...wholly repudiated the terms of compromise come to at the trial, whereupon the defendant applied for a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a new trial had. The plaintiff denied that ehe had given any such instruction s to settle the action,...

...back. The jury having returned a verdict in favour of Mrs. Glen, the defender, the pursuers moved for a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and « new trial granted. They maintained (1.) that the ver'lict was contrary to evidence. The deed was...

...£1,000, and in the costs of the suit. Dr. Phillimore, QC (Mr. Thring with him), moved the Court for a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and a new trial granted, on the grounds—first, of misdirection; secondly, that the verdict was against...

...£1,000, and in the costs of the suit. Dr. Phillimore, QC (Mr. Thring with him], moved the Court for a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and a new trial granted, on the grounds — first, of misdirection ; secondly, that the verdict was against...

...plaintiffs, but gave the defendants leave to move.* Subsequently, a rule was granted by this Court, to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and entered for the defendants, pursuant to leave reserved at the trial, upon the ground of the invention...

...moved, in pursuance of the leave reserved at Motion far the trial, for a rule calling upon the plaintiff to show cause " why ^ «/»• the verdict should not be set aside, and the verdict entered for the defendants instead thereof, or why a nonsuit should not be entered on the...

...was laid having refused to grant a poll which was demanded. Subsequently the Churchwardens obtained a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and the rule has been argued in the Court of Common Pleas. The judges held that the rate was invalid, that...

...partner of that firm, and that they furnished the starch believing him to be a partner. He moved for a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and the Court unanimously refused it, the Lord President remarking that the evidence that he held himself...

...the Southwark County Court for false imprisonment. Verdict for the defendant. Humfrey now moved for a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and a new trial granted, on the ground of misdirection. Cur. adv. vult. COURT OF EXCHEQUER. April 16. 1851....

...liable. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, with 40s. damages. Temple, Q, C., having obtained a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and a new trial had on the ground that the judge misdirected the jury, by telling them that the Companies...