« AnteriorContinuar »
(Civ. No. 4445. First Appellate District, Division Two.-May 11,
GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
(a Corporation), Respondent, v. JOHN A. PARKER, Appellant.
 PLACE OF TRIAL-STIPULATION OF PARTIES.-Order denying mo
tion to change place of trial reversed on authority of General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Codiga, ante, p. 117.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George H. Cabaniss, Judge. Reversed.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Edward Bickmore and Thos. W. Firby for Appellant.
Haswell & Pierce for Respondent.
STURTEVANT, J.-This is an appeal from an order refusing to change the place of trial. The facts are almost identical with and the case involves no principle except as passed on by this court in General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Codiga, ante, p. 117 [216 Pac. 383). The case was submitted by stipulation on the briefs filed in that case.
On the authority of the Codiga case the order denying the motion to change the place of trial is reversed.
Nourse, J., and Langdon, P. J., concurred.
[Civ. No. 4420. First Appellate District, Division Two.—May 28,
JAMES M. DOON, Appellant, v. EARLE A. WALCOTT
et al., Respondents.
 MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS-SAN FRANCISCO-CIVIL SERVICE-STRIK
ING NAMES FROM LISTS.-Judgment affirmed upon authority of
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Walter Perry Johnson, Judge. Affirmed.
The facts are the same as in Gilbert v. Civil Service Com., 61 Cal. App. 459.
William A. Kelly for Appellant.
Geo. Lull, City Attorney, and Maurice T. Dooling, Jr., Assistant City Attorney, for Respondents.
NOURSE, J.—This is an appeal from a judgment deny. ing appellant's petition for a writ of mandate to compel the respondents, constituting the Civil Service Commission of the city and county of San Francisco, to restore his name to a place upon the register of candidates eligible to appointment to the position of general clerk in the classified civil service of the city and county of San Francisco. The appeal is submitted on the reord in Gilbert v. Civil Service Com., 61 Cal. App. 459 [215 Pac. 97). No briefs are filed upon this appeal and therefore nothing new is presented for consideration.
 Upon the authority of the Gilbert case the judgment is affirmed.
Sturtevant, J., and Langdon, P. J., concurred.
ACCOMPLICE. See Criminal Law, 38, 59.
ACCOUNTING. See Partnership, 1-3; Services, 2.
ACCOUNTS. See Corporations, 7, 8.
ADMISSIONS. See Broker's Commissions, 5; Criminal Law, 25, 26,
ADVICE OF COUNSEL. See Constitutional Law, 1, 8.
AGE. See Criminal Law, 44; Juvenile Court Act, 4.
PENDITURES BY BROKERS.-In this action to recover secret profits,
on the sale at the increased price.- Rempel F. Kells, 81.
act of the defendants having been unlawful, it is presumed to
have been done with an unlawful intent.-Id.
make any mortgage for his principal (and a trust deed given as
porations, 4, 5; Demand, 1; Guaranty, 2.
ALIEN LAND LAW.