those who spoke irreverently of the Sacra- ment, 265; exhorted to submit him- self to the Pope, 266; promised re- conciliation, 266; threatened with punishment, 267; acknowledges an universal Church, 268; refuses to confine the Church to Rome, 268; cites Vincentius Lyrinensis in sup- port of his opinion, 268; accuses the Roman Church of divers faults, 268; explains certain apostolic precepts, 268; his opinions required in direct answers, 270; promised a copy of the Articles against him, 270; pro- mised pen, ink, and paper and books, 270; articles against him and Lati- mer-five in number, 270-1; exami- ned upon the articles brought against him, 272; remonstrates on being hurried in his answers, 272; states what justice required in his case, 272; compares his treatment with that of Christ, 272; unjustly accused of making the king Pilate, 272; compares his accusers with Caiaphas,
272; promised a day to prepare his answers, 272; protests against the authority of the judges, 272; not suffered to give his reasons for pro- testing, 273; answers to the first article of accusation, 273; his answer not understood, 273; gives another answer which is received, 273; shews that it is impossible to answer yes or no, 273; answers to the second article of accusation, 274; his answer not re- ceived, 274; gives another reply, 274; determined to have answered the se- cond article affirmatively, 275; cites Augustine on the Sacraments, 275; answers to the third article of accu- sation, 275; his answer to the third article declared to be affirmative, 276; replies to the fourth article of accusation, 276; replies to the fifth article of accusation, 276; his reply to the first article not understood, 276; remanded till next day to an- swer again, 276; ordered to have pen, ink, and paper, 276; his appear- ance on the second day's session, 277; seated at a table covered with silk, 277; again_required to remove his cap at the Pope's name, but refuses as before, 277; the former examina- tion of, recapitulated, 278; argues again on the words of St Augustine touching the supremacy of the Ro- man See, 279; objects to Bishop White's book of extracts, 279; re- futes an argument founded on Cyril, 280; reproves the irreverent terms of the Bishop of Lincoln, 281; writes an answer to the first article, 281; his answer taken from him by Bishop White's order, 281; not allowed to read his answer, 281; his third an- swer to the first article declared to be blasphemous by the Commissioners, 282; his third answer to the first article examined by the Commis- sioners, 282; his answer only read by parts, 282; refers his judges to his written replies, 282; exhorted to recant by Brooks, Bishop of Glou- cester, 282; said to lean to his own singular wit, 283; the main support of the Reformation, 283; accused by Brooks of self-conceit, 283; refuses to allow that Cranmer depended on him, 284; gently exhorted by the Bishop of Lincoln to turn, 285; granted leave to speak forty words, 285; begins to speak about the su- premacy, 285; stopped by Dr Wes- ton, 285; assured that it was grievous to condemn him, 285; condemned by Dr White, Bishop of Lincoln, as Commissioner, 286; communication between, and Dr Brooks, Bishop of Gloucester, Dr Marshall, Vice-Chan- cellor, and others, 286; refuses the offer of mercy made by Bishop Brooks, 287; not taken for a true
Bishop by the papists, 288; degraded from the office of a priest, 288; re- fuses to put on the surplice to be degraded, 288; has the surplice put on him, 289; inveighs against the "trinkets" appertaining to the Mass, 289; the chalice and wafer held in his hand, 289; the office of preaching taken from him, 289; deprived of the surplice, 290; desires conference with Bishop Brooks, 290; recommends Bertram on the Sacrament, 290; speaks of his worldly affairs, 290; pleads for certain poor men, 290; complaints that what he had bestowed when Bishop of London on his sister's husband, is unlawfully taken away, 290; reads his supplication to Bishop Brooks, 291; asserts that he could not be charged with any open crime, 291; confesses his sin- ful nature, 291; bidden to repent by the Warden of a certain College, 292; his behaviour on the night previous to his Martyrdom, 292; speaks of his suffering as a marriage, 292; com- forts his sorrowing friends, 292; re- fuses to have any one to sit up with him, 292; his behaviour at the time of his Martyrdom, 293; his dress suitable to his episcopal dignity, 293; looked towards Bocardo in hope to see Cranmer, 293; brought to the stake in company with Latimer, 293; kisses the stake, and prays beside it, 294; wishes to answer Dr Smith's sermon, 295; refuses to recant, 295; prepares for execution, 295; gives away his apparel and other things, 296; prays for the realm of England, 296; is chained to the stake, 296; has gunpowder given him, to be tied about his neck, 296; supplicates Lord Williams for those persons on whose behalf he had already memorialized the Queen, 297; the pile at his feet lighted, 297; his last prayers, 297; his protracted sufferings, 298; his death, 298; the lamentations of the people at his death, 299; smaller treatises and documents by, 301; his account of his disputation at Oxford, 303; blamed to the Duke of Somer- set, 327; opposes the incorporation of Clare Hall with Trinity Hall, 329; asks for a Prebend in St Paul's for Grindall, 331; commands the preachers in London to reprove the sin of covetousness, 334; asks for the nomination to the Chantership in St Paul's, 336; refuses to recant at West's recommendation, 338; salutes Dr Crome, 356; false reports of his behaviour in prison, 359; the book of communion taken from him, 359; catalogue of his works betrayed, or thought to be, by Grimbold, 361; his dissent from the Romish religion, 361; his brother sent copies of his
writings to Grimbold, 361; his writ- ings seized, 361; his farewell to George Shipside, 395;-to Alice Ship- side, 396;-to John Ridley, 396;-to Elizabeth Ridley, 396;-to his sister of Unthanke, 396;-to Nich. Ridley of Willowmountswick,396;-to Ralph Whitfield, 397; moved from prison to prison, 390; his treatise against Transubstantiation, his own opinion of it, 390; his strait captivity at Oxford, 391; nominated to the See of Durham, 405; his farewell to Cambridge, 406;-to Pembroke Col- lege, 406; to Herne, 407; his walk at Pembroke College, 407; his fare- well to the Church at Canterbury, 407;-to Rochester, 408;-to West- minster, 408;-to London, 408; his expostulation with the See of Lon- don, 408; his farewell to the citizens of London, 412; his expostulation with the Lords, 413; his testimony in favour of the early bishops of Rome, 414; maintains Rome to be the See of Satan, 415; advises pa- tience to the persecuted, 419; his farewell to the prisoners in Christ's cause, 419; compares present tribu- lation with future glory, 421; notes the persecutions of the apostles, 423; reproves the fear of death, 425; his consolation to the persecuted, 426; his farewell to the flock of Christ, 427; his leases disallowed by Bon- ner, 427; his letter to the Queen, 427; his treatment of his tenantry, 427; his tenants how treated by Bon- ner, 427; his letter to the Queen re- fused by Bishop Brooks, 427; his petition for his sister, 428; his plate left in his bed-chamber, 428; Dr Lancelot, a preacher, 337; Thomas, of the Bull Head in Cheape, 391; Robert-Appendix III., 492. Rogers, John, Prebendary of St Pan- cras, 331; the English Marian Pro- tomartyr, 380.
Rome asserted to be Antichrist, 53; the Babylonical beast, 53; Babylon, 53; the great whore, 53; condemned by Peter and John, 53, 54; all things venal at, 54; the laws of, unrighteous, 55; the merchandise of, pardons, pilgrimages, &c., 55; canonizes such as are stout in the Pope's cause, 55; tolerates immunities from godly dis- cipline, 55; claims the power to make Christ's body, 56; Bishop of, his au- thority alleged, 136;-usurped and tyrannical, 136;-denied by English- men, 136;-the renunciation of his authority defended in a little book, "de utraque potestate" and Note G., 512; a patriarchate, 263. Rubric primars prohibited, 320.
Sacrament of the Eucharist, what is the substance or matter of it, 11; the
question of the matter of, that on which depends the whole controversy of Transubstantiation, 11; whether adoration be due to it, 11; one mate- rial substance of the Sacrament of the body, and one of the Sacrament of the blood, 12; substance of the, changed in blessing, as asserted by Innocent III., Duns Scotus and Gardiner, 16; substance of the wine remaineth after the blessing, 17, 18; proved by the Evangelists, Matthew and Mark, 17; the substance of the bread unchanged, 18; differences between Matthew and Luke as to the words used at its in- stitution, 18; of the blood abused in the Latin Mass by being denied to the lay people, 23; whoso receiveth, receiveth life or death, 161; asserted by St Augustine to be life, 161; not complete without unity, nutrition and conversion, 171; definition of, by Augustine, 239; a visible sign of in- visible grace, 239.
Sacraments how there is grace pertaining to, 239; no promise made to the mere symbols of, 240; not bread and wine, but the body and blood of Christ, 240; only instruments of grace, 241; consist in the use of sanctified sym- bols, 241; the opinion of Chrysostom concerning, 241; Origen concern- ing, 241; the analogy of the, 205; nourishing quality of, 205; uniting quality of, 205; the similitude in-of dissimilar things, 205; not to be admi- nistered save by lawful ministers, 321. Sacramentaries, what, 175.
Sacrifice, Latimer asserts that Christ made none in his last Supper, 111, 112; wherein it consisteth, 211; one in all places, 216.
Salt, conjuration of, to be health to be- lievers, 107.
Sampson, Mr, a preacher, 337. Sanders, 380.
Scala Coeli, what-Note C., 510. School, Divinity, at Oxford prepared for the trial of Ridley, 256. Schools at Oxford shameless treatment of Ridley in the, 304. Scory, Master, in Friesland, 387. Scotus, quoted by du Plessy-Note A.,
Scriptural examples of God's ready help in extreme perils, 73, 74. Scripture sufficient for our salvation, 113; for the Jews without the Rab- bins, 113; its sufficiency asserted by St Jerome, 113;-St Augustine, 113; not of any private interpretation, 114; the authority of, 171; to be measured by authority, not by number, 172. Scriptures only to be expounded by ordained persons, 321. Sedgwick, Mr, 169.
Sedition always brought as an accusa- tion against those who preached the truth, 143.
See of London, importance of, 336. Separation from the Church a great crime, 119.
Sepulchre Paschal, prohibited, 320. Seton disputes with Ridley, 123. Seton, Dr, 191.
Shaxton, Bishop of Salisbury, 115. Shipside, Ridley's brother-in-law, pre- sent at his burning, 295. Sir Johns, popish priests, 104. Smith, Dr Richard, Ridley's opponent at Oxford, 189; account given of him by Strype, 189; his letter to the Archbishop of Canterbury, 190; his book "de Sacerdotum connubiis," 190; proposes three questions for dis- cussion, 192; preaches at the stake before Ridley and Latimer, 294; his opinions on the sacramental presence, 308; asserts that the impenitent eat the body of Christ, 309; defends Transubstantiation against reason, 310; his opinion on the accidents of bread and wine, 310; condemns the weak reasoning of Gardiner, 311; his opinion on the Mass, 311; denies, by implication, the sufficiency of Christ's sacrifice, 311.
Smith, Mr Secretary, 328. Smithfield, xiii.
Socrates, his Historia Ecclesiastica cited, xiii, 132. Sorbonical clamours, 304. Sorbonne-Note A., 509. Soto, a friar, 293.
Stafford, Henry, Lord-Note G., 512. Staunton, Ridley's receiver, 428.
St Bartholomew's Hospital founded by Edward VI., xiii.
St Stephen, his martyrdom, 76; his vision, 229.
Substance, its meaning in Theodoret, 314.
Suffolk, Catherine, Duchess of, 382. Strutt's "Sports and Pastimes" cited, Appendix III., 493.
Sword, the power of, delivered to kings and governors, 266. Synod of London, 226.
Table, why the Lord's board should be after the form of, rather than of an altar, 321.
Tau, a mark or cross, 70. Tanner, Bishop, his Bibliotheca Bri- tanica, xiii.
Taylor, Dr, his godly confession, 358; Ridley's love for him, 364; Appen- dix III., 487.
Tertullian, Cyprian's opinion of him, 37; calls the Sacramental bread a figure of Christ's body, 37; agrees with Origen, Hilary, Ambrose, Basil, Augustine, &c. as to the Sacraments, 38; accused by the Papists of writing carelessly, 38; calls bread "a repre- sentation of the Lord's Body," 38; his testimony against Image-worship, 86; burned frankincense in his cham-
ber, 90; his approbation of Anti- quity, 94; his testimony to An- tiquity, 105; his judgment on the Sacrament, 160; not Catholic, 163; passage from, concerning the Pas- chal, 233; may dally in sense ana- logical,' 233.
Tertullus accused Paul of sedition, 143. Theodoretus asserts that the nature of the sacramental symbols is not changed, 35; asserts that the Sacra- ments go not out of their own nature, 36; wrote (as the Papists say) before the determination of the Church, 36; suspected to be a Nestorian, 36; tried and acquitted at the Council of Chal- cedon, 36.
Theodoret, Eccl. Hist. cited, 134–144. Theodosius I. prohibits images or paintings in Churches, 93. Theophylact, his opinion cited by Ridley, 228; expounded by Ogle- thorpe, 228; Ridley's opinion con- cerning his authority, 229; extract from, concerning the Sacrament, 230; passages from, disputed by Peter Martyr, 230; uses the word ueтаo- TOIXELOUTAL, 230; asserts that Judas tasted the Lord's flesh, 247. Thomas Aquinas, 309. Thomas, Mr William, 321. Thorp the Martyr,-Appendix III.,494. Tobit, an example of devotion, 138. Tomkins, a weaver, a martyr, 391. Tot. quots., what-Note C., 510. Tradition not so sure as the Canonical Scriptures, 221.
Traditions, vain ones restored by the Papists, 53.
Transubstantiation, whether any take place in the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper, 11; must be granted by those who assert that the matter of the Sa- crament is Christ's natural body born of the Virgin, 11; three arguments against, 16, 17; "argumentum ad absurdum" against, 17-20; effected by the word "blessed," "benedixit," in the opinion of Innocent III., 11; difficulty as to the words which effect the change, 18; assertion by many Romanists that the change is effected by, or at, the words "hoc est corpus meum," 26; takes place at the last syllable "um," 27; begins with a miracle and ends with a miracle, 31; asserted to be necessary to avoid the absurdity of Christ's "impanation,' 34; denied by Origen, pp. 29, 31, by Chrysostom, 32, 34, by Theodoret, 35, 36; contrary to Scripture, 171; passages of Scripture cited against, 172; second ground against, 173; condemned by the Fathers, 173;-by Dionysius, 173; -by Ignatius, 173;-by Irenæus,173; -by Tertullian, 173;-by Chrysos- tom, 174;-by Cyprian, 174;-by Theodoret, 174;-by Gelasius, 174; -by Hesychius, 174;-by Bertram,
« AnteriorContinuar » |