 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1898 - 796 páginas
...Cooley, Const. Lim. (6th Ed.) 172, that "the generality of the title is no objection to it, so long as it is not made a cover to legislation incongruous...considered as having a necessary or proper connection." People v. Mahaney, 13 Mich. 481. The title is sufficient if it fairly and reasonably announces the... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1887 - 736 páginas
...the legislation contemplated. " The generality of a title is therefore no objection to it, so long as it is not made a cover to legislation incongruous...considered as having a necessary or proper connection." Cooley, Const. Lim. 144; Harrington v. Wands, 23 Mich. 385 ; Kurtz v. People, 33 Mich. 279 ; People... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1868 - 776 páginas
...restricted to such narrow bounds." l The generality of a title is therefore no objection to it, so long as it is not made a cover to legislation incongruous in itself, and which by no fair intendmcnt can be considered as having a necessary or proper connection.2 The legislature must determine... | |
 | 1892 - 582 páginas
...title is therefore no objection to it, so longas it is not made a cover to legislation incongrnous in itself, and which by no fair intendment can be...considered as having a necessary or proper connection." In Lulher v. Saylor, 8 Mo. A pp. 424, the act in question was an act entitled "An act to better secure... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1871 - 846 páginas
...restricted to such narrow bounds." 1 The generality of a title is therefore no objection to it, so long as it is not made a cover to legislation incongruous...can be considered. as having a necessary or proper connection.2 The legislature must determine for itself how broad and comprehensive shall be the object... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1874 - 914 páginas
...restricted to such narrow bounds." l The generality of a title is therefore no objection to it, so long as it is not made a cover to legislation incongruous...can be considered as having a necessary or proper connection.2 The legislature must determine for itself how broad and comprehensive shall be the object... | |
 | 1881 - 638 páginas
...connection or relation to each other ; therefore, so long as it is not made a cover to legislation which, by no fair intendment, can be considered as having a necessary or proper connection, the generality of the title would not make it objectionable.4 It has accordingly been held, that the title... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1909 - 588 páginas
...[4Lea],l.) RESPONDENT'S BOINTS. "The generality of the title is therefore no objection to it, so long as it is not made a cover to legislation incongruous...by no fair intendment can be considered as having any necessary or proper connection." (Cooley, Const. Lim., 206.) An act fixing the time for the opening... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1878 - 1032 páginas
...restricted to such narrow bounds." ! The generality of a title is therefore no objection to it, so long as it is not made a cover to legislation incongruous...considered as having a necessary or proper connection. 2 The legislature must determine for itself how broad and comprehensive shall be the object of a statute,... | |
 | Benjamin James Lea - 1880 - 820 páginas
...no objection to it so long as it is not made a cover to legislation inMorrell v. Fickle. congruous in itself, and which, by no fair intendment, can be...considered as having a necessary or proper connection." 8 Heis., 519. "We have certainly no disposition to "fritter away" the important and salutory provision... | |
| |
The generality of a title is therefore no objection to it, so long as it is not made a cover to legislation incongruous in itself, and which by no fair intendment can be considered as having a necessary or proper connection. 
