Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

(2 Chron. xx.) About B.C. 760, Jotham fought with the king of the Ammonites, and compelled the Ammonites to give him the same year 100 talents of silver, and 10,000 measures of wheat, and 10,000 of barley; so much they paid also the second and the third year. (2 Chron. xxvii.) From the prophetic writings, we derive some further information as to the history and character of the Ammonites. They are accused by Amos (i. 13.) of the barbarous practice of ripping up women with child. Their destruction is predicted by Isaiah, xi. 14; Zephaniah, ii. 9; Jeremiah, xlix. 1-5; Ezekiel, XXV.

About 600 B.C., bands of the Ammonites came with Nebuchadnezzar against Jerusalem, (2 Kings xxiv. 2.) and exulted in the downfall of their once powerful and inveterate enemy. About 457 B.C., Ezra enforced the Mosaical law (Deut. xxiii. 2.), that an Ammonite should not enter into the congregation of the Lord, even to his tenth generation. Consequently, Ezra separated many Israelites from their Ammonitish wives, (Ezra ix. x.) King Solomon, at an earlier period, had violated the Mosaic law, by having Ammonitish women in his harem. (1 Kings xi. 1.) Ezra's adherence to the law of Moses excited the hostility of the Ammonites to the rebuilding of Jerusalem, which was ridiculed by Tobiah the Ammonite, who said, even that which they build, if a fox go up, he shall even break down their stone wall. (Neh. iv. 3.) Nehemiah, who was also a vigorous reformer, cursed and smote those Israelites who had married wives of Ammon and plucked off their hair (Neh. xiii.), about 434 B.C. Judas the Maccabee fought, during the reign of Antiochus Epiphanes, about 164 B.C., many battles with Timotheos, the mighty captain of the Ammonites, who had much people. Judas took their town, Jazar: (Maccabees v.) Rabbah had been already destroyed by Antiochus the Great. (Polyb. v. 71.) In the days of Justin Martyr, the Ammonites were still very numerous; and in the days of Origen, the Ammonites and Edomites went under the general name of Arabians (lib. v.) Their metropolis, Rabbah, which we must suppose had been rebuilt, is called by Josephus Paßada, by Eusebius Appay, by Polybius and Stephanus Byzantinus, Paßßuтáμμava, and Philadelphia; and by the Arabians, Am-man. Abulfeda describes its extensive remains (Tab. Syriæ, ed. Köhler, p. 91), which were found by Seetzen under the name of Robba and Rabba. (Zach's Monatliche Correspondenz, xviii. p. 433.) These, however, belong to the Greek period, not to the ruins of ancient Rabba. [See PHILADELPHIA.] The surrounding country was called Arabia Philadelphiensis. The bed of Og king of Bashan belonged to the curiosities of Rabbah; but how it got there, we are not told. [See AMORITES.] Nine cubits were the length, and four the breadth thereof, (Deut. iii. 2.) The Ammonites were uncircumcised (Jer. ix. 26.), and worshipped Molech or Milcom, and their idolatry was, by the Ammonitish wives of Solomon, introduced among the Israelites. (1 Kings xi. 7, 33. 2 Kings xxiii. 13.)

Of their kings, we know only Nahash and Hanun, in the time of David, and Baalis, contemporary with Nebuchadnezzar. (Jer. xl.)

AMMO'NIUM. [See Swan.]

AMMO'NIUM, a name proposed by Davy to express the supposed metal which amalgamates with mercury, when it is electrified in contact with ammonia, as already described; he thought it scarcely possible to conceive that a substance, which forms with mercury so perfect an amalgam, should not be metallic.-Phil. Trans., 1808.

Although few chemists have adopted this opinion, its probability is still maintained by Berzelius: he considers ammonium to be a compound of 1 volume of azotic gas and 4 volumes of hydrogen gas; these being nearly the proportions of them contained in the mixture of ammoniacal and hydrogen gases, obtained when the amalgam is decomposed by water.

The property of amalgamating with mercury is the only circumstance which denotes an approximation to the nature of a metal in the substance in question; while there are difficulties almost insuperable to such a conclusion. No metal has hitherto been decomposed; mercury is the only substance with which the supposed ammonium has been combined, and it has never been procured in a separate

[blocks in formation]

brance. This word, however, both in the Greek and in the Latin language. into which latter it was introduced, (see Aurelian. Vopisc. chap. 39,) acquired a more particular signification, and was used to denote a declaration of the person or persons who had newly acquired or recovered the sovereign power in a state, by which they pardoned all persons who composed, supported, or obeyed the government which had been just overthrown. A declaration of this kind may be either absolute and universal, or it may except certain persons specifically named, or certain classes of persons generally described. Thus, in Athens, when Thrasybulus had destroyed the oligarchy of the Thirty Tyrants, and had restored the democratical form of government, an exceptive amnesty of past political offences was declared, from the operation of which the Thirty themselves, and some few persons who had acted in the most invidious offices under them, were excluded. So when Bonaparte returned from Elba in 1815, he published an amnesty from which he excluded thirteen persons, whom he named in a decree published at Lyons. The act of indemnity, passed upon the restoration of Charles II., by which the persons actually concerned in the execution of his father were excluded from the benefit of the royal and parliamentary pardon, is an instance of an amnesty from which a class of persons were excepted by a general description and not by name. Of a like nature was the law passed by the French Chambers in January, 1816, upon the return of Louis XVIII. to the throne of France after the victory at Waterloo, which offered a complete amnesty to all persons who had directly or indirectly taken part in the rebellion and usurpation of Napoleon Bonaparte,' with the exception of certain persons, whose names had been previously mentioned in a royal ordinance as the most active partizans of the usurper. It was objected to this French law of amnesty, that it did not point out with sufficient perspicuity the individuals who were to be excepted from its operation. Instead of confining itself to naming the offenders, it went on to except whole classes of offences, by which means a degree of uncertainty and confusion was occasioned, which much retarded the peaceable settlement of the nation. In consequence of this course,' says M. de Chateaubriand in a pamphlet published soon after the event, punishment and fear have been permitted to hover over France; wounds have been kept open, passions exasperated, and recollections of enmity awakened." The act of indemnity, passed at the accession of Charles II. was not liable to this objection, by the distinctness of which, as Dr. Johnson said, the flutter of innumerable bosoms was stilled,' and a state of public feeling promoted, extremely favourable to the authority and quiet government of the restored prince.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

AMOL, a Persian town in the province of Mazanderan. It stands on the river Herauz, which flows through it, about twelve miles from the southern shore of the Caspian sea, in 36° 30′ N. lat. 52° 23′ 55′′ E. long. from Greenwich. There is a bridge of twelve arches, and eight feet in width, over the river, the stream of which is full and rapid. The only interesting building in Amol is the ruin of a mausoleum erected by Shah Abbas over the remains of his maternal ancestor, Seyed Quwam-u-deen, otherwise called Meer Buzoorg, king of Saree and Amol, who died in 1378. It was a structure of considerable magnificence, till the greater part of it was thrown down by an earthquake about twenty years ago. There were formerly other extensive ruins in the town and neighbourhood, but of these the only traces now existing are some mounds of earth. Amol is divided into eight muhulehs or districts, and in the winter, when it is fullest, may contain from 35,000 to 40,000 inhabitants. The houses are between 4000 and 5000 in number. The bazars are large and well supplied; but the only traffic carried on is with the country and villages in the iminediate vicinity. Amol is the capital of a government of the same name, which yields a revenue of between 70007, and 8ocel. sterling. The mountains approach close to the town on the south; the space between it and the sea is thickly covered with wood; there are many groups of houses among the trees, but no regular roads. (See Travels and Adventures in the Persian Provinces on the southern Banks of the Caspian Sea, by James B. Fraser, 4to., 1826.)

AMO'MUM, a genus of plants bearing aromatic seeds, and belonging to the natural order Seitaminea. It consists of species having white flowers collected in close heads, which arise from the base of the leaves, and only just raise themselves above the ground; the lower lip of the flower is

[merged small][merged small][graphic][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

This area is partitioned in unequal proportions among 44 villages. Rather more than one half of the land is under cultivation: a large portion of that which is considered unproductive, consists of an extensive salt-flat, which lies along the north-western boundary of the pergunnah, and adjoins the sea. The only port, Ghundhar, is situated in this quarter; its trade is now insignificant, although the town must at some remote period have been a considerable place, as appears from the extensive ruins around it. The fands of Ghundhar are entirely neglected, not an acre has been cultivated for many years, although much of it is considered fit for tillage: the inhabitants are chiefly occupied in making salt. In the cold season salt is produced in the pans in about a month, but in the warm season the evaporation goes on much more rapidly. The gross produce of the salt-pans is thus divided: 50 per cent. to the government, 35 per cent. to the proprietors of the pans, and the remaining 15 per cent. in various proportions among different native functionaries.

Every foot of land in this and the other pergunnahs of the district belongs to some one or other of the villages

(Amomum Cardamomum.]

of which the pergunnah is composed. The strict observance paid to the preservation of their boundaries by the inhabitants of every village in this quarter is remarkable. These boundaries are commonly marked by strips of land 20 or 30 yards in breadth, which are left waste; and though they are sometimes ploughed up by common consent, the line remains as fully recognized as if it bore the most visible marks. Every pergunnah has its own hereditary officers of revenue and record, and every village has its establishment of public servants.

Some part of the soil of Amood is sandy, and of a light brown colour, but the greater part is of superior fertility, and well adapted for wheat, which, with millet, forms the principal food of the inhabitants. The wheat is of the bearded kind, and grows to the height of 18 inches: there are commonly about 50 grains of wheat in each ear. It is sown late in September, or early in October, and ripens in March, when it is pulled up by the roots. An experiment was tried in 1819, to ascertain the produce of wheat, which was ascertained to be equal to only 336 pounds, or 6 bushels per acre. The field on which this experiment was made had been fallow the preceding year, but had not been manured. The seed is sown very thin, at the rate of only two-thirds of a bushel to the acre, and the ripening grain is subject to the depredations of very large birds, called kulums, which visit the country just before harvest in large flocks. Numerous herds of antelopes are also commonly met with, and are very destructive to the crops. A considerable quantity of cotton is produced.

The population of Amood has been ascertained to amount

to 16,347 souls, of whom 3203 are Mohamedans, and 13,144 | watching this dilemma, took an axe ten ells long, and are Hindoos. The number of houses in the pergunnah being himself ten ells high, he jumped another ten ells, is 4075; of cows and buffaloes, 5908; of oxen, 4639; of struck Og in the ancle and lamed him for life, until he was ploughs, 1752, and of carts, 889. finally destroyed at the age of 900 years. (Blackwood's Magazine, 1832, p. 744.)

This pergunnah was obtained by cession from the late Peishwa Dowlut Rao Scindia, under the treaty of Poona, dated 13th June, 1817. (Report of Colonel Williams in Appendix to the Report of the House of Commons (1832) on the Affairs of the East India Company.)

AMORITES (ON, Auoppaio), the most powerful tribe of the Canaanites, or the aborigines of Palestine. The name Amorites seems sometimes to be used for all the Canaanites, as all the British are by foreigners sometimes called Englishmen. Canaan begat Sidon his first-born, and Heth, and the Jebusite, and the Amorite, and the Girgasite, and the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite, and the Arvadite. These are the sons of Ham. (Gen. x. 15-20.) The Amorites are mentioned among the ten nations whose country was given to the seed of Abraham. (Gen. xv. 19-21.) The Amorites dwelt chiefly in the mountains, which afterwards belonged to the tribe of Judah. (Numb. xiii. 29. Deut. i. 20.) The name has been explained by Simonis and Gesenius by mountaineer: means head, top of a tree, and head of a tribe, emir, chieftain, prince. Perhaps the name was given because the Amorites were like Emirs at the head of the Canaanitish tribes. Others have translated amarus, bitter, embittered, from 779; or rebel, from ; or talking, eloquent, from 8. The word occurs in the singular number only, which is often used collectively for the whole Amoritish nation. Some Amorites dwelt in the plains bordering upon the tribe of Dan, and others between the rivers Jordan and Arnon.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

The river Arnon was the border between Moab and the Amorites. (Num. xxi. 13.) Of the cities of the Amorites it was said to the people of Israel, Thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth: but thou shalt utterly destroy the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizites, Hivites, and Jebusites, as the Lord thy God has commanded thee, that they teach you not to do after all their abominations, which they have done unto their gods.' (Deut. xx. 16.) Even their sous and their daughters have they burnt in the fire to their gods. (Deut. xii. 31.) Whoever of the children of Israel or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, giveth of his seed unto Moloch shall be put to death.' (Lev. xx. 2.)

[ocr errors]

The Amorites were of tall stature. According to Amos, (ii. 9.) they were high as cedars and strong as oaks. This poetical description is illustrated by the historical statement, that the size of the iron bedstead of the Amoritish king, Og of Bashan, was nine cubits by four. (Deut. iii. 11.) Hence we may infer, that Og's stature was gigantic, although it did not fill his iron bedstead any more than the Stuarts filled the enormous bedsteads at Hampton Court. But it is most likely that this bedstead, as it is called, was a kind of divan. But the biblical statement could not bridle the flights of rabbinical imagination, who, regardless of the sacred text which they professed to illustrate, surpassed all the extravagancies of Arabian, Persian, and Indian poesy; in the Jalkut Shimoni, Moses told the angel of death that Sihon and Og were so vast, that they could not be drowned in the deluge, its waters reaching only to their ancles. Sihon was harder than a wall and taller than any tower, and no creature on earth could withstand his strength. But after the demon with whom he was connected had been chained, Israel was let loose upon him and discomfited him and the Amorites. The Sevachir declares that Og, putting his hand against the windows of heaven, and his feet against the fountains of the great deep, stopped the deluge, until the water being made hot scalded the giant to the bone, who now, mounting the ark, rode out the storm. If Og retained his appetite, he must have been an inconvenient passenger, for his bill of fare was daily 1000 oxen, 1000 head of game, and 1000 measures of wine. According to Berachoth, Og, having ascertained that the camp of Israel was three miles in extent, tore up a sheet of rock of the same size, with the view to crush all arts of war, by putting this extinguisher upon the history of Israel. But whilst Og held the rock over his head it was bored by insects, broken into pieces, which fell on his shoulders, and nearly strangled the giant. Joshua,

[ocr errors]

So much seems certain, that in antient times the natives of Syria exceeded in stature the inhabitants of the desert and of Egypt.

The four confederate kings (Genesis xiv.), who plundered Sodom and Gomorrah and took Lot captive, smote also

הַצְצן תָּמָר the Amorites that dwelt in Hazzazon Tamar

amputation or cutting of the palm tree, which place was afterwards called Engeddi, "a ry Kid's Eye or Kids Fountain, on the western borders of the Dead Sea, (B.C. 1913.) Abram dwelt at this time in the plain of Mamre the Amorite, the brother of Eshcol and Aner, Abram's confederates. Hence we perceive that the Amorites chiefly inhabited the country afterwards occupied by the tribe of Judah, (Gen. xiv. 13.) and that they were on friendly terms with Abram.

The inhabitants of Gideon were Amorites. By feigning to send ambassadors from a great distance they obtained peace with the Israelites under Joshua about the year B.C. 1451. (See Joshua ix.) For making this confederacy Gibeon was attacked by five kings of the Amorites; but Joshua chased them from Gibeon to Bethhoron, Azekah, and Makkedah, where, according to Joshua, (x. 11.) more died from hailstones than by the sword of the Israelites. But after all this, the Amorites retained so much power, that they forced (B.c. 1425) the children of Dan into the mountain, for they would not suffer them to come down to the valley. But the Amorites would dwell in Mount Heres in Ajalon, and in Shaalbim; yet the house of Joseph prevailed so that they became tributaries. And the coast of the Amorites was from the going up to Akrabim, from the rock and upward. (Judges i. 34-36.) The remarkable fact, that the Israelites conquered the mountains sooner than the plains is explained (Judges i. 19.): it was because the inhabitants of the plain had chariots of iron.

and the Amorites. The Gibeonites (to whom seven deAbout the year B.C. 1120 there was peace between Israel scendants of Saul were delivered by David about the year atrocities) were of the remnant of the Amorites whom Joshua B.C. 1020, that they might revenge themselves for Saul's had made hewers of wood and drawers of water. (Jos. ix. ; 2 Sam. xx.) Another branch of the Amorites dwelt between the rivers Jordan and Arnon. (Num. xxi. 13., xxii. 36.; Judges xi. 18.) Here Moses and the children of Israel dwelt at Heshbon, and Og, king of Bashan, in the plain east had smitten two kings of the Amorites, namely, Sihon, who of Jordan. These kings had refused to let the Israelites pass through their borders. But it appears that these Amorites were not extirpated, and that their descendants formed, even during the time of the Maccabees, a distinct tribe: for we read in Josephus's Antiquit. (xiii. chap. 1.) that the Amorites (Auapuíov aides) from Medaba fell suddenly upon the corps of Johannes Gaddis, when he was conveying, according to the command of his brother Jonathan, the baggage of the Jewish host to the Nabathaean Arabs who roved between the Euphrates and the Red Sea. Simon and Jonathan revenged the death of their brother Johannes by falling suddenly upon the splendid train of an Amoritish bridegroom who was leading his bride, the daughter of a rich Arabian, from Gabatha to Medaba. On this occasion 400 men, women and children were killed.

AMOS, the prophet, was a native of the town of Thekoa, which was about six miles south of Bethlehem. He was not a prophet's son, but a herdsman, and a gatherer of sycamore fruit, and the Lord took him as he followed the flock, to prophesy unto Israel. (Amos vii. 14, 15.) Therefore, Amos mentions the kingdom of Judah only incidentally, and hence Dr. Coke, Dr. Adam Clarke, and several commentators before them have vaguely conjectured Amos to be a native of the kingdom of Israel. Amos saw his visions concerning Israel in the days of Uzziah, King of Judah, and in the days of Jeroboam II., King of Israel, two years before the earthquake. (Amos i. 1.) This earthquake is mentioned by Zechariah, (xiv. 5.) Ye shall flee, like as ye tled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah, King of Judah,' which happened, according to the

opinions of the later Jews, when Uzziah went into the temple to burn incense upon the altar, and Azariah, the priest, went in after him, and with him fourscore priests, valiant men who withstood Uzziah, and said, it appertaineth not unto thee to burn incense, but to the priests that are consecrated: go out of the sanctuary. Then Uzziah was wroth, leprosy rose in his forehead, and the priests thrust him out from thence. (2 Chron. xxvi.) According to Josephus, (Antiquit. ix. 10. § 4.) the earthquake began during the king's altercation with the priests. A ray of the sun, according to the story, fell through a fissure of the temple into the face of the king and struck him with leprosy. The western part of Mount Olivet rolled four stadia or furlongs to the east side of the mountain, covered many streets and destroyed the king's gardens.

It is probable that the prophecies of Amos were delivered between the years 798-784 before Christ.

With this period, the contents of the book of Amos agree, for the borders of Israel extended from Hamath to the Arnon (Amos vi. 14.), and the vices, which the prophet denounces, are such as usually predominate during periods of temporal prosperity and security. Isaiah, Hosea, and Amos were contemporaries. The opinion that Isaiah, a member of the royal family, was a son of Amos the herdsman, arose from a confusion of the prophet whose name is Gamos diy (signifying, burden or burdened) with the (strong) Amots, the name of the father of Isaiah. The Greeks wrote both names Amōs.

אָמוֹץ word

In the Book Περὶ τῶν προφητῶν πῶς ἐκοιμήθησαν καὶ ποῦ κεῖνται, which has been published with the works of Epiphanius, who was bishop of Constantia, in Cyprus, at the end of the fourth century, we read that Amos, born at Thekoa, in the land of Zebulon, the father of Isaiah, was wounded with a sword by Amaziah the priest, at Bethel, whom he had reproved for worshipping calves. The son of Amaziah struck him with a bludgeon on the head, so that he died two days after returning to his country, where he was buried with his fathers. The land of Zebulon may here signify the sandy region, the desert of Thekoa, which extends from the south of Jerusalem to the Persian Gulph, at the entrance of which Thekoa was situated, surrounded with tolerable pastures. Or it means the country of ju the Idumean, Gen. xxxvi. 20, which the Latins called terra Sobail. (See H. A. Hamakeri, Commentatio in libellum de vita et morte Prophetarum. Amst. 1'833. In Instituti regii Commentariis.)

Many having repeated St. Jerome's saying, that Amos was rude in speech, but not in knowledge,' Bishop Louth, in his twenty-first lecture, shows that Amos was not behind the chief prophets in eloquence. The book of Amos is written in an excellent Hebrew style, but the orthography differs occasionally from the usual standard. Amos, the herdsman, has taken many figures from pastoral life, but he alludes also to history, geography, and astronomy. Thus we see that knowledge, in olden times, was not confined to those who, like Isaiah, were of the blood royal, or priests like Jeremiah, but extended sometimes even to herdsmen.

Chapters i. ii. describe the approaching judgment of Jehovah, which rolls like a thunder-storm over the surrounding states, Damascus, Philistia, Tyrus, Edom, Ammon, Moab, touches upon Judah, and halts over Israel, on account of its injustice, immorality, idolatry, and stubbornness against the providence of Jehovah.

Chapters iii., iv., v., and vi. contain the predictions of the punishment of Israel; and chapters vii.-ix. visions of judgment, in which is interwoven the history of Amaziah's opposition, who said unto Amos, O thou seer, go, flee thee away into the land of Judah, and there eat bread, and prophesy there.

The canonical authority of Amos rests upon the internal character of his work, upon the united testimony of the Jewish and Christian church, and upon the use which the apostles made of Amos (v. 25, 26, in Acts vii. 42., Amos tx. 11., and in Acts xv. 16.). Philo, Josephus, and the fathers quote Amos among the minor prophets, and even the author of the book of Tobit (ii. 6.) quotes a passage from Amos, mentioning his name.

AMOY, a celebrated port of China, in the province of Fo-kien, in 20° 45′ north latitude and 118o east longitude.

In Mandarin dialect, the name of the place is Hea-mun,
which is pronounced by the natives Ha-moy.
The district in which this flourishing town, the emporium
of the commerce of the province, is situated, is one of the
most barren in all China, and not only yields nothing for
exportation, but is dependent even for the necessaries of life
on the neighbouring island of Formosa, which has been
described as the granary of the eastern coast of China. Not-
withstanding this serious disadvantage, the merchants of
Amoy are among the most wealthy and enterprising in the
Chinese empire; they have formed connexions all along the
coast, and have established commercial houses in many
parts of the eastern archipelago. Most of the Formosian
colonists emigrated from the district of Amoy, with capital
supplied by its merchants, and in proportion as the island
has flourished, so has Amoy increased in wealth and im-
portance.

During the south-west monsoon, the merchants of Amoy freight their vessels at Formosa with sugar, which they sell at various ports to the northward, returning home with cargoes of drugs. They maintain commercial relations with Manilla, as well as with Tonquin and Cochin China: they annually employ forty large junks in trading with Bankok, the capital of Siam. Junks of the largest class-some of them 800 tons burden-go to Borneo, Macassar, Java, and the Soo-loo islands; and many of them annually visit Sincapore, in order to procure goods of British manufacture.

This port has not always been closed against European vessels. According to the records of the East India Company, — The King of Tywan, on taking Amoy in 1675, issued a proclamation inviting both Chinese and foreign merchants to trade thither, exempting them from the payment of all duties for three years. Many vessels, in consequence, resorted to the port, but the exemption was speedily revoked. In 1681, the town was taken by the Tartars, but Europeans were still allowed to trade thither, and continued to do so until 1734, when the exactions of the Mandarins deterred them from continuing so unprofitable an intercourse; and when an English ship went there, ten years after, many vain endeavours and much fruitless discussion were employed to induce the Chinese to trade, so that the vessel was obliged to proceed to Bengal for a

cargo.

The ship Amherst visited Amoy last year (1832) with no better success; it appears, however, that the obstacles to her trading all proceeded from the authorities, and not from the people, by whom our countrymen were received in the most friendly manner. The harbour of Amoy is spacious and secure. (Lords' Report of 1820-21, relative to the Trade with the East Indies and China; and Report of Proceedings on a Voyage in the Ship Amherst to the Northern Ports of China, by Mr. H. H. Lindsay.) AMPELI'DEÆ, one of the names of the vine tribe. [See

VITES.]

AMPHIBIA, (from the Greek word &pißos, which signifies having a double life,) a zoological term employed in different senses by different writers. In common conversation we are accustomed to call all mammals, such as seals, otters, beavers, &c., amphibious, whose organization disposes them to resort indifferently either to the land or water for procuring food and other purposes, or whose habits are at once terrestrial and aquatic; thus we usually denominate the common campagnol (Arvicola amphibia) and white-bellied shrew (Sorex fodiens), the water-rat and water-shrew respectively, and consider them in every respect as amphibious animals. But in this sense of the word every land-animal is more or less amphibious, for all resort occasionally to the water, and with the single exception of man, all appear to have an instinctive power of swimming. Previous to the time of Linnæus, the earlier naturalists attached no more definite meaning to the word than that which was sanctioned by popular custom, and which, it will be observed, is more properly expressed by the term aquatic. The great Swedish philosopher, however, rejected this vague and improper signification, and applied the term generally to the third class of his system of zoology, which comprised not only all the animals since more properly denominated reptiles, such as the tortoises, lizards, serpents, and frogs, but likewise the cartilaginous fishes. Linnæus was evidently ignorant of the true characters and natural limits of this class of animals, the term amphibia was certainly very applicable to many of the genera and species which it embraced, but with

regard to the great majority of them it was an absolute misnomer. The shark and the ray are as incapable of existing out of the water, as many of the common lizards are of living in it, and consequently neither the group which Linnæus proposed to establish, nor the name by which he designated it, has been adopted by more recent zoologists. The cartilaginous fishes have been referred to the other aquatic tribes, with which their habits and organic conformation naturally connect them, and the remainder of the class, which stands in Gmelin's celebrated edition of the Systema Naturæ under the name amphibia, is admitted into modern systems under the more appropriate designation of reptiles.

[ocr errors]

right to be represented in the council, were the Thessalians, Beotians, Dorians, Ionians, Perrhobians, Magnesians, Lo crians, Etæans, Phthiots, Malians, Phocians. Each nation was represented by certain sovereign states, of which it was supposed to be the parent: thus Sparta, conjointly with other Dorian states, represented the Dorian nation. Amongst the states thus united in representing their common nation, there was a perfect equality. Sparta enjoyed no superiority over Dorium and Cytínium, two inconsiderable towns in Doris, and the deputies of Athens, one of the representatives of the Ionian nation, sat in the council on equal terms with those of Eretria in Eubea, and of Priene, an Ionian colony in Asia Minor. From a rather doubtful Taken in its strict and literal sense, the term amphibious passage in Eschines, De Fuls. Leg, 43. compared with a would apply only to such animals as have the power of living statement in Diodorus, xvi. 60. it seems that each nation, indifferently, at the same time, either upon land or in water. whatever might be the number of its constituent states, had To fulfil this condition it is necessary that a truly amphibious two, and only two votes. The council had two regular sesanimal should be provided with the means of breathing in sions in each year, meeting in the spring at Delphi, and in either of these elements, that is, that it should simulta- the autumn near Pyle, otherwise called Thermopyla; but neously possess both lungs and gills. Now there are four special meetings were sometimes called before the usual genera of batrachian reptiles which actually do possess this time. From its meeting at Pylæ, a session of the Amextraordinary double apparatus for extracting the principle phictyons was called a Pylæa, and the deputies were called which supports animal life indifferently from either element; Pylagoræ, that is, councillors at Pyla. There were also and these, as Baron Cuvier has justly observed, comprise in deputies distinguished by the name of Hieromnemons, reality the only known vertebrated animals which are truly whose office it was, as their name implies, to attend to matamphibious. They are the axolotls, the menobranchi, and ters pertaining to religion. Athens sent three Pylagore the sirens, all of which inhabit the rivers and lakes of Ame- and one Hieromnemon. The former were appointed for rica, and the proteus which is found in subterraneous streams each session; the latter probably for a longer period, connecting certain lakes in Carniola and Hungary. The perhaps for the year, or two sessions. The council enterexistence and simultaneous action of gills and lungs in these tained charges laid before it in relation to offences comanimals,' says Baron Cuvier, in a note to the Règne Ani- mitted against the Delphic god, made decrees thereupon, mal, can no longer be doubted as one of the most clearly and appointed persons to execute them. These decrees, established facts in natural history; I have before me the as we learn from Diodorus, xvi. 24. were registered at lungs of a siren of three feet in length, in which the vascular Delphi. The oath taken by the deputies bound the Amapparatus is as well developed and as complicated as in any phictyons not to destroy any of the Amphictyonic cities, or other reptile, yet nevertheless this siren had gills as com- to debar them from the use of their fountains in peace or plete as any other species. These then are the only strictly war; to make war on any who should transgress in these amphibious reptiles; but if we were disposed to take the particulars, and to destroy their cities; to punish with hand, term in a little more extended sense, it might, without im- foot, voice, and with all their might, any who should plunpropriety, be applied to the entire order of reptiles which der the property of the god, (the Delphic Apollo,) or should M. Brongniart, and after him all modern naturalists, deno- be privy to, or devise anything against that which was in minate batrachians, because all these animals, without his temple. This is the oldest form of the Amphictyonic exception, breathe by means of gills in their tadpole state, oath which has been recorded, and is expressly called by and only acquire lungs when they assume the more mature Eschines the ancient oath of the Amphictyons. It has inand perfect form of reptiles. advertently been attributed to Solon by Mr. Mitford, who has apparently confounded it with another oath imposed on a particular occasion. An ordinary council consisted only of the deputed Pylagora and Hieromnemons; but on some occasions at Delphi, all who were present with the Amphictyonic deputies to sacrifice in the temple and consult the oracle of the god, were summoned to attend, and then it received the name of an ecclesia or assembly. Beside the list of Amphictyonic nations given by Eschines, we have one from Pausanias which differs a little from that of Eschines, and another from Harpocration which differs slightly from both. The orator, whilst he speaks generally of twelve nations, names only eleven. Strabo agrees with him in the larger number. It is further remarkable, that whilst Eschines places the Thessalians at the head of his list, Demosthenes, De Pac. p. 62. expressly excludes them from a seat in the council.

Beyond this, however, the term cannot with propriety be extended to the reptiles in general, because these animals, though the limited quantity of their respiration enables them to remain under water for a much longer period than birds or mammals, can no more absolutely dispense with breathing than the higher classes, and like them would inevitably be drowned it prevented for any length of time from coming to the surface to breathe. For further information upon this subject, see REPTILE, Batrachians, and AQUATIC ANIMALS.

AMPHIBOLITE, a name sometimes given to the simple mineral more commonly called hornblende, and which was introduced by Haüy, the mineralogist, who use lessly changed many names. He called hornblende amphibole, because it is easily mistaken for augite, another simple mineral closely allied to it in composition, from pipes, amphibolos, equivocal.

AMPHICTYONS, members of a colebrated council in ancient Greece, called the Amphictyonic Council.

According to the popular story, this council was founded by Amphiotyon, son of Deucalion, who lived, if he lived at all, many centuries before the Trojan war. It is supposed by a writer quoted by Pausanias, x. 8., to derive its name, with a slight alteration, from a word signifying settlers around a place. Strabo, who professes to know nothing of its founder, says that Acrisius, the mythological king of Argos, fixed its constitution, and regulated its proceedings. Amidst the darkness which hangs over its origin, we discover with certainty, that it was one of the earliest institutions in Greece. No full or clear account has been given of it during any period of its existence by those who had the means of informing us. The fullest information is supplied by Eschines the orator; but before any attempt is made, by the help of some short notices from other writers, and of conjecture, to trace its earlier history, it may not be amiss to state what is certainly known of this council as it existed in his time.

According to Eschines, the Greek nations which had a

Eschines has left us much in the dark as to the usual mode of proceeding in the Amphictyonic sessions; and we shall look elsewhere in vain for certain information. It should seem that all the Pylagoræ sat in the council and took part in its deliberations; but if the common opinion mentioned above, respecting the two rotes allowed to each nation, be correct, it is certain that they did not all vote. The regulations according to which the decisions of the twelve nations were made can only be conjectured. We know that the religious matters which fell under the jurisdiction of the Amphictyonic body were managed principally, at least, by the Hieromnemons, who appear, from a verse in Aristophanes, Nub. 613., to have been appointed by lot, but we are not as well informed respecting the limits which separated their duties from those of the Pylagoræ, nor respecting the relative rank which they held in the council. (See Esch. contr. Ctes. p. 68–72. Fals. Leg. p. 43.) The little that is told is to be found for the most part in the ancient lexicographers and scholiasts, or comments tors, who knew perhaps nothing about the matter, and whose accounts are sufficiently perplexing to give room for great variety of opinions among modern writers.

Some have

« AnteriorContinuar »