Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

681

S. Thomas, for appellees. George Clinton, for the Townsend Davis and the
W. I. Babcock. George S. Potter, for the Owego. Before WALLACE, LA-
COMBE, and SHIPMAN, Circuit Judges. No opinion. Decree of district
court affirmed, with interest and costs, on opinion below. 71 Fed. 537.

(100 Fed. 999.)

(Cir

CITY OF BEATRICE v. NORTHWESTERN MUT. LIFE INS. CO.
cuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. January 19, 1900.) No. 1,299. In
John
Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska.
F. N. Prout, Alfred Hazlett, and Alburtus H. Kidd, for plaintiff in error.
No opinion. Affirmed,
L. Kennedy and M. L. Learned, for defendant in error.
with costs.

(100 Fed. 999.)

CITY OF CLEVELAND v. UNITED STATES. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. February 14, 1900.) No. 684. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. Miner G. Norton and Ford, Boyd & Crowl, for appellant. J. J. Sullivan, for appellee. Dismissed on motion by appellant.

(100 Fed. 999.)

CITY OF LINCOLN v. SNYDER. January 22, 1900.) No. 1,323.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. J. R. Webster and John P. Maule, for Lionel C. Burr and Charles L. Burr, for defendant in error. plaintiff in error.

Dismissed, with costs, on motion of defendant in error.

(100 Fed. 999.)

CITY OF LINCOLN v. STODDARD. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth In Error to the Circuit Court of the Circuit. January 22, 1900.) No. 1,322. United States for the District of Nebraska. J. R. Webster and John P. Maule, Thomas Ryan, for defendant in error. Dismissed, with for plaintiff in error. costs, on motion of defendant in error.

(100 Fed. 999.)

CITY OF PIERRE v. GORHAM. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. March 12, 1900.) No. 1,310. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Dakota. Ivan W. Goodner, for plaintiff in error. H. R. Horner, R. W. Stewart, and Herbert Winsor, for defendant in Dismissed, with costs, on motion of plaintiff in error.

error.

(100 Fed. 1000.)

CORRY V. SMITH et al. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. February 15, 1900.) No. 735. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. Forman & McTighe and Arnold Green, for appellant. Goulder, Holding & Masten, for appellees. Dismissed, on appellees' motion, for failure of appellant to file briefs under rule 24 (31 C. C. A. clxiv., 90 Fed. clxiv.).

[ocr errors]

(100 Fed. 1000.)

DAUGHERTY v. HODD et al. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. February 5, 1900.) No. 1,378. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. Charles Ogden and Joel W. West, for appellant. Carroll S. Montgomery and Matthew A. Hall, for appellees. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of appellees.

(100 Fed. 1000.)

DENNISON MFG. CO. v. SCHARF TAG, LABEL & BOX CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. March 12, 1900.) No. 785. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan. Rowland Cox, for appellant. James Whittemore, for appellee. Dismissed on motion of appellant.

(100 Fed. 1000.)

DEWEY STAVE CO. et al. v. PIERCE. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. January 5, 1900.) No. 686. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. Doyle & Lewis and Clayton B. Everett, for appellants. Brown & Geddes, for appellee. No opinion. Decree of circuit court affirmed on stipulation.

(100 Fed. 1000.)

EQUITABLE MUT. LIFE ASS'N v. CONNOR. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. December 21, 1899.) No. 1,281. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. Oliver B. Liddell, for plaintiff in error. J. E. Robinson and Milton L. Anfenger, for defendant in error. Dismissed, without costs to either party in this court, per stipulation of the parties.

(100 Fed. 1000.)

FIDELITY & CASUALTY CO. OF NEW YORK v. TICKTIN. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. January 29, 1900.) No. 1,364. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. William Warner, O. H. Dean, W. D. McLeod, and Hale Holden, for plaintiff in error. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of plaintiff in error. See 87 Fed. 543.

(100 Fed. 1000.)

FISHER v. COMMERCIAL SAV. BANK OF ALBION, MICH., et al. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. February 26, 1900.) No. 798. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan. A. M. Culver and Fred A. Baker, for appellant. Edwin F. Conely, for appellees. Dismissed on stipulation.

(100 Fed. 1001.)

GERMAN-AMERICAN INS. CO. OF NEW YORK v. HARRISON. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. December 6, 1899.) No. 1,217. In Error

to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa. A. H. McVey, for plaintiff in error. A. H. Stutsman and D. M. Sprague, for defendant in error. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of defendant in error, with 10 per cent. damages on the original judgment.

(100 Fed. 1001.)

GREEN v. CITY OF LYNN. (Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit. January 19, 1899.) No. 240. Before WEBB, ALDRICH, and BROWN, District Judges. Motion to file petition in error denied. See 31 C. C. A. 248, 87 Fed. 839.

(100 Fed. 1001.)

HARDSOOG MFG. CO. v. LATTIMORE. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. January 10, 1900.) No. 1,301. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa. John W. Munday, for appellant. E. Hayward Fairbanks, for appellee. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of appellee, pursuant to rule 23 (31 C. C. A. clxiii., 90 Fed. clxiii.), for failure to print the record.

(100 Fed. 1001.)

HARRISON v. GERMAN-AMERICAN INS. CO. OF NEW YORK. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. December 6, 1899.) No. 1,218. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa. A. H. Stutsman and D. M. Sprague, for plaintiff in error. A. H. McVey, for defendant in error. Dismissed, at costs of defendant in error, on motion of plaintiff in error.

(100 Fed. 1001.)

HIGGIN MFG. CO. v. MURDOCK. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. February 12, 1900.) No. 774. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio. George B. Parkinson, for appellant. Jones & James, for appellee. No opinion. Decree of circuit court reversed.

(100 Fed. 1001.)

HULL et al. v. MINER et al. (Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit. January 11, 1898.) No. 193. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. James J. Myers, Henry G. Vaughn, Charles C. Morgan, Jr., and Samuel H. Brown, for appellants. James H. Lange and Odin B. Roberts, for appellees. Before PUTNAM, Circuit Judge, and WEBB, District Judge.

PER CURIAM. On motion of the appellants, and before any hearing on the merits, it is ordered that this appeal be dismissed, without costs in this court (the appellees waiving costs), and that a mandate issue forthwith.

(100 Fed. 1001.)

JOHN HANCOCK MUT. LIFE INS. CO. v. CITY OF HURON. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. January 25, 1900.) No. 1,332. In Error to

the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Dakota. William M. Jones, for plaintiff in error. John Wood, for defendant in error. Νο opinion. Affirmed, with costs. See 80 Fed. 652.

(100 Fed. 1002.)

JOHNSON et al. v. SCHMIDT. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. January 5, 1900.) No. 740. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Tennessee. John F. McNutt, for plaintiffs in error. No opinion. Judgment of circuit court affirmed.

(100 Fed. 1002.)

KILGORE'S ADM'R v. STANLEY. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. December 24, 1897.) No. 660. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Georgia. Alex. C. King, for appellee. Dismissed under rule 16 (31 C. C. A. clix., 90 Fed. clix.).

(100 Fed. 1002.)

(Circuit Court of Ap

KINGDOM PUB. CO. v. AMERICAN BOOK CO. peals, Eighth Circuit. December 4, 1899.) No. 1,171. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. C. S. Darrow, W. V. Fifield, Henry J. Fletcher, and James C. Fifield, for plaintiff in error. C. S. Jelley, C. D. O'Brien, and Thomas D. O'Brien, for defendant in error. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of defendant in error, pursuant to rule 24 (31 C. C. A. clxiv., 90 Fed. clxiv.).

(100 Fed. 1002.)

LA DOW et al. v. PENFIELD. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. March 15, 1900.) No. 678. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. Gilbert & Hills, for appellants. Kline, Carr, Tolles & Goff, for appellee. No opinion. Decree of circuit court affirmed.

(100 Fed. 1002.)

LANGE et al. v. SEITER.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. December 5, 1899.) No. 1,207. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. William A. Alderson and Clifford B. Allen, for plaintiffs in error. Sterling P. Bond, for defendant in error. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of plaintiffs in error.

(100 Fed. 1002.)

LOUISVILLE & N. R. CO. v. CARNEY. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 16, 1900.) No. 897. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Alabama. Wm. A. Walker, for plaintiff in error. A. O. Lane and Frank S. White, for defendant in error. Writ of error dismissed.

(100 Fed. 1002.)

McDONALD v. THOMPSON.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. January 24, 1900.) No. 1,329. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. Andrew E. Harvey and John H. Ames, for plaintiff in error. Charles E. Magoon and Halleck F. Rose, for defendant in error. Writ of error dismissed, with costs, on motion of plaintiff in error.

(100 Fed. 1002.)

McGHEE et al. v. CITY OF MEMPHIS et al. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. December 4, 1899.) No. 709. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee. No opinion. Decree of circuit court affirmed.

(100 Fed. 1003.)

NOLAN V. MORGAN. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.) No. 752. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio. E. P. Bradstreet, for plaintiff in error. Ernest Rehm, for defendant in error. Dismissed, on motion of defendant, because action below abates by law on the death of either party.

(100 Fed. 1003.)

NORTH CAROLINA CORP. COMMISSION et al. v. NORFOLK & C. R. CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. February 8, 1900.) No. 352. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of North Carolina. John W. Hinsdale, for appellants. George Rountree and R. O. Burton, for appellee. Appeal dismissed, without prejudice, by consent. See 99 Fed. 162.

(100 Fed. 1003.)

NORTH CAROLINA CORP. COMMISSION et al. v. ROANOKE & T. R. R. CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. 1900.) No. 360. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of North Carolina. John W. Hinsdale, for appellants. John D. Shaw, for appellee. Appeal dismissed. See 99 Fed. 162.

(100 Fed. 1003.)

NORTH CAROLINA CORP. COMMISSION et al. v. SOUTHERN RY. CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. February 20, 1900.) No. 359. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of North Carolina. John W. Hinsdale, for appellants. Charles Price, for appellee. Appeal dismissed, without prejudice, by consent. See 99 Fed. 162.

(100 Fed. 1003.)

NORTHERN PAC. RY. CO. v. CLARK, Auditor, et al. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. January 9, 1900.) No. 337. Appeal from the Cir

« AnteriorContinuar »