Imágenes de páginas

flage in the year 1627, did not always understand him. The very books which are neceffary to our

7 "The tongue in general is fo much refined fince Shakspeare's time, that many of his words, and more of his phrafes, are fearce intelligible." Preface to Dryden's Troilus and Greffida. The various changes made by Dryden in particular paffages in that play, and by him and D'Avenant in The Tempeft, prove decifively that they frequently did not understand our poet's language.

In his defence of the Epilogue to The Conquest of Granada, Dryden arraigns Ben Jonfon for ufing the perfonal, inftead of the neutral, pronoun, and unfear'd for unafraid:


[ocr errors]

Though heaven should speak with all his wrath at once, "We fhould ftand upright, and unfear'd.' "His (fays he) is ill fyntax with heaven, and by unfear'd he means unafraid; words of a quite contrary fignification. He perpetually ufes ports for gates, which is an affected error in him, to introduce Latin by the lofs of the English idiom."


Now his for its, however ill the fyntax may be, was the common language of the time; and to fear, in the fenfe of to terrify, is found not only in all the poets, but in every dictionary of that age. With refpe&t to ports, Shakspeare who will not be fufpected of affecting Latinifms, frequently employs that word in the fame fenfe as Jonfon has done, and as probably the whole kingdom did; for the word is fill fo ufed in Scotland.

D'Avenant's alteration of Macbeth, and Meafure for Meafure, furnish many proofs of the fame kind. In The Law against Lovers, which he formed on Much Ado about Nothing, and Meafure for Meafure, are thefe lines:

[ocr errors]

nor do I think,

"The prince has true difcretion who affects it. The paffage imitated is in Meafure for Measure:

"Nor do I think the man of fafe difcretion,

"That does affect it.'

If our poet's language had been well understood, the epithet fafe would not have been rejected. See Othello:

"My blood begins my fafer guides to rule;

"And paffion, having my beil judgment collied." &c. So alfo Edgar, in King Lear:

"The fafer fenfe will ne'er accommodate

"His mafter thus.

[ocr errors]

author's illuftration, were of fo little account in their time, that what now we can scarce procure at any price, was then the furniture of the nursery or ftall. In fifty years after our poet's death, Dryden mentions that he was then become " little obfolete." In the beginning of the present century Lord Shaftesbury complains of his rude unpolished file, and his ANTIQUATED phrafe and wit;” and not long afterwards Gildon informs us that he

[ocr errors]


8 The price of books at different periods may ferve in fome meafure to afcertain the tafte and particular ftudy of the age. At the fale of Dr. Francis Bernard's library in 1698, the following books were fold at the annexed prices:

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

Caxton's Recueyll of the hiftories of Troy, 1502. O
Chronicle of England.

Hall's Chronicle.

Grafton's Chronicle.

Holinfhed's Chronicle, 1587.

2 6



6 0 6 10


1 10 6

This book is now frequently fold for ten guineas.

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]

This book is now ufually fold for a guinea.

[blocks in formation]

Powell's Hiftory of Wales.

Painter's fecond tome of the Palace of Pleasure.

0 0 4

The two volumes of Painter's Palace of Pleafure are now ufually fold for three guineas.


Metamorphofis of Ajax, by Sir John Harrington. 4

[ocr errors]

had been rejected from fome modern collections of poetry on accunt of his obfolete language. Whence could these representations have proceeded, but because our poet, not being diligently ftudied, not being compared with the contemporary writers, was not understood? If he had been "read, ad mired, ftudied, and imitated," in the fame degree as he is now, the enthusiasm of fome one or other of his admirers in the laft age would have induced him to make fome enquiries concerning the hiftory of his theatrical career, and the anecdotes of his private life. But no fuch perfon was found; no anxiety in the publick fought out any particulars concerning him after the Restoration, (if we except the few which were collected by Mr. Aubry,) though at that time the hiftory of his life must have been known to many; for his fifter Joan Hart, who must have known much of his early years, did not die till 1646 his favourite daughter, Mrs. Hall, lived till 1649; and his second daughter, Judith, was living at Stratford-upon-Avon in the beginning of the year 1662. His grand-daughter, Lady Barnard, did not die till 1670. Mr. Thomas Combe, to whom Shakspeare bequeathed his fword, furvived our poet above forty years, having died at Stratford in 1657. His elder brother William Combe lived till 1667. Sir Richard Bishop, who was born in 1585, lived at Bridgetown near Stratford till 1672; and his fon Sir William Bishop, who was born in 1626, died there in 1700. From all these perfons without doubt many circumflances relative to Shakspeare might have been obtained; but that was an age as deficient in literary curiofity as in tafte.



It is remarkable that in a century after our poet's death, five editions only of his plays were publifhed; which probably confifted of not more than three thousand copies. During the fame period three editions of the plays of Fletcher, and four of thofe of Jonson, had appeared. On the other hand, from the year 17 16 to the prefent time, that is, in feventy-four years, but two editions of the former writer, and one of the latter, have been iffued from the prefs; while above thirty thousand copies of Shakspeare have been dispersed through England. That nearly as many editions of the works of Jonfon as of Shakspeare fhould have been demanded in the laft century, will not appear furprifing, when we recollect what Dryden has related foon after the Reftoration: that "others were then

[ocr errors]

generally preferred before him." By others Jonfon

Notwithstanding our high admiration of Shakspeare, we are yet without a fplendid edition of his works, with the illuftrations which the united efforts of various commentators have contributed; while in other countries the moft brilliant decorations have been lavished on their diftinguished poets. The editions of Pope and Hanmer, may, with almost as much propriety, be called their works, as thofe of Shakspeare; and therefore can have no claim to be admitted into any elegant library. Nor will the promised edition, with engravings, undertaken by Mr. Alderman Boydell, remedy this defect, for it is not to be accompanied with notes. At fome future, and no very diftant, time, I mean to furnish the publick with an elegant edition in quarto (without engravings,) in which the text of the prefent edition fhall be followed, with the illuftrations fubjoined in the fame page.

In the year 1642, whether from fome capricious viciffitude in the publick tafte, or from a general inattention to the drama, we find Shirley complaining that few came to fee cur author's performances:

and Fletcher were meant. To attempt to fhew to


You fee

"What audience we have: What company


To Shakspeare comes? whofe mirth did once beguile "Dull hours, and bufkin'd made even forrow fmile; "So lovely were the wounds, that men would fay They could endure the bleeding a whole day; "He has but few friends lately."

[ocr errors]



Prologue to The Sifters. Shakspeare to thee was dull, whofe beft jeft lies I'th' lady's queftions, and the fool's replies; "Old fafhion'd wit, which walk'd from town to town, "In trunk-hofe, which our fathers call'd the clown;


Whofe wit our nicer times would obfcenenefs call, "And which made bawdry pafs for comical.

"Nature was all his art; thy vein was free

"As his, but without his fcurrility.

[ocr errors]

Verles on Fletcher, by William Cartwright, 1647. After the Refloration, on the revival of the theatres, the plays of Beaumont and Fletcher were esteemed fo much fuperior to thofe of our author, that we are told by Dryden, two of their pieces were acted through the year, for one of Shakspeare's." If his teftimony needed any corroboration, the following verfes would afford it:

In our old plays, the humour, love, and paffion, "Like doublet, hofe, and cloak, are out of fashion; "That which the world call'd wit in Shakspeare's age, Is laugh'd at, as improper for our flage.


[ocr errors]

Prologue to Shirley's Love Tricks, 1667. "At every fhop, while Shakspeare's lofty file Neglected lies, to mice and worms a spoil, "Gilt on the back, juft fmoking from the prefs, "The apprentice fhews you D'Urfey's Hudibras,

[ocr errors]


Crown's Mak, bound up with Settle's choiceft labours,
And promifes fome new effay of Babor's."

SATIRE, published in 1680.

against old as well as new to rage,

"Is the peculiar frenzy of this age.


Shakspeare muft down, and you must praise no more,

"Soft Defdemona, nor the jealous Moor:


Shakspeare, whofe fruitful genius, happy wit,

« AnteriorContinuar »