...motive and forthat object." In Gill v. Griffith, 2 Md. Cb. 270, the court decided that a party cannot be permitted to take a bill of sale or mortgage of...another for his own security, leave the mortgagor iu possession and ostensibly the owner, and at his request and to keep the public from a knowledge...

...ostensibly the owner, and keep the public from a knowledge of the existence of the mortgage by withholding it from record for an indefinite period, renewing it periodically, and then receiving the benefit of the security by placing the last renewal upon record, to the prejudice of...

...and lor that object." Also Gill v. Griffith (2 Md. Ch , 270), wherein it was held th ta party cannot be permitted to take a bill of sale or mortgage of...owner, and at his request, and to keep the public Irom i knowledge of its existence, withhold it from the record an indefinite period, renewing it periodically,...

...and for that object." Also Gill v. Griffith, 2 Md. Ch. 270, wherein it was held that a party cannot be permitted to take a bill of sale or mortgage of...from a knowledge of its existence, withhold it from the record an indefinite period, renewing it periodically, and then receive the benefit of it by placing...

...of this kind,8 and so, too, in North Carolina.4 In a Maryland case, it was held that a party cannot be permitted to take a bill of sale or mortgage of...chattels from another for his own security, leave the mortgagee in possession, and ostensibly the owner, and at his request, and to keep the public from...